Preview

William Bennett Drugs

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
737 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
William Bennett Drugs
In William J. Bennett’s argument, Drugs: Should their Sale and Use Be Legalized, he tries to persuade the readers that drugs should not be legalized. He goes on to explain the national drug policy and the intellectuals that by and large are against it but have little to contribute to the matter. The argument like he says is a little one sided, there is a whole lot to say about the national drug policy and very little to say about the intellectuals.
In his essay he explains both sides of the argument but it is more of his own opinion, and he tends to jump around a lot with different ideas. When he does actually give some factual evidence, he does not explain it well enough or give a good point on the subject. Bennett does however give some
…show more content…
Trying to locate the source of the drug problem, maybe an inner city problem, poverty, could be racism or some other social decline in our society. Bennett’s opinion on the intellectual consensus that the drug problem in America is absurdly simple, and easily solved; and that the drug problem in America is a lost cause, is that it’s a contradictory proposition and is false. If drugs were legalized Bennett thinks many matters in our society will be worse off. If drugs were sold at a local convenient store would they be taxed, if they were then a black market would always come into play. If they were sold really cheap, then drugs could be bought with the allowance of a middle school kid. Crime would not be eliminated by legalizing drugs with the research that most drug criminals were into crime well before they were into any drugs. Crime would still continue, to pay for everyday living needs of …show more content…
In New Mexico he spoke to Rudy Chavez, Jack Candelarla and police chief Sam Baca about putting together a youth program to help keep kids off the street and away from drugs. Unfortunately this failed but then they set up a police station right in the heart of the drug problem on the streets. Together the police station and the residence in the area wanting to clean up the streets cleared the area making it safe for there kids to walk on the streets without fear. Then the youth center became successful doing what it is supposed to do. He also has been traveling around the country observing the drug problems in communities. He found that there are problems like these all over the country. Most communities don’t want to just stand and do nothing as this epidemic inclines. They want to fight back, take back there communities, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Juliette Hughes wrote an article for The Age newspaper about how she thinks drugs should be legalised. She used many different sorts of metalanguage techniques such as using expert’s opinion, appealing to people’s self-interest etc. Hughes is an ethicist; her point of view is from an ethical standpoint. Hughes used examples from history and scientific experiment. The intended audience is a mature audience, who are open minded about the legalisation of drugs.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument of legalizing pot has been in question for years now. William Bennett, who served as the Secretary of Education under Ronald Reagan and a Drug Czar under H.W. Bush, wrote an article called “Legal Pot Is a Public Health Menace”, that is full of hard hitting facts. Though all his facts go against the legalization of pot, not all of them are trustworthy enough to decide whether or not to legalize pot. Most of Bennett’s facts are unrepresentative, unclear, or insufficient for the claim he wants to get across to his audience.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William J. Bennett is a well-known writer and thinker who is widely appreciated for his insights and wisdom. That 's what makes the article in question so disappointing. Of course, part of the explanation might be the fact that Bennett originally wrote the article as a newspaper op-ed column. Newspaper editorials are not conducive to documentation of facts and evidence. Still, by more carefully following his own high standards of reasoning and avoiding such exaggeration, "straw man" reasoning, sweeping generalization, and "either/or" fallacies as I 've cited, Bennett clearly could have made his case much…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Looking at the legal status of drugs, and one's own liberty for that matter, I examined the works of Mills and Dworkin. There are many different views, and in the end, as in all philosophical issues, there is no one answer. It then boils down to which one, if either, of these two different points of view is correct. Each of the works is presented in the book Contemporary Moral Problems by James White. After careful examination of both views, I will discuss each and decide if Dworkin's criticism of Mill's is correct.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    His story contained how he grew up in a single family home in South Central L.A. where gangs—two in particular--had gained notoriety, and as a product of his environment, got caught up running a multimillion dollar drug trafficking operation. He also spoke of working in conjunction with a CIA operative. He was now a recovered drug dealer, who once trafficked drugs; served time in prison; implemented the government’s role in literally delivering” boat loads” of cocaine to America’s poorest neighborhoods, but now he is an author and motivational speaker promoting his book.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Still Separate , Still Unequal By Jonathan Kozol Summary •Jonathan Kozol's "Still Separate Still Unequal" he explains how he visits various urban schools. The children voice their opinions and say how they feel forgotten and unimportant.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1301 Eng

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Having a presence and a resume to prove it, Mr. Bennett builds a firm idea that can be understood, but that is all it is, an idea. Right from the start he belittles those who use drugs (some of which are deemed intellectual) and at the same time shows signs of pity by saying they could have been a functioning part in society. This idea almost contradicts itself until you delve into his thesis. “I’m sorry to say that on properly intellectual grounds the arguments mustered against our current drug policy by America’s intellectuals make for very thin gruel indeed.”(633) now you realize his tone at the beginning was a sarcastic remark to the idea of people crowned as the…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drugs Vidal Analysis

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Vidal author of "Drugs" witting in 1970 on New York Time's expresses the authors feeling and devotions making a stand on what she believes to be the truths, backing up every statement with facts or relatable historical events, which are relatable. The author Vidal speaks her mind about making drug illegal does not work, as to end drug addiction, deaths and trafficking, why legalizing drugs would work, and why nonetheless legalization is unlikely to happen, but also including Homage to Daniel Shays Collected Essays. The authors tone is opening straightforward and rational which haves a direct impact on the reader by the use of words creating an atmosphere of her true feelings on this subject which is that neither legalizing or abolishing drugs would solve the problem Americans are facing with the obsessive dealing of drugs which haves many effects on peoples'…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs, he takes a different approach to regarding the War on Drugs. While he feels that current drug policies have failed, his book focuses on the injustice of punitive drug laws and believes we should stop punishing people for using illicit drugs. “A law whose purpose is deterrence must always be backed by a demonstration that the law is just.” (ix) His book is presented in three chapters. Chapter one describes our present drug policies and laws and raises questions to answer whether these are just or unjust and offers his position of decriminalization as a more ethical approach to drug use. Chapter two reviews the most frequent arguments used in favor of punishing drug users and Husak believes that none of these are convincing enough to warrant enacting laws on a person’s behavior. Chapter three declares that punishing drug users is counterproductive and damaging to us…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Butts

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In "Against the legalization of Drugs", We've seen how James Q. Wilson says that Heroin and Cocaine should be kept illegal. Perhaps the strongest argument Wilson gives to support this claim, is that a government may rightly restrict an individual's liberty to prevent harm to others. Although this is in violation with an individual's freedom of thought and speech. In this paper, I will present two arguments from Kantian ethics and Douglas Husak that refute this idea, and further show that heroin and cocaine should not be kept illegal.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within the last 50 years, drug legalization has been a very hotly debated topic in the United States society. It almost seems that every "street drug" was once legal, but banned soon after its introduction in society. Illegal substances that one sees today were once synthesized and created by chemist such as LSD, ecstasy, methamphetamine, cocaine, and etc., and at some point used for medical reasons, however during many circumstances were deemed illegal by the government due to detrimental effects after prolonged usage. William Bennett's "Drugs: Should Their Sale and Use Be Legalized" targets the general American public into understanding the societal importance of upholding the nations current drug policy. Bennett starts his piece by stating, "The issue I want to address is our national drug policy and the intellectuals" (Bennett 592). Bennett specifically addresses the issue the nation, by using the pronoun "our." Also this is a "national" issue, which is also an indication that he is targeting the general American public. Bennett is clearly on the side of keeping and enforcing banning and making narcotics illegal. He is trying to win over the individuals who are in between the issue, and of course the liberals who are opposed to the nation's drug policy.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enlgish

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In an article called “Drugs” by Gore Vidal. Vidal makes a strong case for legalizing all drugs in this country. He discusses basic human nature and events to make his claim. Basically Gore makes three main points about drug use. He tells the reader that making drugs illegal does not stop drug addiction and trafficking, why legalized drugs would work, and why legalization is still unlikely to occur. My own view on the legalizing of drugs does not agree with Vidal.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Against the Legalization of Drugs,” by Peter de Marneffe, the argument that the use and possession of drugs needs to be decriminalized is made, because of the belief that the criminalization of drug use and possession violates the rights of citizens. In this paper, I will defend de Marneffe’s position by refuting a possible objection. Contrarians may claim that decriminalizing drugs will inevitably lead individuals to try harder and more dangerous drugs.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the arguments against legalization of drugs is what we have all grown up hearing which is “drugs are bad”. This reason has been said throughout most of our life and is what we learn in schools. However, legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco have caused more harm than illegal drugs. Another argument against legalization is that it would send mix signals to children. Drugs are bad and “just say no” have been sayings we have all learned growing up. However, if drugs were suddenly legal children would be confused. The rates of use can fluctuate in high school students with their confusion about drugs. Another argument against legalizing drugs is that the drug epidemic for late 1800s to 1900s ended because of society’s shift in attitude…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Against America's Drug War

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Over the past four decades, drugs use remains a very serious problem in the US, even though the drug war has made these substances less accessible. There are a lot of supporting views for the motion that government should legalize drugs, the reasons being: to spend less on war drugs, to make drugs more accessible to people and scientists in need of drugs, to collect tax revenues, etc. Two well-known professors and authors, Michael Huemer and Gabor Maté, argue, in their articles, against America’s drug war with two different approaches. Even though some might agree on Huemer’s point of legalizing drugs on the basis of individual freedom, I noticed some claims that I believe are not moral to the Kantian and Utilitarian point of views. On the…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays