Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

A Strong Character with a Weak Mind

Better Essays
1655 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Strong Character with a Weak Mind
A Strong Character of Weak Mind
In William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark appears to be a powerful man, driven by bloodlust to avenge his father’s death. At the beginning of The Royal Shakespeare Company’s 2009 version of the play, Hamlet conducts himself in a reserved manner. However, as the movie progresses, he begins to act more impulsively. For example, the prince seems very eager to question Queen Gertrude and King Claudius’s relationship and marriage. Hamlet’s unique determination to discover the truth behind the late king’s early death depicts him as steady and sensible, yet his brash personality diminishes the thoughtfulness in his decision-making. The 2009 version of Hamlet demonstrates this during Act I, Scene IV, when Hamlet encounters the ghost of his father. In order to portray the prince as a man of rashness rather than reason, director Gregory Doran uses dramatic dialogue, acting and film techniques to bring the tragic character’s implicit character to light.
Doran first introduces Hamlet’s intense demeanor in Act I, Scene II during his soliloquy. His disapproval in Gertrude and Claudius’s marriage becomes evident as he proclaims, “Frailty, thy name is woman!” and how Gertrude married his “father’s brother, but no more like [his] father Than [he] to Hercules.” Hamlet becomes lost in thought and looks off in the distance while speaking his mind, even when Horatio, Marcellus and Bernardo enter the scene. This heat of passion sparks the curiosity and inquisitiveness that he carries throughout the rest of the film, but also introduces the very impulsivity that leads to his downfall. Hamlet’s heightened emotional state in Scene IV quickly undermines his thoughtful character. The scene begins with an establishing shot as Hamlet, Horatio and Marcellus stand side by side in a long hallway:

While King Claudius throws a party nearby, flashes of light illuminate the hallway. The shrill noises of fireworks and trumpets dominate the sound while Hamlet speaks in a low tone. The rhythm of his speech quickly breaks by Horatio sharply exclaiming, “Look, my lord, it comes!” in reference to the ghost of King Hamlet, now entering the shot’s frame:

Even with the key light being shown on Horatio’s face, a stark contrast can be observed from his expression and Hamlet’s, the latter showing more shock and astonishment than the other. The fireworks and trumpets hush and ominous bass tones replace the sound. A slight fog enters the shot, and Hamlet begins to step backwards. The tone of this scene has suddenly changed from being relaxed to tense due to the ghost’s presence. This shift hints at King Hamlet’s powerful nature early on in the scene. The camera cuts away to a more distant position and includes Marcellus in the frame:

The camera now films in deep focus, allowing the audience to observe Hamlet as he backs away from his father while speaking in a frail and trembling voice. He appears very humble and afraid of his father’s ghost. Hamlet continues to ramble as if he has lost a sense of who he is and what he is trying to achieve: an understanding of what happened to his father. Horatio and Marcellus are left without words, leaving the action between the Prince and late King of Denmark.
Now that the camera’s focus lies only on Hamlet and his father, the mood changes and Hamlet’s impulsive nature comes to light. The prince sinks against a wall while speaking to the ghost, who stands on the opposite side of the wall in front of a window. This initiates a shot/reverse shot sequence between Hamlet and his father:

The shot of the prince uses low contrast. The framing encompasses the wall behind Hamlet, and the camera films at level with Hamlet’s face. A dim light illuminates his position and fearful expression. In comparison, the shot of the King employs high contrast due to the background light. The framing includes the window behind the King, along with a fog that emits from the ghost as the light falls upon his back. The camera films below the ghost’s face. Both shots are taken moderately close up to the actors’ faces. The strong background light, fog and level of framing make the ghost appear much more threatening and commanding than Hamlet. Now that the prince comes face to face with the very person he finds himself so distraught over, Hamlet’s identity and personality change. The juxtaposition of Hamlet’s wavering character and his father’s stern temperament delivers a glimpse of Prince Hamlet’s true self, someone that may not be as thoughtful as the audience expects. The late king’s strong and shocking presence makes the situation much more realistic for Prince Hamlet and cracks his composure. Although the ghost never speaks in the scene, this shot/reverse shot sequence displays his discontent with the situation in Denmark. The acting of the prince and king alone reveal the true authority figure: King Hamlet. The Prince of Denmark also contrasts the behavior of his good friend, Horatio. Throughout the film, Horatio comes off as the more composed and loyal friend of Hamlet. It not only highlights Hamlet’s radical behavior, but also emphasizes the imprudence in his judgment. As the ghost leaves, Hamlet frantically tells Horatio why he should follow his father. He speaks very quickly while repeatedly looking in the ghost’s direction:

The shot is now close up and implements low-key lighting, which focuses on the left side of Hamlet’s face. It also includes the surrounding brick wall whose dull colors vividly highlight Hamlet’s facial expressions. David Tennant makes dramatic and wild expressions as he pieces together what he just witnessed. His determination to uncover the truth and vindicate his father returns with a much more unsettled disposition. Hamlet never rationalizes his desire to follow his father’s ghost, leaving Horatio to try and make sense of the situation. The camera turns towards Hamlet’s loyal companion and increases the depth of focus to include the ghost, now at the opposite end of the hallway:

The shot now uses a lower contrast in regard to the actors’ faces. The background light illuminates the hallway without showing the individual characters. The level of framing cuts the top of Hamlet’s head from the shot, showing how he directs his attention to his father rather than to Horatio. His failure to even acknowledge Horatio’s attempts to explain the circumstances stresses the fact that Hamlet is not in a keen and focused state of mind. He appears more flustered and easily influenced by the ghost’s presence, unlike the very independent and thoughtful Hamlet who the audience acquainted with throughout the film. The shot then becomes close-up to Horatio’s face, with the key light directed on his right side:

The ghost stands outside the shot’s frame. Horatio’s face becomes more detailed, showing his sincerity and concern for Hamlet’s well being. The level of framing stays at eye level with Horatio, but below that of Marcellus and even more below that of Hamlet. This signifies that Horatio’s appeal to logic comes off as insignificant and bears no effect on Hamlet’s rational. The prince thoughtlessly decided how he will act and indeed acts upon this reflex. This demonstrates how easily Hamlet can be influenced in believing a certain idea or position. Even if Horatio tried to reason with Hamlet before the ghost entered the scene, Hamlet would have likely reacted with the same level of emotionalism. He convinced himself from the beginning that speaking to his father was exactly what he needed to do. The contrast of his spontaneous behavior and Horatio’s thoughtful reasoning indicates how impulsive the Prince of Denmark truly is. After ignoring Horatio, Hamlet runs toward the direction of his father to a new room. He discovers that his father’s death resulted from foul play, committed by the late king’s own brother: Claudius. Now that he spoke with his father and uncovered the truth, Hamlet must decide how he should act upon the King’s revealing account. Immediately after the King’s ghost departs, Hamlet declares his next move. He exclaims, “I’ll wipe away all trivial fond records, All saws of books, all forms, all pressures past, That youth and observation copied there; And thy commandment all alone shall live Within the book and volume of my brain, Unmix’d with baser matter: yes, by heaven!” Hamlet’s exposure to this new information beguiles him in to a sensationalized state of mind and causes him to impulsively draw conclusions before he can even stand up from the ground. His hasty demeanor follows him to Act II, Scene II. Here, Hamlet assumes Polonius to be a fishmonger and gives him advice for how Polonius should care for his daughter. Hamlet fails to acknowledge the possibility of Polonius being Ophelia’s father and even acts recklessly enough to poke fun at his old age. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern then enter the scene. Very little time elapses before Hamlet indicts the two of being sent for. He asks, “Were you not sent for?” Neither Rosencrantz nor Guildenstern reply definitely before Hamlet claims, “You were sent for…I know the good king and queen have sent for you.” He then goes on to speculate the cause for this action; again, neither of his friends has answered the original question at this point. Hamlet’s impulsive thinking triggers him to construct broad extrapolations, solely based upon a single intuition. Act I, Scene IV of Hamlet introduces a slightly new twist to Prince Hamlet’s character than the audience has yet to experience. Although Hamlet consistently advocates for what he believes in, the mere appearance of his father’s ghost is all it takes for him to lose his sense of reason and rationale. This spontaneous change of character brings light to Hamlet not being as thoughtful as one would expect from a prince. The Royal Shakespeare Company’s emphasis on this particular scene reveals Hamlet’s true character and foreshadows the melodrama and dramatic flair that later escalate in Shakespeare’s tragic play.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Hamlet, Prince of Denmark has remained the most perplexing, as well as the most popular, of William Shakespeare’s tragedies. Whether considered as literature, philosophy, or drama, its artistic stature is universally admitted. To explain the reasons for its excellence in a few words, however, is a daunting task. Apart from the matchless artistry of its language, the play’s appeal rests in large measure on the character of Hamlet himself. Called upon to avenge his father’s murder, he is compelled to face problems of duty, morality, and ethics that have been human concerns through the ages. The play has tantalized critics with what has become known as the Hamlet mystery, that of Hamlet’s complex behavior, most notably his indecision and his reluctance to act.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark is known well for his complex outlook and his perplexing relationship with those who surround him, specifically Ophelia and Gertrude. In this story, the themes duty and obligation provided the driving force behind the actions of several characters, such as Hamlet. Hamlet’s overwhelming public duty makes it unclear as to what he personally wants. As seen within the play, Hamlet also experiences a psychological change which led to a change in how he views others.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    William Shakespeare’s Hamlet tells the story of how betrayal and the supernatural lead Hamlet, the prince of Denmark, down a path of self-destruction. Gertrude, Hamlet’s mother, also plays an instrumental role in his decline. Her quick marriage to his uncle, Claudius, who kills his father, devastates Hamlet. He ponders adopting the Greco-Roman philosophy of revenge, but questions its morality because he respects the Judeo-Christian virtue that honors fathers, old or new. These elements lure Hamlet into a psychological metamorphosis and nourish his emotional insecurities. In the movie versions of Hamlet, specifically in the Gertrude bedroom scene, Laurence Olivier and Franco Zeffirelli examine Hamlet’s sanity and his relationship with Gertrude. Both Olivier and Zeffirelli use aural and visual representation, but Olivier’s Hamlet retains more of the original structure and text of the play, allowing for some interpretation, while Zeffirelli edits the lines of the play generously and incorporates explicit imagery to present his…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insanity In Hamlet

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout the madness that embodies Hamlet, a playwright written by none other than William Shakespeare, readers are taken on a prolific journey of the unique characteristics that outline Prince Hamlet himself. The play, set in Denmark during Elizabethan times, amplifies Prince Hamlet’s revenge on his uncle, Claudius, who has strangely married his mother in absence of his father after his mysterious death. Claudius has murdered his own brother for his own benefit of seizing the throne. When a ghost appears on a dark night outside of Elsinore Castle, Prince Hamlet observes that it is his father’s spirit, and it is speaking to him. The ghost proceeds to inform Hamlet that it is Claudius who murdered him, and orders Hamlet to seek revenge immediately. For the duration of Hamlet’s boiling insanity that is brought upon his surroundings and sarcastic lifestyle, he uses his judgement to carry him through the various encounters and family predicaments.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the characterization of Hamlet, three depictions have been justifiably important towards the results of each story. In William Shakespeare’s depiction of Hamlet in The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, embodies relatability and provokes empathy from readers. Amleth, originating as a figure in a medieval Scandinavian legend, portrays an extreme characterization who is less subtle in his tactics when investigating his father’s murder. Within the extremities of Hamlet and Amleth’s character, BBC’s 2009 television film Hamlet can be found.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamlet. Book vs Movies

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To play Hamlet well is to succeed on the stage or on the screen. It is one of the most complex of the Shakespearian roles that many actors have aspired to master or at least, bring something distinctive and fresh to the pivotal character. There is no doubt that Hamlet “brazenly solicits interpretation”, demonstrated by modern day actors including Mel Gibson, Ethan Hawke and Kenneth Branagh, in the medium of film. Throughout the 20th Century, film adaptations have finely developed both the character of Hamlet and have nurtured a performance of the play, in some very creative and exciting ways. Film directors Franco Zeffirelli, Michael Almereyda and Kenneth Branagh have brought “Hamlet” to varying levels of success on the screen while achieving this through stark differences in interpretation and through realising very different creative ideas.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his play “Hamlet-The prince of Denmark”, Shakespeare gives literature one of its most complex and enigmatic characters: Prince Hamlet. His greatness and complexity lies in the fact that he is a multidimensional character, who has a plethora of facets to him. He seems to possess contradictory characteristics, which often pull him in opposite directions and thus determine the course of his action. Hamlet embodies a struggle within him, between a side that wants to unleash the fury of his father’s murder and depart from the path of moral righteousness to avenge his dead father, and the side that represents his moral sense that inhibits his action due to the fear of its eternal consequences. The fragmentation within Hamlet’s personality is clear from the fact that it reflects the personalities of the other characters in the play. As Marjorie Garber says in her book ‘Shakespeare after all’: “The technique of “splitting”, producing several versions of a character type split into component aspects, is one of the most effective devices of Hamlet, and will culminate in Hamlet’s dying recognition that all his rivals and friends are in some ways aspects of himself.” Thus, while on one hand, some aspects of Hamlet’s character are reminiscent of his foe, Claudius, a cunning strategist, on the other hand, there is a Horatio within him, who possesses the faculty to distinguish between right and wrong, and is thus the voice of moral righteousness. This is mirrored in the inner dichotomy that Hamlet has to deal with, that of Hamlet, the ruthless strategist who is capable of employing deceit and Hamlet, the human, with an inclination against any evil, damnable act. This essay will prove how Hamlet possesses the characteristics of a Machiavellian hero yet his conscience prevents this side of him from completely manifesting his personality and these conflicting forces within him…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This wonderfully British play begins with the death of Hamlet’s father followed by the “o’er hasty” marriage of his uncle Claudius and his mother Gertrude. Hamlet is angry and upset that his mother would remarry so quickly, especially considering she wed her step-brother; a move that would have been utterly societally unacceptable to anyone but a royal. Hamlet is also very wary of his uncle Claudius and suspects him of the “cruel and unnatural murder” of Old Hamlet who was once the respected king of Denmark and who also happens to be Claudius’ own brother and Hamlet’s beloved father. As a result of these misfortunes, Hamlet becomes an interestingly bitter character, driven through several states of being. Hamlet’s wit and sarcastic use of double meanings are present from the very beginning of the play. In fact, the first words out of his mouth are double-sided. In reference to their awkward familial relationship, Hamlet gives Claudius the biting remark, “A little more than kin, and less than kind” (I. ii. 67). This is immediately followed by the first of Hamlet’s many pouting puns, “Not so, my lord. I am too much i’ the sun” (I. ii. 69). These double meanings are used to reveal the several layers of Hamlet’s…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, there is a horrendous catastrophe that revolves around Hamlet, the prince of Denmark. Hamlet involves romance, disastrous events, and death. Throughout the play, Hamlet is a prince who fails to take action whenever he needs to, leads to everyone around him getting hurt and in the end, he himself gets hurt. When his father died, he knew that his death was not natural, but he had to make sure he was correct before he avenges his father’s death. When the ghost of Old King Hamlet told Hamlet that King Claudius murdered him just to take the throne, Hamlet vowed he would stop at nothing until his father’s death was avenged, which lead to many deaths. The play revolves around the theme of “Appearance vs. Reality” because of the ways characters try to hide their true intent and how the characters use deception by spying and plotting on each other.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainey Bland English 102 Dr. Christine Schott 14 November 2014 A Scorned Man’s Revenge The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark is one of William Shakespeare’s most recognized plays. It is a production that revolves around the central theme of revenge. In the first act, the reader is introduced to Hamlet whose uncle, Claudius, is king of the country. Once Claudius realizes Hamlet’s intentions to murder him for his father’s murder, Claudius plots to accomplish his own objectives.…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamlet is an actor at heart, caring only to follow the script which the ghost of his father has provided for him: ‘Honor calls for him to make a show’. Performing ‘to create a favorable appearance in the eyes of others [in essence, the ‘mob’]’ (O’Neill p. 126) is the only way which Hamlet can achieve his end-goal, and he knows that utilising his power as future King of Denmark will be key to his…

    • 2142 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet’s first soliloquy in Act I, scene ii, lines 133-164 is a passionate and startling passage that strongly contrasts to the artificial dialogue and actions that he portrays to his uncle Claudius throughout the remainder of the play. This soliloquy serves to reveal Hamlet’s melancholia and the reasons for his dispair in an outpouring of anger, disgust, sorrow, and grief through which he explains how everything in his life seems futile and miserable. He mourns the death of his father, is sickened by his mother’s marriage to his uncle, and also feels extremely miserable about the entire situation with regards to the value of his own life.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Truth of Hamlet

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hamlet the Prince of Denmark is a play consisting of a lot of revenge. This masterpiece of literature was created by William Shakespeare. Hamlet the Prince of Denmark is a tragedy. The play Hamlet is most likely written between 1600 -1602, which is a period when tragedies were very popular. Hamlet the Prince of Denmark is a realistic play. This means that the events that took place in the play could take place in real life. Since this play took place in the 1600’s, many things are done differently than they would be done today. In the play Hamlet the Prince of Denmark, the antagonist, Hamlet, goes through many difficult experiences.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    AMour

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some people think Hamlet is weak and hesitant because his hesitance of killing his uncle and he is skeptical about the words of his father’s ghost. But that is unreasonable. Hamlet is not weak; on the contrary, he is intelligent and brave. He is honest in nature, but he has to play as a madman. He is kind in nature, but he has to revenge. Facing the contrast and difficulties in his life, he doesn’t shrink back but choose to accomplish the revenge plan with more efforts. Sometimes, Hamlet shows doubts, shake and weak will, however, this is not his character. By nature, Hamlet is strong. He 's energetic with a magnificent soul. He is magnificent and strong even in times of setbacks, since a man of determination makes far wiser choices at trying moments than a vulnerable striving man. Such was the comment for Hamlet by Belinskiy(1948:207) which obviously explains the strong of Hamlet. As the prince of Denmark, on one hand, he must obtain realistic proof to prove his uncle’s crimes; one the other hand, he hopes the revenge is not only the personal revenge, but the change of society. He prays in Act 1, Scene 5: “The time is out of joint – O, cursed spite that…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The moment we see Hamlet we are captivated by his contradictions. He is irresponsible and responsible, uncontrolled and controlled, friendly but also unfriendly. Hamlet is furious bout his father’s death, but shows no remorse for the killings he committed. His appearance shows he is full of mourning and that he is a troubled character.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics