Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

A Form of Government for Xlandia

Good Essays
1637 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Form of Government for Xlandia
White Paper: A Recommendation for Xlandia

Every Government needs a framework in order for them to efficiently work, regulate, and rule the masses. This framework is known as a Constitution, and it is a set of fundamental principles created according to the desires and needs of those involved in its forging. Now Government power is limited when there is a mutual respect on the restraints on power, a constitution with legal limits on power, individual rights are protected in the constitution, and in all there is a status quo for promoting what is best for everyone. To add to this there is a separation of powers and the power must be shared. However, the polar opposite of a limited government is an unlimited government which includes two types, an Authoritarian and Totalitarian. Within a Totalitarian government, there is one dominant leader supported by a mass party, the media is controlled, there is no opposition allowed, terror is used to maintain power, and individual behavior is controlled. In an Authoritarian government, it is controlled by a single person or a dominant elite, the military shows full support, the government itself is not accountable for its actions, the media can be censored, and the public is not allowed to criticize the government.

Now if you are looking for structure, something with a final say, a written constitution is the way to go because it grants a written assurance of all the principles set forth within the document. With an unwritten, you would have to depend on the tradition of the people, and traditions can either evolve or change in varying amounts of time, the only assurance and final say you can get is by those who are around you. A written constitution is needed for Xlandia because they just came out of a dictatorship, they aren’t familiar with democracy, and they need a structured final say in a written constitution. A federalist system is one where sovereignty is divided between a central governing authority and it’s counterparts (States and or Regions), this gives these regions a good deal of power, which, in Xlandia’s case would not do well because first of all, they need to all be in this rebirth of a new government together, and secondly, some areas might be so full of the lower class that the upper elite would surely lose power. A unitary government is one where all power goes to the National government in which it is easy to control, it is consistent, and it is really efficient. This unitary system is a good choice because the regions of Xlandia are distinct, however each must be represented in a place where they must work together for the benefit of their whole country rather than the benefit of their individual regions. Within this Unitary system, a parliamentary system would be the weapon of choice because each region is bound to be represented in parliament. There would be minimal conflicts, more diversity, and multiple parties in one concentrated area. Also, the upper elite would have a chance to get power in parliament to represent their region(s), yet the people will also have a say here because they get to vote for them. So if the upper elite’s characteristics are in favor of the people, the elite would be able to maintain his or her power while the people would be able to have a good representative for them. (Both parties win in this scenario) A presidential system is one where a head of government is also head of state and leads an executive branch that is separate from the legislative branch. Now, because the head of state has so much power, this would not work out for the Xlandians who just had a dictator because they are weary of having one person with too much power. The rights of the Xlandians should be protected within the Constitution because we can’t have contradictions in a consistent system of government. (Parliament) This, again refers to the Xlandians needing a final say on things because they need that assurance that they are protected, and this is a fundamental fact that democracies work best when the rights of everyone is protected as it echoes what John Locke said that each person’s life is valuable. The military of Xlandia should be governed by the civilian government because the generals can’t have military superiority because they could easily overthrow the civilian government, and sometimes the military and civilians do not agree on things, plus everyone should be able to contribute on decisions their military should do. (Thus enforcing unity)

As for the executive powers, the chief executive must be elected by representatives, this encourages the people to really choose wisely when they vote for their representative in parliament because whoever they pick will elect their chief executive. The role of the chief is simple, there will only be one, and the chief’s primary task is to enforce and carry out laws rather than make them. (Otherwise this contradicts our need to have no dictator like characteristics within this new government.) Also, in my view, if we leave the vote of the chief to popular vote, the risks of votes themselves being blind is high, and because the Chief would have overwhelming influence, one small slip up could mean another dictatorship. The executive would have a 4 year term so as to shorten his/her’s time to avoid corruption.

The Legislative branch should be unicameral because a unicameral system allows for less gridlock, and it will help ease the Xlandians into Democracy. Unicameral means that there is only one legislative or parliamentary chamber rather than a Bicameral, which means that there are two legislative or parliamentary chambers. Though a Bicameral system has a check and balance characteristic, it only works when the two chambers can work together, and in this case each region is distinct and the risk of them not working together cohesively is high. In order for them to truly understand democracy, things have to be simple, and having things in one place is a lot more simple than having things spread out everywhere. The legislative branch should be selected by popular vote because since they themselves elect the chief and make the laws, they should embody what the Country as a whole desires and needs. I also think that a term of 5-6 years is sufficient to aid the representatives in setting their foundations and in getting tasks done. Also, because the representatives have two more years than the executive, the influence of the many will “rub,” off on the chief.

Judicial Power within Xlandia consists of a Supreme Court as does any judicial branch. The members should be appointed by the executive with legislative approval so that the people’s choice is technically embodied within the selection process. (The people elect their representatives in the legislative branch) Also, since the executive has some say in this, (so as to avoid a dictator characteristic here), the Supreme court should be subject to judicial review and be independent. That way the executive branch doesn’t have too much say in all of these things. The executive stays true to his/her role, which is to enforce and carry out laws.

The Citizens ultimately have the most power, however, in these turbulent times where the Country must ease itself into Democracy, they must have a voluntary vote, and in order to vote, you must be literate and understand how everything will work. Sure there is a difference than book and street smarts, but a balance of both is needed to make an educated vote for the better of the Country. Thus, to vote, you must pass a standard literacy test which tests for basics in reading and writing. To add to this, eventually, because the educated would want the others to become educated, the literacy rate of Xlandia would be able to escalate through Government programs, etc. A Country must invest in its people. Also, in order to help keep each region to their own and to keep them happy, a multiple party system will be placed. This gives more room for more voices to be heard in one concentrated central government.

A strong middle class will be made by the government eventually, hopefully through the use of government programs to help educate the rest of the Country and to help create higher places of learning. Education is key in developing good skills, and because a good portion of the Country would have a head start, they can move onto higher education while the others will eventually catch up. The skills they learned would ultimately translate into the workforce, and will help inspire entrepreneurship because the competition will be stiff, however this spark of skills and newly educated people will make everyone have hope for themselves. Ultimately because the work force is expanding, (as we see in China right now), their economy will get a good boost from all the competition and numbers they will be generating because of the educational system. New technologies would be discovered, and others would be improved upon in these places of learning. People’s minds will be enlightened, and they will finally know, to an extent, who they are and their importance here. The more educated a people, the more complex they become and eventually new laws will be placed so as to help keep up with their progressing lives. Because education is so highlighted, (as it is here in the USA), the military will certainly be upgraded due to the fact that the military comes from its people. Education will give this Country a breath of new life, and will encourage the enforcement of the common good.

***Please note that this is for a government class.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Let's start out with popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty, is that the citizens of the country are in charge of the government and how it performs. Without this today, the government would do whatever he wanted to do. Next, is limited government. Limited government is basically on how much power the government can have. We decide how much money the government can take from us through taxes. Without this, the government…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is the type of government where there is segment of different powers between a state government and the central government. The United States is a federalist government where the states have their own individual powers and authority that they are able to exercise and the federal government has its own circle of authority that it tends to exercise.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the past, people have experienced a type of government that centered all its power, authority, policies, rules, and regulations on the mighty and vigor of a dictator. A dictator is a person who solely runs the nation with a single government that rules every land and every freedom of the people as human beings and citizens of the country. During the World Wars, dictators such as Adolf Hitler of Germany, Benito Mussolini of Italy, and Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union were the center for abolishment and annihilate their totalitarian regimes that have destroyed millions of lives and homes from different parts of the world (“Totalitarian Regimes”). However, despite the destruction of totalitarianism government, there are still totalitarian practices that are evident within the modern government of democracy and independence. Accordingly, this paper will recognize and discuss the origins of totalitarianism in order to compare and contrast some apparent manifestations of modern totalitarianism. Moreover, this paper will also identify some key points of evidences that modern totalitarianism is present in the current structure of democracy especially in the United States.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Gregory S. Kavka, “government is necessary to constrain people’s conduct toward one another, because people are not sufficiently virtuous to exercise the requisite degree of control on their own” (G. Kavka). In other words, government is created to control the faults of human nature for example, greediness and unfairness. “Framing a government which is to be administered by men over men” (R. Higgs). However, government is made of men with human faults and will act selfishly for their own gain if necessary. This is why constraints are put on government systems preventing absolute power to reign over citizens. If men were born without faults, if men were born perfect,…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is the theory or advocacy of federal principles for dividing powers between member units and common institutions. Unlike in a unitary state, sovereignty in federal political orders is non-centralized, often constitutionally, between at least two levels so that units at each level have final authority and can be self governing in some issue area. Citizens thus have political obligations to, or have their rights secured by, two authorities. The division of power between the member unit and center may vary, typically the center has powers regarding defense and foreign policy, but member units may also have international roles. The decision-making bodies of member units may also participate in central decision-making bodies. Much recent philosophical attention is spurred by renewed political interest in federalism, coupled with empirical findings concerning the requisite and legitimate basis for stability and trust among citizens in federal political orders. Philosophical contributions have addressed the dilemmas and opportunities facing Canada, Australia, Europe, Russia, Iraq, Nepal and Nigeria, to mention just a few areas where federal arrangements are seen as interesting solutions to accommodate differences among populations divided by ethnic or cultural cleavages yet seeking a common, often democratic, political order.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is a system of government that divides governing power and authority between the national governments and the state governments (Bowman). In 1787, the framers of the constitution chose this specific type of government to rule over the United States. I will show you that the framers chose this system of government for several different types of reasons. Reasons are because the national government was not strong enough, to maintain the states sovereignty, and it will protect individual liberty. I will also show you how the 10th Amendment, Concurrent Powers, and Block Grants each apply to the federalist system of government. You will see why the framers chose Federalism and understand how Block Grants, Concurrent Powers, and the 10th amendment is important and ties into federalism.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ▪ Need for government to protect the freedom of citizens with interference of the government that has exceeded its necessary size or scope.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Federalism: Simultaneous federal/national and state/local governments; 2 levels of sovereignty operating at the same time over the people (viable national government that can behave effectively for all of the people, yet the benefits of diversity and decentralization).…

    • 4617 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Limited government is the principle that government may only do those things the people have given it the power to do. Much of the constitution spells out limits on the power of government. Limited government expresses that no one including the government is above the law. This is called the rule of law.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We the People

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A constitutional government is a limited government through separation of powers and checks and balances. Separating powers is a primary strategy of promoting constitutional or limited government by ensuring that no one individual branch has excessive power that can be abused, it consists of three branches, legislative, judicial, and executive branch. These branches were put forth so that no one branch has more power than the other, thus, checks and balances. Federalism is the power shared between the states and the national government. This limits the government by sharing its powers amongst the states so it would not be a tyrannical government.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6 Basic Principles

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Popular sovereignty means the government can govern only with the consent of the governed. In essence, this means that all political power resides with the people, so we are the source for all governmental power. An example of this is the United States government itself. We as citizens of our country allow ourselves to be governed by our government because of our similar beliefs culture. Limited government means that no government is all-powerful, and that a government may do only those things that the people have given it the power to do. This ties in to popular sovereignty because they are both kept under control by the people. An example of this is that members of government are not above law and must obey it themselves.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whilst reading the material for this semester, I came across the controversial topic of the limit of power to govern the people multiple times. America couldn’t seem to agree on where the line was drawn between the people’s power versus the federal governments. We had great difficulty with it in the 18th century and we still do today. This matter in the present day can be simply put as the political issues between democrats and republicans. Though they are two separate parties one will find that their wants don’t differ as much as one would expect. They want what is best for the country in order to become an even greater, efficient nation. But it’s the size of the government that divides the two. One prefers a government that is not quite significant…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government and Thoreau

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    at all or a tyranny but a limited government, where the people have more say.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Anarchy vs. Autocracy

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Liberty vs. Security; both are seemingly broad terms, but due to current events, circumstances have occured resulting in an infringement on liberty because of issues regarding national security thus, creating problems for citizens and politicians alike. Liberty is best defined as a concept that identifies the condition in which an individual has the right to act according to his/her free will[1]. Security is the degree of protection from danger, loss, or criminals[2]. The problem lies in that there are many different views on what the government’s role on the proper balance between the two should be. The proper balance between liberty and security is an equilibrium unless in specific events or time periods where the rules are determined by all registered voters.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an authoritative regime individuals exercise power over the state and able to so without being held constitutionally liable to the public (Gandhi & Przeworski, 2007: 1279). Thus, the leaders in an authoritarian regime have limitless authority to change policies in order to maintain power; however, non-acceptance by the governed could consequently result in a political regime losing its legitimacy, which could ultimately pave way for a revolution via domestic uprising. Foreign pressure and intervention could also play a role in the demise of an authoritative regime via costly sanctions and direct military intervention (Geddes, 2002: 1).…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics