Preview

A National Security Strategy for the Philippines

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7627 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A National Security Strategy for the Philippines
RP-NSS FOR 2010-2016

A NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY FOR THE PHILIPPINES
2010-2016

17 September 2010

NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY (2010-2016)
Republic of the Philippines

INTRODUCTION

The common experience among nations upon becoming sovereign states is the immediate launching of a collective effort to craft a comprehensive national security plan. The experience of the Philippines upon becoming a sovereign nation on 04 July 1946 did not fit this model. Instead, we chose to continue adopting for 75 years Commonwealth Act Number 1 or National Defense Act that was enacted in 1935.

The American-sponsored Bill No. 102 providing for the defense of the Philippines was drafted and subsequently passed by the Philippine Assembly on December 20, 1935, and signed into law by President of the Commonwealth Government of the Philippines, Manuel Quezon, on December 21, 1935. This became Commonwealth Act Number 1 otherwise known as the National Defense Act of 1935. This Act provided the legal basis for contingency planning for the defense of the Philippines. Growing out of World War II and the Commonwealth era the Filipino nation became an independent Republic. The scope of the National Defense Act of 1935, therefore, became inadequate the moment we became a sovereign nation and became increasingly so as we continued to mature.

The body of literature on national security points to the fact that it is a complex and multidimensional entity. It must be based on the national principles embodied in the Constitution. In the same manner, it must also adapt to a fast-changing security environment. National security and defense planning that was first triggered by the National Defense Act of 1935, was based on the 1935 Constitution, and all succeeding security and defense planning and implementation activities thereafter have grown from it -- to the 1973 Constitution, and on to the 1987 Constitution – and all Presidential decrees and executive orders between them

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the end, the annexation of the Philipines caused unhappiness in the both the Philipines and in the United States. Filipinos wanted idependence and Anti-Imperialist didn't want to take this from them. The United States should not have annexed…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    JLYGGUKTFYUJYT

    • 655 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first reason why the United States was right to annex the Philippines is because the Filipinos are not capable of governing themselves. William McKinley makes an excellent point, “That we could not leave them [Philippines] to themselves- they were unfit for self-governing- and they would soon have anarchy and misrule…” (Document C). The Philippines would have messed up if they would govern themselves. Albert J. Beveridge says, “The rule that all just government applies only to those who are capable of self-government,” (Document B). The Filipinos need the United States to help govern them. Both those men were right, the Filipinos were not ready.…

    • 655 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the 1800s, industries were growing rapidly, and there wasn’t much land left in the United States to conquer, so the United States began looking beyond its borders for new places to control. As a result, on February 6th, 1899, after learning that the Treaty of Paris was ratified, the United States annexed the Philippines. At this moment, the arguments for annexing the Philippines were that they were unfit for self-government and that if the United States hadn’t annexed, somebody else would have, while the arguments against were that it was a massive betrayal to the Filipinos, as well as the United States’s own values and the massive bloodshed that would result. A reason for annexing the Philippines was that they were simply unfit for self-government. In an…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author also explains that involving the people would be critical since presuming their submissiveness risks creating resentment and lack of cooperation over time. It is important to make the people to understand the appropriateness of security measures to increase their willingness to collaborate to achieve security goals. Further, the author advocates for opening up of homeland security work to avoid working in secrecy and involve the private sector and the general public. The author sees the move to insulate information from the public as undermining the defense of critical…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There have been many changes to the National Security Council (NSC) since 1949, but the creation of the Deputies Committee (DC) with the National Security Directive (NSD) 1 reorganization in 1989 resulted in a national security system commonly recognized as the “Gold Standard.” The driving force behind this reorganization stems from lessons learned during the Iran-Contra affair and from recognition of a poorly functioning crisis management system. This change incorporated new mechanisms to handle crises and inspired trust among members of the system. The DC has become a vital addition of the national security system and plays a key role in the formation of national security policy today.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phase 2: Seeking a National Strategy: A Concert for Preserving Security and Promoting Freedom (August 1999 - April 2000). This Report devised a U.S. national security strategy to deal with the world in 2025. The purpose of the Phase II Report is to define an American strategy based on U.S. interests and key objectives. It develops a strategy for America to secure the benefits of…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Filipinos- During World War II, Philippines was taken by Japanese Army. Filipinos in America worried about their home land, Philippines. They wanted to join U.S, Armed Force to get back Philippines to fight for the liberation of their home land. According to page 359, chapter 10, "On February 19, 1942, Secretary of War Henry Stimson announced the organization of the First Filipino Infantry Regiment: this new unit is formed in recognition of the intense loyalty and patriotism of those Filipinos who are now residing in the United State." Filipinos were allowed to join U.S Armed Force by U.S Government. Because of this new policy, Filipinos who were members of…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    "The united States possesses unprecedented and unequaled-strength and influence in the world. Sustained by faith in the principals of liberty, and the value of a free society, this position comes with unparalleled responsibilities, obligations, and opportunity."…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obama, Barack H. The National Security Strategy (NSS) of the United States of America, 2010. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2010.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States’ policy was to govern the Philippine Archipelago for the common welfare of the Filipino people and to train the Filipinos for self-governance. The United States was hoping that the Filipino people would be capable of independence someday.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Arguments from the Anti-Imperialist League were very strong and influential against the takeover of the Philippines by the United States. Anti-Imperialists denounced subjugation and suppression of what should be free people as a debauchery of American principles. The takeover of the Philippines went against the American belief system that it is derived from the Declaration of Independence (WW Norton Publishing, 2007). This action created a grievous heresy of the United States. The choices and actions the United States were enforcing were negatively representing the country, and in conflict with the “self-governing” principle of the United States, because a country supporting self-directed government should not be taking over a country against its will. Stated by Abraham Lincoln, “No man is good enough to govern another man without that man’s consent.” (WW Norton publishing, 2007). The Anti-Imperialistic League deplored these despotic and abhorrent actions in the Philippines. By taking over the Filipinos and forcing their way…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

     1942: Occupied by the Japanese  1945: Liberated by American and Filipino forces  1946: Attained independency and founded a democracy…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    National Security Strategy

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The date September 11, 2001 has changed the way in which the entire world started to perceive threats and their own security related to these threats. Concerning the security and approach of the U.S., the White House has published its new ‘National Security Strategy’ in 2002 setting a guideline for its eventual war on terrorism. This is the primary text that will be mainly dealt with in this writing because it is the official source showing U.S. plans of action. The 35 page long document alongside other issues mainly refers to the supremacy of the U.S. concerning its military power in which Bush’s policy of preemptive wars is justified as a necessity to fight terrorism. My argument in this paper is that when one analysis the U.S. national security plan after the attacks of September 11, the National Security Strategy is flawed, especially regarding certain points, first of all the threats are set too broadly in which it gives the U.S. the right to attack any state which is seen as a possible threat rather then mainly focusing on the most crucial terrorist groups alarming the USA such as al-Qai‘da. In addition to this the U.S. foreign policy in my opinion is one, which rather than solving the problem of terrorism will create more enemies and in addition increase the vulnerability of America itself because of the wrong type of actions taken in the military sense and the high level of involvement in regions with Islamic character.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The concept of homeland security is not new; since the bloody birth of the United States in 1776, Americans have been engaged in securing and defending the homeland. However, the current manifestation of the expression Homeland Security was created in the crucible of modern terrorist attacks, most notably that of September 11, 2001. As Noftsinger, Newbold, and Wheeler (2007) note, today’s idea of homeland security was created in response to the increasing terrorist threat, when it was recognized that the increased terrorist threat could not be combatted through conventional means.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Global Strategic Assessment 2009: America’s Security Role in a Changing Security World. Washington DC: National Defense University Press, 2009: 162-185.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays