Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Why Should We Oppose Death Penalty

Good Essays
1396 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Should We Oppose Death Penalty
To

His Excellency,
The President of India,
Rashtrapathi Bhavan,
New Delhi – 110 001.

Sub:

Yours Excellency,

We appreciate your initiative for creating a debate on abolishing Death Penalty in India. The points in observation note that has forwarded to Home Ministry (Source : Frontline November 5) was extra ordinary, which shows that Death Penalty will die at the earliest.

WHY SHOULD WE OPPOSE THE DEATH PENALTY?

The thoughts of a Man on Death Row

The feelings of some one who knows that he will not be alive, say, a month from now, not because he is terminally ill, but because he will be killed by the state!.

It is legitimate to ask how a person behaves when he knows that he has a specified number of days to live a specific number of mornings, afternoons, evenings and nights to live and experience before he enters the realm of the unknown.

It is said that many such death row prisoners have probably after an initial period of terror and despair – become calm & collected, resigning themselves to their fate, possibly thinking that, after all, there is an afterlife, that existence in the ordinary sense of the word will not be impaired although it may take on a different form.

This is probably why many death-row-prisoners turn to religions books, especially to passages which try to throw light on life after death, strong & disciplined minds are more than likely to have resource to such simulated ‘peace’ particularly so if they have transgressed the law of the land when indulging in activity springing from deep ideological beliefs.
Only poor Human beings hanged

Most of the study on Death Penalty has concluded that only the ‘poorest of poor’ are sentenced to Hanging. The installed question is. Do the better off get away with heinous crime?

Justice on Revenge

Apart from victim family, society also demands the killing, society wants to feel that it is safer without him, that it is a warning to other, but most of all because society wants to see him punished.

Yet if society’s call is for blood, for punishment, for revenge against the murderer, why are courts trying to find a more ‘humane method’ with which to kill? The killing / execution should be an “quick and simple as possible, free from anything that Sharpens the poignancy of the prisoner’s apprehension.

An Unjust Justice

It is often said that capital punishment is given to those without capital. Most often, those on the death row are those least able to defend themselves in court. The death penalty is applied arbitrarily, depending on such random factors on the competence of lawyers, the strength of evidence, the tampering of proof, the capacity of witnesses to sustain cross examination, the integrity of the witness, plea-bargain or pardons granted.

In this context, the denial of an automatic right of appeal to the supreme court in case the death sentence is confirmed by the High Court requires to be examined. We need to review the right of the High Court to reject death sentence appeals. To prevent the Miscarriage of Justice the death sentence awardees should have an automatic right to appeal to the highest court in the land.

The death penalty has an essential fault – it is irrevocable. Mistakes can be rectified, death cannot. Yet mistakes are inevitable in all systems of Justice, however scrupulous the process and however honest the participants.

World Wide abolition

By the end of 1998, 67 countries had abolished the Death Penalty for all offences and 14 for all but exceptional offences, such as war time crimes, at least 24 countries, which retained the death penalty, in law, were considered abolitionist in practice – they had not executed any one for atleast 10 years or had made as international commitment not to carryout creations.

Some countries reduced the scope of the Death Penalty. A few countries have taken the process of abolishing capital punishment India is today debating whether Death Penalty should be abolished. India is party to the International covenant on civil and political rights (ICCPR) that require a progression towards abolition of Death Penalty.

Growing Opposition

Despite such developments, growing international opposition to the Death Penalty was symbolished in 1998 with the adoption in July of the statue of the international criminal court. After much debate it was decided to exclude the Death Penalty on punishment for what are arguably the most heinous crimes – genocide, other crimes against humanity and war crimes. The clear implication is that if the Death Penalty should not be used for the worst possible crimes, then it should not be used for lesser crimes in other words, it should never be used.

As societies develop, we move away from barbaric practices so that criminals are punished, but more importantly, are corrected.

Violates the right to life

Death penalty violates the right to life guaranteed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the ICCPR. These documents affirm this right in several way. For instance, they clearly state that no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, in human or degrading treatment or punishment. It is clear that, like torture, an execution is an extreme form of physical and mental assault on a person, already rendered helpless by incarceration. If hanging a woman by her arms until she experiences pain is rightly considered torture, how does one describe hanging her by the neck until she is dead?

Besides, neither the physical pain caused by the action of killing a human being, nor the psychological suffering caused by a foreknowledge of death at the hands of the State be quantified. Whether a death sentence is carried out six months after a summary trial, six weeks after a mass trial or after 16 years of lengthy legal proceedings, the persons executed is subjected to uniquely cruel, in human and degrading treatment and punishment. Therefore, on no account can a State justify imposition of death penalty, while continues to affirm the right to life.

Silence Political Opponents

Death penalty is used by some States to silence political opponents or to eliminate “troublesome’ individuals. Many of us are familiar with the case of the famous Nigerian writer and human rights activist, Ken Siro Wiwa who was executed by his country’s military regime. His crime: he had dared to speak for his Ogoni people, whose land and other natural resources were being plundered by multinationals. Death penalty, therefore, severs, once and for all, a person’s right to hold opinions and to speak freely.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

CAMPAIGN AGAINST DEATH PENALTY

The Campaign is the result of voluntary efforts of committed individuals and organisations as well as the commitment of intellectuals and writers who generously devote their time for it. As such all those who are associated with it, either as National Committee members or as those who work in building up public opinion against death penalty or in attempting to get clemency for particular prisoners waiting in the death row are keen to make it a broad based nation-wide campaign and involve in it as many people as possible who would give their time and energy on a purely voluntary basis.

The Campaign Against Death Penalty was launched early last year in Chennai in a public meeting addressed by Justice V.R.Krishna Iyer. In response to the suggestions from the floor, Justice Krishna Iyer, respecting the sentiments of the members of the audience, agreed to be the Chairperson of the Campaign and as requested by him K.Manoharan, well known Writer and Human Rights Activists accepted the responsibilities of the Convenor. The National Committee was gradually built up. We have been able to carry on with activities such as bringing out literature on the need to abolish death penalty, organizing public meetings, participating in the debates in electronic media, writing for news papers, writing mercy petitions for clemency for those in the death row and collecting signatures from eminent citizens and requesting them to intervene on behalf of the condemned prisoners. For the first time in Tamil Nadu we brought together hundreds of writers in a special conference against death penalty. Our friends in other civil and human rights organisations in Tamil Nadu, Andhra, Kerala, Karnataka and Delhi have also organized conferences and campaigns against death penalty. We share their experiences and exchange literature and other material with them.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is a controversial topic that has existed since the beginning of civilization. The death penalty, and capital punishment are interchangeable terms that provide legalized murders at the hands of the government. This form of killing is permitted in approximately 38 states (Capital Punishment, 2011). The death penalty has been a way for humans to control one another throughout history. The death penalty is a chancy way of instilling justice. In addition, there is no guarantee that the person sentenced to death is completely innocent. For many years, the death penalty has been the cause of many innocent and untimely deaths. The death penalty is a final decision to a possible mistake. Also, the death penalty infringes on…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone has their views and opinions on the death penalty. They are either for it or against it, but what does that really mean? Sixty-three percent of the population of America are for it because a human being killed another human and they think that it is only fair that the defendant also dies. Then the other thirty-seven percent are against it either because it may have been a loved one that had killed someone and they do not want to see their loved one be killed or they think that killing the person that killed the other person does not give the victim any justice because that they are already dead. (U.S. Death Penalty). But what most people do not know is why or how the death penalty was originated, or why they ended most of the death penalty. The death penalty is painted vividly as immoral and insufficient, while others…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a punishment that results in death usually caused by capital crimes or capital offenses. It is commonly referred to as the death sentence. According to an article “Buzzle” not all countries accept capital punishment but there are still a lot of states who do (par.1). Capital punishment has been around for thousands of years, this punishment is said to have helped keep crime level down and alter the minds of future criminals to prevent them from committing atrocious crimes such as: murder, terrorism, and in some situations aggravated kidnapping.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teachers and other scholarly intellectuals have used the terms “penitentiary” for more than twenty years. “The penitentiary was more of an idea or set of principles than a physical institution with shape and form”(Foster, 2006, p. 21). It wasn’t really a building for ex cons, it was more of a concept. The purposes of a penitentiary were both secular and spiritual. In Western societies, penitentiary was supposed to be a place of humane punishment rather than physical punishment. This place was created to keep prisoners separated from each other as much as possible; isolation, as opposed to regular prisons. It was also created for prisoners to express their feelings of regret of their wrongdoing. “As a secular institution, the penitentiary was meeting the religious need for expressing contrition for sin. The principal goal of the penitentiary was to achieve the kind of spiritual transformation in a criminal being that was associated with the religious beings of the medieval monastery”(Foster, p. 22).…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Place to Stand Essay

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Can words change person’s thoughts from desperation, violence, to peace and normality within a dehumanizing prison? Some prisoners spending short to long term sentenced, sometimes lose themselves in a world of violence and become worse off when coming into the prison system, than how they used to be before prison life. Trying to hold on to any bit of sanity or respect for humanity becomes an everyday struggle. Sometimes the smallest thing can help prevent the feeling, of going over that edge of no return from a dreadfulness act of death.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eight Amendment Essay

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When our founding fathers wrote the Bill of Rights, they included a surfeit of amendments that would protect the people’s rights. One of the most prominent amendments in the bill of rights is the eighth amendment. The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution is the section of the Bill of Rights that states that punishments must be fair, cannot be cruel, and that fines that are extraordinary large cannot be set. The eighth amendment states that punishment must be fair, however a plethora of modern issues violate this specific part of the amendment. In fact, one of the most pivotal modern issue regarding the eight amendment in the bill of rights is death penalty.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Caring for Mrs. Thomas

    • 3510 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Most people have at least a vague idea, or opinion, of how they would act or behave under certain circumstances. However, when actually confronted with the circumstance, people often surprise themselves with their first-hand reaction to the anticipated scenario. In the same fashion, given that death remains such an emotionally laden, but…

    • 3510 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (1) Capital Punishment, or execution, the sentence of death upon a person by judicial process as a punishment for an offense committed.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty played a dominant role for a long time executing prisoners who violently disobeyed the law. Since the banning of the death penalty, the overcrowding of our prisons has been at an all-time high. Wasting your existence in prison, especially at a young age, is not an ideal lifestyle. Numerous inmates have requested a lethal injection rather than growing old behind bars. In Sarah Blake’s newspaper article, “Inside Story on How Martin Bryant Lives — and Will Die,” she introduces Martin Bryant as a man who brutally killed 35 innocent people and was sentenced for 1035 years of prison. Sarah also told us that Martin Bryant shortly began attempting to commit suicide after understanding his sentence. He said, “Imprisonment for life, with no hope of parole, is torture”…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people have different views on the death penalty. The view is split between for and against. Capital Punishment is a touchy subject to talk about. In the personal essay, “A Death in Texas”, Steve Earle tells of his friendship with a prisoner, Jonathan Nobles, on death row. Jonathan was sentenced because he murdered two women.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The other reason to support this theory was that, only when the death-row inmates were kept alive for longer, a new society was developed. This was the main reason why this was the only death camp in which approximately 100.000 Jews left the camp alive. Because of this reasons, few ethical theorists or religious thinkers have paid attention to the highly important political fact that this field was in fact a new form of human society.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confinement In Prisons

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the late eighteenth century, penal reformists, in an effort to stray from the vicious and public forms of punishment that America had adopted from British rule, pushed for the creation of penitentiaries (Guenther 2013:3). They privatized punishment because they believed that prisoners, isolated from all contact in a cell within these penitentiaries, would be forced to confront and reflect upon their bad behaviors (Guenther 2013:4). At these early penitentiaries, inmates would eat, sleep, and work in these cells, in complete silence, with no contact with any of the prisoners around them or the outside world. (Guenther 2013:14). By disconnecting them from their old neighborhood and their old way of life, criminals were expected to redeem themselves and re-enter society as a “tabula rasa”, or a blank slate (Guenther 2013:14). While reformists believed that this would work in theory, they quickly learned that solitary confinement, in practice, proved to hurt the inmate more than it helped. Critics of the penitentiary believed that there was no chance for redemption in such conditions. In fact, they saw that “prisoners emerged from this machine with eyes like blanks, a deranged nervous system, and a diminished capacity for coherent thought or conversation (Guenter 2013:15).” In 1890, after discovering the haunting and damaging conditions that existed within such prisons, the Supreme…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion Behind Bars

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The history of mankind has shown the pervasive influences of religion, and thus the study of religion involving the attempt to understand its significance, its origin, and its myriad form, has become important in modern time , in a globalized world. Both religion and the prison have been subjected to considerable mates. Very little research has been done on religion within the prison.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Life of David Gale

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are civilizations and niches of hunters all over the world that believe if you drink the blood of the steer you kill you reach a level of enlightenment that only hunters and those willing to take a life are subject to. If this is true what happens psychologically to the hired hands of “correctional facilities” that either apply for or are relocated to the job of, executioner, murderer, or any variation of the job? If your job is to kill, regardless of weather or not it is classified as “justifiable” your psychological dynamics will undoubtedly be altered. To quote John Mayer “where are all the people watching people watching me?” If you give people the right or duty to kill others their morals become questionable. George Shaw’s standpoint towards capitol punishment challenges the very concept of an eye for an eye and the mentality of politicians and civilians alike that support capital punishment. If the son of a carpenter learns patience, hard work, dedication, and craftsmanship what is absorbed by the son of an executioner? Alan Parker clearly utilizes a balance of both pathos and logos in the film The Life of David Gale, to present both rational and non-rational aspects in support of the argument that Capital Punishment is not only wrong, but the system and branches of the judicial system…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays