Preview

A Critique of John T. Noonan's an Almost Absolute Value in History

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1248 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Critique of John T. Noonan's an Almost Absolute Value in History
A Critique of An Almost Absolute Value in History “An Almost Absolute Value in History,” by John Noonan, argues against the morality of abortion at any time during a pregnancy. According to Noonan (2012) humanity begins at the moment of conception. Therefore, the unborn child has the inherent right to live, and abortion at any stage of gestation would be the equivalent of murder (p. 472). He makes no exceptions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. The only exception he makes is when continuing a pregnancy puts the mother’s life at risk. His arguments are strong against abortion at a later stage of pregnancy, but they are not as strong in arguing that abortion is immoral as soon as fertilization of an ovum occurs. In order to convince us of the immorality of abortion, John Noonan (2012) addresses the question of when a fetus becomes “human” (p. 469). He argues against several popular ideas. One popular position is that a fetus becomes human when it becomes viable (could survive outside of the mother’s womb). Noonan (2012) argues that this position makes the distinction that until viability, the fetus is completely dependent upon its mother. He argues that even when a child is born, and for several years of its life, it is completely dependent upon another to feed and care for it. In his opinion, if no longer being dependent is the criterion for humanity, then children don’t become “human” until they are able to care for themselves (p. 469-470). The main issue with Noonan’s argument is that he interchanges the terms “viable” and “dependent”. Although an infant is dependent upon another person for survival, it no longer needs to be physically connected to that person. It can be dependent on someone other than its mother. He also argues that the time of viability varies among races, and that length and weight are better indicators of development and a fetus’s ability to survive outside the womb (Noonan, 2012, p. 470). Here again his


References: Borenstein, Seth. (2012, June 24). What was he thinking? Study turns to ape intellect. Phys.org. Retrieved from phys.org/news/2012-06-line-blurs-animal-monkeys-math.html Daily Mail Reporter. (2011, May 12). Mystery of fading childhood memories solved: Why you are unable to recall your earliest childhood experiences. Mail Online. Retrieved from www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1386194/Very-young-children-DO-memories--just-forget-older.html Noonan, J.T. Jr. (2012). An almost absolute value in history. In R. Munson (Ed.), Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in bioethics (9th ed.) (pp. 469-472). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Gengage Learning.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    When a fetus gains moral status, or when the fetus becomes a person, is an unclear point that…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The goal of Judith Jarvis Thomson in her defense of abortion is to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She begins by stating a premise. “For the sake of the argument” a human embryo is a person. This premise is one of the arguments most opponents of abortion use, but as she points out, isn’t much of an argument at all. These people spend a lot of their time dwelling on the fact that the fetus is a person and hardly any time explaining how the fetus being a person has anything to with abortion being impermissible. In the same breath, she states that those who agree with abortion spend a lot of their time saying the fetus is in fact not a person. Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above. When looking at the analogies separately, they are in no way related to the abortion topic, but the conclusions drawn from each can be applied. Because these examples aren’t directly related to the debate, our emotions won’t necessarily be involved and we can clearly think about what is the “right” thing to do for each specific scenario.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti-abortionists often refer to abortion as, ' the intentional killing of unborn babies', and see it as an evil deed, committed only by those who do not appreciate the value of human life. Although, it seems that, in many cases it is quite the opposite. In cases such as one night stands, rape or underage pregnancies, mothers often tend to choose abortion with the fear that they cannot give their child the life they deserve. These pregnancies are unwanted, accidental even. The mother does not plainly wish to kill her child for selfish reasons, but…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Kulik and Brown have described a special type of remembering called ‘flashbulb memory’, which is where the insignificant details surrounding highly emotional and shocking events (e.g. the destruction of…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mary Anne Warren argues the position that abortion is morally permissible because the fetus is not a person therefore has no rights therefore not immoral to be killed. I shall argue that Warren’s position is invalid since her argument “appears to justify not only abortion, but infanticide as well.”…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that abortions should be legal because women should have the right to choose whether or not they want to bring a baby into the world. They believe a woman should have property rights which include the body and the fetus. They also believe a woman should have privacy rights which means the state should not interfere with private matters. These people are called pro choice. At the same time many people are anti-abortion because they believe “Life is present from the moment of conception” (526). In Don Marquis’s essay, “Why Abortion is Immoral” he takes the position that abortion is “morally unjustified” (525). The purpose of the essay is to go against the belief that “The anti-abortion position is either a symptom of irrational religious dogma or a conclusion generated by seriously confused philosophical argument” (525). Abortions should be illegal because they are morally wrong except, in cases beyond our control.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychology Study Guide

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Due Date Rd. Pg.423-Pg.428 1. How does the great ape display capacities for thinking? 2. How did Wolfgang Kohler observe apparent insight while observing chimpanzees?…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jonathan Glover, in his article Matters of Life and Death casts dispersions on both pro-abortion and anti-abortion debates citing them as too knee-jerk emotional reactions diminishing the inherent complexity of the other side (1. Glover, CC2006, p. 0110). Glover comprehensively addresses the key points of both sides of the abortion debate and evaluates their inherent virtues, especially for those who hold these opinions, then methodically points out its flaws. Ultimately, Glover comes to the conclusion that though a fetus is a human at the moment of conception, the right to abort lies with the mother and her own self-determination.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. The ‘Conservative Argument’ is based on two premises: it is wrong to kill an innocent human, and fetuses are innocent humans; therefore abortion is wrong (Singer, 1979, p.107). Whilst this argument is valid, there have been many attempts to show that the second premise is wrong. The primary method to show this has been to find the “moral dividing line” between fetus and human, most notably viability, when the fetus can exist independently (Singer, 1979, p.107-108). This main objection is flawed as countries have different levels of technology, which influences the age a fetus can be independent, meaning for developing countries the line drawn would be far later than developed countries (Singer, 1979, p.109). This is substantial as location…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    about their first school day and a false narrative about either an implausible event (abducted by a…

    • 4907 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over whether abortion should be legal and to what point in the pregnancy it should be allowed has polarized many societies. Many religious preach that at the moment of conception, the new life is human and possesses a soul. Therefore, abortion is murder. Other, less extreme views, suggest the life is not human until there is a recognizable "completion of form." A third view proposes we have an obligation to create a good life for all children already born before we bring more unwanted children into the world.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Infantile amnesia is the inability to remember events that happened in early childhood before age 3. This is not caused by the time gap, because a person has an autobiographical memory that recalls many personally meaningful one-time events from the past.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro Choice or Pro Life?

    • 1905 Words
    • 8 Pages

     Human life begins at conception. Therefore, abortion is murder, which is universally condemned and prohibited. It is not considered a matter of individual moral judgment.…

    • 1905 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issue Proposal on Abortion

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As a catholic-born child, I was brought up with very strict rules laid out before me that would help me with choices such as the holy sacrament of confirmation and marriage to the very controversial choice of abortion. Since I’ve been Catholic all of my life, I am a firm believer in the pro-life choice, which is advocating full legal protection of embryos and fetuses along with high opposition to the legalization of induced abortions. A baby is a baby is a baby. Whether it is an embryo, fetus, or almost a full term baby, it is still considered life. That is how I like to view this topic. This semester I plan to research why abortion is morally wrong and should be illegal. Although I feel this way, I also want to establish that there are a few exceptions in my book that would be considered lawful if a woman was considering aborting a life. Exceptions such as saving a woman when she is in danger or when she is a victim of rape or incest should be considered and ultimately allowed because in order to keep evolution going, a woman must be alive. In some cases, doctors believe that removing the fallopian tubes or performing a hysterectomy, knowing the embryo or fetus will die, is justifiable because otherwise, she would be certain to die. Since there are laws that separate church and state, I cannot and will not base my reasons solely on my religion. Moreover, I will dig deep and find facts on more reasons and examples as to why abortions are morally wrong and should be illegal.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question between whether abortion is morally right or wrong has been talked about for years and no common ground has been made. Judith Thomson, a believer in Pro-choice, argues that abortion is not wrong because the mother should have a choice of what happens to her body. In response to this, Donald Marquis who is against abortion believes every fetus is a human with a right to have a future like ours. Each Ethicist gives examples and theories as to why abortion is wrong or right. In this essay, I will attempt to show that abortion is okay in some cases, and Donald Marquis’s views and arguments are broad and incorrect.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics