Preview

A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
15524 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations
THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE • VOL. LVII, NO. 4 • AUGUST 2002

A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations
JAY R. RITTER and IVO WELCH*
ABSTRACT
We review the theory and evidence on IPO activity: why firms go public, why they reward first-day investors with considerable underpricing, and how IPOs perform in the long run. Our perspective is threefold: First, we believe that many IPO phenomena are not stationary. Second, we believe research into share allocation issues is the most promising area of research in IPOs at the moment. Third, we argue that asymmetric information is not the primary driver of many IPO phenomena. Instead, we believe future progress in the literature will come from nonrational and agency conf lict explanations. We describe some promising such alternatives. From 1980 to 2001, the number of companies going public in the United
States exceeded one per business day. The number of initial public offerings
~IPOs! has varied from year to year, however, with some years seeing fewer than 100 IPOs, and others seeing more than 400. These IPOs raised $488 billion ~in 2001 dollars! in gross proceeds, an average of $78 million per deal.
At the end of the first day of trading, their shares traded on average at 18.8 percent above the price at which the company sold them. For an investor buying shares at the first-day closing price and holding them for three years,
IPOs returned 22.6 percent. Still, over three years, the average IPO underperformed the CRSP value-weighted market index by 23.4 percent and underperformed seasoned companies with the same market capitalization and book-to-market ratio by 5.1 percent.
In a nutshell, these numbers summarize the patterns in issuing activity, underpricing, and long-run underperformance, which have been the focus of a large theoretical and empirical literature. We survey this literature, focusing on recent papers. Space constraints force us to take a U.S.-centric point of view and to omit a



References: Aggarwal, Rajesh, Laurie Krigman, and Kent Womack, 2002, Strategic IPO underpricing, information momentum, and lockup expiration selling, Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming. Aggarwal, Reena, 2000, Stabilization activities by underwriters after initial public offerings, Journal of Finance 55, 1075–1103. Aggarwal, Reena, 2002, Allocation of initial public offerings and f lipping activity, Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming. Aggarwal, Reena, and Patrick Conroy, 2000, Price discovery in initial public offerings and the role of the lead underwriter, Journal of Finance 55, 2903–2922. Aggarwal, Reena, Nagpurnanand R. Prabhala, and Manju Puri, 2002, Institutional allocation in initial public offerings: Empirical evidence, Journal of Finance 57, 1421–1442. Allen, Franklin, and Gerald R. Faulhaber, 1989, Signaling by underpricing in the IPO market, Journal of Financial Economics 23, 303–324. Amihud, Yakov, Shmuel Hauser, and Amir Kirsh, 2001, Allocations, adverse selection and cascades in IPOs: Evidence from Israel, Working paper, New York University. Baker, Malcolm P., and Jeffrey Wurgler, 2000, The equity share in new issues and aggregate stock returns, The Journal of Finance 55, 2219–2257. Barber, Brad M., and John D. Lyon, 1996, Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics, Journal of Financial Economics 41, Barber, Brad M., and John D. Lyon, 1997, Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics, Journal of Financial Economics 43, Baron, David P., 1982, A model of the demand for investment banking advising and distribution services for new issues, Journal of Finance 37, 955–976. Beatty, Randolph P., and Jay R. Ritter, 1986, Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings, Journal of Financial Economics 15, 213–232. Beatty, Randolph P., and Ivo Welch, 1996, Issuer expenses and legal liability in initial public offerings, Journal of Law and Economics 39, 545–602. Benveniste, Lawrence M., and Walid Y. Busaba, 1997, Bookbuilding vs. fixed price: An analysis of competing strategies for marketing IPOs, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 32, 383–403. Benveniste, Lawrence M., Walid Y. Busaba, and William J. Wilhelm, Jr., 1996, Price stabilization as a bonding mechanism in new equity issues, Journal of Financial Economics 42, 223–256. Benveniste, Lawrence M., Sina M. Erdal, and William J. Wilhelm, Jr., 1998, Who benefits from secondary market price stabilization of IPOs? Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 741–767. Benveniste, Lawrence M., and Paul A. Spindt, 1989, How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues, Journal of Financial Economics 24, 343–362. Benveniste, Lawrence M., and William J. Wilhelm, 1990, A comparative analysis of IPO proceeds under alternative regulatory environments, Journal of Financial Economics 28, 173–208. Bernardo, Antonio E., and Ivo Welch, 2001, On the evolution of overconfidence and entrepreneurs, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10, 301–330. Biais, Bruno, and Anne Marie Faugeron, 2002, IPO auctions: English, Dutch, . . . French and Internet, Journal of Financial Intermediation 11, 9–36. Black, Bernard S., and Ronald J. Gilson, 1998, Venture capital and the structure of capital markets: Banks versus stock markets, Journal of Financial Economics 47, 243–277. Boehmer, Ekkehart, and P. Raymond Fishe, 2001, Equilibrium rationing in initial public offerings of equity, Working paper, University of Miami. Booth, James R., and Lena Chua, 1996, Ownership dispersion, costly information, and IPO underpricing, Journal of Financial Economics 41, 291–310. Bradley, Daniel, and Brad Jordan, 2002, Partial adjustment to public information and IPO underpricing, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, forthcoming. Bradley, Daniel, Brad Jordan, and Jay R. Ritter, 2002, The quiet period goes out with a bang, Journal of Finance, forthcoming. Bradley, Daniel, Brad Jordan, Ivan Roten, and Ha-Chin Yi, 2001, Venture capital and IPO lockup expirations: An empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Research 24, 465–492. Brau, James C., Bill Francis, and Ninon Kohers, 2002, The choice of IPO versus takeover: Empirical evidence, Journal of Business, forthcoming. Brav, Alon, 2000, Inference in long-horizon event studies: A Bayesian approach with applications to initial public offerings, Journal of Finance 55, 1979–2016. Brav, Alon, and Paul A. Gompers, 1997, Myth or reality? The long-run underperformance of initial public offerings: Evidence from venture and nonventure capital-backed companies, Journal of Finance 52, 1791–1821. Brav, Alon, and Paul A. Gompers, 2002, Insider trading subsequent to initial public offerings: Evidence from expirations of lockup provisions, Review of Financial Studies, forthcoming. Brennan, Michael J., and J. Franks, 1997, Underpricing, ownership and control in initial public offerings of equity securities in the UK, Journal of Financial Economics 45, 391–413. Carter, Richard B., Frederick H. Dark, and Ajai K. Singh, 1998, Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and the long-run performance of IPO stocks, Journal of Finance 53, 285–311. Carter, Richard B., and Steven Manaster, 1990, Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation, Journal of Finance 45, 1045–1067. Chemmanur, Thomas J., 1993, The pricing of initial public offers: A dynamic model with information production, Journal of Finance 48, 285–304. Chemmanur, Thomas J., and Paolo Fulghieri, 1999, A theory of the going-public decision, Review of Financial Studies 12, 249–279. Choe, Hyuk, Ronald Masulis, and Vikram Nanda, 1993, Common stock offerings across the business cycle: Theory and evidence, Journal of Empirical Finance 1, 3–31. Chowdhry, Bhagwan, and Vikram Nanda, 1996, Stabilization, syndication, and pricing of IPOs, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31, 25–42. Cooney, John W., Ajai K. Singh, Richard B. Carter, and Frederick H. Dark, 2001, IPO initial returns and underwriter reputation: Has the inverse relationship f lipped in the 1900s? Cornelli, Francesca, and David Goldreich, 2001, Bookbuilding and strategic allocation, Journal of Finance 56, 2337–2369. Cornelli, Francesca, and David Goldreich, 2002, Bookbuilding: How informative is the order book? Working paper, London Business School. Daniel, Kent, David Hirshleifer, and A. Subrahmanyam, 1998, Investor psychology and security market under- and over-reactions, Journal of Finance 53, 1839–1886. Derrien, Francois, and Kent L. Womack, 2002, Auctions vs. bookbuilding and the control of underpricing in hot IPO markets, Review of Financial Studies, forthcoming. Drake, Philip D., and Michael R. Vetsuypens, 1993, IPO underpricing and insurance against legal liability, Financial Management 22, 64–73. Dunbar, Craig G., 2000, Factors affecting investment bank initial public offering market share. Eckbo, Espen, and Oyvind Norli, 2001, Leverage, liquidity, and long-run IPO returns, Working Paper, Dartmouth College. Ellis, Katrina, Roni Michaely, and Maureen O’Hara, 2000, When the underwriter is the market

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    efb201lect7in141

    • 2302 Words
    • 11 Pages

    EFB201 Lecture 7 – Equity Markets Reading – Viney chapter 6 p181-193, chapter 7 Tutorial Questions – Viney chapter 6 Essay Questions 1,2,6,7 Viney chapter 7 Essay Questions 1,2,9,10 Additional tute questions (on Blackboard Site) 1 Outline Background to Listed Companies Initial Public Offerings (IPO’s) Ordinary Shares Equity Funding Alternatives Share Returns and Valuation Introduction to the ASX 2 Background to Listed Companies…

    • 2302 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Riordan Manufacturing

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An Initial Public Offering (IPO) is the first time a company issues stock to the public. According to Bateman and Snell, “Initial public stock offerings (IPOs) offer a way to raise capital through federally registered and underwritten sales of shares in the company” (2011, pg. 255). There are various advantages to going public. An IPO may raise capital, reduce debt, improve the balance sheet, and enhance net worth. Riordan may be able to pursue unaffordable opportunities and improve credibility with customers. Investors may be attracted to the company now.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    FIN 516 IPO Paper

    • 1324 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An Initial Public Offering (IPO) is when a private company sells its first stock to the public. This is usually done by company’s who are smaller and or “younger” looking to raise capital in order to expand. It can however be done by larger private companies that want to become public. IPO’s can be a risky investment, as the investors do not know how the stock will do on its first day of trading, in addition, there are not much historical data either. In August 2010, Gevo Inc., filed for IPO with the SEC, which went public in January 2011.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For a private company to raise money in the financial markets an initial public offering (IPO) has some advantages. One of the first benefits is generating revenue from the sale of shares of stock in the company. The company’s owners gain liquidity in their share of the company. This liquidity makes it easier for the owners to sell their interests in the company. Going public gives the company access to the public markets in the…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Baderman Island

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages

    An IPO is the first issue of stock a company makes, where the issuing firm sells pieces of itself to investors who are now partial owners (Taubman, 2001). The investors own a number of shares, which determines what percentage of ownership they hold. Owning a portion of the firm can be potentially lucrative for an investor if the firm increases in value. After the investors own the shares, which they acquired at a certain rate, they can sell them in the secondary market for a profit, as long as the firm’s value has indeed increased. At times, when a firm has excess net income, they will share those profits with the shareholders through dividends, paying a certain amount per share back to the…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HW 6 Fin 402 Solutions

    • 768 Words
    • 3 Pages

    . “I was amazed to find that the announcement of a stock issuance drives down the value of the firm by 30%, on average, of the proceeds of the issue. That issue cost dwarfs the underwriter’s spread and the administrative costs of the issue. It makes common stock issues prohibitively expensive.”…

    • 768 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fin 501 Case 1 studymde

    • 1645 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Lets begin by taking a quick look at the differences of each IPO. Investment Bankers use a book building process and make their money by charging large fees and commissions to take the issue on a "Road Show" to large institutional and sophisticated investors to determine an appropriate IPO price and in return these selected investors often receive the initial allotments of IPO shares and therefore benefit from the price appreciation imbued between the offer price and the open price. (Fung, 2011).…

    • 1645 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Underwriters play an important role in the IPO process. For instance, they are responsible for the advertisement of the IPO to the institutional investors who then table their bids for determination. After the tabling of the bids, it is the role of the underwriters to decide how to allocate the shares to the institutional investors. In fact, they are responsible for the type of investor they want to acquire stock at the company. For instance, reputation of the institutional investor is considered while allocating shares. Other important factors that are usually put into consideration include length of investment, that is long-term or short-term, and are the institutional investors domestic or foreign?…

    • 1182 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    S & S Air Case Study

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jordan, B. D. (Eds.). (2011). Essentials of corporate finance (7th ed., Rev.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kaserer, C., Mettler, A., & Obernberger, S. (2011). The Impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the Cost of Going Public. Business Research, 4(2), 125-147.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jetblue Ipo

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Draho, J. (2004). “The IPO Decision: Why and How Companies Go Public”. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    July 31, 2006 Abstract In about one-third of US IPOs between 1996 and 2000, executives received stock options with an exercise price set equal to the IPO offer price (rather than a price determined by the market). Among firms with such “IPO options”, 58 percent of top executives receive a net gain from underpricing, meaning the gain from IPO options exceeds the loss from the dilution of their pre-IPO shareholdings. If executives can influence the IPO offer price, we expect a positive relation between these IPO options and underpricing. Alternatively, executives may be able to influence the timing and terms of their stock options, and this would similarly predict a positive relation between IPO options and underpricing. However, we fail to find any evidence of such a relation. Our results run counter to the emerging literature claiming that managers blatantly take self-serving actions to improve their personal welfare at shareholder expense. ____________________________________________________________…

    • 15520 Words
    • 63 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finance

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The online auction process is full of advantages and disadvantages from the perspective of the issuing company. On the one hand, it increases the ability of small investors to participate in the IPO process, and minimizes the traditional dominance of larger institutional investors who were lucrative clients of the underwriting investment bank. On the other hand, small investors may lack the ability to efficiently price an IPO due to lack of information.…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ktm Case Report

    • 2977 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Cited: Jones, T., & Swaleheen, M. u. (2010). Endogenous Examination of Underwriter Reputation and IPO Returns. Managerial Finance, 36(4), 284-293.…

    • 2977 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We will first examine the development of various hypothesis surrounding lock-ups, this will be followed by the empirical results supporting the use of proxy variables and we explain how they were used to test the variety of hypotheses. Particular attention will be paid to the separate subsamples of firms, and the data concerning the differential correlation between underpricing and lockup length across the subsamples of firms. Further, this literature examines the motivations for lockup provision, the determinants of the length of the lockup period, and the returns around lockup expiration. Lastly the relevance of this article to SA and various other international firms will be discussed.…

    • 2575 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays