Preview

Why the Marxist Ideal Cannot Work

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1720 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why the Marxist Ideal Cannot Work
The Marxist ideal, a highly appealing, almost Utopian

society, is impossible to achieve due to the fact that it

demands that the human mind be almost without flaws. It

asks of society and its members to be absolutely without

ranks, without greed or leadership. This has been clearly

impossible for society. Each step to achieving a communist

establishment has been, continues to be, and will be, in

actuality, a step towards the totalitarian societies of past

and current so-called communist countries. Communism

became popular solely in under-developed countries,

contrary to Marx's beliefs as to what should happen, and

its rise in these countries was the beginning of its fall. Marx

believed that the only way to overthrow capitalism was to

create a revolution of the proletariat and in essence this

revolution carries the cause even farther away from true

communism. Equality is the next issue that Marx tackled,

and in the communist ideal, it is absolutely crucial. In the

real world of distorted ideologies, it hovers in the

background. The ultimate in communist ideologies,

however, is that eventually there will be no need for

government. This essay will illustrate how, as communist

societies in the real world progress, nothing could be

further from the truth. Currently, communism, as exercised

in the few Communist countries left in the world, is far from

the Marxist ideal. From its beginnings to the present day

and into the future, communism has become distorted into

something that would be Marx's worst nightmare. Due to

"quirks" in the human mind that just can't seem to be

worked out, the Marxist ideal simply cannot work.

Marx's prediction was that communism would prevail in

the highly industrialized countries of Western Europe.

Instead, it took place in Russia, a country troubled by its

corrupt head of state.

By definition a Communist revolt demanded an

industrialized

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    also gives way to understanding how objective reality is conveyed in this story on a social level. In…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it possible to have a Utopian society with the human race? A Utopia is a society that is perfect and nothing goes wrong in the society. It is impossible to have a Utopian society with the human race. Reasons for being impossible is because not everyone is going to think the same and agree on everything. Humans have emotions and this is one if the characteristics of making them human. In Brave New World, the people are unable to feel sad or upset. The people in Brave New World do not believe in religion. Also sleeping with more than one person is not frowned upon in Brave New World. Having a perfect world could not work due to the complications that everyday life has.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxist: the Lottery

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” is about a town in which a little black box controls whether or not a person may live or be killed. The lack of dominant female characters illustrates the assumption that women are often seen as inferior to men. Interesting developments of the plot and theme make it obvious to the reader how women are portrayed in the story. This short story shows how the upper class in a society can control the working class through fear or psychological manipulation, and live in luxury while those around them suffer.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    advantage of a naïve and growing economy to reap its benefits without giving anything in…

    • 822 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story “Brave New World” by Aldous Huxley, one can see that the author truly wishes his readers to analyze the book via the subsets of Marxism. The first and foremost rationale of the text lending itself to a Marxist analysis comes from the symbolism portrayed by the surname of the main character in the book. Bernard Marx seems to be such a unique and peculiar name that one can with certainty assume that there must be reasoning for it, especially considering the context of this novel. In the first few introductions to Bernard, he narrates his distaste towards his fellow colleagues for “talking about [Lenina] as though she were a bit of meat. Have her here, have her there. Like mutton. Degrading her to so much mutton” (Huxley 39). In the mind of Bernard, his colleagues do not treat Lenina as an equivalent human being who belongs to the same and equal faction as his colleagues. Instead, through the eyes of Bernard she is seen simply as ‘degrading’ meat. Bernard’s hatred towards this subject matter exemplifies conceivably the similarities between the thoughts of Karl Marx and Bernard. From this, one can easily anticipate that Bernard Marx will play a pivotal role that maybe shadows the thoughts of the real Karl Marx in around the period of Huxley’s era. One can even go about saying that perhaps the vast popularity of Marxism at the time of this novel’s publication posed a direct influence on Huxley’s perception of society, which he then applied to the story. Quite ironically however, later on in the novel while Bernard watches the clear ocean, “it makes [him] feel as though [he] was more [him]… More on [his] own, not so completely a part of something else. Not just a cell in the social body” (Huxley 78). In these more updated and comprehensive thoughts of Bernard Marx, one can realize that his aversion towards the collective society of the World State shatters the previous anticipations…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people disagree and agree with an Utopian society, Google states that a Utopian society is "a modeled on or aiming for a state in which everything is perfect; idealistic." I'm one of those people who also disagrees with an Utopian society, my first reason is because I believe everyone should be different and there own people. Second reason is because nobody should ever be controlled or treated like robots. My last reason in which I disagree with a Utopian society is because I fear for future generations, kids growing up and not actually having any type of freedom.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Marxism Anti Democratic

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to answer this question the parameters of the discussion must first be set, with key terms in the title defined. Marxism I define to be ‘an economic and socio-political worldview and method of socio-economic enquiry which focuses upon a materialist interpretation of history, a dialectical view of social change and an analysis and critique of capitalism. ‘ Democracy, I define to be an ‘egalitarian form of government in which sovereignty is vested in the people and exercised by them or elected agents.’ In the following essay I will present two opposing interpretations of Marxism, with both leading to wildly divergent conclusions regarding the democratic nature of Marxism. The first perspective revolves around a literal interpretation of Marxism; with the emphasis being entirely on Marx’s writings as oppose to any subsequent interpretations or manifestations of his beliefs. The second perspective involves an empirical study of Marxism, with various Marxist regimes analyzed and the extent to which they are democratic being the primary means of assessing as to whether Marxism is democratic or not. The following two quotations, I believe demonstrate the polarity of opinion existing on Marxism and Democracy and accurately summarize the two perspectives I will be arguing; Hal Draper (1978) states ‘Marx’s socialism maybe most quickly defined, as the complete democratization of society, not merely of political forms,’ and Joseph Femia ‘Communist despotism was a logical consequence of Marxist theory.’ In the first part of the essay, I will outline Marx’s theory of the state and democracy which supports the argument that Marxism is not theoretically anti-democratic. In the second part of the essay I will present the view that as a result of their being such significant empirical evidence in opposition to this thesis I believe it is hard to argue that Marxism can be viewed as democratic. Marx stated ‘The question whether human…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In discussing is welfare possible for Marx under the capitalist mode of production there is some debate that the welfare state have been guided through by questions, one is that the salience of the class diminish with the extension of social citizenship? Or can welfare state fundamentally transforms capitalist society? And finally what are the causal forces behind welfare- state development? (Esping-Andersen, 1989). But as you can guess these questions aren’t recent, as they were established in the 19th century by political economists, it doesn’t matter whether they are liberal, conservative or even Marxist. This is because they were preoccupied due to the relationship of capitalism and welfare.…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Republic vs. Democracy

    • 3611 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Introduction In this era when individuals are questioning the legitimacy and wisdom of unregulated free markets, issues are raised about the most efficient form of economic activity and the best role for government in an economy. These issues have been discussed at many points in the past, and different societies have come to different conclusions regarding political and economic systems. In the United States, and many developed nations around the world, the view has often been that democracy accompanied by capitalism, offers the best, most efficient use of resources and governments guided by those principles assure the best outcomes for their populations. Other countries have adopted very different governing principles. Communist doctrine, as adopted by some nations, endorses the establishment of an egalitarian, classless, stateless society based on common ownership of the means of production and property (Communism: The failure of an utopian system, 2008). The civilization is governed by an individual, or individuals, whose function is to ensure the efficiency of the society as a whole. As an ideal, the communist doctrine defines a just city as one that eliminates the need for its citizens to wish to exploit each other. History appears to indicate that in practice, however, the communist vision cannot be fulfilled since “absolute power (which is given to the leader) corrupts absolutely” (Martin, 2009). Human nature does not appear to manage total supremacy well.…

    • 3611 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asses the Marxist view that the main role of the family is to serve the interest of capitalism.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Industrial Revolution around the 18th and early 19th centuries, Karl Marx (the founder of communism) analyzed the conflict which he strongly believed exists between the Bourgeoisie (Upper-Middle Class) and Proletariat (Lower Class). Marx was against capitalistic views because in his perspective, such a system of society only meant that the privileged groups would exploit the sub-ordinate groups and this would result in a massive class-inequality. Moreover, that the rich would keep getting richer and the poor would remain getting poorer. In society, mankind will have lost its appreciation for equality and human welfare. Taxation or any other methods will be of no use because it does not guarantee a Lower-Class citizen a better position in employment, education, or wealth. But, merely provides them enough wages so that they may hold themselves in place. Marx believed that in order to eliminate class-struggle and inequality would mean to eliminate capitalism as a whole and resort to the ways of socialism which would eventually, lead to…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx has long been established as one of the most influential thinkers and writers of modern times. The Communist Manifesto which was published back in 1848 covers his theories regarding socialism. It aided the establishment of communist Russia and although that particular scenario failed there are elements of Marx’s work that I find relevant in today’s society.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Those unfamiliar with Karl Marx, the egalitarian normative theorist insists that the “first phase of communist society the economy will distribute goods according to the norm, to each according to his labor contribution” (Arneson 56). Basically, Marx is stating that a society should satisfy its people by creating a form of equal opportunity, and yet those who cannot contribute or do not have the proper skill in contributing cannot be rewarded, thus making this type of society defective. With regards to this, Marx discarded this norm and claimed that if the communist society is attained by higher phase, then the society can eventually “move beyond the sphere of bourgeois right altogether and operate according to the norm, from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” (Arneson 56). Marx’s is presenting how equality can be achieved if one is able to contribute anything according to his or her…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Did Communism Fail

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page

    This paper will be about why communism failed originally, not because communism was ideal, but because of other factors. First, the Soviet Union never reached communism. Stalin’s regime began to take control in the 1920’s, and then Soviet Union the era of Stalinism, not communism. Communism was based upon the theory of an economic Utopia, where all wealth is shared and distributed equally, with no personal ownership. The theory, devised by Karl Marx, espouses that human greed can be eliminated by changing human nature, which can be belief that extenuating circumstances could change the basic individual characteristics.…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Liberalism and Marx's ideal of Communism are based on two very different but closely related ideologies. American Liberalism is based on the ideology of Classical Liberalism or Liberalism. Marx's ideal of Communism, on the other hand, is based on the Socialism ideology. Both of these ideologies came to because people didn't agree with the way thing were being run at that time. After studying them both closely, because of they way I have been taught in school and at home that people are selfish, I believe that socialism, as good as it sounds, could never come to be because of how selfish people are.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics