Working Class and Age Group
Personal ID: c2711493 TMA03 Part 1: Using the data in the table provided on pages 20 and 21, what can you say about relationships people have with their neighbours and immediate community?
By:
Looking at the information ICM provided about relationship between neighbours, it is evident that there is a huge difference between the quantities of good neighbouring relationships in different age groups, for example, from the total number, 47358, only 1031, which means 18% claims to have a very good relationship with their neighbours, and by the age group 65+, this number increases to 59%, which means 5820 people, which means times more “good neighbouring” relationships then at the first age group. Also from the first age group 645 from 1031 claims that they don`t have a good relationships with neighbours, but in the other age group I am examining, only 498 says the same, which is only 5% of the total number. After looking at the table in whole, it can be seen clearly how numbers increase together, which is a pattern: the number of good relationships increase with growing age.
I have also found an interesting anomaly when examining the question about how much time neighbours spending together, the numbers do not increase proportionally. As a matter fact the 25-34 age group decreases time spent with other neighbours by 2% compared to the 18-24 age group, then after increasing again by the age of 54, it goes down again by 1%, which means number of relationships are not permanent, and they change many times in a human`s life. The other table shows how relations formed according to regional and social class based data, with the same questions as in table 1. Upper and middle classes seem to socialize more than skilled, or unskilled workers, they have a better relationship with neighbours than those who are possibly on a lower income. It is
By:
Looking at the information ICM provided about relationship between neighbours, it is evident that there is a huge difference between the quantities of good neighbouring relationships in different age groups, for example, from the total number, 47358, only 1031, which means 18% claims to have a very good relationship with their neighbours, and by the age group 65+, this number increases to 59%, which means 5820 people, which means times more “good neighbouring” relationships then at the first age group. Also from the first age group 645 from 1031 claims that they don`t have a good relationships with neighbours, but in the other age group I am examining, only 498 says the same, which is only 5% of the total number. After looking at the table in whole, it can be seen clearly how numbers increase together, which is a pattern: the number of good relationships increase with growing age.
I have also found an interesting anomaly when examining the question about how much time neighbours spending together, the numbers do not increase proportionally. As a matter fact the 25-34 age group decreases time spent with other neighbours by 2% compared to the 18-24 age group, then after increasing again by the age of 54, it goes down again by 1%, which means number of relationships are not permanent, and they change many times in a human`s life. The other table shows how relations formed according to regional and social class based data, with the same questions as in table 1. Upper and middle classes seem to socialize more than skilled, or unskilled workers, they have a better relationship with neighbours than those who are possibly on a lower income. It is