All college students are required to take a Humanities class.
Critical Thinking is a Humanities class.
All college students take Critical Thinking.
This syllogism is inductive. I believe this to be true because one of the premises is probable; it is possible for the conclusion to be false. Students may take a humanity class other than critical thinking. I do not think this syllogism is deductively valid because one of the premises may not be true and that could make the conclusion is false. The premises are: All college students are required to take a Humanities class, and all college students take Critical Thinking. The conclusion is critical thinking is a humanities class.
Syllogism 2
All college students study.
Ernie is a college student.
Therefore, Ernie studies.
This syllogism is deductive. I believe this to be true because it is formed from general to particular and general truth applies. This syllogism is deductively valid because the premises are true causing the conclusion to be true. Premises: All college students study and Ernie is a college student. Conclusion, Therefore, Ernie studies.
Syllogism 3
All college students attend class.
Cindy attends class.
Therefore, Cindy is a college student.
This syllogism is deductive. This is deductive because the conclusion is true based on premises that are true or accepted as true. This is deductively valid because all true premises led to a true conclusion. Premises: All college students attend class and Cindy attends class. Conclusion: Therefore, Cindy is a college student.
Syllogism 4
Two girls submit an assignment,
The two submissions are identical,
Therefore, two girls worked together on their assignment.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
This argument concludes that a claim is true just because the person that made the claim is an authority. In the example, the person concludes that Gold Bond Powder works just because Shaquille O’Neil, a very famous athlete, recommends it.…
- 726 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
What reasoning is used? Is it inductive or deductive? The reason being used in this article appeared to be inductive reasoning, because the author started by the Facebook problem into the issue of identity free use through the workplace and communication services.…
- 610 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
4. The argument in paragraph 6 acts as a syllogism because the paragraph is divided into three basic ideas:…
- 562 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Arguments from classification are a type of argument that “begins with data substantiating a generalization about a class of persons, objects, events, or ideas” (Nelson, et al., 2013, p. 251). In his speech, JFK classifies all free people together in one large group. He proves a point that all men are not free if even a single man is left behind, “Freedom is indivisible, and when one man is enslaved, all are not free” (JFK, 1963). He also states that all free people are united and citizens of Berlin. This is a good way that JFK shows how the United States is an ally of West Berlin and this is also a good way of persuading all other anti-communist countries that they should also be allies of West Berlin. Chaffee (2013) also notices this idea in his speech by stating that “… (JFK) stressed that anti-communistic America, and many other ally nations, would hold their ground on the issues in Berlin” (para 4). This is a good way of showing that the nations that aren’t confined to communism are allies and united in the fight against…
- 788 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
While we pay attention to the definition of logical validity, the premise are suppose to be true and the conclusion is false. If you look at the argument, it really isn’t that strong to be true. For example, suppose it is winter in Fontana, California of 2012, there was no snow. Yet, there was snow on 2007. The conclusion is not fully correct. Therefore by definition, it is logically valid. At other points the V.T does not work.…
- 336 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
prevent being deceived by bad arguments. improving their skills in arguing. *** All of the above Instructor Explanation: The answer can be found in Chapter One of An Introduction to Logic. Points Received: 0 of 1 Comments: 3. Question : Logic is the study of Student Answer: the human mind.…
- 496 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In this paper I will: (i) state the premises and conclusion of St. Thomas Aquinas's “Uncaused Cause” argument, I will argue that the argument is a deductive argument. Merriam-Webster.com's definition of cause is: “something or someone that produces an effect, result, or condition: something or someone that makes something happen or exist”. (www.merriam-webster.com) A deductive argument is an argument in which the premise or premises claim to prove that the conclusion is true. An inductive argument is an argument in which the premise or premises claim to prove that in most cases the conclusion is true. I will argue that the argument is a priori. A Priori knowledge is knowledge that can be obtain based…
- 923 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
order to have an argument one must be attempting to prove or justify one statement (the…
- 5131 Words
- 19 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Generally, we want our arguments to be “good” arguments—sound deductive arguments and strong inductive arguments. Unfortunately, arguments often look good when they are not. Such arguments are said to commit a fallacy, a mistake in reasoning. Wide ranges of fallacies have been identified, but we will look at only some of the most common ones. When trying to construct a good argument, it is important to be able to identify what bad arguments look like. Then we can avoid making these mistakes ourselves and prevent others from trying to convince us of something on the basis of bad reasoning!…
- 13498 Words
- 54 Pages
Good Essays -
9. Why is an enthymeme more useful than a syllogism in analyzing and constructing an argument?…
- 994 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
T or F: if it is impossible for the premises of an argument to be true without the conclusion also being true the argument is deductively valid.…
- 427 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This is the opposite of inductive reasoning, which involves creating broad generalizations from specific observations. The basic idea of deductive reasoning is that if something is true of a class of things in general, this truth applies to all members of that class. One of the keys for sound deductive reasoning, then, is to be able to properly identify members of the class, because incorrect categorizations will result in unsound conclusions.…
- 382 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
By Categorical Syllogism, her argument is deductively valid. Hence, accepting the all the premises commits us to accepting the conclusion. By accepting English's conclusion…
- 1348 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Offer a reflection with regard to the strength of the overall argument; in other words, evaluate the hypothetical syllogism for both its validity and its soundness. Do you think there are any missing assumptions, missing pieces of evidence, or weak premises, and does the conclusion follow from the premises? Briefly outline the strength or weakness of the syllogism.…
- 1105 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
statement until they arrive at the conclusion. Instead, students should work with just one side of the…
- 556 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays