Youth and Consumerism
The politics of land reform and land settlement in Sri Lanka
By Sunil Bastian Introduction It is possible to analyse land reforms using a variety of frameworks. The most common one found in literature, especially among those concerned about the economy, is to link the land reform debate with the objective of achieving agricultural growth. For others who are concerned with rights, the purpose is to ensure land rights and poverty alleviation. In recent times the notion of rights based development has helped to propagate this approach. This essay on the politics of land reforms in Sri Lanka takes a different path. Its main thrust is to link the politics of land reform in Sri Lanka with the project of state building during the post-colonial period. States are not only a collection of institutions and functions. They are based on ideas. The ruling classes that dominate these states expect these ideas to ensure the coherence of the state. Ideas to ensure coherence of states can originate from different sources. In recent times, because of the prominence given to political Islam, there is a discussion about religious identities and state formation. Building states based on a religious identity is the objective of Islamic movements. The paper begins with the assumption that it is possible to analyse different doctrines of development from a similar angle. Doctrines of development have served the purpose of state building. For the ruling classes they have been a key instrument is forging relations with critical sections of society, so that the stability and coherence of the state can be maintained. Therefore a significant objective of development policies is not only to achieve the policy goals that it has set itself, but also to forge a relationship between the rulers and the ruled so that the state is secure. The objective of this paper is to analyse the politics of land polices and land reforms as an element in state building in Sri Lanka. It argues that the state
By Sunil Bastian Introduction It is possible to analyse land reforms using a variety of frameworks. The most common one found in literature, especially among those concerned about the economy, is to link the land reform debate with the objective of achieving agricultural growth. For others who are concerned with rights, the purpose is to ensure land rights and poverty alleviation. In recent times the notion of rights based development has helped to propagate this approach. This essay on the politics of land reforms in Sri Lanka takes a different path. Its main thrust is to link the politics of land reform in Sri Lanka with the project of state building during the post-colonial period. States are not only a collection of institutions and functions. They are based on ideas. The ruling classes that dominate these states expect these ideas to ensure the coherence of the state. Ideas to ensure coherence of states can originate from different sources. In recent times, because of the prominence given to political Islam, there is a discussion about religious identities and state formation. Building states based on a religious identity is the objective of Islamic movements. The paper begins with the assumption that it is possible to analyse different doctrines of development from a similar angle. Doctrines of development have served the purpose of state building. For the ruling classes they have been a key instrument is forging relations with critical sections of society, so that the stability and coherence of the state can be maintained. Therefore a significant objective of development policies is not only to achieve the policy goals that it has set itself, but also to forge a relationship between the rulers and the ruled so that the state is secure. The objective of this paper is to analyse the politics of land polices and land reforms as an element in state building in Sri Lanka. It argues that the state