Preview

Williams Arguments Against Euthanasia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
423 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Williams Arguments Against Euthanasia
Williams’ first argument states his belief in which every human has the will to live. The will to live is a psychological force to fight for survival which is an important process of conscious and unconscious reasoning which is why the first argument is The Argument from Nature. Williams says, “Our bodies are similarly structured for survival right down to the molecular level” (2). However, euthanasia goes against this belief. He starts by making an appeal to religion by saying, “It is possible, but not necessary, to make an appeal to revealed religion in this connection. Man as trustee of his body acts against God, its rightful possessor, when he takes his own life” (Williams 2). He then continues to say that he doesn’t include this in his argument because religious beliefs are not mutual among all people. Euthanasia takes away our dignity which denies our basic human character.
The second argument is The Argument from Self-Interest. Euthanasia is the allowing of working against our best interests. There are flaws with this as with many other solutions …show more content…
If euthanasia is allowed Williams feels like it would have a negative effect on the medical professionals in the industry. “It could have a corrupting influence so that in any case that is severe doctors and nurses might not try hard enough to save the patient” (3). This would cause the quality of doctors to decline. He uses the slippery slope effect to help explain the results in euthanasia became a policy. If a person is unable to take their own life, they have someone make the decisions for them. “Already at this point euthanasia is not personal and voluntary, for others are acting ‘on behalf of’ the patient as they see fit” (3). This will then cause directed euthanasia instead of voluntary. Mental illnesses also have a large role in the decisions of euthanasia. Like the death penalty, euthanasia has too many risks for us to employ it as a
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Richard Nicholas Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 85 Words
    • 1 Page

    Richard Nicholas Arguments Against Euthanasia

    Euthanasia saves people from pain and suffering while dying. Richard Nicholas in his article “a quick and painless death” (euthanasia), reveal different real stories of patients who were given dozens of painkillers and muscle relaxants that eventually cause death of a person. Nicholas in his article clearly state that desire of death for a patient who is suffering from an incurable disease for a long time, is normal. Before the act of euthanasia, doctors apply resuscitative effort even when they know that patient is…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reg Crew Euthanasia
    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reg Crew Euthanasia

    The main argument for euthanasia to be legal is that many people believe that everyone should have the right to decide when they want to die. Many argue that because we can determine the course of our lives by our own free will, we have the right to live our lives and determine our own course. It then follows that we also have as human beings, the fundamental right to determine how we die. The argument of people who are very anti-euthanasia is that euthanasia is immoral because life must be preserved and protected. For something to be immoral, it would have to violate moral laws or norms. The preservation of life is, however, the decision of the patient who has full control and not the physician.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arguments Against Euthanasia Ethical
    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    Arguments Against Euthanasia Ethical

    Euthanasia is currently legal in the United States, but still considered cruel to some people. Animals that are in agony and need mercy are euthanized. Some think that it's cruel to put animals out of there misery, but some think it's cruel not to. Euthanasia, mercy killing used on animals, is fair to animals in suffer. If a dog got hit by a car and was in great pain, you could either wait until it dies on its own, or euthanize the dog, putting it out of its misery.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rachels And Williams Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rachels And Williams Arguments Against Euthanasia

    Williams starts off the writing with the statement, “Although I respect the compassion that leads to this conclusion, I believe the conclusion is wrong. I want to show that euthanasia is wrong” (WEB). This shows that she is understanding of the view that it is right but feels that euthanasia is still wrong. The first augment is the argument of Nature which is stated, “Euthanasia does violence to this natural goal of survival. It is literally acting against nature because all the processes of nature are bent towards the end of bodily survival.” (WEB). This argument basically states that it is natural for a human to fight to live no matter what and when you provide an out for human it is unjust because it isn’t the way nature had intended it to be. The second point that is made is the argument for self-interest which is stated as, “We may think that we have no hope of recovery when, as a matter of fact, our chances are quite good. In such circumstances, if euthanasia were permitted, we would die needlessly.” (WEB). Basically this argument states that miracles do happen and if we allow doctors to end someone’s life it gives them no chance for the miracle. The last argument is the argument of practical effects which is described as, “It could have a…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia Essay
    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia In Australia Essay

    Euthanasia has more advantages than disadvantages and actually helps patients and families in numerous ways: it stops the patient from suffering from horrible, chronic diseases and puts an end to their horrific pain. Euthanasia…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Euthanasia Ethically Wrong
    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is Euthanasia Ethically Wrong

    1). Physicians have sworn an oath which does not allow them to take part in the killing of people. Individuals against euthanasia believe that physicians should not take part in directly causing death because they will not be able to keep it under control. Euthanasia would never be legalized without regulations and controls in place. If euthanasia were legalized then doctors would not be breaking any oaths or laws. Physicians are knowledgeable professionals who can provide their patients with all of the information needed to make an informed decision. Physicians should be treated with respect and not judged when they have not done nothing for you to think otherwise. The option of euthanasia would only be given to those who are terminally ill so that they can make their own decision and not prolong suffering and pain for themselves and their families. Gibson explains that “human life is sacred and it is wrong to kill another human” (2008, para. 3). Those against euthanasia believe that it devalues human life and we should only “[do] unto others as we would have others do unto us” (Gibson, 2008, para. 7). Euthanasia gives patients the freedom and respect to make one final decision in their life when they are not able to make any others. This actually shows that they value their life enough to not suffer unnecessarily. They want other to remember them when they were happy and not in pain. Euthanasia can also give patients a chance to donate organs which again shows that they really do value human…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Euthanasia And Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Euthanasia And Physician Assisted Suicide

    But, an opponent to euthanasia and physician assisted suicide worries about a slippery slope, what terminal patient’s rights could be abused. Beyond the opposition to euthanasia based on apprehension about latent abuse is the threat of the so-called slippery slope. According to Jeffrey’s theory, legalization of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide would be followed by involuntary euthanasia, involving patients whose individual desires could not be evaluated due to pressure from family or financial circumstance or believe that patient is burden on society (p. 123). It would be a sign of non-voluntary euthanasia. Other people can put to death many terminal patients who understand the circumstance even do not want to die. Legalization of…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Morality Of Euthanasia Analysis
    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Morality Of Euthanasia Analysis

    But then again, he is just trying to challenge the distinction and he is successful at it. It makes me think why should anyone suffer a slow painful death? In the end both cause the death of someone. Active euthanasia would be much more “compassionate.” In my opinion, we see euthanasia as a brutal killing because we are more exposed to the terrible things shown by the media, but we are not as familiar with the characteristics of letting someone die. Thus, we always think killing is worst. I believe that active euthanasia should be a choice and it is not wrong. A terminally ill patient should be able to decide his fate to end his life or continue suffering. Of course, when the patient is not able to make decisions it should be the guardian’s right to do it. It is not easy to make such decision, but the option should be…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil Argument Against Euthanasia
    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil Argument Against Euthanasia

    One side of this issue trusts that if helping somebody in suicide they are held blameworthy of executing a man. They are stating euthanasia is authorized murder and murder ought to never be advocated and legitimized. Individuals trust that regardless of the amount of torment one experiences "there is no such thing as an existence not worth living" (ProCon.org). On the other side there are the individuals who trust that "the privilege to kick the bucket ought to be a matter of individual decision" (Michael Irwin). Individuals trust that helping somebody enduring ought to have a…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Argument Against Euthanasia
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Argument Against Euthanasia

    The study of Bioethics involves the consideration of ethical issues arising from advancements in medicine and/or biology. The study of bioethics helps with determining the proper decision in regard to medical or biological issues. Bioethics is highly influential in academia, where scholars investigate the various scenarios arising from advancements, but is also influential in the applied realms of biology and medicine. Albert Jonsen, in his book Bioethics, claims "This field has established itself as an integral part of practical or applied philosophy and as a valuable adjunct to health policy and medical practice" (Jonsen 4). When dealing with the human body, ethics must be considered in order to preserve the value of human life. A highly…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Active Euthanasia And Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Active Euthanasia And Physician Assisted Suicide

    Euthanasia contradicts the main reason of being a physician. Doctors are known to be healers not killers and this could cause ethical issues. In Kirk Johnson’s letter on behalf of the American Medical Association (AMA) he addresses how euthanasia would make a negative impact. “The involvement of physicians in euthanasia heightens the significance of its ethical prohibition. The physician who performs euthanasia assumes unique responsibility for the act of ending the patient's life. Euthanasia could also readily be extended to incompetent patients and other vulnerable populations. Instead of engaging in euthanasia, physicians must aggressively respond to the needs of patients at the end of life. Patients should not be abandoned once it is determined that cure is impossible. Patients near the end of life must continue to receive emotional support, comfort care, adequate pain control, respect for patient autonomy, and good communication.” He stated an alternative to the suicide, which was that physicians should get the patient ready for his death and make him feel comfortable rather than just ending his…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments Against Euthanasia

    Medical professionals already have many burdens throughout their medical path, adding the guilt of killing someone to the list is not fair for the healthcare professionals and the family members. Euthanasia is ethically and morally wrong because the doctors have to continue to find possible ways to treat the patient not to give the patient the option of choosing to die. The incident in “Britain with the nurses technically killing the patient could have been avoided” (Fenigsen, “Other People’s Lives: Reflections On Medicine, Ethics, And Euthanasia”). Although, some people might believe that ending the patient’s pain is ending their suffering, but many fail to realize the actual outcome if euthanasia were to be practiced. For instance, “If terminating life is a benefit, the reasoning goes, why should euthanasia be limited only to those who can give consent? Why need we ask for consent” (ProCon.org, “Top Ten Pros and Cons)”, the slippery slope a reality to…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    Another argument that people against assisted suicide provide is that it may lead to involuntary Euthanasia. The slippery slope argument says that assisted suicide if legalized may result in end-of-life decisions being made without patient’s consent(Dieterle, 2007, p. 129). While people in favour of assisted suicide argue that Slippery Slope is a complete exaggeration and Death with Dignity Act in Oregon is a living example of that(Sharma, 2008) . Involuntary euthanasia is far from being reality in Oregon(Dieterle, 2007). Time has come for us to stop worrying too…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Benefits Of Assisted Suicide
    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Benefits Of Assisted Suicide

    The controversy of euthanasia has been comparable to an equally controversial topic: abortion. Both topics deal with medically assisted death - one with babies, and the other of terminally ill individuals. In both cases, people are accusing doctors of being “murderers”, which implies that the doctors issuing the life-ending drug are monsters (Source G). Furthermore, critics of euthanasia argue that some patients do not have the mental capability to make a decision, such as those suffering through dementia or other mental illnesses (Source F). However, all people should have the right to make their own choice about their life, and should be able to receive proper medical support with their decision. Euthanasia has shown to have many medical benefits, which clearly far outweigh the downsides. In Oregon, for example, the passing of the ODDA, an assisted suicide bill, has shown to have actually increased and bettered end of life care (Source C). In the end, euthanasia has unequivocal benefits, mainly medical and moral, that are far more important and significant than the minor…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Rogerian Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rogerian Arguments Against Euthanasia

    Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, is described as the requested termination of a life of someone who is capable of living his or her life but is terminally ill. Although euthanasia is highly debated, most people seem to be able to agree on one thing: euthanasia relieves a person of unnecessary and long-term suffering. There are two types of euthanasia. The first type is referred to as active euthanasia, which means that a physician gives their patient different types of drugs, sometimes called a “cocktail”, which, when taken by the patient, terminates their life. The second type is called passive euthanasia, which is where the patient refuses any types of drugs or treatments, which also eventually will terminate that patient’s life. Both types of euthanasia are highly debated. Euthanasia is illegal in every state in America, while assisted suicide is only legal in four (State-by-State Guide). The debate over the topic of euthanasia argues whether or not it should be legal for doctors to practice euthanasia on their patients in America.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More

Related Topics