Preview

You Have Reason for Cloning Humans

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1494 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
You Have Reason for Cloning Humans
You Have No Reason for Cloning Humans

Think of walking down the street in thirty years and running into an exact replica of yourself. Is it your twin? No, you do not have a twin; it is your clone. Your biological makeup could have been cloned as an embryo and raised separately as an experiment.
I bet many of you have seen Star Wars, Jurassic Park or many of the other movies that describe cloning. Most of what you see in these movies is false. What you do not know is if that cloning could be dangerous, to the clone and to our society as a whole. Based on this, according to Time Magazine poll (March 10th, 1997) reported that 74% of those asked believe that it is against God's will to clone humans.
Ever since the successful cloning in Scotland of the Finn Dorset sheep, Dolly on July 5, 1996, cloning has been one of much debate. The reason why Dolly shocked the world was that she was the first clone from a cell of an adult mammal, something previously thought to be impossible. This meant that the possibility of cloning human beings was increased. For fear of realizing human cloning, a lot of countries have taken necessary measures to regulate the study of it (The Problems of Cloning). Some people, such as scientists in this field and certain infertile couples, are now arguing against banning it. But I think we should ban human cloning because it has a possibility to reduce the value of our life, to take away individuality in our society, to destroy the moral and social systems, to cause physical and psychological damage especially for the clone, to goes against the religion rules and, of course, it is ethically and morally wrong.
As an individual person and human being, we are raised with family values. We are taught about the value of marriage, parenthood and respect. Cloning will bring the demise of those values. "Changes in the broader culture make it now vastly more difficult to express common and respectful understanding of sexuality, procreation, nascent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Bowring, F. (2004). Therapeutic and reproductive cloning: a critique. Social Science & Medicine, 58(2), 401. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00206-5…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    J. (2015). Cloning humans? Biological, ethical, and social considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(29), 8879-8886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501798112…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Couples who are battling with infertility can benefit from human cloning. By having a cloned cell implanted into a mother’s uterus, she can possibly have a child that she could not have had through natural procreation. Human cloning can give infertile couples a biological child who received genes from one or both parents. Those who are advocates for reproductive cloning generally give three reasons: The goodness of human freedom, existence, and well-being. People believe that human cloning for reproduction purposes is not making themselves free, but that they are free to practice human cloning. They want to the ability to decide based on their own moral values what is right and wrong with having a cloned child. The goodness of existence has people advocating for the potential cloned child. People argue that once the cloned child is born it would “prefer existence as a clone to no existence at all (PCBE).” No one can verify that the child would believe that statement once they are old enough to think for themselves. The final argument for human cloning is for the goodness of well-being. This argument is for using human cloning to help infertile couples to have a biological child. Other people argue that the well-being is to benefit the genetic quality of the next generation by ensuring that all diseases and disorders that the child may inherit are removed…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years, science and technology have expanded to make it possible to create identical creatures. While new cloning technology is a great advancement, it raises a plethora of moral and ethical questions. Cloning may bring about new ways to find cures for babies, according to Philip M. Boffey, but cloning also “could usher in a new eugenics”. The problems produced from the prospect of cloning greatly outweigh the benefits.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is cloning? Cloning, a process in which genetically identical copies of a biological entity are produced. The copy is referred to as a clone because it has the same makeup as the original thing it was cloned from. Cloning can happen naturally through asexual reproduction where a one parent cell splits itself into two identical daughter cells. In humans cloning can happen naturally when a fertilized egg splits making two embryos with almost identical genetic makeup, although they do not look genetically identical to either parent. Artificial cloning in animals, or reproductive cloning, is what is erroneous since it can damage the original or the clone permanently. There are other forms of artificial cloning such as gene cloning and therapeutic…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leon Kass’s provides a compelling article on why the world should ban cloning. Kass’ article, “Preventing a Brave New World”, provides Kass’ theories of if society progresses on its current path, society would start to turn to cloning as an alternative to typical reproduction. Cloning offers a way to design an offspring rather than the typical experience of child raising. Kass believes if cloning is not banned, society will be more dependent upon technology and be at technologies whim.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This question shakes us all to our very souls. For humans to consider the cloning of one another, forces everyone of us to question the very concepts of right and wrong that makes us all human. The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, is ethically and morally wrong. Scientists and ethicists alike have debated the dangerous implications of human and non-human cloning extensively since 1997 when scientists at the Roslin Institute in Scotland produced a cloned sheep, named Dolly. No direct conclusions have been drawn, but compelling arguments state that cloning of both human and non-human species results in harmful physical and psychological effects on both groups. The following issues dealing with cloning and its ethical and moral implications will be addressed: cloning of human beings would result in severe psychological effects in the cloned child, and that the cloning of non-human species such as animals subjects them to unethical or moral treatment for human needs.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning a Human Being

