Preview

A Terrostic Nation

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2207 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Terrostic Nation
A Terroristic Nation The nation of Iran is poised to strike with nuclear devastation towards the United States and several of its allies. How long does the world have before this is the headlines of every newspaper and television news report? What are the nations of the world to do with a nation that is willing to use nuclear weapons as a strike of terrorism? Can this be stopped and if so how? These are just a few of the questions that are arising as a result of Iran’s recent rhetoric and actions. The Country of Iran will need to be dealt with in an extremely firm and ruthless manner that would send a message to other rogue Middle Eastern countries. The Middle East has and probably will always be a divided land of warring nations, factions, and tribes. When we look at the situation of Iran we must consider their stance on a plethora of worldly issues. In particular, we must look at their history as a nation and how it has added or attempted to negate terroristic actions. Upon analyzing these issues we must decide the different courses of actions that can be taken. The decision will most likely be something that the world will have to live with for many years to come. The ramifications of prolonging actions to deal with this country should be considered along with the consequences of any immediate action taken. Considering that Iran is a major player in the world’s oil supply and their location to other oil countries will play a major factor in how they should be dealt with. The dealings should concern not only world peace but its impact of the world’s oil or its supply. Considering their history within their own borders, their history and propensity for violence, and what we might consider irrational thought are just a few of the factors that will go into how, when, and why we will deal with such a complex nation and the issues it presents to not just the United States but the world as a whole. We can start by looking at a brief history of their most recent


References: Bard, M. (Ph.D.) (2005). The complete idiot’s guide to Middle East conflict (3rd Ed.). New York, NY: Penguin group. Britannica, Encyclopedia (2006). Iran: The essential guide to a country on the brink. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Burns, N (2007). United States policy toward Iran Retrieved June 18, 2007 from: http://www.state.gov/p/us/rm/2007/82374.htm Bush, G., W. (U.S. President) (2002). State of the union address National Geographic Channel (2006). The final report-Iran hostage crisis [Television episode]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Looming Tower

    • 4335 Words
    • 18 Pages

    References: Bergen. P., (2010). The Longest War: The Enduring Conflict Between America and Al-Qaeda. New York: Simon and Schuster…

    • 4335 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    GKE Task 2

    • 1554 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sohail, K. (2005). Prophets of violence, prophets of peace: Understanding the roots of contemporary political violence. [ebrary book]. Retrieved from https:lrps.wgu.edu/provision/17907583…

    • 1554 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The debacle between the U.S.A and Iran started many years ago with the Iranian Islamic revolution of 1979, before that they had rather good relations. Iran’s nuclear activities present a particularly acute security challenge. A nuclear-armed Iran would present a direct threat to U.S. friends, allies and wellbeing in the region and destabilize an already delicate…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pf con case

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Subpoint A – Nuclear proliferation is an action fueled by fear and if there is increase in military force interference, that fear will be legitimized. According to the article “Why Countries Build Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century” by Zachary Keck, “Iran’s nuclear program is better explained, then, by the rise in the potential conventional threat the U.S. poses to the Iran.” As many countries are, Iran was obviously intimidated by the massive military force of the U.S. and made the decision to begin proliferating nuclear weapons. And if the U.S. uses military force as an act to prevent nuclear proliferation, that goal may not be fulfilled.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    US Foreign Policy and the Iran Hostage Crisis, edited by David Patrick Houghton, Cambridge University Press, 2001. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com.ezproxy2.apus.edu/lib/apus/detail.action?docID=201802.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Drug Trade of Brazil

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Texts: The major sources include: William Cleveland’s A History of the Modern Middle East; Avi Shlaim’s War and Peace in the Middle East; and Nikolaos Van Dam’s The Struggle for Power in Syria.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The idea of Iran developing a nuclear weapon has undoubtedly sparked up an international debate on both sides of the isle. While many in the west debate about which actions to take to prevent the development of the bomb or if Iran is even developing the bomb other countries like Russian and China have been reluctant to criticize. From a western perspective we have to decide whether or not a patient diplomacy is the best approach to Iran’s nuclear problem or not. The consequences of attacking Iran could prove to be just as disastrous as not attacking Iran and being threatened by ban attack. In “Taking Side” two scholars on this issue debate this very question. Christopher Hemmer, from “Responding to a Nuclear Iran” and Norman Podhoretz, editor-at-large for the opinion journal “Commentary” argue on both sides of the issue. This is a general overview of the situation, a summary of each authors main points and a conclusion based on my own opinion.…

    • 3654 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wrong Strategy On Iran Author: Ray Takeyh, Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies September 10, 2004The Washington Post: http://www.cfr.org/iran/wrong-strategy-iran/p7323…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rahman, K. "Conflict and Security." Www.eldis.org. Institute of Policy Studies, Pakistan, 2001. Web. 11 Dec. 2013.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. United States need to make a substantial investment of political and military capital to the Middle East in the midst of an economic crisis and at a time when it is attempting to shift its forces out of the region. . Deterrence would come with enormous economic and geopolitical costs and would have to remain in place as long as Iran remained hostile to U.S. interests, which could mean decades or longer. Given the instability of the region, this effort might still fail, resulting in a war far more costly and destructive than the one that critics of a pre-emptive strike on Iran now hope to avoid.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fall of Saddam Hussein’s rule in 2003 saw a shift in the Iraq political situation. Fostered by the U.S. intervention, the Sunni, who were the minority and in power lost it to the majority Shia. Many leaders in the Middle East expressed their worry over the increasing influence of the Shia in Iraq (Nasr, 2006). Following this, Iran, primarily a Shiite country began to suggest a foreign policy that was more aggressive in the Near East, where Iraq is located. This action by Iran caused apprehension by neighboring countries who contemplated that Iran had plans to expand its Shiite influence. Further apprehension was reinforced by the fixation that Iran has on the issue of nuclear weapons.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Military Culture

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Lederach, J.P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War of 1812 vs. Iraq War

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bibliography: Baker, James A., and Lee H. Hamilton. "The Iraq Study Group Report." FDLP Electronic…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As some of us know, the topic on whether the United States should enter Iran has been a question our country has been asking itself for some time now. The war has been going on for many years now and many people have had enough of it. This is partially the main reason why our country cannot decide whether or not to invade Iran. After reading a few articles on this topic I have come to realize that by invading Iran, we will help not just the United States, but many other countries as well. We all know how big Iran is into terrorism. After 9/11, I personally would like to invade Iran and shut down everything they have. By invading Iran the United States can shut down some of the big terrorist groups and help our country as well as other countries from future terrorist attacks. By taking out these groups many countries would feel safer and won’t have to worry about being attacked every day. Terrorism is being seen more frequently and it’s something that needs to be stopped. My next point on why the United States should invade Iran is to stop their nuclear programs. Just one nuclear bomb can destroy and small country and wreak destruction and havoc on a larger country. The United States would benefit greatly along with many other countries if we were to invade and eliminate Iran’s nuclear facilities. We can clearly see that Iran doesn’t see eye to eye with the United States. By invading and taking out their strong point (nuclear programs), we could earn much needed respect and possibly end years of history with these countries. I feel that Iran doesn’t know the damage in which they can do with nuclear weapons. The power of these weapons can cause severe damage to any country. By invading Iran, the United States can end things for good and help our country get back on the right path. The next reason why should invade Iran is our economic issue we are facing. As we all know, war is a very costly incident for a…

    • 663 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays