As Americans continued to push further west, the feeling that the Indians that lived in these areas needed to be removed so the land being inhabited by them could be used for agriculture and other profits to the U.S. On page 134, Zinn states that “Gold was discovered in Cherokee territory in Georgia. Thousands of whites invaded, destroyed Indian property staked out claims.” This shows how Americans were only preoccupied on their own wealth, and they were willing to destroy the lives of thousands of Indians to get what they wanted. In effect to this, the U.S government made numerous treaties with the Indians, which gave them land that would always be theirs, and also promised that they would protect them. On page 136, Zinn expresses how the U.S. lied in the statement: “’a permanent home … which shall under the most solemn guarantee of the United States be and remain theirs forever...’ It was another lie.”
This movement to get rid of the Indians was aided by General Jackson, who set the Indian removal into effect in the war of 1812. He did this when he battled the great Tecumseh and conquered his allied Indian nation, then started to distribute their lands. Jackson became the leader of the distribution of Indian lands, and distributed them in unequal ways. In 1828 when Jackson was running for President, his platform was based upon Indian Removal, which was a popular issue. Jackson, who won a sweeping victory, began to formulate his strategies on how he would use an "Indian Removal campaign". In 1829, after seeing that his beloved Indian Removal Bill was not being followed, Jackson began dealing with the Indian tribes and offered them "untouchable" tracts of lands west of the Mississippi River if they would only cede their lands to the US and move themselves there.
The United States’ falseness is shown in the way that they broke the majority of the promises of protection that they made with the Indians. They also found some way to make the treaties void, which allowed them to push the Indians farther and farther west.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Although Jackson avoided committing himself on the tariff of internal improvements, his favoring of rapid removal was well know and accounted for his popularity in Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi. The issue involved Indian tribes all over the country, but the ones with the most to lose were the civilized tribes which included the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and the Seminoles. These people practiced agriculture and animal husbandry and still processed substantial domains in the Deep South states plus in Tennessee, North Carolina, and the Florida Territory (342). The Indian removal bill took high priority in the Jackson’s legislative agenda. Both getting the bill to pass and the latter enforcement of it took Jackson’s full attention. However the Indian removal bill called for another round of treaty-making, intended to secure the complete removal of the Indians to west of the Mississippi (347). The president signed Indian removal into law on May 28, 1830. Jackson wasted no time implementing his favorite measure. While the nations focus was on Georgia and the Cherokees, he sent John Coffee and Secretary of War Eaton to Mississippi to obtain the removal of the Choctaws (352). The efforts the commenced secured the treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek on September 27, 1830. Some Choctaws in the forests of eastern Mississippi contrived to avoid the government’s attention until 1918,…
- 2200 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
"In examining the question how the disturbances on the frontiers are to be quieted, two modes present themselves, by which the object might perhaps be effected; the first of which is by raising an army, and (destroying the resisting] tribes entirely, or 2ndly by forming treaties of peace with them, in which their rights and limits should be explicitly defined, and the treaties observed on the part of the United States with the most rigid justice, by punishing the whites, who should violate the same. In considering the first mode, an inquiry would arise, whether, under the existing circumstances of affairs, the United States have a clear right, consistently with the principles of justice and the laws of nature, to proceed to the destruction or expulsion of the savages.... The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a. just war. To dispossess them on any other principle, would be a gross violation of the fundamental laws of nature, and of that distributive justice which is the glory of a nation. But if it should be decided, on an abstract view of the situation, to remove by force the ... Indians from the territory they occupy, the finances of the United States would not at present…
- 3003 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
On May 28, 1830 the Indian tribes had another setback by the Untied States government, where there rights were stripped away even further. President Andrew Jackson signed into law “The Removal Act.” This new law gave the President of the United States the authority “to cause so much of any territory belonging to the United States, west of the Mississippi River, not including in…
- 1405 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
I am a bit angered by the driving statement in this chapter, which is that the atrocities of the past are quietly accepted for the sake of progress. Howard Zinn uses the instances of Columbus’ first arrival to the West Indies and the eventual mass genocide that took place as an example of this very statement. Another example of such an injustice is the invasion of the British into North America and the Spaniards into South America. Other information released in this chapter is the fact that the Indians tried to appeal to their invaders more humane side so that both opposing powers could live in harmony. Why is it that the hunger for space and land was so strong that the British could not find it within themselves to merely be happy in sharing? The Indians provided them with food in the harsh winter months as well as a means of protecting the British from exposure in the cold. It was pretty heartless to decimate an entire peoples after they were so hospitable. Howard Zinn also goes on to speak of the Indians’ customs and culture which also gives further insight as to why the Indians gave without expecting in return.…
- 1329 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The United States took possession of numerous Indians lands after the discovery of America by Christopher Columbus. They claimed those lands of America using the Christendom’s theory stating that Christian’s nations have an absolute domination over non-Christians territories. Plenty of Acts and Treaties were also used to whitewash this doctrine of domination; the Indian Removal Act in 1835well illustrates this “whitewash” practice. Originally intended to create pace and to ensure the integrity of Indians territories, the Removal Act created multiple conflicts in between Indians and Christian’s communities and resulted in the removal of the Indians people from their own homeland, as a result of the Americans ‘desire to conquer the Indians territories. Furthermore, the United States categorized the Indian people as “domestic dependent nations” and also as “migratory hunters” with no attachment to their homelands, therefore the lands of America were supposedly uninhabited and available for Christians ‘nations to govern.…
- 412 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the late 1800s, Americans were continuing to expand Westward as they “worried that the Northeast was overpopulated and that, as a result, the country would face the same problems as Europe—class conflict, poverty, and urban ills” (Document I). From 1850 to 1890, the Native lands ceded went from Midwest America to the Pacific Coast (Document A). This presented a similar problem that they had faced in the past with Native American land. In an attempt to overcome conflicts with the possession of Native American land, the United States set in place policies that were often inconsiderate to the Natives, but that they believed to be better economically, politically, and morally. These policies varied from government provided food for the Natives, to the distribution of the new land, and the treatment of Native for their various practices. All of these things greatly affected the course of Native American people and their cultures to this day.…
- 998 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1814 he commanded the U.S. military forces that defeated a faction of the Creek nation. In their defeat, the Creeks lost 22 million acres of land in southern Georgia and central Alabama. As president, he continued to try and acquire more Indian land for white settlers who wanted to grow cotton, much like him. In 1830 Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act which allowed the government to move the Indians out of cotton rich land, and into Indian reservations out west. This travel took a toll on many of the tribes, and the journey the Indians took came to be known as the “Trail of Tears”. In addition, there was the Supreme Court case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, where the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cherokee Nation. This ruling of the Supreme Court did not stop Jackson and his followers from driving the Cherokees off of their land, which people viewed unconstitional from Jackson’s part.…
- 783 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
He claimed that the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was beneficial to both Americans and Indians. Americans, he said, could relieve themselves of these “savage hunters” and burgeon in “population, wealth, and power” if they agreed to his forcible removal of Indians. (On Indian Removal) However, to buttress his argument, he skillfully persuades Congress that Indian removal is also amazingly to their self-benefit as well. Resettlement would allows Indians to “pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions” (On Indian Removal). Jackson believed that Indians were unwilling to acclimatize to American culture and gives them a ghastly ultimatum: “utter annihilation” or kind “removal and settlement” (On Indian Removal). Unfortunately, the former was the de facto policy, and millions of Indians died as a result of this heinous law. Andrew Jackson openly and mercilessly oppressed and exterminated the native populations in the eastern U.S. and received the support of the whites…
- 951 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“An Indian’s View of Indian Affairs” where Chief Young Joseph illustrates the deception of the U.S. government in taking the lands of the Native American people. He talks about the friendships established in trust and the spoken treaties made between the Natives and the Government. These spoken treaties however were grossly broken leaving the Native Americans without substantial land and forced to live in camps and on lands that are not suited to provide for the vast number of people. (Joseph 330-332) I am not saying Zinn is a champion for indigenous rights by any means, actually he is quite the opposite, but I am saying that Zinn and this article do agree on a larger overarching idea. The idea that the U.S government took something that did not belong to them, they took land away from the people and gave it to railroads and banks, developing a system of intolerable monopolies.…
- 472 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Fishel’s statement illustrates the ongoing attempt of the United States to encroach on Indian lands, especially the Shoshones in order to take advantage of the bountiful land that these Natives own. This proves as an example of the ongoing settler colonialism of the United States despite of its stated adherence to human rights and equality among its citizens. Its actions toward the Shoshone demonstrates…
- 618 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Andrew Jackson was the president who signed the Indian Removal Act. This act is more commonly know as the Trail of Tears, which was ruled unconstitutional by the supreme court at the time. However, he ignored the order and sent his army to forcefully remove…
- 359 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Although the United States had good reasons for kicking the Indians off their land like mining and housing for the extreme population growth, the United States wasn't justified in its treatment of the Native Americans during the period of Western Expansion.…
- 434 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1830, Jackson signed into law Congress’s Indian Removal Act. According to this law, the president…
- 706 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The conflict between American power and American democratic ideals was a recurring problem that took on a new form. There was a change in America’s foreign policy and their willingness to establish dominance in the world, in the turn of the twentieth century, but there had always been a struggle of democratic ideals. This was the United States’ first attempt to claim territories across the world, but they had been constantly claiming territories on their own continent. For example, there was a period of westward expansion throughout the nineteenth century. In this period Americans were stealing, and later fighting for, lands from the Native Americans, with the excuse of Manifest Destiny. This fight for lands occupied by Native Americans can be seen in the Indian Wars. This war was in conflict with their democratic ideals because they were…
- 599 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The “Americans” were willing to conquer all the American land, but first they had to destroy Indian culture even by killing thousands of natives. First the Indians were confined into reservations that didn't allow them to free-roam as they had always been used to. They had to stay into defined borders, they couldn't travel around anymore, they couldn't hunt their food anymore, they could just hand down their traditions to they youngsters and hope for a brighter future.…
- 2276 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays