Preview

Without the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact there would be no war in Europe. To what extent is this statement accurate?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
604 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Without the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact there would be no war in Europe. To what extent is this statement accurate?
http://www.historyonthenet.com/WW2/causes.htm
Without the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact there would have been no war in Europe. To what extent is this statement accurate?
Within Europe leading up to World War II, the Nazis and Soviets made the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression pacts which negligible of the pact it seems inevitable that the war would have existed as there were many other major factors that provoked the war in Europe. These factors include the unresolved issues of World War One, with the Treaty of Versailles being the main one, Hitler’s actions, one of these being the invasion of Poland, the failure of appeasement and the failure of the League of Nations. With these major factors the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact was only a minor factor in the war in Europe and so without it the war would have still broke out.
On August 23, 1939, enemies Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact, in which the two countries agreed to, take no military action against each other for the next 10 years. By signing this pact, Germany had protected itself from having to fight a two-front war and the Soviet Union was awarded land, including parts of Poland and the Blatic States. Soviet leader Stalin viewed the pact as a way to keep his nation on peaceful terms with Germany, while giving him time to build up the Soviet military, while Hitler used the pact to make sure Germany was able to invade Poland unopposed. Historian Ian Kershaw notes in “Hitler: 1936–1945: Nemesis,” the German chancellor was ecstatic. He congratulated his foreign minister and said the pact “will hit like a bombshell.” Hitler had planned on invading Poland from the start as it would bring lebensraum for the German people. According to Hitler’s plan, the “racially superior” Germans would colonise territory. German expansion had begun with the annexation of Austria in 1938 and continued in 1939 with the occupation of the Sudetenland and then all of Czechoslovakia. Both

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Through the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of 1939, Stalin was advancing his own hostile outside arrangement in eastern Europe by making 'mystery conventions' inside the agreement with Germany, utilizing those conventions to progress into free Finland, Estonia, Latvia and other Baltic States and effectively supporting Germany in the war with the Western forces to meet his own particular…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Representatives from Nazi Germany and Soviet Union signed the Nazi- Soviet Non -Aggression Pact, which prevented two countries to attack each other. Thus, Germany protected itself from having a war prior to World War 2. In return, Germany gave the Soviet Union land from parts of Poland and Baltic States. Since Hitler was preparing for war in hoping to acquire Poland, he wanted to prevent a two-front war that may cause weakened German forces, so he planned prior to the war and made a pact with the Soviets, creating the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In August 1939 the Soviet Union signed a non-aggression treaty called the Nazi-Soviet Pact with the Nazis. This pact was signed so that Stalin could keep the Soviet Union out of a war with Germany on the eastern front of Europe. Stalin believed that war with the Nazis was a foregone conclusion. The pact was signed in the hope of pushing this conflict off until 1942. This was not a wise decision. The Nazis had become so confident and powerful with their Blitzkrieg model of warfare that the Soviets would have been more prepared for battle in 1939 rather than 1941. Operation Barbarossa allowed this more formidable Nazi force to smash through the Soviet defences in both the north and south of Russia and the Ukraine.…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Evaluate the view that Operation Barbarossa was the major turning point of the European War.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ 19

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1939 the world was plunged into World War II because of the Munich Agreement. The Munich Agreement was an agreement regarding the Sudetenland Crisis between the major powers of Europe after a conference held in Munich in Germany in 1938. The Sudetenland was an important region of Czechoslovakia. The Treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty created as a result of six months of negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which put an official end to World War I between the Allies and Central Powers. The Munich Agreement caused many disagreements between European countries. Collective security was a more effective response to aggression than appeasement because more European countries disagreed than agreed with the decision made during the Munich Conference for various reasons and Germany had many ways of keeping its territories under control.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ world war 2

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Actions were taken that moved Europe toward war. The debate over the causes of World War II provides…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin's effects on WW2

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On August 23rd of 1939, Soviet Union ruler Joseph Stalin agreed to sign a non-aggression, or neutrality pact with Adolf Hiter, this prove to have a huge influence on the decisions of the Germans. Part of the non-agression pact was that the Soviets would not come to aid Poland if it was attacked, Stalin agreed. This non-agression pact insured Germany that it would not be fighting on two fronts in the coming war, for signing this pact the Soviet Union was given land that included part of Poland and some Baltic States[1]. Just a couple days before the non-agression pact was signed, Vyacheslav Molotov, the Chairman of the Council of People's in the Soviet Union made an economic agreement with the Germans, agreeing to provide food products and raw materials to Germany in exchange for machinery from Germany, this in combination with the non-agression pact helped Germany bypass the British blockade. These pacts were supposed to last ten years, they only lasted two.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “No single nation or alliance could be held responsible for the outbreak of war” How far do you agree with this opinion?…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the start of the first world war, Germany and the Soviet Union signed a nonaggression pact. With Germany and the Soviet Union being allies, the rest of the world had their suspicions. In the U.S., Senator Truman expressed his dislike of both countries and his view of them as potential enemies(Doc A). Unfortunately for the Soviet Union, the pact between him and Hitler was soon broken by a German invasion. The invasion of the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941 was a surprise to everyone, especially Stalin who was not prepared for it. According to Churchill, it was the turning point of the war. This turn on Stalin seemed like a great thing, if the Soviet Union hadn’t collapsed so quickly. With the fear of the Soviet Union’s surrender, Churchill and Roosevelt secretly met in the historic Atlantic Conference in August 1941. An outcome of the conference was the eight-point Atlantic Charter, where Churchill and Roosevelt agreed to defeat Germany before turning to Japan, and they planned for a new world organization, and affirmed their commitment to self-determination for all nations.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II was arguably the largest and most destructive war in history. It shaped the world we live in today and its shadows can still be found. Battles were fought on multiple continents, the air, and the sea. The many facets of the war have been explored by scholars and students for over 65 years. The many causes, the results and the importance of the battles won or lost lies in the eyes of the author. It can easily be assumed that this war flared from the cinders of World War I, but complexity of it expands from there. Similar to WWI, there were many conflicting situations leading up to the war, (Treaty of Versailles, Hitler and Mussolini’s actions, and failure of appeasement and the League of Nations) but Germany’s invasion of Poland set the wheels in motion (parallel to the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in WWI). This resulted in Britain and France declaring war on Germany in September 1939 (historyonthenet).…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Non-Aggression Pact

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Non-aggression pact was an agreement between the Soviet Union and Germany, which promised that each nation would not attack the one another, madon August 23, 1939. German troops invaded Poland on August 31, 1939, in hopes to occupy and split Poland with the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union would also be taking over Finland; the Baltic countries of , Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. A few days later on September 3, 1939, Great Britain and France declared war on Germany. On September 17, the Soviet Union invaded eastern Poland and then moved north…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WW2 Prevented

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    World War II, I think, could have been prevented in two ways leading up to the war, if people realized how their actions would cause reactions. The war could have been prevented if the Treaty of Versailles wasn’t so harsh on the Germans. Without this motivation to gain back Germany’s pride and confidence, Hitler probably wouldn’t have rose to power. Even if Hitler was still angry, and looking for revenge he wouldn’t have had as many followers or as much people to support his argument. Majority of people wouldn’t be so irritated with the circumstances and wouldn’t be looking for a person to point there fingers at to blame for their issues. Also, later on in Hitler’s rise to dominating new lands, he violated several contracts, the Treat of Versailles as well as the Munich Conference. The Treaty stated that Hitler was not allowed to rebuild his army nor take over any lands, which he did both of. Along with violation of the Treaty of Versailles, Hitler signed a contracted saying he was allowed to keep the Sudetenland in compromise that he vowed not to take over the rest of Czechoslovakia or any other lands. Even though Hitler signed the contract, he took over the rest of Czechoslovakia anyway because he recognized how easy it was to gain land, and how weak the French and British looked by appeasing to him. With this being said, the League of Nation should have placed a hard punishment for violating both Treaty of Versailles and the Munich Conference, in order to prove to Hitler they were serious, and weren’t just playing around. By giving in to him easily they showed Hitler that he had the power and he was capable to do whatever he wished with it. If the French and British reacted more strictly to Hitler when he did those actions, then Hitler may have realized that they were more competition then he expected, and it would warn him not to do anything further preventing mass destruction…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler wanted to expand the German land for economic means and used the Treaty of Versailles as an excuse to invade Poland. Hitler demanded more out of the French and British Governments, and they decided to give a small portion of Czechoslovakia; Hitler wasn’t satisfied; he invaded the whole of Czechoslovakia in 1939. The French and British Governments at the time didn’t want a repeat of World War I and had an intention of appeasing Hitler to stop further…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles was not the main cause of World War II; although, it did hasten the conflict. This is a result of the provisions caused by German expansion, economic downfall and hyperinflation and the vulnerability of the German people that later led to Hitler and the Fascist party being…

    • 52 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - Hitler was determined to conquer Eastern Europe - Hitler had made his plans clear - the policy of appeasement was clearly doomed from the start - Hitler just…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays