Preview

Why The Romans Won The Punic Wars?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
668 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why The Romans Won The Punic Wars?
The first Punic War began in 264 B.C. and was fought between Carthage and Rome jostling to control Sicily because of its prime trade location, resulting in a Roman victory. The second Punic War was also won by Rome and was fought in Spain because of the incredible hatred Carthaginian general Hannibal had for Rome. The third and final Punic War ended in 146 B.C. when Rome destroyed Carthage. Although the Romans were lucky that Hannibal let many opportunities to attack them slip by, the Romans won the Punic Wars because of their creative battle strategies, strong Roman leadership, and the ingenious idea of the Fabian policy.

The Romans not only had good morals, for example having honor on the battle field, but also very good war tactics. The Carthaginian Empire had a very large and powerful navy while the Roman Empire had no experience fighting on the seas. Despite their inexperience, they quickly built ships and sailed off to meet Hannibal’s navy. Lacking knowledge of fighting on water, the Romans devised a strategy to turn sea fighting into land fighting. They used grappling hooks to bring the enemy’s ships to a stop and then crossed the gang plank onto the other ship using hand-to-hand combat. This idea turned the tides of the sea battles, and
…show more content…
Throughout the three Punic Wars, both sides fought with extreme bravery and commitment, but the skills and morals of the Roman army resulted in their triumph. Through strong leaders like Scipio Africanus and Fabius Maximus, as well as brilliant ideas like fighting land battles at sea and the Fabian Policy, Rome destroyed the Carthaginian army and defeated the mighty general Hannibal. Although the Romans were lucky that Hannibal neglected many opportunities to attack, the result of the Roman conquest was clearly not just luck. The Roman efforts prevailed and achieved them a well earned

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    By 246 BCE, the Carthaginians controlled the trade routes and maritime trade in the Mediterranean. The Rome Republic was founded in 509 BCE as a result of an overthrow of Tarquinius Superbus, King of Rome. By 246 BCE, Rome, a small city, was unable to trade in the Mediterranean, only the Tiber River, but it dominated the Italian Peninsula, and only had access to the Italian Peninsula. However, Rome was growing stronger. The Punic Wars were fought to determine who controlled the trade in the…

    • 4407 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Punic Wars were three conflicts between Carthage and Rome. The first conflict was from 264-241 B.C. It grew out of an altercation between Messana and Syracuse. The Messanians asked Carthage for help and Syracuse asked Rome for help. The Strait of Messana, which separated the Italian Peninsula from Sicily, was important strategically, and both Carthage and Rome responded. The Punic army (Carthaginians) arrived in Sicily and mediated peace between the two and established a military base. When the Roman army arrived, they drove off the Punic army from the military base and war ensued (Columbia…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal Barca was one of the few military geniuses back in the time of 220 B.C. Hannibal’s efforts almost brought the Carthaginians victory over the immense Roman empire. With the Carthaginian army at his side, Hannibal brought a massive army to try and annihilate the forces of Rome. Hannibal did many things that made him one of the greatest generals of all time. Hannibal brought a massive army over the Alps and Pyrenees to surprise the Romans, he won many battles against the Roman Empire, and then took command of a Greek fleet.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4) 264 B.C.E. Rome fought two protracted and bloody war against Carthaginians. This was so they could dominate the commerce of the western Mediterranean.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal’s overall war strategy in Italy, or lack thereof, can be seen as a strong contributing factor to Carthage’s ultimate defeat in the Second Punic War. Livy describes, “Hannibal…without orders from the senate, crossed both the Alps and the Ebro.” Demonstrating his defiance of Carthaginian Government’s ambitions against Rome. Ultimately, Hannibal sought not to destroy Rome but to “create a balance of power with [her]” according to Fronda. This is to suggest that rather than conquer Rome, Hannibal wanted to be on the same playing field in order to deny them the opportunity to claim hegemony over the Mediterranean. The content of the Macedonian–Carthaginian Treaty further evidences Hannibal’s lack of intention to destroy Rome as, in multiple sections, it discusses how Rome will be treated and acknowledges their…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper the overview, prelude, and battle of Lake Trasimene will be analyzed and discussed to understand the brilliance behind one of the greatest military tactical attacks in history. The Battle of Lake Trasimene was waged by one of the most charismatic, smart, and cunning generals of all time in Hannibal. Hannibal, the son of Hamilcar Barca of Carthage, was raised to eat, breath, and hate Rome from the beginning of his childhood. Livy states that, “From the day when he was proclaimed commander in chief, he seemed to regard Italy as his assigned field of action, and war with Rome as a duty imposed upon him.”(Livy 21.5, Line 1-3.) This inner rage that was instilled in him as a child is a driving force that can be seen throughout this battle as well as his remaining campaigns against the Romans.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 600 BCE and 600 CE, many empires throughout the world rose to power as a result of powerful military organizations that allowed them to defend themselves and conquer new land. Forceful armies were especially important in both Rome and Greece, where their dynamic military permitted them to dominate and expand their territories, thus increasing their empire’s power and influence. Most notably in the Roman Empire, the strong martial force led the state to victory in several battles, including the Battle of Zama. The empire’s powerful military obliterated Carthage and led to Rome subsequently taking control of the area. As a result of winning such battles, Rome took control of more land and expanded its territory to take over much of Southern…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though this would be the primary dominate force on the battlefield, Rome actually lost battles because they were primarily heavy infantry. Roman soldiers adopted fighting tactics of other forces and enemies to become the most elite force on the battle field. Starting out, soldiers fought like the Greek worriers known as hoplites. Hoplites were essentially an infantry man armed with a shield and spear, which were on reserve until called to battle. The tactics that were adopted from the Hoplites was a formation called the Phalanx. This formation consisted of soldiers lining up shoulder to shoulder with their weapon in one hand and shield in the opposite. Not only did this help with shields protecting one another, it made lines impenetrable for arrows, spears and enemy as long as they maintained a solid line side by side.2…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1000 BCE, a group of Latins, later known as Romans, founded the city of Rome. After almost 500 years of it being founded, the Romans set up a republic. They gained territory by force, beginning with the Italian peninsula and then easily moving to the Mediterranean region. The Romans launched a series of three wars, known as the Punic Wars. During this time, the were able to conquer Carthage and in return gained access into Sicily, Sardinia, and Corsica. Even after the Punic Wars ended, Rome still managed to gain the territory of Macedonia, Greece and even some parts of Anatolia. Even through troubling times of the empire, it still managed to spread through Gaul,…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Romans were great diplomats. They were firm when necessary and smart about granting citizenship. They also let citizens participate in domestic affairs. Their military was made up of strong, persistent soldiers. If a substantial amount of men were lost in battle they wouldn’t just surrender, but instead recruit new soldiers. They would build up new armies so that they could keep fighting. The Romans were also good strategists. By the year 264 BCE Rome had established colonies in strategic spots throughout Italy. By connecting these settlements with roads, they built a military and communication network that helped them rule more effectively. By getting military help from allies, they mobilized Italy’s military…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He defeated the Carthaginians led by the legendary general, Hannibal at the northern city of Zama in Africa. By doing so, he ended the nearly 20 year old war. In this battle, the Romans were numerically deficient in infantry but where outnumbered in cavalry. After an extended skirmish between Rome and the Carthaginians, the light infantry and the mix of light infantry and war elephants deployed by Hannibal, and cause the man formations of the 2 sides to meet. Hannibal sends his army in echelon formation to envelop the roman flanks but ends up loosing the battle. The Battle of Zama was the last and decisive victory to the second Punic war. Zama was one of the three wars between Carthage and Rome and resulted in the destruction of Carthage and is annexed by Rome. A modern but similar battle to Zama was the Battle of Waterloo. Napoleon, another legendary general, led the French to battle against the English and their allies. Although Napoleon had a great reputation, Wellington, the general of the European side, proved to have more intelligence when he outsmarts Napoleon's plan and defeats the French. Both battles saw the final defeat of a famed and "invincible" military leader, Hannibal at Zama and Napoleon at Waterloo. Also, both battles were decisive battles in that they ultimately end the great wars. The Battle of Zama ended the 2nd Punic war and the Battle of Waterloo ended the Napoleonic wars. All in…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome rule its people in a very organize and civil manner, which draws loyalty among its citizens. Rome has an effective and distinct way in managing people, particularly to the inhabitants of their newly acquired lands and territories. One of the best example was the Latins in Latium, whose devotion and loyalty were exceedingly commendable, especially during the Second Punic War, where they fought valiantly--along with the Romans --against the forces of Hannibal. On other hand, Carthage "great advantage" was they have a "permanent able leader," that command its military forces. Unlike Rome, the order of its military resides in the hands of its civil magistrates, who were constantly replaced…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    started in 218 BC and lasted until 201 BC. This was also the most fascinating. It was the Carthaginians bitterness over the agreement from the first war, and the expansion following the years after it that brought on this war. Part of this expansion was the taking of Corsica and Sardinia from Carthage in the year of 237 BC. From 237 to 219 Hannibal, son of Hamilicar, and Hasdrubal,…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Punic Wars

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    gave them the advantage in the first war, although they suffered a large loss at the battle…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Gladiators

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome’s military might have been small but it was mighty, it had excellent military tactics and strong military generals. This contributes to why they kept on winning many battles. The fights that were won prisoners of war were taken. Many of the prisoners were then sold into the gladiatorial school and tried to earn their freedom, fighting in the gladiator games.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays