The Jury selection process was that there were many possible jurors, and the two lawyers picked who got to be on the jury during the trail, 6 choice for each lawyer. The lawyers based their designs on stereotypical stereotypes such as white will always feel that black is guilty, and other factors that contributed to what each lawyer wanted. I feel as though this is fair in the sense that each lawyer picks who they want, and no its not fair that they are choosing people that they know what they're final verdict will be.
In todays society there is defiantly still some tension when it comes to race, and I feel as though those opinions and beliefs comes from the old fashion ways of thinking passed on from one generation to the next. This movie does not change my opinion on the fact that I strongly believe the law should be upheld whether the person is black or white. I do believe that the white men would have been found guilty in that day, especially with a confession on paper, I do also believe that these men knew exactly what they were doing which makes their crime that much worse ( Mens Rea), I also strongly believe that no matter the situation if the person committed a crime as cruel as rape whether they were in the right mind or not should be put away. The term Actus Reus is basically saying guilty mind, and that a person must be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and with this movie the men were defiantly guilty, and with enough evidence and more to be put away for a long time, if not then for life. If i was Carl Lee I would have done what he did and more. I don’t think dying is the worst thing that could happen to someone, I would feel as though them being tutored is beyond justified and although some may argue that life in prison would be worse than death I do not agree. How is it fair that a person commits a crime that will alter their victims life for the worst, and effect them their whole life, and be aloud to have live in a room, with a bed and food and clothes on their back. I believe they died too easily for the crime they committed. In my opinion I completely agree with the verdict of not guilty for Carl Lee, I do not think that if he was in his right of mind( Mens Rea) or not that it would have made a difference, what he did was justifiable and I agree with it, I also do not think that him feeling guilty or not should have effected the juries discussion, what he did he did because he needed too, and he should not feel guilty for killing the scum that raped his daughter.
The title “ A Time to Kill” related to the movie because in my opinion there is a very small and understandable time to kill, such as when two men rape a 10 year old girl. That is when there is a time to kill.
By Nick Keschtkar
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The viewers were able to see discrimination. The flim showed how white people was being ruthless to the African American community. Police was being lenient about the activity that was taking place in the community and wasn’t caring for nobody. There were scenes in the movie where it got place but, the most famous scene was when Radio Raheem had an altercation with Sal owner of the pizzeria. As the argument took place outside, I riot broke loose. Raido Raheem was fighting sal and an officer put him in a illegal…
- 604 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Throughout the film it depicts blacks in a submissive position to which they are abusing their powers, such as the scene of the state legislature portraying black legislature are drunken pigs who’s only interest is intermarriage, every white persons nightmare. It’s a foreshadow of what the nation would be like if blacks were granted positions in…
- 323 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
It's a great movie and the fact that it's in black and white is very effective, because everyone has such strong opinions. Everything is "black" or "white" to the jurists.…
- 1927 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Those that have not been exposed to a jury trial might be rather shocked how to process works, not only in criminal matters but also in civil matters as in the case…
- 522 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This movie took a very unique approach. It separated two classes of people, whites and blacks. They were separated by, what I believe is the greatest degree of separation today, money. In the movie the only people in the upper class were black and the main family in the movie was white. In today 's society that is different, you would expect white people to have the money and black to be in the lower class. While that is not always the case, it is what is perceived in today 's society.…
- 1511 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The film talks about the racial inequality within our criminal justice system. I personally think that the film definitely made me think again about the incarceration and criminal justice system because what we saw in the film was not something that everyone across the country knows about. I think it was a good film to educate community and point out about this critical issue. The United States has the highest crime rate and incarceration rate in the world. It sounds frightening but it is the truth. In my opinion the biggest reasons for this mass incarceration were these two factors; being “tough on crime” and the drug war. Intersection of race and poverty within the system became tough on African Americans because they are making up the big portion of the prison population. It could be some kind of movement towards Black community if you consider the numbers but again it is devastating.…
- 261 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Part of what makes a jury so fair is that not just anyone may be selected for jury duty. However, these limitations do not include pertain to race, gender, or social status, they in fact remain as anonymous as they could possibly be with numbers replacing names, and contact to outside sources limited for the sake of conducting an unbiased jury trial. Attorneys are extremely critical when deciding who will partake in a jury. Those chosen must not have any outside contact or any knowledge whatsoever of any person involved in the trial or there is the possibility of a biased vote. As much as possible, lawyers try to choose a well-rounded jury that consists of people from many different fields of work and backgrounds so as to have as many different perspectives as possible. For instance, if a psychologist were on a jury, they could offer a very in-depth perception of those on trial. Also those with a lot of different personal life experiences can usually compare those experiences and use them to benefit their decision…
- 480 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This movie also gave out a great deal of information about the Civil Rights struggle in Birmingham. It did a wonderful job of laying out the facts and and events leading up to the church bombing. Unfortunately, it took their deaths to act as the wakeup call to America concerning the racism and Civil Rights movement in the south. The scenes with George Wallace are outrageous, considering that his segregationist policies, in a way, led to the deaths of the girls. The scene where he introduces a black man that he doesn’t even know, as his “best friend” in a lame attempt at repentance, is pitiful in how pathetic he seems to be in trying to clean up his image, after the fact.…
- 417 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Thesis: Carl Lee Haley should be found not guilty because he had Christian morals, he was insane, and his family was the victim in this society.…
- 1345 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The movie and the readings validate because in the movie, we saw black students and white students clearly working together in school, sports and etc., but there was still silent confrontations going on. There was a white student who admitted that being white is better than being black because whites have certain priorities and more socially acceptable.…
- 1105 Words
- 5 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The first thing I didn’t like about this film was the way the KKK and the authorities treated the Dahmer family because they were involved in the civil rights movement and allowed blacks to have a place to vote and because of this their home and store was burned and Mr. Dahmer was killed. Even back then we are supposed to have been living in the land of the free but that to me really didn’t exist for black people and even today we still have to work twice as hard to prove ourselves. Mr. Dahmer states that race has a lot of connotations to it, some good and some bad and I agree but majority of it is bad, that’s just my opinion. Another thing I didn’t like was how the judicial system let these people go because of their ethnicity and it took over thirty years for the Dahmer family to get justice.…
- 823 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The issue of jury selection is also critical within the criminal justice system and has also brought a lot of controversy. Many people believe that this does indeed necessitate change in this area of criminal justice because there is the belief that the process does not create or ensure fairness. Additionally, it does not ensure that the right persons are chosen for the job. This means that most people may be judged in the wrong manner merely because the jury selection process is extremely flawed.…
- 577 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
To me, this story did not only reflect the opinions of our government system, but of the peoples’ consciousness of getting past Jim Crowe segregation laws. The film also gave insight to what other people, at that time, thought about pertaining the laws of being against the “mixing of the races”. The reasons that came out had to do with God not wanting the races to mix and that is why he put them in different continents. A woman stated this in the interview footage and it reflected the line of thinking of many people that were against people like the Lovings.…
- 632 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A huge feel of the film is gotten through the time period it took place in. People’s views on race were made very publicly within the jury. Many of them seemed to have personal vendettas against different races. They deemed the boy’s Hispanic race to be slum and nothing more than that. A universal problem that is shown in several ways throughout the film is personal prejudice getting in the way of judgment. Juror number ten’s reason for saying the accused boy was guilty was because he felt people from slums should not be trusted and that they kill one and another for fun. His prejudice lead him to discriminate against the boy initially by voting guilty earlier in the film, before being convinced in voting not guilty. This was during the civil rights era and all of that. We all know blacks weren’t treated equally and this makes it…
- 922 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“A Time to Kill” directed by Joel Schumacher is a legal drama set in rural Mississippi involving the racial tensions within the region during the segregation period released in 1996. This case in the film involves multiple important aspects: race, family ties, injustice. However, these are not what this This is simply a story of two victims: one stripped forcefully through the violent stripping of innocence, the other stripped of the fundamental human right of justice, driven to provide justice for his flesh and blood daughter. The second victim is forced to commit crime, driven to vindicate his family and prevent potential crimes in the future.…
- 1433 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays