Preview

Why War Is Justified?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1323 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why War Is Justified?
George Washington once said: “To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means for preserving peace.” As much of an irony it is, war is needed to safeguard our amity and to ensure that the balance of power will not be disturbed. The idea of war has been received with countless different altercations. In history, we learned that governments have glorified war to recruit young men to join the army by using propaganda. Soldiers who have died for their country were depicted as heroes, fighting for their own freedoms. However, in this modern age the horrors of war come to light, what happens on the battlefield is nothing to be triumphant about. Although war has never been a favorable option, it can be justified. A war is justified if …show more content…
War is a very imprecise action as it is impossible to predict an outcome, even if the state tries to avoid the general population, there will always be civilian casualties. The loss of innocent civilian lives are even seen as “collateral damage” in seeking justice for the deaths of civilian lives. A country often has vested interest to pursue the group of aggressors or even kill them, yet this puts in danger the lives of innocents. This also puts in jeopardy the livelihood of ordinary civilians as they live in terror. When the responding nation also kills the uninvolved citizens in the quest for justice, they too commit the act of injustice first inflicted on them, making both countries equally wrong. Thus when a country kills more innocents to seek equity, even more resentment and hatred will be created, creating a cycle of violence and counter-violence. This happened in World War II, the Americans declared war with Japan after the Pearl Harbour bombing. In order to end the war, the U.S. dropped two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This resulted in the death of 129,000–246,000 people killed, and large numbers of civilians died months after the bombing due to the effects of burns, radiation sickness and other injuries. The Americans justified the bombing as a necessity, choosing not to invade Japanese home islands which would result the death of millions of Japanese and Allied forces. Yet the death toll of the bombings greatly outnumbers those in Pearl Harbour. Although the U.S. had a right intention to declare war and did manage to end it, the Japanese seem to have taken a much bigger penance than they should from America. Of course, war itself brings suffering. World War II itself had 85 million casualties, while the Holocaust in Europe killed 17 million people. Thus it can be seen that war is unjustified based on the loss of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In today's world and society, war is often the last source of solution for perseverance and safekeeping of a democracy’s interests, while on the other…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War should never be used unless it is the last option available, and only if peace will really come as a result of the mass suffering and disaster. As General Dwight Eisenhower said in a message to his invasion troops, "You will bring about the destruction of the German war machine, the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed peoples of Europe, and security to yourselves in a free world" (39). The best way to solve a conflict is not to resort to violence, but rather to words. If war is inevitable, then those who had nothing to do with it should be left alone and not involved, such as innocent…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Historically, war has been the leading solution for solving conflicts globally. Though combat tactics have become increasingly more sophisticated over many centuries. The ability to affect and change the world through war stayed the same. All the while, the mentality of the public has become increasingly dissociative, and people have less interest on a large scare. From World War I until now, war has constantly evolved, and support has constantly fluctuated.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To conclude, there is no doubt that the conflict of war is a useless encounter that affects many innocent people’s lives, the economic stability and physiological wellbeing of soldiers. It is evident that in some circumstances society makes war to ensure peace, and on the surface this seems rational, even plausible. However, in reality throughout the journey there is a great human and economic cost…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    New American Militarism

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    War has become a game for the United States, an addicting one. Many years ago, war was always seen as a last tragic sult, but when forwarding in time, this is no…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is ubiquitous; there will always be one country at war with another during all the times of the year. The first recorded war was in 2700 BCE in Mesopotamia between Sumer and Elam, and the latest have been the Syrian and Iraq wars. Although there have been countless amounts of changes in warfare since 2700 BCE there will forever be a constant controversy about what good comes from war. While soldiers are risking their lives across the world civilians are at home contemplating the pros and cons of warfare. Though trauma that accompanies war is unforgivable, war is not entirely useless. Without it countries and people around the world would be taken advantage of. The destruction left behind by war is nothing in comparison to the catastrophic…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “War, what is it good for”? The lyrics to the 60’s pop song, provokes the question that Just War proponents and Pacifists have wrestled with throughout history, reaching opposite conclusions. Those in favor of Just War theory, say war is only good insofar as it is fought for the right reasons and brings about the right end. Whereas, Pacifists reject war completely, preferring peaceful means to resolve conflict. But which one is morally and ethically right? Which one should be adopted and practiced by the Nations of this World? Upon examining the logic and philosophical implications of each ethical stance, one is able to sympathize with them both, seeing their values and virtue.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When is war acceptable? That is the question that the Just War theory (jus bellum iustum) attempts to answer. Guided by an evolving set of criteria, this tradition attempts to provide a framework by which the both the reasons for a war and the combatants' behavior may be judged to be ethical and morally justifiable. This theory or doctrine, has roots in both philosophical and historical contexts, having been shaped by conventions and rules observed through ages of war as well as the thoughts of philosophers of those same ages. These principles are divided into two parts: 'the right to go to war' (jus ad bellum), which concerns itself with whether it is justifiable…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human beings have been at battle with one another since prehistoric times, and people have been discussing the rights and wrongs of it for almost just as long. The purpose of war ethics is to help decide what is right or wrong, both for individuals and countries, and to contribute to debates on public policy, and ultimately to government and individual action. War ethics also lead to the creation of formal codes of war, the drafting and implementation of rules of engagement for soldiers, and in the punishment of soldiers and others for war crimes. War ethics are a highly controversial topic and many people’s opinions differ on the subject. For instance, there are individuals who believe that war is bad because it involves deliberately killing or injuring people. These people also believe that war is a fundamental wrong and an abuse of the victims’ human rights. People opposing the war may even extend further with the idea or theory of pacifism. There are several different forms of pacifism, but they all include the idea that war and violence are unjustifiable, and that conflicts should be settled in a peaceful manner. Many people believe that pacifism is more than opposition to war. They argue that it must include action to promote justice and human rights. This is where those who believe that war isn’t particularly good nor bad but believe it may be necessary and do not see it as wrong come into the picture. The people for war believe that war should be fought if there is a just cause, has been lawfully declared, the intention behind the war is good or pure, other plans of resolving issues had been tried first, there is a reasonable chance of success, and the means must be in proportion to the end that the war seeks to achieve. Many individuals for war argue that it is important to acknowledge the difference between the moralities of pacifism as it applies to an individual, and the application…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just War Theory

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    These victims of acts of aggression provide evidence for the importance of a clear understanding of just cause for battle. The ethics of war are deep arguments that originate at the dawn of humanity. At our core, all humans share a desire to live, thrive, and above all maintain a certain sense of morality. To determine the answers to the questions of what justifies war, who justifies it, and why we as human beings feel the need to fight, one must understand the purpose of war, and with that, the conviction of the human soul. At the end of the day, there is no victory in killing, no matter the success that it may lead to. War, in my opinion, must be fought for peace and peace alone. We are one species, who share many ideas, beliefs, cultures, and systems of thought. In order to progress and reach our full potential as humans, we must see that we will never fully understand the ethics behind war, because there is no “right” answer. What we can do, however, is justify how we act during war by demonstrating a clear comprehension of our actions and accepting the repercussions…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fallen Angels

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many people believe that wars do not always have a valid reason to be fought. Some of the arguments are that it brings death of civilians that could have been avoided. But in truth, people die every day. War may cause some harmful things, but, if you think about it, don’t people? I believe, and encourage you to believe with me, that wars are in fact necessary. Not just because we are fighting for what we believe in, but good things do come of war. Such as brotherhood, patriotism to your country, and also unifies our country as a whole by us coming together.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Things They Carried

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages

    War presents a very complex moral dilemma. While it is necessary to fight for freedom, a better world, and what is right, war contradicts itself. The very same soldiers that fight in defense of these values have them taken away because of their experiences at war. The negative effects are just as big as the positive effects of war. A nation can never really win in war because of this. Instead war just stays a neutral thing.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Was Hiroshima Wrong

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War is something that has affected everyone since civilization started. War is between two or more groups of people, their leader usually sending out an army of a sort to attack the opponent. Whether it be internationally known countries, or a child playing with their action figures, war is violent. It causes destruction, tragedy, and loss. Hiroshima was one of the most catastrophic events that took place in history. No one knew what was happening or what to do, since this was the first atom bomb ever dropped on a city. Some say that Hiroshima could have started the cold war. The ethics of war take their place here. People have asked about Hiroshima and the Just War Theory. They ask if Hiroshima was justified, or if it wasn’t and Americans…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In today's society, the possession and effective use of force is necessary. We have to recognize that we live in an imperfect world where evil seems to be an inevitablity. Our constant need for power makes the idea of a violent free world unimaginable. As long as we continue on this power hungry path the political issues will continue on this same path. Force is necessary with our current societal conditions and can be looked at as irresponsible when a nation does not prepare for the necessity of force. Any political conversation that entails the words, truth, liberty or peace run hand in hand with the use of force to create them. The perspective of some people are…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Is Pointless

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Most of us realise what war is. But today I have come to you, to provide you with an insight into war and its devastating effects. War is a state open and declared armed hostile conflict between states or nations, it has evoked a loss of millions of lives over the past 200 years, and thus war is a pointless act of conflict.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays