Preview

Why Was England's Ordeal A Civil War?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
664 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was England's Ordeal A Civil War?
“England’s Ordeal” lasted for nearly 20 years, starting in 1642 and ended in 1660. At the time it was treated as, and is still called, a civil war because there was no better way to describe the circumstances occurring in England at the time. The very distinct characteristic of this war was that the motivations were not between classes but rather within them. Religion was the fulcrum of this war with parliament and the crown as the counterweights. England was divided into two groups: the roundheads and the cavaliers. Roundheads, given their named for their short-cropped hairstyle, sided with parliament. The term Cavalier, was used as an insult to describe men willing “to commit all manner of Outrage and Violence" (Webster), and consisted of those loyal to the king. Parliament desired a constitutional monarchy, which fell because King Charles did not want …show more content…
At the time Kings were thought to be anointed by god and practice divine right, therefore parliament was not only defying King Charles I but also god himself. Parliament was trying to build on an unconstitutional foundation and they had to convince the people that God and justice were on their side. Since, the old military was loyal the king, parliament attempted to gather local militia, but failed because the leaders were trying to keep this as un-revolutionary as possible. There was a large debate on whether or not a war would be necessary. Originally, there was no objective to dismantle the monarchy but over time it was obvious war had to take place. October 23rd 1642, King Charles I and his army were traveling from Shrewsbury to London when he discovered the Parliamentary army was just a few miles away. The Kings army took the high ground at Edgehill and it was there that the first major battle of the civil war took place. Though the war ended in a draw, it gave the King the advantage because he was able to reach

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Charles I did not go along with the parliament. He took a serious hit during his 22 years as king. He began to give into extra parliamentary resorts such as, new tariffs and duties and collection of discontinued taxes. This angered the parliament as taxes were being illegally collected for an already unfortunate war and one that involved France…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James I was an absolutist ruler who emphasized the divine right of kings and sought to restrain Parliament under his will. Consequently, conflicts were inevitable as James I, and ensuing rulers, often found himself deficient of funds, and Parliament served as the gateway to the money. James I and his successor Charles I called Parliamentary meetings solely to ascertain the issue of funds. During this period, Parliament was rarely called upon and after these debates for money, Charles I and James I completely dissolved the Parliament. I did so because he agreed to admit the illegality of his taxes in turn for funding from Parliament. Afterwards, he abolished the Parliament to pursue his own endeavors. Furthermore, during Charles tenure, the English Civil War took place as a result from the lack of amity between Charles and Parliament. The Scottish invaded England, but Parliament refused to allow Charles to raise an army, because they feared he would abuse his powers and assail English citizens who opposed him. Charles I was eventually defeated and executed by Oliver Cromwell. Following the inadequacy of Cromwell, Charles II rose to power and was keyed the "merry monarch" for his easy-going nature. He imposed the Cabal system, a group of five individuals who handled the political issues of England; the term Cabal stems from the initials of each official member. This system acted as a type of Parliament in its methods of governing. During this period as a whole, it is evident that Parliament often conflicted with the ideals of the ruling monarch.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles’s led the country without calling parliament for 11 years from 1629 – 1640. He initiated personal rule for many reasons. Firstly his close relationship with Buckingham alienated Parliament and caused resentment by Parliament. Secondly Charles had very strong believed in divine right and therefore saw no need for Parliament. Furthermore Charles religious policy’s led many to believe of a Catholic Conspiracy, which further distanced the King from Parliament. Lastly the King wasn’t getting substantial financial help from Parliament and decided that he would try and raise the finance without him.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nineteen Propositions

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page

    King Charles On January 4 1642 arrested five members of the commons John Pym, John Hampden, Denzil Holles, William Strode, Sir Arthur Hesilrige, and one Lord named Mandeville. So in March Parliament passed the Militia Ordinance which you did not have to get say from the King so Parliament could select whoever they wanted to be Lord and deputy. The King power started to become limited. Parliament sent out a letter called Nineteen Propositions to the king which was a list of things that Parliament wanted to have control fully or as equally as the king and King Charles denied it. So both the Parliament and King got ready for war. Around the middle of 1642 people started flocking towards the king some of the people who opposed him started to join…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If not for this Charles would have simply chosen to dissolve parliament again when things stopped going his way, rather than starting the first civil war. The Members of Parliament knew this and so ensured in advance that parliament would be able to go through with its policies without the threat of Charles being able to stop it. It can therefore be assumed that parliament was willing to take measures to guarantee the political situation in England was amended. However Parliament was very much divided over how harshly they should oppose the king and his methods of ruling England, some individuals, such as Oliver Cromwell thought that since the parliamentary side was winning the vast majority of battles it must be the will of God that the King is fully defeated; another Member of parliament who strongly opposed the king John Pym, who was a leader on the Committee of Safety and organised parliament’s military strategy and negotiated the allegiance with Scotland, which he realised was a fundamental factor to remove King Charles I from power. These particular individuals were willing to go to any lengths to gain parliamentary control of England, including going to war however other MPs were more inclined to make peace with the…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    parliament frq

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the execution of Charles I, Oliver Cromwell governed under a military dictatorship. He removed all Presbyterians from Parliament which created a Rump Parliament that voted to execute Charles and…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The Civil War Happen? Bang! Why did the Civil War start? The main reason of the Civil War was John Brown,Bleeding Kansas and Abraham Lincoln they all have a lot to do with the Civil War and how it started.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On April 12, 1861 The Civil war began when Confederate warships bombarded Union soldiers at Fort Sumner. The Civil War is said to be one of the deadliest and most destructive of all America's wars.The Civil War was fought in thousand of different places, from southern Pennsylvania to Texas; from New Mexico to the Florida coast. The majority of the fighting took place in the states of Virginia and Tennessee. Many still debate on what cause the Civil War.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the English Civil War broke out in 1642, Cromwell had military training or experience. Yet within a decade, according to one leading Royalist statesman and historian, he "mounted himself into the throne of the three kingdoms [England, Wales, and Scotland] without the name of a king but with greater power and authority than had ever been exercised or claimed by any king." Cromwell's power arose from his military ability and his unique relationship with his troops. As soon as the war began, the creation of a pious and professional army to serve the English Parliament became his principal concern, and in 1645 he pushed for the formation of a standing army, with central funding and central direction. Under the command of Thomas Fairfax, with Cromwell as his deputy, this "New Model Army" quickly routed the main Royalist force at the Battle of Naseby (June 14, 1645), marking the beginning of a string of remarkable…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why The Civil War Began

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Civil war began in April of 1861. There were many reasons the Civil War began. For example, slavery was one of the reasons. Another reason was that the South wanted to secede from the United States because they believed more in state’s rights rather than federal rights. These are two of the main reasons the Civil War began.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why The Civil War Started?

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As we all know the Civil War is a huge part of United States history. Have you ever wondered why the Civil War Started? Have you thought about the impact this war had on the country, people, slaves, and trading. It's very important to understand that intentions of the war along with life during the war and the economy have shaped what the U.S, has become today.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many different contributing factors to the start of The Civil War. Five of these causes were the Northwest Ordinance and Missouri Compromise, John Brown’s raid, The 1850 Compromise, The Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the constant conflict between the North and South. The Northwest Ordinance said the there could be no slavery in states north of the Ohio River, however slave holders moved west to new states. This then led to the Missouri Compromise which said no slave states passed the 36 30 degree. John Brown’s raid on the federal arsenal was considered by many to be the cause of the civil war. The 1850 Compromise was also heavily contributed to the start of the civil war. In the compromise New Mexico and…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believed God chose him to rule as king, so he shouldn’t have parliament, on his side to help him! He only had his closest friends and advisors to help him. William Laud, who was a close friend, in which Charles had made archbishop of Canterbury, he also specialised in helping Charles with religion. William was the one, who advised Charles to send the new prayer book to Scotland. The Duke of Buckingham, (George Villiers) had been a favourite of James 1 and James had made him: Viscount, Earl, Marquis and then Duke of Buckingham, soon George moved his loyalty onto Charles and became a good friend and loyal advisor. George had become unpopular with parliament, for supporting the marriage of Charles and Henrietta. Charles had stopped George getting killed by parliament, but in 1623 George was stabbed to death while in Portsmouth. Thomas Wentworth, was an MP and loyal to the king, he was trying to do both, being an MP and loyal to the king. But, it didn’t work as parliament weren’t happy, that made Thomas closer to the king instead. Thomas was known as Black Tom, because of his dark hair and gloomy face, as well as he always wore black puritan clothes. Charles made Thomas lord president of the North and lord deputy of Ireland. Thomas controlled Ireland strictly. Charles’ advisors could not lend him the money to fight the Scots. Charles was going to have to ask Parliament, but that would mean not believing so much in ‘The Divine Rights of Kings’, which upset Charles. Parliament were not happy at all with Charles, for shutting them down for 11 years and when they heard that Charles needed the money to fight the scots, they knew Charles was vulnerable. Parliament weren’t happy with how the king was controlling the country, especially with his choice of advisors. They wanted more say in practically everything the king did. Charles didn’t think…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil War

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    -the First shot of the civil was in a battle that was called The Merrimac. The Union Army led by General Robert E. Lee won this battle. Many battles where won by the south and other where won by the north, President Lincoln flew to Camp David, a camp which General Lee and General Grant which were the two generals that led the south, they both waited inside a modest tent in camp David to sign a Treaty with the north. This brought the civil war to an official ending.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Charles raised his Standard in Nottingham 1642 it was unclear who, or how, the war would be won, but Parliament's Victory in The Civil War 1646, can be explained by a Multitude of reasons, most notably; a Royalist lack of finance [or more generally resources], and Parliamentary revolutionary Reform and Organisation.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays