Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

A Philosophical Look at Human Nature

Good Essays
1157 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Philosophical Look at Human Nature
We might as well re-name Human Beings to Human Doings. What does it mean to be a human rather than do things humans do. Are actions an innate response or do actions stem from emotions and feelings accumulated by unique individual perception. At what point does reason morph into moral obligation and justified response. Philosophers have been tracing the roots of human nature to gain information to educate society on how best to govern the species. I will be analyzing David Hume's work, A Treatise of Human Nature to define and explain his views on justice and morality. All thoughts, feelings and actions sprout from the foundation of ones perception. Each individual perceives the world a certain way, which influences all that one does. Hume believes morality derives from passion rather than reason. "Morals excite passions, and produce or prevent actions. Reason itself is utterly impotent in this particular. The rules of morality, therefore, are not conclusion out of reason" (Hume, 406). Reason follows an "if this then that" outline but never does it naturally occur "if this than you ought to do that". The "ought" arrives from unknown origins and changes the pattern of the concept. It is not until one brings personal obligations into a given situation that the answer changes from cause and effect to you a feeling of "you ought to" act in some way. These self created obligations derive from sentiments one attaches to objects, places, people or actions. "Moral distinctions, therefore, are not the offspring of reason" (Hume, 407). Among humans there are common moral obligations such as caring for your children. People feel that it is right and necessary to nurture your children into adult hood or till they are able to survive independently. This assumed agreement between most humans comes from the strong feeling of unconditional love towards offspring, I believe this to be more of an innate response than anything. The action of caring for your children does not have the capacity to be right or wrong, good or bad. It is true that humans don't praise actions themselves but the intentions behind them. It is the force or thought that is driving the action that we applaud or discourage. Justice is a form of a moral sense one feels they should enforce in society. Hume uses the example of what would one benefit from paying a loan back rather than keeping the money, which seems out of reason, the most logical approach. Hume argues that justice comes from the sympathy one feels when imagining oneself in that same situation. Therefore, justice is driven by self interest and the need to secure ones rights. One may realize that it is in their best interest to act out of justice to ensure justice will be acted upon them, as well. Justice does not come from love of all man kind embedded in humans as an instinct. It is a product of feelings and selfishness to preserve one owns prosperity. Reality just is. Each person experiences the world through a series of reactions to reality. This filter of the mind is more complex than just taking in information from data your five senses collects and then continue to exist, or be. The mind thinks and processes information through thoughts which emotions and feelings derive. Then, with that information, the mind decides how to properly react based off how you feel about the set reality. Rather then continuing to be, you choose to do. Sympathy allows one man to relate to another while obtaining a further understanding of what that individual is experiencing. Connecting oneself to a possible outcome that one may find undesirable brings a sense of guilt or negative emotions. It is out of this passion we are influenced to act justly. This tool is used to gain knowledge and insight without the clouded perception of an individual. When sympathizing, one can determine the unjust act of oneself or another without emotional judgements distorting the reality. When justice is used by the people, it binds man to man ensuring loyalty and comfort among a community. Man faces many obstacles against nature unlike the animal kingdom, man has himself and the human capacity to problem solve and manipulate his surroundings but not much further protection. To live a fulfilling human life one requires so many complexities that society is the only way to fulfill oneself. "It is by society alone he is able to supply his defects and raise himself up to an equality with his fellow-creatures, and even acquire a superiority above them." (Hume, 418). It is in a mans best interest to engage in justice and morality to ensure that he will be treated with the most respect and care. Justice, as was stated before, comes from self interest. Outside this self interest is a hierarchy of other people one cares about most. One cares for himself, then immediate family including children and significant other, friends and distant family, following acquaintances, following the strangers and following he enemies. The more one can identify and relate to another the more interest and justice will be displayed in that relationship because people innately respond to all things involving themselves. Selfishness is evident in all human beings. If people cared for others children the same way they care for their own society would be significantly different. Hume believes justice to be a human convention, nothing more or less. "Here then is a proposition, which, I think, may be regarded as certain, that it is only from the selfishness and confined generosity of man, along with the scanty provision of nature has made for his wants, that justice derives its origin…" (Hume, 423). If by human nature, man was filled with generosity and unconditional love and cared for all humanity as he cared for himself, there would be no need for justice! Also, if nature gifted humanity with the abundance of recourses, food, water and land there would again, be no need for justice if each man could have it all! It's under the conditions that nothing is in abundance on Earth and man is dammed with jealousy and greed that justice is born. Therefore, man has created justice as coping mechanism to the short comings of his own nature and nature itself. The teachings of philosophy allow us to place ourselves beneath the microscope and dissect our very own nature. Humans are unique in the our prompting desire to act upon our emotions. Hume believes justice to be a complete human convention and self interested concept. It is true that our selfish driven lives ground society. For, without the imperfections of man and scarcity of nature, we find no substance to bind ourselves to one another. There would be no reason for community in a world where one was capable of having it all. It is in the absence of fulfillment that inspires the beauty of morality and justice.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Back in Hume’s time, there were mainly three schools of thought regarding the nature of morality. This debate was initiated by Thomas Hobbes’ view that moral obligations and duties came from self-regarding motives. In response to Thomas Hobbes’ argument, there are two schools of thought, namely rationalism and sentimentalism. Rationalists such as Samuel Clarke argued that morality could be explained by pure reason , and acting morally is just the same as acting rationally. Hume is on the side of the sentimentalists, as he rejects reason as the basis of morality . Hume argues, rather, that it is our moral sentiments that serve as the basis of moral approvals and disapprovals . In Hume’s picture, each action produces certain feelings in the recipients, be it pain or pleasure, and it is through sympathizing with the recipients which we have an impression of the resulting pain or pleasure in the recipients, and thus approve of or disapprove of the active person’s character trait which led to the action.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussing the principles from which we determine moral good or evil, virtue or vice, Hume argues that because the number of situations we may encounter is 'infinite' it would be absurd to imagine an 'original instinct' or individual principle for each possibility. (T3.1.2.6)1 Instead he suggests that, following the usual maxim of nature producing diversity from limited principles, we should look for more general principles.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When we think of our families, we think of our own children, if we have them. As responsible parents, we need to make certain that they are fed, schooled, healthy, and happy. To maintain our children and these needs, we must have the personal responsibility to tend to these needs. Without personal responsibility, our children would either have to fend for themselves or someone would have to step in and take that responsibility. Most of us do not have any issues taking care of our children because we love them and are obligated by this love.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Examined

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It is possible to interpret Freud as being committed to hard determinism. It is also possible to interpret Freud as believing in freedom.…

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume (1711-1776) believes that morality is based on sentiment, or feelings and emotions. In other words, when you feel that something is right or wrong, it is because you were taught that it was right or wrong. When researching Hume, I found the agent, receiver, and the spectator distinction: a product of earlier moral sense theories. The agent is the person that performs an action, the receiver is the person affected by the action, and the spectator is the person who observes and approves or disapproves of the action. (Fieser) The idea of sentiment is that we can perceive the outcomes of actions through our feelings. Whoever raises you, teaches you how to perceive your feelings of right or wrong.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sympathy, under Hume’s definition, clearly varies in terms of degree with the different connections the objects of sympathy have with us: we are more able to sympathize with a person close to us than with an indifferent stranger, and we sympathize more readily with our compatriot than with a person from another country with a different color of skin, as implied by the principle of association of ideas. Moral evaluations, on contrary, should not vary with the relationships the person, whose character trait is being evaluated, has with us. It is therefore counterintuitive for Hume to have his account of morality based on sympathy, which apparently possesses such a biased character. When two persons, with different relationships with us, share…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume believes the root of morality is emotion. He believes emotions, or passions, as he calls them, are the driving force behind our actions. Hume believes that how we feel about things determines what we determine is moral or immoral. There is no logical reason for keeping one’s promises if there is no benefit to you. However, we as a people have decided that keeping one’s word is moral because we would like someone to do that for us. We keep our promises because we want people to think kindly of us. There is no logic behind it, but there is emotion. Even when there is nothing to be gained for us by keeping our promises, we still maintain its moral to keep them because of how it makes us feel. This means, even when it is illogical to do something, if we feel it is moral, we should do it. Reason is not enough to change how we behave. It can give us some direction but it cannot compel us to do…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “I conceive that nothing taketh beginning from itself, but from the action of some other immediate agent without itself. And that therefore, when first a man hath an appetite or will to something, to which immediately before he had no appetite nor will, the cause of his will, is not the will itself, but something else not in his own disposing. So that whereas it is out of controversy, that of voluntary actions the will is the necessary cause, and by this which is said, the will is also caused by other things whereof it disposeth not, it followeth, that voluntary actions have all of them necessary causes, and therefore are necessitated.” (Hume. Liberty and Nessessity.)…

    • 2044 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Waller, B. N. (2008). Consider Ethics: Theory, Readings, and Contemporary Issues (2nd ed). New York: Pearson/Longman.…

    • 3255 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the second chapter of What if? Religious Themes in Science Fiction, Mike Alsford introduces the idea that science fiction is much more than the futuristic technologies that many people have defined the genre by, but is more about the human condition and what defines us as humans. When viewing science fiction through this lens, the futuristic technologies are little more than a literary device, and the focus shifts to the deeper elements of the plot. In the second chapter, Alsford looks at different historical opinions of what the essential ingredient of humanity is and applies them to Chistianity and the science fiction genre.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Nature

    • 1288 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is human nature and why does it affect my topic so much. The Spanish in some…

    • 1288 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Human Condition

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    for they didn’t feel any sort of compassion. When those we cared for hurt us or we hurt…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book Divergent, there were five factions. The names were abnegation, amity, dauntless, erudite and candor. Each faction was formed by a group of people who blamed human’s nature for destroying the earth. Erudite was formed by those who blamed ignorance for the war that had occurred in the past. Abnegation was formed by those who blamed selflessness for human natures fault. Candor was formed by those who blamed duplicity and deception for human nature's faults. Amity was formed by those who blamed war and fighting for human natures faults, and dauntless was formed by those who blamed cowardice for human natures faults. The dauntless protected the city from the inside and outside. They formed Dauntless around the principle of eliminating fear believing bravery will lead to a more perfect society. Every faction had a role in the city the dauntless had 3 main things, characteristics, physical traits and functions that made them different from the others.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Nature Essay

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Humans over many years have proven that they are 3 things: nastiness, selfishness and the incapability of caring for themselves. That’s what bring me too my statement that based on personal, current, and historical examples humans, by nature, are nasty, selfish, dependent organisms.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recognizing Humanity

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The capability for dehumanization is within all of us. This statement echoes through history up to the present time as true. Everyday humanity hears of incidents where the compassion and respect for human life is disregarded and demeaned. Everyday somewhere in the world someone is found wielding a gun or strapped with an explosive vest ready and willing to destroy innocent lives whose only crime was being at the right place at the wrong time. When sociologists try to understand why humanity's value for life is unchanging despite the milestones made as a species, the one answer that comes to mind is that people have the innate tendency to become inhuman. History has taught humanity very little about tolerance and people continue to make the same mistakes. However, humanity can be very accommodating, loving, and caring and this has been seen in people who have dedicated their whole lives to preach peace and further the teachings of kindness and compassion. In as much as we have the capability to love and care, we still revert to negative tendencies and this contributes to the social evils inherent in our everyday lives. This tendencies, however small, makes all the difference about what kind of people we can be.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics