The Ethiopian painting of the Battle of Adowa in 1896 where Ethiopians were victorious over Italian troops is also not clear on why the Ethiopians fought back (doc.5). Another document on why the Ethiopians fought back so vigorously would be more helpful. In a lette On the other r written from an African leader to another African leader, he describes how German invaders killed on the Congo River in 1877, Mojimba, an Africna chief, describes how the British had overcame Africans with guns n a lette On the other r written from an African leader to another African leader, he describes how German invaders killed one of his men everyday and it is obvious that change ropean intruders as a much stronger force than themselves and lost all their ties to older tradition through fear. In 1886, the British government commissioned and administered the development of the which was signed by many African rulers (doc.1). These Africans gave in but the document does not specify if they gave in because they lost sights of the nation they were once before. Another document of the reason why these Africans gave in would reveal if they saw the European threat as a to their…
In the period of 1880 to 1914, positive and negative attitudes ascended throughout the acquisition of African colonies. Some thought that it would reinforce Europe's economy and government, others supposed it would add pressures to Europe; it end up being a benefit to the economy, strengthen the nation and civilizing Africa. Motivations would be up brought upon the vague consideration about this dilemma.…
In document two, the Ashanti leader responds to the British offer for protectorate status by declining very politely. He stated that his offer is something that he deeply considered, but he decided to reject this offer because he wanted to maintain their tradition. The leader also stated, however, that he didn’t want to be colony, but still have a friendly relationship. In document three, the Ethiopian emperor Menelik II, wrote a letter to Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, and Russia saying that he would not just watch the Europeans take over his lands. He wanted to keep his Christian ways and keep the country safe while he still appealed the Europeans. Over time, many Africans tried to avoid falling under European pressure and still maintained a good relationship with…
In document 3, the emperor of Ethiopia, Menelik II, wrote a letter to Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, and Russia in 1891. He talks about how for the past fourteen centuries, Ethiopia was on an island of Christians. He doesn’t agree about the division of Africa and says that the All-Powerful had been protecting Ethiopia up until that time. He hopes that the Lord, Jesus Christ, doesn’t let the division happen. What I picked up from this was that he is a leader, therefore doesn’t want to lose any power. He is also Christian and is using religion to react to this. In document 5, there’s an Ethiopian painting of the battle of Adowa, in which the Ethiopian were victorious over the Italian troops in 1896. I considered this religion by looking at the painting and seeing crosses on the Ethiopian flags as well as the Italian flags. From this painting I can see that the Ethiopians are diverse as well. In the painting there is a person on a horse but around it there is illumination. Since the painting was Ethiopian, I can see that this can be considered as God watching over the Ethiopians as well as helping them fight and win. In document 8, a German military officer is the one talking, in account of the 1905 Maji Maji Rebellion in German East Africa in 1906. What this document talks about is that a snake had given medicine to a medicine man and that it would strengthen women and…
We can see in Document 1; the contract from the Royal Niger Company, that the Europeans wanted to make it seem as if they were giving the African Leaders a choice to give up their land. Leaders of these tribes would have believed that signing wasn’t an obligation and could refuse if they wanted. This shown in Document 2; The letter to Britain from the Ashanti leader, Prempeh I, where he states,” My kingdom of Ashanti will never commit itself to any such policy”. He declined in a respectful honorable manner, expecting the Europeans to leave them be. From Prempeh I’s point of view, he most likely believed that they were in charge of their own fate, but Europe did not just step back. An additional document that would support this would be from an African leader who signed the document, to see how they were treated in comparison to those who refused to…
In the years that followed the Berlin Conference (1884-1885) European nations divided and colonized Africa among themselves. This time period became to be known as the Scramble for Africa. It would be years until Africa freed itself of European domination. Yet in the time that the Scramble for Africa took place, European dominance was met with various reactions from the native people. Some natives unwillingly submitted, opposed to the idea of European domination, but left with no other choice. Other natives were willing to compromise, while the rest were preparing or already rebelling against the…
The late nineteenth century and early twentieth century United States expansionism was a continuation of past United States expansionism in the way that we would have the power to take over indigenous people’s land and were willing to sacrifice their lives but the United States was still not willing to grant the indigenous people citizenship. This new expansionism was also a departure from the old expansionism in that the United States began to expand, not within its homeland for personal reasons, but on an international scale. The United States risked so much to gain these small islands and other countries during the age of Imperialism. Ever since the Spanish-American war, it could be seen that the United States would become a global superpower and would focus on other countries instead of focusing on its previous internal affairs in 1848-1898.…
Economics were most responsible for the new imperialism of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries? Many factors came into play that lead to the success of Britain.There success was shown in the Industrial Revolution which had transformed the west. In addition to the advances in science and technology. These factors include, resources, trade, territorial growth, Imperialism and money they can spend on advantages. The resources which were most abundant were coal and iron. They also had a surplus of wood however, they did not replant trees. The Anglo-Saxon race had alliances which assisted with the control of Africa.…
The textbook definition of “industrialized” contains descriptors that emphasize its modern context, manipulating words such as ‘streamlined’ and ‘mechanized’. In relation to the Industrial Revolution, the same vein ethnocentrism, within the framework of an automated culture, surfaced. With the influence of this self-importance on imperialism in Africa, ideas of The White Man’s Burden and religious superiority as a justification of expansion, as well as political competitiveness in the form of barbaric tendencies, evolved and repressed the African people rapidly.…
Many African kingdoms, who had governed themselves before European colonization, were against the colonization of their lands under other European countries. Based on an African Ashanti queen’s account, in document six, it is clear that the colonizing Europeans had very little respect for monarchies already in place (Doc 6). This alone spurred the subjects of African kingdoms to violence with their colonizers, the Europeans. Another leader of the Herero people, having already allowed German occupation and suffered for it, urges his fellow leaders not to peacefully…
Imperialization came about through the necessity of resources for industrialization and began in the 19th century when industrial progress drove nations to search for new markets for their products. The competition that was fueled by these nations would have lead to all out war without treaties and agreements being made on the side of the conquerors, however, at no time did they consider the desires of the conquered. They did not just claim land, but create social structures similar to theirs, which they believed superior. Many Europeans believed that these “savages” should be civilized and in many cases a group of humanitarians brought in their christian god. These Ethnocentric attitudes led to beliefs of racism and a superiority the…
The last general motive behind European imperialism in Africa were cultural reasons. Industrialized countries felt as if it was their need to help less fortunate countries to lift them out of poverty and feed the “new-caught, sullen peoples, half-devil and half-child” (Document F). Document F also has a quote from Lobengula Khumalo, a chief leader in South Africa, stating how he felt as if England had crept up on his tribe’s territory and snatched it away, as a chameleon does to a fly, “England is the chameleon and I am the fly.”…
I was arguing with my British friends one day about the British Empire and how it impacted the world we live in. They argued it was for the good thing but it also had negative effects. I argued against this. Colonization or as I call it ’legal theft’ was a catastrophe. People deserve to rule themselves. But why was it able to happen? Colonized Africans were exploited and the significant changes that their colonial powers brought were thought to solely positively but many of these negative changes are still effecting Africa today.…
Before European imperialism reached Africa, the African people lived in villages and had agricultural economies. When the Europeans spread into inland Africa and started colonize the land, the life of natives drastically changed. The Europeans came into Africa, took over the land and began to dictate and deceive the Africans for European gain. The Europeans brought an active and more worldly economy to Africa, but they did not let the natives constructively participate or benefit from this new system. European imperialism was harmful to Africa in several ways, as when the Europeans came over, so came a significant loss of life to natives and famine, and a division of culture that brought conflict into tribes, and a loss of land and resources,…
The statement the modern world owes a lot to the Ancient Egyptian civilization is a well debated subject but still is unclear to many. Ancient Egypt was said to have started many things that appears in the modern world these days. I would have to agree with the statement the modern world owes the ancient Egyptian civilization because things such as agriculture is the same now and back then. Even though agricultural work is well advance in today’s society it still came from the mere ideas and beings of the egyptians.…