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the advancement in cloning could hold many benefits, they may be outweighed by the disadvantages. Author Lewis Thomas analyzes the necessary elements for cloning a human being to expound on the theory. Lewis argues that cloning removes the pleasure associated with procreation without changing the eventuality of death. So, the person cloned can only observe his clone enjoy the experience of growing up while he continues to age. Also, it would not be the same as the feeling for a son or daughter. Thomas indicates the person cloned could not view the clone “as anything but an absolute, desolate orphan” (52). There is also the risk that the procedure will not follow the agenda. Thomas describes it as “raising one’s self from infancy” and wonders whether the clone might turn out to be “an incorrigible juvenile delinquent” (52).…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unthinkable as it may be, there is a fear that parents may clone their children for "spare parts." Such a theory is ludicrous because parents of twins do not view one child as a spare part should the other break. She reasons that a clone would be looked upon as equally as a twin.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The creation of genetic clones has been proven to be possible. In 1996, a sheep named Dolly was born ( Dolly, First Cloned Sheep ) which happened to be one of the single biggest scientific breakthroughs in the past century. Dolly was the first mammal to be successfully cloned from an adult cell. Cloning has an incredibly negative effect upon species, because it reduces genetic diversity, which increases susceptibility to viruses. Sexual reproduction, which is natural, leads to the introduction of genes from both parents to their offspring. Immunity to disease can be genetically inherited. Without this important and natural process, any species that were subjected to cloning technology would be very vulnerable to particular diseases. If humans were to be cloned, the gene pool would be altered significantly, with negative impacts that could lead to extinction. In addition, there is a significant amount of religious opposition to the cloning processes. In Abrahamic religions, a newborn human receives the blessing of God. However, if a human were to be cloned, they would not receive this blessing due to being an artificial creation. Playing the role of God is something that was highlighted in the novel Frankenstein, where a scientist created artificial life. However, he could bear the stress of seeing his creature, who turned out to be hideous and of monstrous proportions. He subsequently abandoned his creation which led to bloodshed. Although this novel is only science-fiction, humanity must take into consideration that artificial life could be used for evil, as well as treated inhumanely, thus, another reason that artificial life should not be invested…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The idea of human cloning is truly bewildering. Combined with genetic engineering, it is the stuff of legendary science fiction. Imagine a human being created to be the epitome of perfection in all aspects; appearance, intellect, and health. It would be as though we were gifted with an evolutionary leap into our own futures long before it arrives on an intellectual level, and on a physiological level perhaps attaining a perfection of health and body that could have never existed. With great intellect comes great discovery, and humans are truly incapable of imagining with accuracy what the future holds, for example, there is no limit to the potential contributions that a clone manufactured to become the most intelligent human ever to exist could bring forward. When stated in this way, the idea of cloning humans sounds ultimately good. Surely such an individual would be treasured by our world, and valued for their accomplishments and benefits to humanity. The revelations that could be brought forward, the cures for disease, the greater understanding into what makes a human a human, the fundamental principles of the creation of life beyond what we currently are aware, these are all found in the study and experimentation of human cloning. But what would be the cost?…

    • 2163 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Have you ever had one of ‘those’ days? You know which ones; the days where there just aren’t enough hands to go around or enough time to finish everything that needs to be done. Those are the days that people tend to have that one fleeting thought: “If only there were two of me, I could relax while my clone does all the work!” But if they had the chance to try it, to have a clone, knowing all of the risks and consequences involved, would they go through with it? No, probably not, but the average person doesn’t think about what the repercussions of cloning themselves may be: repercussions that justify the outlawing of the cloning process.…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    At the present time the science has achieved such high level of the development that it became possible to clone not only the cells but the whole organisms. Up to now such experiments were made on the representatives of the animal kingdom. In the late 90s the whole humanity could make sure of such experiment.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Clone Fd

    • 264 Words
    • 1 Page

    In this article ‘ Human Cloning Debate: Why Do It? Who’d Be Hurt? Should it be legal?’ by a science writer Peter Kendall, of the Chicago Tribune, the author states the benefits and dangers of human cloning. Kendall pointed out that one of the benefits of human cloning is that it can help infertile couples get babies. Another benefit of human cloning is it can recreate extinct species. Human cloning also can provide matched organs and bone marrow to people who need to transplant. On the contrary, people are afraid of the production of cloning is malformed babies. Kendall argued that human cloning is against to society ethically and humanity development. Cloning a “perfect baby” is also considered a fear of human cloning, because everything has been decided before a baby born. In conclusion, this article is about the advantages and disadvantages of human cloning.…

    • 264 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Another reason why human cloning should be banned is because the population will be exploded (McGee), since the problem of some great countries are over population, if they clone a lot of human even the success rate is small they will make population really crowded, its implication is that we won’t have enough resources and food to nourish cloned humans. This idea is demented, think about the poor kids in the third world countries would it be fair to them? They deserve to have food on their table every meal. We first have to think about others, and then we can think about our people that have passed…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays