Preview

A critical thinking application (12-A) Employment-At-Will

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1944 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A critical thinking application (12-A) Employment-At-Will
In the United States of America, all relationships that deal with employment are overseen and directed by external forces, such as the employment laws. These employment laws were created and adjusted over time to legally protect employees from unfair treatment and improve the relationships between employers and employees. There is a large variety of different “labor and equal employment laws,” however the predominantly most significant ones concerning the relationships of employment can be expressed in “four types of legal doctrine and legislation” (Bernardin & Russell, 2013, p. 439). These four legal issues are: Employment-at-Will, Whistle-blowing, Privacy, and Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN). One very large legal issue today is the employment-at-will doctrine. It is commonly misinterpreted by many employees and “89 percent of workers surveyed believed that an employee cannot be lawfully terminated for simple reasons of personal dislike” (Bernardin & Russell, 2013, p. 583). The termination for such reasons is “in fact lawful as long as EEO laws are not violated” (Bernardin & Russell, 2013, p. 583).
The employment-at-will doctrine is a very controversial law that brings up strong debates between its defenders and critics. Bernardin & Russell (2013) define the employment-at-will doctrine as “a common-law standard that states that a private institution has the right to terminate its employees, with or without just cause, in the absence of a written contract” (p. 439). This basically means that an employment relationship can be terminated at the will of either the employer or the employee. Neither the employer that lets go of an employee, not the employee that quits is liable to the other party in any way, “even if this termination causes damage to the other party” (“Employment at Will”, n.d.). However, it is of great importance “to note that employment-at-will does not exist when there is either a contract (implied or explicit) or a



References: Bernardin, H. J., & Russell, J. E. (2013). Human resource management: An experiential approach (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Employment at will. (n.d.). Employment at Will Comments. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://employment.uslegal.com/employment-at-will/ Exceptions. (n.d.). Employment Exceptions Comments. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://employment.uslegal.com/employment-at-will/exceptions/ Lister, J. (2011, May 19). What can i do if my employer accused me of stealing & fired me?. eHow. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.ehow.com/info_8449818_can-employer-accused-stealing-fired.html Public policy exception law & legal definition. (n.d.). Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://definitions.uslegal.com/p/public-policy-exception/ Siegel, M. (1998, October 26). Yes, they can fire you laws these days might shield you from discrimination--but not from a cruel or irrational boss, if you, like most, lack some kind of contract. CNNMoney. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1998/10/26/249993/ Your rights and responsibilities as an employee in washington state. (2014, January). A Guide to Free and Low-Cost Legal Aid, Assistance and Services in Washington. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.washingtonlawhelp.org/resource/your-rights-and-responsibilities-as-an-employ

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the event that the case is filed, the defense may argue that the courts in Texas have always held that employment for an unspecified period may be ended at will. This argument is backed in the dissenting opinion in Aiello vs United Air Lines, Inc., 818 F.2d 1196 (1987) In this case, the judge quotes East line & RRR Co. Vs Scott and 72 Tex. 70,75 10, S.W. 99, 102 (1888). Yet another case cited in the Aiello vs United Air Lines, Inc., 818 F.2d 1196 (1987) case, is the Joachim v. A& T Information Sys., where the court ruled against the plaintiff following claims of discriminatory dismissal. The court in this case held that despite the provision that the company shall not terminate employment based on sexual preferences, the implied contract was not binding according to Texas law. However, Texas law provides that a disclaimer must be included in the handbook to ensure clarity regarding the nature of employment. This position, therefore, may be…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are some exceptions where employees cannot be fired even if they are at-will employees. One exception is a statutory exception. A statutory exception says an employer can't fire an employee that is a member of a labor union if their firing is in violation of labor laws or collective bargaining agreements. Another exception is an implied-in-fact contract. An implied-in-fact says that if the company states in a handbook, on a bulletin board or other means that an employee cannot be fired if they perform their job properly. A public policy exception states that an employee cannot be fired if it violates public policy. An employee cannot be fired for serving in jury duty, or refusing to break a law. Another exception is a tort exception. A tort exception says an employee can sue an employer…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Laws Enforced by EEOC. (2014). Retrieved June 25, 2014, from U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the Employment-at-will doctrine an employers can terminate their employees for any reason, however there are three exception to the rules. They are public-policy exception, implied-contract exception, and covenant-of-good-faith exception.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is the employment at-will doctrine in the United States, and what are some of the major exceptions to the doctrine? How might the employment at-will doctrine engender a legal but immoral discharge? (based on Legal Challenges text Chapter 21 and Business Ethics text Chapter 16, Parts I and II; tied to course competencies 1, 2, 3, and 4)…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Big Lots: Case Study

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The commencement of the class’s courses examines the concept of employment-at-will within firms. The paper analyzes the following questions: how does the employment-at-will concept employs to Big Lots? What exceptions refine its application to Big Lots? And how is it used by the managers for the protection of the organization?…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Muhl, J. (2001) The employment-at-will doctrine: three major exceptions Retrieved April 13, 2012 from findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1153/is_1_124/ai_71704724…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The at-will agreements allow employers ease of hiring as well as firing. For any employee who is underperforming, they are bound to face the sack, which may qualify them for unemployment insurance if there lacks a paper trail of disciplinary action. Conversely, employees can be terminated for no good reason or any virtually any reason. The longevity of one’s contract may depend on the mood of the supervisor. As such, employees can never be 100 percent of their job security. In most cases, workers may devise a plan for side incomes, which robs the organization of productivity. The ruling in Montgomery County Hospital Dist. v. Brown (1998) provided that an employer's general oral assurances that an worker would not be terminated without good cause does not modify the employee's at-will status, absent a definite stated intent to be bound not to terminate the employee except under…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Everyday managers are faced with that dreadful task of firing an employee and that question on their mind prior to doing it is probably, "Am I doing this the legal way and will anything come back to haunt me at a later date?" Managers must understand all state and federal laws that pertain to lawful termination and employee rights, the way they do this is by reading company policies and researching all the laws that cover these areas and there are many out there. Therefore, how does employment-at-will work for the employer? The employee?…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Employment Law governs the rights and responsibilities of employers and employees in the workplace. Also referred to as labor law, these rules are designed to keep workers safe and make sure they are treated fairly, as well as to protect employers’ interests. The common law rules of employment created by courts and practiced in the seventeen and eighteen hundreds were that of at will employees, who could be fired for no reason at all. Employment laws in present day society have evolved to represent both employer and employee and are now based on federal and state statutes and legislation as well as court decisions. The evolution of these laws can be traced back to the United States Constitution, which provides protection against discrimination by federal and state governments. The Fifth Amendment prohibits the federal government from depriving individuals of "life, liberty, or property," without due process of the law and guarantees that each person receive equal protection of the laws. The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits states from violating an individual 's rights of due process and equal protection.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    child care

    • 1702 Words
    • 9 Pages

    We have the right not to discriminate against on the grounds of age, gender, race, disability, religion or belief and sexual orientation due in recruitment and from first day of employment for as long as we are employed, this right is legally protected.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    | Employment law exists so that there is no exploitation, bullying/discrimination of employees, and to protect the employer.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are valid reasons to be against the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA). A boss has the right to hire and fire those he deems fit. He can do so under at-will employment. At-will employment means that an employee can be fired by their employer at any time for any reason, except if the reason is an illegal one, or for no reason without…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three exceptions to the employment-at-will application within any organization; public policy, implied-contract, and covenant-of-good faith. These limits protect the employee from being fired for getting hurt on the job, or if there is a sign contract between the employee and employer that employer has to adhere to that contract. Companies have to abide by these guidelines by law to provide fair treatment to employees. Once these limits are not applied it leaves the company open for possible law suits and loss of trust from employees. One example we’ve heard in the news for years is the treatment of employees of Wal-Mart. It was a huge case which cost the company a lot of money.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At-will means that an employer can terminate an employee at any time for any reason (except an illegal one), or for no reason without incurring legal liability. Likewise, an employee is free to leave a job at any time for any or no reason with no adverse legal consequences.…

    • 2523 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics