Why We Should Not Reinstate Canada
In my opinion, I think capital punishment is immoral and Canada should not reinstate the death penalty. The death penalty is unethical and doesn’t speak for the morals Canadians hold so close to their hearts, and the decision to reinstate it would create a huge negative impact on foreign relations around the world. Canada is a strong advocate toward fighting injustice and for human rights, and if we decided to reinstate it, countries would highly condemn that decision and would leave Canada out of important discussions to create a more equal and just world. In addition, the death penalty costs governments around the world a massive amount of money. For example, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, taxpayers in the state of California paid over 4 billion dollars for the death penalty since it was reinstated in the state in 1978. Canada is already struggling with deficits of up to 18
…show more content…
The juror’s recognized and valued that they were participating in a key pillar of democracy, a fair and unbiased jury. Juror #11 mentions the importance of this, saying to the jury that “This is a remarkable thing about democracy. That we are…ummmm… what is the word…Ah, notified! That we are notified by mail to come down to this place and decide on the guilt or innocence of a man we have not known before. We have nothing to gain or lose by our verdict. This is one of the reasons why we are strong. We should not make it a personal thing.” Juror #11 is amplifying the importance in the civic duty they were partaking in, and is encouraging the jury to make their decision based on the facts presented to them, not from their personal beliefs. While some juror’s, especially Juror #3, included their personal beliefs in their decisions throughout the deliberation, many realized the importance of their job, and looked deep into the evidence presented to them before they reached a
The juror’s recognized and valued that they were participating in a key pillar of democracy, a fair and unbiased jury. Juror #11 mentions the importance of this, saying to the jury that “This is a remarkable thing about democracy. That we are…ummmm… what is the word…Ah, notified! That we are notified by mail to come down to this place and decide on the guilt or innocence of a man we have not known before. We have nothing to gain or lose by our verdict. This is one of the reasons why we are strong. We should not make it a personal thing.” Juror #11 is amplifying the importance in the civic duty they were partaking in, and is encouraging the jury to make their decision based on the facts presented to them, not from their personal beliefs. While some juror’s, especially Juror #3, included their personal beliefs in their decisions throughout the deliberation, many realized the importance of their job, and looked deep into the evidence presented to them before they reached a