Preview

Why War I Was Germany Cause World War One?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
960 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why War I Was Germany Cause World War One?
There is no uncertainty all the European forces assumed a part in inciting World War One, yet most normally, fingers point to Germany. Is Germany really to fault for the main world war? That is the question that will be tended to in this paper. WWI was viewed as the principal add up to war, which means nations devote the greater part of their assets to battle and win. Alongside every nation utilizing their qualities, they had a tangled partnership framework which helped them battle, in which nations made antagonistic activities on each other. On November 11, 1918, the First Armistice at Compiegne was marked, measuring the fault on Germany. Germany can't be completely reprimanded for causing World War One, although their activities did propose …show more content…
On August 5, 1914, Germany and Austria-Hungary marked the Blank Check, which affirmed their help for each other. Germany's best course of action was to pronounce war on Russia, which would enable their partner to battle Serbia and just Serbia. On the off chance that Germany is getting reprimanded for causing war since they moved down their partner, for what reason don't the other get faulted also? Germany can't be singled out from alternate nations by adhering to their partnership understanding and supporting their companion. Even though Germany did not cause the whole war, they played a part in its introduction. After the unification of its 30 expresses, Germany's regular citizens picked up a lot of solid patriot emotions. Over a course of thirty years, they turned into the most grounded modern power in Europe, after the Franco-Prussian war. They had the most grounded economy and military. Their regular people were arrogant, and this could conceivably be risky and be a danger to different …show more content…
The second reason is that Russia prepared a considerable measure speedier than they figured they would, so they needed to part their troops down the middle with a specific end goal to guard each front. The way that this arrangement had been in the making a very long time before the war even began undermined alternate countries and made pressure inside the landmass. This demonstrates regardless of whether Serbia's dark hand hadn't killed Franz Ferdinand, Germany would can possibly blend things up at any rate. Students of history who measure the heaviness of the war all on Germany are not placing themselves in Germany's shoes; they don't understand they are just attempting to safeguard both themselves and their partners as well as make up for lost time to the next European nations both power-wise and regional shrewd. They were attempting to be a useful partner to Austria-Hungary and make up for lost time to the next European forces. Despite the reality Germany made some lamentable demonstrations of hostility amid the season of World War One, they can't be altogether reprimanded for the reason for World War

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Finding the Middle Ground

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1914 is arguably one of the most influential years in human history. Not only did it introduce the world to the practice of total warfare, but it also demonstrated the devastating outcome of rising political and economic tensions in Europe, as well as the inevitable conflict that is rooted in our global anarchic system. Almost a century later, historians continue to study the catastrophic events that occurred in 1914 and one of the most controversial and sensitive topics is the debate on who is to blame for the outbreak of WWI. Many would be quick to point their finger at Germany, including historian Fritz Fischer, who validly argues that Germany was responsible for WWI based upon their nation’s political and militaristic aims to establish Germany as a world power. On the other hand, historian Paul Ritter questions Fischer’s argument, believing that Germany did not intentionally plan for WWI to occur. Both points are valid, yet the truth may not lie on either extreme sides of the spectrum. Rather, the long-term and short-term responsibility of WWI is shared between Germany, the conflictive nature of the world’s political system, and those nation states that exist within such a system during 1914. Therefore, the combination of a precarious political environment and an ambitious militaristic intention and course of action holds Germany highly, yet not completely, responsible for WWI.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate of Germanys responsibility for the outbreak of war first began with the charge of war guilt given in Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty. Germany rejected Article 231 and successfully campaigned against it as by 1950 it had become widely accepted that Germany where not solely responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914. The first source from Gordon Corrigan, Mud, Blood and Poppycock, published in 2003 addresses Germany’s “unconditional support” to Austria- Hungary to support the idea of Germany being the main reason for the outbreak of World War 1. In this source Corrigan refers to Fritz Fischer’s theory in which he argued that Germany’s leaders might not have been solely to for what happened in 1914 but hold a substantial share of the responsibility. Source 2 from L.F.C Turner, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1970 agrees with Source 1 by reinforcing that it was Germany’s support to Austria and the Blank Cheque that were vital in the starting of War. On the other hand, Source 3 from James Joll, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1984 disagrees with source 1 as Joll highlights the involvement of other countries with a main focus on Britain being a main factor in the cause of war. Source 2 agrees with this to some extent as it also discusses that Germany is not the only country that is responsible.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Austria and Hungary were the countries who made Serbia and Russia angry, not Germany. Austria and Hungary wanted Serbian land because they had just gained vast amounts of land from the Second Balkan War. The only reason Germany entered the war is because Austria and Hungary promised land to Germany. Their new Franz, Austrias military leader, was assassinated and the one who replaced him wanted to attack Serbia because he held a grudge against Serbia for a long time, but their Emperor said no. Their Emperor was 84 years old and he didn’t want to deal with a war, but the Franz attacked anyway and he didn’t realize that in attacked Serbia, then he would have to attack Russia too. The latest Franz attacked anyway and they got Germany to help them. They were power hungry and they didn’t have a great of status at the time so they wanted more power. Russia sided with Serbia,…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Centennial College The Making of the Modern World Corse Instructor: Dr. Jacob Meunier Group Number: 03 Name: Ng Sze Wing Date: 23th March 2015 Topic 2 By studying and discuss from the long- and short-term causes of the war, to understand how accurate was Article 231 on placing full blame for World War I on Germans.…

    • 2778 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1 Dbq Analysis

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although Count Brockdorff-Rantzau, the German delegation leader believed that Germany was not at all responsible for world war one, the Treaty of Versailles take it that Germany is the one responsible for this war due to their loss(Doc.4). At the delegation to the Versailles Peace Conference the German delegation leader had protested that one of the causes of this war was imperialism. The method of imperialism added to the threat to other countries because of its policies of retaliation and expansion(Doc.5). As a result of there being an expansion throughout European nations, mobilization occurred. Mobilization lead to militarism adding to the factors of tension and threats. While, both the…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question of whether no single alliance or nation could be held responsible for the outbreak of war is a hotly debated topic. Source 2 strongly agrees with the statement giving the view that no one nation could be held responsible. However, source 1 gives the opposite view that German aggression was primarily responsible, which is supported, to a large extent by source 3, which highlights German imperialistic aims as being a key aggravator. However, it does also suggest that other great powers were also aggressive to some extent. This essay will focus on the idea that, primarily, German aggression was to blame.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to Russian Empire’s and Austria-Hungary’s declaration of war against each other after the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria, Germany declared war on Russia on August 1, 1914. Three days later, the German Reichstag declared Burgfrieden or “civil peace” which declared for people to set aside their conflicts aside and unite to defend the country. Most Germans expecting a rapid victory, enthusiastically supported the war. Their views, however, shifted from ebullience to one of detest. Opinions toward war all varied to each person. Some supported the war through the end, while some changed their view and wanted the war to end. In another perspective, some saw the war as an economic opportunity.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which then cause Germany to ally with Austria-Hungary and threaten a war towards Russia, although Russia back downed so therefore the beginning of World War One was postponed. So…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World war I was the first world war that cause about 40 million deaths and over 300 billion dollars of damage. The Allies and Central powers were fight most for power and respect. The Franco-Prussian war triggered tension and the alliance system and the arms race. The Franco-Prussian was the one of the main reasons the war started anthers reason was the assentation of the archduke of Austria-Hungry Franz Ferdinand assassinated.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Europe was to a great extent a ‘powder keg’ ready to explode prior to 1914. Despite conflicting views on the causes of World War 1, the outbreak of this War was not inevitable, nor was it the result of one key event. However, it was more a product of rising tensions, rivalry and fear within Europe, which dated back primarily to the 18th and 19th centuries. Emerging new ideologies and the development of new technologies facilitated change in the structure of European societies. As a result, European powers felt the need to exert their dominance and control through military expansion, and aggressive nationalism. The ethnocentric attitudes prevailing at this time lead to a desire of many nations to expand their empires and colonies to new areas. All of this led to the development of complex alliance systems, governed by diplomacy and strategy. Due to such, the reflection that Europe was a powder keg ready to explode in 1914, is significantly valid. As it encapsulates and reflects the rising tensions amongst powers at that time, and the mutual mistrust and resentment between them.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting around 1870 imperialism amplified and is a major cause of World War I due to the actions and emotions associated with imperialism. Imperialism was the practice of one or more nations trying to control another nation or people, thus reducing or even eliminating their sovereignty. While not all the Great Powers and Serbia hold equal blame, each country felt or stimulated imperialism from 1870 until 1914. To start, England believed that the sun never sets on her empire, thus she believed in the need to continually keep building geographically and militarily. British forces were bold, innovative, and caused irritation and “international friction” (Remak 30). In 1898, English and French forces collided in pursuit of Sudan. Sudan had been held by locals, however, under the rules of European imperialism the land should be controlled by, “...the fittest conqueror” (30).…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Holocaust was a major event that occurred during WWII that imprisoned many European Jews. There were many aspects that contributed to the Holocaust happening. These include anti-semitism, the loss of World War I, and Hitler’s gain in power. Anti-semitism was one of the causes of the Holocaust. According to the website call to conscience “this question lies in the strong anti-Semitic tradition in Europe” ("The reasons for the Holocaust").…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    cause of wwI dbq

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At the turn of the twentieth century, Europe seemed to enjoy a period of peace and progress. Yet below the surface, several forces were at work that would lead Europe into the “Great War.” On of these forces was nationalism, and it had an explosive effect in the Balkans. But, nationalism was only one of the many causes of WWI. Historians and eye witnesses have described the causes of WWI and have tried to assess the responsibility for it. All wars occur because of basic political issues, such as nationalism, imperialism, alliances, militarism, and economics. World War I was no exception to this rule. Each of these played a part in bringing about The Great War. Along with these causes, all wars also have a spark and World War I is no different.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first World War, The Great War, or what many like to call it, was an avoidable war that cost millions of military and civilian lives. The blood of both sides, mixed in the dirt and mud that soaked the uniforms of the sick troops, taking cover in trenches, praying to God that they aren't the ones to be bombed by the next mortar incoming; this barely scratches the surface when describing “The Great War”. World war 1 had many opportunities to end, however even if it didn't, it a least gave everyone in the world an insight on how terrible war is, and how its changed from the past.…

    • 2099 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World War I, also known as “The War to End All Wars”, “The War of the Nations”, and “The great war”, is studied all around the world. Although WWI is taught world wide, historians still debate on the main cause of the war. Historians can agree that the main five causes of WWI were militarism, alliance systems, imperialism, nationalism, and assassination. These five beliefs and actions lead up to the disunion of the world . WWI was an avoidable war. The causes of the war were all connected. Without militarism there would be no imperialism. Without imperialism there would be no nationalism. Without nationalism there would be no alliances. Without alliances there would be no assassination. However, because of nationalism and the idea that one…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays