Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

William Shakespeare's King Lear: A Review

Good Essays
779 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
William Shakespeare's King Lear: A Review
In a harsh world, one must adopt a rational and realistic outlook to be successful. Often, humans who act upon their uncontrolled, undirected whims of emotion folly into their own failures and even their demises. It is a failure to act rationally that leads to the tragic ending of Shakespeare’s play, King Lear. In the concluding Act V, all main characters of both plots die except for Albany and Edgar. The tragic ending is an inversion of the conventional development of justice in Aristotelian tragedies, where good triumphs evil with almost always a happy ending. This success usually follows the tragic hero’s agnagnorisis thereafter they overcome their hamartia to resolve the main conflict. Though Shakespeare did not follow Aristotelian tragedy plots, the ending of King Lear still causes the reader to question why Cordelia must die after King Lear has already regained his sanity. It is what transpires after Cordelia’s death, where King Lear descends again into madness that clarifies the point of Cordelia’s death. Shakespeare’s use of peripeteia with Cordelia’s death reveals that Lear has actually failed to amend his hamartia.

Cordelia’s is characterized as emotional, virtuous, and naïve which Lear indulges making her an effective tool to demonstrate Lear’s failed anagnorisis. It is obvious that Cordelia has a deep relation to emotion, given Shakespeare choice to name her Cordelia which means heart in Latin. Cordelia is symbolic of truth and virtue, as setup by her characterization when she defends her claim that her “love’s more richer than [her] tongue” (Shakespeare 1.1.79-80). Cordelia symbolizing virtue is confirmed by Lear’s statement that “thy truth…be thy dower” and France’s decision to “[her] virtues here I seize upon” (Shakespeare 1.1.112, 1.1.273). In an objective view of Cordelia, this characterization demonstrates emotion’s dominance over her actions and, resultantly, a naïve quality of Cordelia. It is Lear’s investment into these qualities of Cordelia that prevents his true agnarnorisis which consequently calls for the death Cordelia as a testament to the failure.

Lear’s investment into the virtuous and emotional qualities of Cordelia perpetuates his hamartia, justifying the tragic ending of the play. As a king, Lear is required to overcome his various personal longings for the sake of his kingdom, a quality that can be summated as rational. Lear overindulges in emotional trifles and is unable to separate his decisions from his ‘heart,’ making him unfit to be the king. There are subtle hints to his heart guiding his decision, such as his plan to award Cordelia the largest portion of the kingdom, demonstrating his preference to her emotion rather than the cold rationale of Goneril. Lear’s indulgence in his emotions is most clear in the beginning with his reaction to Cordelia’s refusal to flatter him. Lear’s diction at this time with the use of words such as “untender,” “heart,” and reference to “loving her most” demonstrates that his decisions are in response to an emotional injury (Shakespeare 1.1.110, 1.1.119, 1.1.128). In this fashion, Lear has committed a similar act of naivety to Cordelia, where emotions and principle overshadowed rationality, which also came in the form of advice from Kent. This emotional dominance is so engrained into Lear’s character that when he attempts to make her a “stranger to [his] heart,” he becomes unbalanced and pushed into action that begins his descent into madness (Shakespeare 1.1.119). In this sense, Lear’s anagnorisis would consist of him remediating his emotional dependency, and becoming acceptably rational. Yet in Act V, Lear displays emotional irrationality when he tells Cordelia “let’s away to prison; we two alone will sing like birds I’ th’ cage” (Shakespeare 5.3.9-10). Lear’s lighthearted tone here suggests a quality of irresponsibility unbecoming of a king since he has been emotionally satisfied. Objectively, Lear should not be so accommodating. Because Lear has failed to attain a true anagnorisis, where he becomes wise as a king should be, Cordelia must die to expose his failure. It is also the final stroke that crushes Lear’s heart to kill him as punishment for his failure.

King Lear follows the eponymous tragic hero and his journey to try and amend his hamartia. Lear fails to amend his emotional dependency, as suggested by his continued affinity for Cordelia. Lear’s failure mandates the death of Cordelia as a testament to his failure, to bring about his death, as well as to provide a pathway to rule for the only sensible and wise ‘good’ character, Edgar. In this fashion justice is served accordingly, punishing those who fail in their duties or to meet expectations, and rewarding the one who fulfilled them.

Word Count: 777

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What is Cordelia’s answer to Lear’s question, and why is Lear outraged by her response?…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary purpose of Shakespeare’s “King Lear”is the tragedy and focus of the fall of a noble character due to a tragic flaw. Shakespeare’s main purpose was perhaps to emphasize on the idea that tragedies intend to show how our very own human nature can turn out to be our worst enemy. In “King Lear,” the reader gets to see how Lear suffers from his tragic flaw, which includes of arrogance and misjudgements. Because of his tragic flaw, King Lear makes bad decisions. When he announces his plan in dividing the kingdom between his three daughters he orders them to speak up and say which daughter loves him the most. He does this not thinking about the consequences; he expects Cordelia, his favorite daughter, to speak up instead Goneril and Regan…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lesson 6

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    a) The opening Act of King Lear evidently portrays Lear’s downward movement as it coincides with Aristotle’s structure of Greek tragedy. The play begins with Lear, a hero of noble birth and ruler of Britain, in an ordered society soon to be disrupted by a fatal flaw that is the result of his excessive pride. His journey from the ordered to the disordered world becomes apparent after he hands his land over to his two elder daughters and banishes his youngest daughter Cordelia from the kingdom. The initial situation began when Lear asks Cordelia, “What can you say to draw / A third more opulent than your sisters?” (I i 87-88), in which she answers “Nothing, my lord” (I i 89). This demonstrates Lear’s arrogance and triggers the rash decision he makes that would greatly impact the tragic events that follow. At the end of the scene, his two elder daughters immediately work to conspire against him so that he would be left with no power at all. Goneril says to Regan that they “must do something, and i’ th’ heat” (I ii 311). This foreshadows Lear’s impending downward movement and begins the reversal of his fortunes as things go from bad to worse. Lear’s recognition of the truth and the existence of his tragic circumstance becomes slightly clear to him when he wonders whether he has lost his mind and cries out “O let me not be mad, not mad, sweet heaven!” (I v 46). Act I leaves off at this stage where Lear is about to suffer tremendously before further stages of recognition, retribution, and restitution occur later in the play.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare in Lear, presents the notion that characters in great authority force suffering upon others in an effort to retain power, admiration, and status. Initially, Lear himself demonstrates this, appallingly treating Cordelia with an irrational snap judgement when he is embarrassed in court by his youngest daughters silence and lack of praise; “Here I disclaim all my parental care.” (1:1:107) This unjust sentence is highly ironic, especially for the audience, as dramatically we see transparent farce of Gonerill and Regan’s dedications of love, and the total truth of Cordelia’s. Due to the “infirmity of his age” (1:1:284) (Lear) the unjust pain Cordelia endures for his mistake is greatened, and due to this dramatic irony the audience is forever hopeful for some form of justice and resolution to come.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the novel, many of the characters can be pointed out as crazy and disillusioned .As different characters are seen to be talking to themselves and show various sides of their characters, I chose King Lear as one who reveals to me the most surprising and unexpected in the scenes through soliloquies and monologues.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He asks Lear to rethink his decision, calling it rash,, and that Cordelia does not love him the least. This ends poorly for Kent, as he is then banished from the kingdom, while Cordelia, although she is now disowned, still marries the King of France, and goes to live with him. Lear’s decision to disown Cordelia turns out to be a horrible one, as she was the only one truthful about her love to her father. Without Cordelia, Lear is forced to live with one of Goneril or Regan. However, both Goneril and Regan are plotting against Lear, and end up leaving him stripped of his power and integrity. Cordelia was the only to be honest, and although it is generally a good trait to have, her honesty towards Lear is what causes her to be disowned. This shows Albany’s quote, as the family was fine before, but when Lear was “striving to better,” he made what he already had worse.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lear’s hamartia is primarily exposed through his unappeasable need for self-appraisal. His narcissistic conduct is brought on by his need for flattery and is the reason for his vulnerability to extreme reaction. As Lear seeks self-appraisal in the first act, he is gravely disappointed in his youngest daughter’s response: “… I cannot heave / My heart into my mouth. I love your majesty / According to my bond, no more nor less.” (I.i.90-92) Her sheer honesty and refusal to give in to his test expose the King’s tragic flaw, as he acts rashly in banishing Cordelia along with his loyal friend Kent. Not only is Lear insulted by her refusal of appraisal, but his vanity inhibits him from being reasonable as he cannot accept that his daughter does not love him more than a daughter ought love her father. Lear tragically misinterprets reality and his injured pride leads him to anger, causing him to act without contemplation. The King’s unbridled fury leads to his unbearable suffering as it unfolds through further action. Through the effect of his hamartia, the King acts without reason and consequently loses his most beloved daughter.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Lear

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Although King Lear by Shakespeare and Candide by Voltaire are very different on the outside they share internal values. King Lear is a play written by William Shakespeare, who was an English poet and playwright who was widely regards as the greatest writer in the English language and the world pre-eminent dramatist (Shakespear, 1998). Candide by Voltaire is a satire, Voltaire was born Francois-Marie Arouet, he use his satirizing style of writing to make fun of the Powerful Frenchmen of his time (voltaire, 1991). The internal values of both books connect them with the Human Condition of man, His love of family in King Lear, with his daughter Cordelia un-condition love for him and Candide love for Lady Cunegonde. The hardship that both characters endured throughout these writing, King Lear by Shakespeare and Candide by Voltaire.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Fool and Cordelia are similarly candid towards their King, they never interact in Shakespeare's King Lear, because the Fool is a chaotic influence while Cordelia is a stabilizing force. While the Fool and Cordelia both act in the Lear's best interest, it is not always evident to Lear. The Fool's actions often anger the King, and lead to an increase in his madness. On the other hand, Cordelia's actions more often soothe Lear, and coax him back into sanity. Another commonality between the Fool and Cordelia is their honesty. Both the Fool and Cordelia are frank with Lear, though he may not always appreciate that they do so for his own good.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The notion that humanity is possessed only by those who understand and perceive the basic human condition can be seen to be explored in King Lear. Lear’s advancing madness allows him to perceive reality once he is stripped of his title and reduced to “nothing” during the storm scene; that is, that man is merely a “poor, bare, forked animal” and that he, for all his royalty, is “no more than this”. Imagery is utilised to affirm his epiphany and accept his insignificance as a mere mortal. In his humility, Lear is able to understand the values of humanity, demonstrated when he bids Cordelia not to resist being jailed, an indication that he has discovered that true filial love is more important than fighting for the material concepts of rank, property and power.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    <br>Lear's feelings in this passage parallel the disorder of the storm. To bring order to the universe, Lear must start by bringing order to himself. This occurs when he becomes lawful and puts his daughters on trial. Soon after, Lear says, "When the rain came to wet me once and the wind to / make me chatter, when the thunder would not peace / at my bidding, there I found ‘em, there I smelt ‘em out" (4, vi, 100-102). Here, Lear explains how the "storm" actually helped him "see" the truth. Soon after this event occurs,…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lear and Comedy

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Strangely enough, it is G. Wilson Knight, a critic famous (not to say notorious) for a vehemently Christian interpretation of Shakespeare’s plays, who notes in The Wheel of Fire some of the comedic aspects of King Lear[1]. Whether or not the harsh moral ecology of King Lear fits comfortably with the Christian ethos of forgiveness, structural elements of comedy are plainly present in King Lear, quite apart from the sardonic humour of the Fool. Indeed, a ‘happy ending’ involving the marriage of Cordelia and Edgar was part of Nahum Tate’s revision of the play which was the accepted version from 1681-1838. Marriage is the traditional ending in Shakesperian comedy, and many critics have found the death of Cordelia to be unacceptably cruel[2]. This is especially true in view of the fact that Shakespeare altered his sources for the story (Holinshead’s Chronicle and the anonymous play King Leir).…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Lear

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Shakespeare uses clothing imagery throughout King Lear to display different themes within the play. The main themes that relate to clothing imagery are Justice, Power and Society/Social Class. Clothing and nakedness imagery is used to show the mental and physical state of the characters. As the character's state of mind changes throughout the play, their clothing reflects this change.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play King Lear and the movie King Lear both shared many similarities. They both told the story about the aging King of Britain and his fall from glory. The movie I watched was named King Lear and was directed by Trevor Nunn. The person who played King Lear was Ian McKellen. In both of these stories Lear was the King of Britain and both the movie and the play start off with him getting ready to retire and pass down his kingdom. King Lear was a powerful king and also one that was well respected, but as the play and movie develop there is evidence that shows other people do not respect him to the extent that he thought. Except in the movie it is visible when Lear gets upset. One of the things that led to the demise of his status was that he blindly gave his Kingdom away to the wrong daughters. This is the beginning of many events that start to show him becoming senile in both the play and the…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Describe the relationship between King Lear and his Fool in this passage. How is the relationship developed in King Lear as a whole?…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays