Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Arguments For and Against Capital Punishment

Good Essays
787 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments For and Against Capital Punishment
Name
Course
Tutor
Date
Capital punishment
Introduction
Capital punishment is also referred to as the death penalty. This punishment is meted out on prisoners who commit very serious crimes such as murder. Death penalty has stirred up a lot of debate with some people opposing it and others been in support of it. Most countries tend to use the option of life sentence instead of the death penalty. What if such murderers placed on life sentence broke out of prisons and went after the family of the victim? Although innocent people have faced the death penalty, advances in technology nowadays reduce such chances and hence purposes of the death sentence are maintained.
Discussion
One of the benefits of the death penalty is deterrence. Punishment has always been used in order to discourage potential criminals from any activity which is unlawful. Murder is a very great crime and hence society should has the right to use very strong punishment (death penalty) to deter would be criminals. This instills a sense of fear to potential murderers. This is because all human beings fear death above everything else. Studies and analysis conducted reveal that the death penalty can indeed deter murder. Swift and efficient punishment methods such as the death penalty are the most likely to lead to deterrence. Death penalty does not only deter potential murderers but it also deters prisoners form committing crime (Siegel 512). Arguments against the deterrent effects of the death penalty are that the studies which have been conducted are not conclusive. Studies that have been conducted reveal that the death penalty has the same deterrent effects as life imprisonment. William Bowers who is a criminologist at Northeastern University claims that the death penalty tends to have the opposite effects. This is because society tends to feel brutalized by it and hence increasing the chances of committing murder (Siegel 514). The inconclusiveness of studies regarding the death sentence can be attributed to the fact that capital punishment is rarely used. Another thing is that if one is to be carried out it can take years before it is executed. Society does not wholly feel brutalized since the family of the victim feels that justice has been carried out The death penalty is also a just response and punishment for the taking of life. The justice balance is disturbed when a murderer takes the life of a person. A rule of violence is encouraged if this balance is not restored. The balance can only be maintained if the murderer’s life is taken. Any lesser punishment would show that society is not serious with humanity (Siegel 513). Stating that the death penalty is a just response is like encouraging revenge. If society is to show that it is serious with humanity it should not take the life of anyone including a criminal. Revenge tends to create a chain of violent behavior. Death penalty does not encourage revenge but rather encourages justice. The family of the victim gets to see justice meted out on a murderer who has caused them pain. The life of a criminal can not be given similar value to the life of a law abiding citizen and hence they should not be treated equally (Siegel 513). The death penalty only punishes the guilty and not innocent people. Ever since 1970, appeals and safeguards have been increased and there has been no proof whatsoever that an innocent person has been executed. DNA testing also ensures than no innocent person is executed (Siegel 514). Capital punishment is an irrevocable form of punishment, once done, it can not be undone. There is a huge amount of evidence to show that some people have been sentenced for the death penalty wrongly. This therefore implies that the system of capital punishment is unreliable (Siegel 513). The mistakes that have been made in sentencing people to the death penalty are due to legal technicalities. Some of the factors that lead to the sentencing of innocent people to the death penalty are outside the justice system. One of the factors is that some of the witnesses lie. Capital punishment has been made more reliable with the advent of technology such as DNA testing devices (Siegel 514).
Conclusion
Capital punishment has several advantages and disadvantages. This has stirred up a lot of debate on whether it should be carried out or not. The benefits of the death penalty include the deterrent effects and the fact that justice is carried out fully. Arguments against are that some innocent people have been executed while murderers walk scott free. Advances in DNA testing however make sure that such mistakes do not occur.

Work cited
Siegel Larry. Introduction to Criminal Justice. Belmont: Wadsworth, 2008.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This documentation continues by adding, that all humans shall be treated with dignity, respect and refrain from cruel punishment. It is for this reason, many see the death penalty as an immoral and unnatural act against human beings. Government officials stand firm to the belief that the death penalty deters the number of criminal. However, due to an absence of scientific and literary reports these findings are false. According to research, the death penalty has little to no effect on the solution to those convicted of violent crimes (Capital Punishment, 2011).…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death penalty is the punish meant of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime and there are twenty-two countries in the world that still impose the death penalty for capital crimes, the United states is one of them. If you are charged with capital homicide, and the jury of twelve of your peers proclaims, “We find the defendant guilty as charged”(Condenaststore). Then it is simple, you are going to forfeit your life, so abolishing the death penalty or there’s no coming back from the grave.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to researchers of this issue, people committing crimes, rely on a chance of avoiding punishment, no matter what it is. Therefore there is basically no difference between a criminal being sentenced to death or to life imprisonment. Since numerous research studies on the subject provide no proof of death penalty affecting the crime rate and due to some methodological difficulties associated with studies on the subject, we should not use a hypothesis about restraining effect of death penalty as a bottom-line argument against the public opinion on this case ("The Facts: 13 Reasons to Oppose the…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a punishment that results in death usually caused by capital crimes or capital offenses. It is commonly referred to as the death sentence. According to an article “Buzzle” not all countries accept capital punishment but there are still a lot of states who do (par.1). Capital punishment has been around for thousands of years, this punishment is said to have helped keep crime level down and alter the minds of future criminals to prevent them from committing atrocious crimes such as: murder, terrorism, and in some situations aggravated kidnapping.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ron Fridell states, "The basic principles of deterrence are that punishments are necessary to deter crime and encourage law abiding behavior. Punishment must also fit the crime with more serious crimes requiring more serious punishments. (61) I agree with the author because capital punishment serves as a device to discourage certain forms of behavior by making the consequences of these actions unpleasant. Capital punishment is acceptable under those terms and it is necessity to the betterment of society. Micheal Kronwetter said, "No other punishment deters men so effectively…as the punishment of death."(19) As an example, murder peaked in 1990 with 2,200 deaths, when New York did not have the death penalty. In 1997, when capital punishment was reinstated the murders for the year totaled 767. Deterrence obviously worked in relation to these crimes. There seems to be a direct relationship between deterrence and the effects of capital…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A deluded minority have the false impression that by presenting the death penalty as a punishment, it will act as an ‘effective deterrent’ – putting people off committing such savage crimes. Contrary to this view, I feel that labelling the death penalty as an ‘effective deterrent’ is misguided.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Death penalty is one the debatable topics throughout the world. There is a conflict between law and ethics. Public opinion does not coincide with the state opinion. There are 33 countries, which use death penalty as capital punishment. According to Amnesty International Report, in 2011, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and USA topped the list. According to statistics, in USA 33 states use death penalty as capital punishment and other 17 does not. (Amnesty International, 2011) Death penalty’s primary goal is to make people think twice before doing crime. The Death penalty helps to decrease the murder’s rate, however it could violate human right.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment: An Eye for an Eye For many years there has been a constant debate between supporters and non-supporters of the death penalty. Many people argue that the death penalty is as much a murder as the crime committed by the offender. Others may say that it provides closure and justice. I am a strong supporter of the death penalty. There are many others like myself. The world is full of the most dangerous and ruthless criminals that should be put to death. There are many pros that the death penalty has to offer that make the world a better place to live. The death penalty is proven to deter crime. Many individuals think twice before committing a crime because of the death penalty. Spectators that have witnessed an execution say that watching an execution has changed their lives. Spectators can advise others to refrain from doing crimes by telling others of their experience. Prison is one place where many people would not expect crime, but sadly there is as much crime in prison as there is on the outside. The death penalty deters inmates from committing crimes in prison because the death penalty can still be added on to their sentence. Crimes are also deterred in prison because some of the most ruthless criminals are isolated and are on death row. Criminologist state that when execution rates go up, murder rates go down. Criminologists also state that each execution deters eighteen murders. Many experts state that speeding up executions would deter crime at a much faster rate. There has been an overall drop in homicides. Nationally the decline was 2.7 percent. With cities that have populations over one million murder rates have declined 9.8 percent. The death penalty also gives families of murder victims’ closure and justice. Many families say that the death penalty is a deterrent in crime. Many families say that even though they feel relief after the murderers’ death, the pain of a lost loved one will never go away. Families want closure and do not…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In the early 1970, the top argument in favor of the death penalty was general deterrence” (Radelet & Borg, 2000, page 2). The authors argue that the death penalty does not prevent others from committing the same offense. They describe how deterrence studies have failed to support the hypothesis that the death penalty is more effective at preventing criminal homicides than along imprisonment.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The gains associated with capital punishment are the affect it can have on effectively deterring criminals from not only murderer, but any serious crime (Cameron 1989). It is used as an intimidation factor for which people weigh the cost and benefits of their actions, and in a case where the cost is their life, the probability of them committing a crime will decrease (Shepherd 2004). The significant relationship it shares with the homicide rate has been found that 150 fewer homicides take place in reaction to one execution happening to a convicted murderer (Cooter and Ulen 2012). Looking at this relationship directly from an economic perspective, capital punishment can be seen as a commodity; an increase in it leads to an increase in consumer welfare as it decreases the chance of another victim being murdered (Cameron 1993). The effect that deterrence has on society is seen as a public good as well because of the positive, widespread affect it has on a larger number of consumers by increases their safety and security. By increasing the amount of resources the government puts towards conviction and punishment for criminal activities, it will allow for a reduction in harm (Cooter and Ulen 2012) and allow the demand for protection and a safer environment to be met. Capital punishment is the strongest alternative of punishment to create the largest deterrent…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal deterrence will continue to be a valuable part of criminological studies. The rational choice perspective has expanded tremendously in the last few decades. It allows criminologist to examine the reasoning process of not only offenders, but the victims as well. The concept of deterrence assumes a much higher degree of rationality. Deterrence doctrine uses the three functions of certainty, severity, and speed of punishment as key elements in the rational decision making process aimed at deciding between criminal and non-criminal paths of conduct (2013). The death penalty does serve as a deterrence from crime. But studies have indicated this might not be the case for every offender. But I would argue that even the deterrence of one individual…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paper

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "Recent research on the relationship between capital punishment and homicide has created a consensus among most economists who have studied the issue that capital punishment deters murder. Early studies from the 1970s and 1980s reached conflicting results. However, recent studies have exploited better data and more sophisticated statistical techniques. The modern refereed studies have consistently shown that capital punishment has a strong deterrent effect, with each execution deterring between 3 and 18 murders...…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People also believe that the death penalty is a deterrent to criminals, the most powerful weapon to prevent the crime occurred. But the fact is the death penalty compared with other kinds of punishment, the death penalty does not deter crime has a special function. Offenders can be divided into two categories: Impulsive type and plan type. For impulsive, they are in the non-rational state at the time of crime, reckless commission of a crime, the death penalty cannot afford deterrent for them. For the plan type, there are too many elements need priorities than death, such as Benefits available on crime, criminal attitude towards his life and so on. Thus, the deterrent effect of the death penalty not prominent than other kinds of punishment. As some homicide, injury, rape, crimes were mostly due to some conflicts or situations stimulation, so that the loss of reason, impulsive, and at the moment committed a crime. In this case, the perpetrators are often impossible to accurately discretionary legal consequences of his crime may cause. For these people, the death penalty deterrence can be said too late to play. Furthermore, most of these people will regret afterward, in fact, sentenced these people to death runs counter to repentance, even those who escaped will continue to stimulate criminal psychology. According to studies, many murderers have that idea after killed first person: "kill one person is dead, kill more people is dead too, so it's ok to kill more.” So the death penalty maybe is an indirect stimulation of the…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A death penalty can also be served as a strong deterrent against potential criminals. Humans are naturally afraid of death, and would rethink again before offending the law. Death penalty can also be seen, as a way to console the victim’s families, should the criminal committed an act of murder. However, one could also argue that even if justice is served, we can never bring back the dead to life.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deterrent Death Penalty

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The authors, Michael L. Radelet and Ronald L Akers, Professors of Sociology, Center for Studies in Criminology and Law, University of Florida, explains that America’s top criminologist has demonstrated that the death penalty does little to reduce rates of criminal violence. They used statistics gathered over the years about the death penalty and deterrent effects and used those to ask questions to criminologist, general public, and police chiefs. By using many expert opinions they seem unbiased. These statistics would help support one of the lack of deterrent effect of the death penalty.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays