Preview

Why the American Democracy Does Not Work

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2983 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why the American Democracy Does Not Work
November 16, 2012

Why the American Democracy Does Not Work

Democracy in America does not work. The system has failed too many times and when problems do get addressed, they get addressed by using tactics that break the Constitutional guidelines. Slavery almost broke the Union and if President Abraham Lincoln did not violate the Constitution, slavery would have destroyed the Union. Economic crises test the limits and powers of the government. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt stretched the Constitution with the New Deal. The Supreme Court, not the House of Representatives choose George W. Bush for President over Al Gore in the 2000 Election. The financial crisis in 2008 showed a failure of the U.S. government to regulate Wall Street.1 These cases demonstrate the flawed structures formed by the Constitution. Though some have tried to change the system, the system flaws lie in the foundation of system: the Constitution. No matter what party holds the majority or the White House, the U.S. government cannot continue to function without systematic change. The American democracy needs to transform its system to work in the 21st century and this can only be done by restructuring the U.S. government. I will argue this from a Jacobs-King/Lazare perspective, analyzing the failures of the structures of the U.S. Federal government throughout history. The Constitution justified slavery and nothing in the Constitution could prohibit it, showing how the system’s failure to protect minority voices. In fact the Constitution did not allow Congress to interfere with the slave trade until “the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight.”2 Nothing stopped slave holders from owning salves or trading slaves. Even as other countries abolished slavery, the U.S. could not because the Constitution stopped them. The Framers of the Constitution decided not to deal with slavery, making their system flawed from the beginning. “Slavery was the quadruple whammy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is generally understood that the United States is built upon the principles of democracy, in which the majority consensus of the citizens helps to define the shape of issues or elections. However, in assuming that the Constitution - the document upon which such practices are founded – is inherently democratic is only partially accurate. Indeed, it has been frequently argued that the U. S. Constitution is representative of the rule of law from a federation as opposed to a pure democracy; in a federation, elections occur among the majority of the citizenry but this process results in elected officials who then determine the direction of the country. In short, a federation transforms a democracy from the rule of the many back into the rule of the few, with the “few” in this sense being the elected officials selected through an elections process.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise between the President and Congress,and debates are things that define American democracy in the 21st century. America's political landscape would seem foreign without the fighting of the party not in power, or the role that every person plays in electing public candidates. As odd as it may seem, our democracy did not always pursue the vote of the common man, or even have two battling political parties. These aspects of American democracy can be traced back to changes that occurred between 1820 and 1840. Jacksonian Economic Policy and Changes in Electoral Politics advanced the development of democracy between 1820 and 1840.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time of the Civil War, I personally believe the Constitution supported slavery more than it did to oppose it. The opposition of slavery existed, in some forms, among supporters of the Constitution. It seems few though were willing to risk the union for it. The slave states were aware of this and used it as a power in the Convention. In a way, it seemed it was a threat to break up the union. The slave states made it clear that their support for the Constitution was dependent on the absence of any apparent threats it brought to slavery. The slaves were considered property and the constitution protected that. By allowing southern states to count each slave as 3/5’s a person, but also not giving slaves the right to vote, guaranteed that…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I believe the United States should reform its governing institutional structures because democracy does not take a great part of it as much as it implies. Through my understanding of the regulation of life in the United States, I have come to realize that it is more of a republican than it is a democratic structure. James Madison, known as “the father of the constitution”, designed the institutional structure to be separated within a form of distribution of powers. Even though Madison’s whole idea of disallowing tyranny through this system is understandable, it has created a major dilemma. This allocation of power has caused a slow and time-consuming flow in the process of taking action. The fear of tyranny has caused…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 DBQ

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By the 1850’s the Constitution, originally viewed as a document for national unity, had become a source of regional disagreements and tension that eventually resulted in the failure of the Union. The Constitution never outright mentions slavery, and created an unsolved problem that later resulted in compromises and the failure of the Union it formed.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The constitution allowed slavery to continue although the declaration of independence claimed “all men were free” , because of every one different opinions and racism.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Filibusters Research Paper

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages

    * Kenneth, Janda, Jeffery M. Berry, and Goldman Jerry, The Challenge of Democracy, 10th edition, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 2009.…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    And guarantee that they had the right to vote. As originally drafted, the Constitution was silent on the issue of slavery, although its language led most scholars to believe that it was constitutionally protected. For that reason, a constitutional amendment was needed to end it.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1778 the US Constitution failed to abolish slavery, this not only guaranteed future conflict over slavery but also highlighted the importance slavery for the unity of America. Many states entering the Union at the end of the war were slave states therefore, it was necessary to reflect the interests of these states in the constitution. Historian Eric Foner goes on to note that, "the words "slaves" and "slavery" did not appear in the Constitution" as they would "contaminate" the notion of American freedom, this shows the intricacy of the matter of slavery right from independence. The constitution, however, encouraged the of return fugitive slaves to their owners, in order to manage the large population of fugitives. It also proposed that "three-fifths…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Civil War, Republicans in Congress enacted some of the most forward-looking legislation in American history, but they have made no progress recently. Republicans shut down the government and held national health care hostage. They aren’t raising the U.S. debt ceiling until they get what they want and thus shutting down the government. The shutdown cost us millions of dollars in revenue. Republicans are holding the government hostage to get what they want, but even they don’t know what they want (Hertzberg). The following paragraph will examine why United State function is not an efficacy democracy.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upon the founding of America, a great deal of pressure was placed onto the Founding Fathers to create a system in which the central government will not acquire too much power and the citizens will be well represented. A representative democracy was, overall, a more effective answer to the question of how to govern the new country rather than a direct democracy after seeing the effects that the Articles of Confederation created when too much of the power of the government was given to the people and their states. A stronger central government was needed without taking away the voice of the people, and that’s what was decided on. However, even though this way has proven to be the most effective way to govern a country, it has its flaws within the system. Corruption finds its way through the system in ways of interest groups and political parties. This system is not immune to factions nor the effect of those factions, and those effects often make their way to important matters within the government.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    America is a Democratic-Republic, not a Democracy. If we had a true Democracy, we the people would vote on every issue. Issues such as every law and every bill. Instead we have a group of people called leaders, who represent America and make those decisions. Then we the people just should abide by those laws and bills that we had no say in.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1787, at the time of the Constitutional Convention, slavery in the United States was a harsh reality. The census of 1790 counted slaves in nearly every state, the only exceptions being Massachusetts and the "districts" of Vermont and Maine. In the entire country 3.8 million people were counted; 700,000 of them, or 18 percent, were slaves. These statistics are a striking example of the prominence of slavery in the history of the United States. They also exemplify the obvious contradiction between the institution of slavery and the advocacy of equality presented by the framers of our Constitution. Despite the freedoms reserved in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, slavery was not only tolerated, it was regulated.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive Summary – Pakistan has been in quest for stable democratic system from its very inception.The process of its democratization has been slow and passive. Its nature has remained fragile. It has been showing high vulnerability towards non democratic interventions. Besides, it has been easily falling prey to non civilian forces. As a result, Pakistan has been continuously failing to offer what a democracy promises. Such pathetic scenario has various reasons behind it at all three levels: State, government and society.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Failure of Democracy

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Almost 150 years ago, Abraham Lincoln defined democracy as a Government of the people, by the people and for the people. Democracy is a form of government in which the authority of government is based on the will of masses. Democracy aims at defining the relationship between the ruler and the masses in such a manner that primacy is assigned to the latter. After sixty years of its existence as an independent country democracy has remained an elusive dream in Pakistan. Let us try to dig deep into the factors which have hampered the growth of democracy in our country.…

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays