Preview

Why Romans and not the Greeks Rule the World

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
277 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Romans and not the Greeks Rule the World
An ancient Greek politician, Polybius, argues in “Why Romans and not the Greeks Governs the World” that the Romans were so well off during their time because of the perfect government they created by combining a kingship, an aristocracy, and a democracy. He argues that, separately, the three governments all had certain strengths, but all sooner or later fell. Polybius states that separately “regular” governments sooner or later fall either to disorder or tyranny. In an effort the avoid a cycle the Greeks faced of greatness followed by a rapid decline, the Romans sought to create a perfect constitution with the best aspects of the three other governments and at the same time created an effective form of checks and balances.
The reason why having a combination of different governments was because it prevented a select few to have an overwhelming amount of power. The government the Romans where so successful with was a mixture of a monarchy (one key ruler), an aristocracy (rule by few privileged individuals), and a democracy (rule by the people). The Consuls (monarchs) were there to make the important decisions and exercised their power over public affairs. The Senate (aristocracy) was there to settle internal civil disputes and settle foreign conflicts. The people (democracy) were there to decide what course the country would decide to take and what laws reflect the views of the country as a whole. Together, these three “branches” kept each other in check and one couldn't do anything without the consent of the others. The ending result was union and balance in which every member of society had an important role I deciding the course of the country.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary reasons that Rome fell was they had poor government. First of all, Rome may have good rules, but they did not enforce them. For example, too many people were exempt from conscription. (Document B) This was a problem because they didn’t have enough people in the army because everybody turned down going to the army. Also, Rome failed to enforce their laws. According to Priscus, wealthy lawbreakers in Rome were able to get away with crimes. (Document E) This was…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pompeian’s government was a democratic system. Citizens voted in their members. There were four levels of government- Electoral assembly (comitium), town council (curia), chief magistrates (duumviri) and magistrates (aediles). These parties were elected in through different means and for different purposes.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Ancient Greece was spread out into the individual city-states, it forced them to each have their own forms of government. Their governments ranged from military rule to dictatorship to democracies. In Athens under the rule of Pericles, their government was a democracy. Any man over the age of 18, who wanted to, could be involved and got paid for being part of the government like people do today. This influenced our government because although we do nat participate directly in day to day government functions, we participate indirectly. Athens also had a jury, who in trials made the final decisions, like we do today. You also had the magistrates, who went out ald enforced the laws like we have police officers do today. Ancient Greeks have…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The kind of government that Ancient Greece had was democracy, wherein everyone is given a chance to be heard and “the administration is in the hands of the many and not the few” (Reilly 91). This gave its citizens to have a say on the events and decisions that occur in the city. It is also a form of government where “aristocrats [were] stripped of all their powers except for certain judicial functions” (Bowra 93). Anyone was capable of being part of the government regardless of their job or their state and each part of Ancient Greece had their representatives to ensure that each part able to contribute and lead. This had a significant part to its rise to power because this form of government was able to develop a trust among its people and it was used as a means of being able to communicate effectively among the people of Ancient Greece.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Ancient Rome Republic and our government have a lot more in common than you would think. They both have similar ideas of what an effective citizen looks like. An effective citizen obeys rules and laws, holds office, and voices their opinion in the government. These are the roles on effective citizen. Without these, the government would not remain intact without these roles of a citizen.…

    • 655 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Government Branches

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The leaders of the states wanted a just and strong national government. And they also wanted to protect the peoples rights and freedom and prevent the government from taking advantage of its power. They believed they could do this by having three seperate branches of government; the Legislative, the Executive and the Judicial. This seperation is called in the first three sections, of the Constitution.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Who is Pericles?

    • 16492 Words
    • 53 Pages

    SS6S2C2PO7— Describe the development of the following types of government and citizenship in ancient Greece and Rome…

    • 16492 Words
    • 53 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did Rome Become Good?

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This resulted in a hybrid system, where if you consider the livelihood of the state, and the happiness of its citizens to be the benchmark of what is good, than Rome would be the best state. Polybius considered it the best state because “the strength which is developed by the State is so extraordinary, that everything required is unfailingly carried out by the eager rivalry shown by all classes to devote their whole minds to the need of the hour, and to secure that any determination come to should not fail for want of promptitude;” (Polybius, 1889) The qualities that he describes as good, come down to the drive and confidence of the Roman citizens. As a result of drive and confidence you get successful men that achieve happiness through the acquisition of material wealth. To the Roman man, they strive all their life to achieve happiness which commonly comes through material wealth. This is somewhat common to Athens, but nowhere near the same qualities as Sparta. Although there are differences between the Roman idea of success and the Athenians’. The Athenians, although they used money would not judge each other on the basis of monetary wealth. So in the Athenians eye, the Romans were more likely to get corrupted by monetary wealth. On the contrast because of the government infrastructure, in Rome the state was less likely to get corrupted by sophists, whereas…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another Ancient that makes the case that the regime or polis makes collective meaning, order, and justice possible is Livy. In his book, The Early History of Rome, Livy uses the history of Brutus to show the relationship between individuals in a polis and politics. Brutus’ political views tied directly with how he wanted Rome and its citizens to act and behave. He wanted to empower his citizens and give them strength during conflict or struggle. Brutus believed that if the people who occupy Rome are strong and powerful, Rome will also be. This is direct correlation to Aristotle in the fact that the polis and individuals who make it up are almost synonymous. This relationship is important in the fact that the model citizen in a regime and polis…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the Romans, Polybius wanted a Republic and Cicero believed in informed consent of the people. The founding fathers believed the Ancients had already established goals, institutions andd the mechanics of politics but did not learn how to keep a government in good shape. 4. “The voting turnout this year dipped…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question: What in your view were Rome’s most important contributions to the humanistic tradition? How did they differ from those of the Greeks?…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are reasons why many of history’s greatest empires have tended to be either oligarchic or monarchial in nature. In observing the development of two of the ancient world’s most prominent models of representative government, the Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic, it can be concluded that when coupled with the political, economic, and social changes that come with expansion, the complications inherent with systems with democratic design prove incapable of running an empire.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greece is normally associated with the origin of democracy. Basically, Greek government evolved from single rule to small group rule to rule by the people. Because each city-state in ancient Greece possessed its own government, some of these types existed other than democracy, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy. This essay will compare and contrast the ancient governments, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy and democracy in Ancient Greek city states.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greek Government

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lastly let us look at the Greek government which most of us are already familiar with, a democracy. The word democracy comes from the Greek word demos, which means rule of the people. This meant that the citizens (free men) had real power when it came to laws and decisions of the government. The most famous Greek city state that operated as a democracy was Athens. Another definition of demos, is mob rule. This was one of the flaws of a democracy in ancient Greece. Emotions would take over and the people would make irrational decisions based on mob mentality (Cartwright,…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics