Preview

William Rowe Theory Of Evil

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
961 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
William Rowe Theory Of Evil
Evil is here amongst us on earth. Why is it here? Who put evil here and what was it’s purpose here on earth? If God is omnipotent, omniscient, and a wholly good being then is he really the master architect behind the creation of this world? But honestly lets touch some fundamentals first. What is evil? What is good? The idea of orthodox theism is that God is portrayed as a person and or being like a person. They also convey God as being the perfect being and that God is the greatest being possible or at least ensuring that people know that God will be the top being and no other being will be created greater than him.
Now they did list at least ten different reasons on why God is so almighty and powerful. I will simple list them and not go
…show more content…
James thought that this idea was the strongest, clearest, and easily understood theory. Rowe states that suffering is omnipotent, omniscient being could have prevented without losing the whole greater good aspect so not let evil permit equally bad or worse A wholly being God should prevent intense suffering from occurring without losing some greater good or permitting some evil equally bad or worse. There is no omnipotent, omniscient, wholly good being, This contradicts the idea of the feel logical premise this is a belief about God being a perfectly good being that would do under certain circumstances. This means that God no that intense suffering is about to happen and Ben would prevent it but could not prevented if he is losing some sort of greater good or permitting some equally evil act itself because a whole good God would not permit evil acts to …show more content…
Rowe does not claim to know or be able to prove that cases of intense suffering pointless. He gives example of how an omnipotent being and omniscient being can out weigh situations that will be justified to whether who is more likely to not impact us directly and impact a lesser population instead us directly. One must simply outweigh the lesser of the two evils and determine which will be a better option for the community

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Evil, how did it happen and why is it still here on this earth? There is this belief that the Christian God is good and all-powerful. He has the power to create worlds and beings, yet there is still evil in the world. Both Pierre Bayle and Voltaire address these questions in their works “Paulicians” and Candide (respectively). They both believe the Manichean philosophy as a more rational thought process than the contemporaneous Christian view. This belief is that there is not one, but two gods in the world; a god of good and a god of evil. I myself believe in a world of balance and like the two authors listed above, accept this as more rational thought than a single omnipotent god. My reasoning is that without evil, there is no concept of good,…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evil comes in as the obstacle coarse in the way of the ultimate prize. After all, with such a great goal, it shouldn't be easy. Though this doesn't really answer the question of where evil came from, or why God allows it. Irenaeus believes that we chose it when humanity fell in Creation. That justifies moral evil. But what of natural evil? Why did God want this journey to take place in such a hazardous environment, with earthquakes and pestilence, and in such frail form, which is susceptible to such dangers? Hick's response is that moral and spiritual development does not take place in a static environment but comes as the result of challenge and struggle and…

    • 935 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If God proves non-existence, we should rightly have a high epistemic standard. Finally, one could object that this criticism applies generally to arguments about evil and our limited human knowledge, rather than bearing specifically on Rowe's particular formulation. However, by constructing his case as a deductive argument that depends on a strong claim about the lack of justifying goods for specific instances of suffering, Rowe's argument takes on a higher burden of proof than more generalized arguments from evil that make weaker claims. Its validity hinges on establishing the truth of that weighty first premise to a very high degree of confidence. The limited human viewpoint seems insufficient to meet this burden.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history, good and evil have been a constant topic of discussion. Whether we are talking about terrorists, natural disasters, or simply your older brother breaking your toy, good and evil surround us. While opinions differ about the nature of good and evil, the tension remains the same. Outcomes are created, whether positive or negative. However horrible an event is, we seem to make light of it. We seem to be able to find the needle of good in the haystack of evil of life. But what is evil…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rambam Research Paper

    • 5133 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Darkness is the absence of light and did not need to be created. If I blow out a candle, I have not created darkness, but rather, I have destroyed the light. The same holds true for good and evil. As Rambam states: “…it cannot be said of God that He directly creates evil, or He has the direct intention to produce evil; that is impossible. His works are all perfectly good. He only produces existence, and all existence is good; whilst evils are of a negative character, and cannot be acted upon. Evil can only be attributed to Him in the way we have…

    • 5133 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Is Blackburn Wrong

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He further argues God’s unwillingness to solve the issues at hand in the first place such as how the survival of some creatures are undeniably based upon the suffering of others; he goes as far as even giving…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an all-perfect God is the ontological argument. While there are several different versions of the argument, all purport to show that it is self-contradictory to deny that there exists a greatest possible being. Thus, on this general line of argument, it is a necessary truth that such a being exists; and this being is the God of traditional Western theism. This article explains and evaluates classic and contemporary versions of the ontological argument.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    73 Evans, Manis). However the argument itself if just a mere introduction into what “God” is or rather who “God” might be. Evans and Manis hint to this in their final paragraph. McCloskey’s version of the argument is misguided in the notion that each individual argument is to be pulled apart singularly or that they cannot relate to form an over arching theme that “Gods” existence is dependent upon many facets. One may look to the “The Absurdity of Life Without God” article when defending this frame of view. That without “God” and the necessity of existence humanity is just a happy accident that is riddled with a meaningless purpose. Though personally the purpose of life and the existence of “God” are not relatable other than the fact they are ideas and existential questions asked only to attempt to “prove” the cause of unexplainable events or…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: James Rachels addresses the conflicts of evil in his book “Problems from Philosophy” by providing various forms of logical problems. The author points out the different possible explanations to why evil would exist. The first major idea Rachels makes is that perhaps pain is essential to caution people of danger. He goes on to suggest that this would not account for why some people are born with deadly diseases. Another idea he makes is that evil helps people appreciate the good in life. One would not be able to distinguish the good in life if evil did not exist. However, this does not explain why the world needs so much evil to exist, instead of letting a few bad things happen occasionally. The third idea the author makes questions why bad things happen to good people. Rachels suggests maybe those bad things that occur in life are…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. once said “He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.” Evil comes in many forms resembling events like terrorist attacks and crimes such as burglaries, rapes, hit and runs, plus more. No matter how small the evil may seem it always has its companion, fear. Fear is able to consume even the smallest of children and make evil seem much more extreme than it has to be. Evil is something that you can overpower or it can overpower you no matter the age in the novels Lord of the Flies, I am Malala, and the story of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument of whether God exists is an age-old debate, both sides attempting to prove their viewpoint, but neither having factual proof. Those that argue for the existence of God claim that He is wholly good, omnipotent and omniscient. However, if that were true and God did possess all three of these attributes, how is it that evil exists in the world? There is pain and suffering, crime and natural disasters that occur daily. With that being said, why does evil exist?…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theology 202 Essay 1

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The vast amount of evil that exists in the world is not because God created it, but because man allowed it. Man was not was not created by God with a built in evil nature; he was created with a free will that was exercised to purposefully sin. God gave Adam a choice whether to do right or wrong and he failed. The moment Adam chose to sin in the Garden of Eden the rest of the human race would be born in sin, too. God did not force this choice on Adam but allowed him to have complete free will. God is wholly benevolent and did not create evil; man brought it into the world by his sinful actions. Adam’s…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are different types of evil that are allowed in this world. The first is moral evil, which began in the garden of Eden when Eve ate the fruit off the tree and deliberately disobeyed God in an act of sin and evil (Gen. 3)(Elwell, pg 412). The next is natural evil; this is explained mainly in natural disasters such as, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and disease. Elwell writes, “natural evil is the consequence of moral evil,” then goes onto explain that natural evil is not distinct…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lastly, the problem of evil questions the omnipresent God…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the argument for the existence of God based on religious experience. (18) 2. ‘The argument merely indicates the probability of God and this is of little value to a religious believer.’ Discuss. (12)…

    • 2406 Words
    • 69 Pages
    Good Essays