Preview

Why Renewable Energy Sources?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1560 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Renewable Energy Sources?
ENG 102
Boris Marinov
Spring 2012
Professor Sean Homer
Research Paper

Why renewable power sources are better than nuclear power?

Nuclear power is the most productive power source. However, there are several ongoing debates around the efficiency and the usage of nuclear power. Several factors such as the catastrophes in Chernobyl and Fukushima and the depleting of coal and gas reserves have led to the idea behind the renewable power sources. The renewable power sources are the future of the energy production in the world. Renewable energy is the energy that comes from natural resources such as sunlight, wind and hydro sources. Those sources are naturally replenished and harmless for the environment. Around 19% of world’s electricity generation comes from renewables.

Nuclear energy is the most effective and debatable power source. From the opponent’s point of view, Greenpeace International stated that the Chernobyl catastrophe has been the greatest technological tragedy in the history to the present days. The World Health Organization estimated that the radioactivity released because of the crash was 200 times more than the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In addition, the radioactive waste remains hazardous and no acceptable solution has been found by the countries that have nuclear power plants. Also, a significant number of cancer deaths has been recorded. Moreover, it is mentioned by Greenpeace the cesium 137 which has been emitted affected 15 European countries. However, the other side of the coin refers to the studies around the safety and efficiency of the nuclear power stations. Nuclear power plants, compared to other power sources such as gas-fired power plants, are cheap in a long time despite their expensive construction. Moreover, nuclear power plants have proven to be resilient and safe. The best evidence can be found at the Fukushima catastrophe. “Not at Fukushima Daiichi, the power station where the meltdowns and



Citations: Monbiot, George. "The Nuclear Industry Stinks. But That Is Not a Reason to Ditch Nuclear Power." The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, 04 July 2011. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. . "Solar Power Changes Families ' Lives in Botswana." Solar Power Changes Families ' Lives in Botswana. United Nations Development Programme. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. . Paish, Oliver. "Small Hydro Power: Technology and Current Status Paish, O. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2002, 6, (6), 537–556." Fuel and Energy Abstracts44.4 (2003): 242. Science Direct. Web. 12 Apr. 2012. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Eugene Robinson, author of “No Fail-Safe Option”, writes during the recent destruction of the Fukushima power plant, cautioning the use of nuclear power, and touching on the Chernobyl incident. He claims that the idea of nuclear energy, in spite of its benefits, is not worth the destruction and damage it could potentially cause.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Due by Day 7 . Nuclear Power . All energy sources have drawbacks. Even the clean hydropower option has negative ramifications. Weigh those against the possible consequences of developing nuclear power, a controversial alternative to fossil fuels. Discuss the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster as well as the 20th century Chernobyl nuclear meltdown in drawing conclusions about risk versus reward of nuclear energy use. The paper must be two to three pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least one ...…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear power plants are much safer for people and the environment. Between 1971 and 2009, nuclear power prevented an average of over 1.8 million net deaths. It has also reduced carbon emissions by 64 gigatonnes over the same period, generated by coal power worldwide. (Kharecha) So many deaths occur due to coal power because of the mining process, on top of all the wastes produced after combustion. Along with being the main contributor to carbon dioxide emissions, coal combustion wastes also result in acid rain. (Olive) The popula…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to remain at the forefront of technological innovation and industrial prowess, the United States must become cognizant that the use of nuclear energy is by far the most efficient policy regarding the creation of power despite the possible risks. This is the belief of William Tucker, the author of the New York Times published article, “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even after Fukushima”.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today's world where technology and advancements has flourished, majority comes to one main source to run on… Energy. There is several alternative methods on producing energy, some more efficient or safer than others. The most common and traditional source of energy in today's world is coal power, but other alternatives do exist such as that of natural gas, solar, wind, hydroelectric and nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is the 3rd most common source of our energy. Nuclear energy was first introduced in 1954 in Russia with the first power plant. Nuclear energy provides about 20% of today's electricity and does provide a substantial amount of energy, but does provide threats of radioactivity.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eart Science Review

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Suppose an electric-generating power plant is about to be built near your house. The local government has not decided whether to allow coal, nuclear, or oil as fuel for the plant (natural gas is not an option). Some groups argue coal is the best choice because there is a 200-year supply and using coal reduces our dependence on foreign oil. Critics argue that burning coal produces three times more global-warming gasses than oil. Coal also produces more dust and expels more acid-rain-causing gases than oil. Others argue that nuclear-generated power produces no greenhouse gases and no other atmospheric pollution. Critics argue that there is presently no long-term location to store the radioactive waste that will be generated and question the safety of nuclear power. Over the life of the plant, nuclear is the least expensive option, followed by coal and then oil.…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power does not put out green house gasses, nuclear power does not pollute our water, and unlike some people believe nuclear power does not release toxic gasses into the air. Some people believe that it produces toxic gases into the air because they see the white clouds that come out of the top of the power plant cooling towers, but in fact those white clouds are actually just the water vapor that has been used to cool the systems, it is not toxic and therefore does not pollute the air. Nuclear energy uses either plutonium or uranium, depending on the type of the reactor. Nuclear reactors produce less waste than any other type of energy source. One pound of plutonium can produce the same amount of energy as 50,000 barrels of oil. The number of deaths caused by coal powered plants is about 24,000 a year. There were only 56 direct deaths caused by the Chernobyl reactor meltdown. Fukushima had no direct deaths, and the only other reported deaths were of the 3 men who were testing a portable reactor in Arco, Idaho. Arco was also the very first city in the world to be powered by nuclear…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Weeks, Jennifer. “Nuclear Energy: Should the U.S. build more nuclear power plants?” CQ Researcher 16.10 (2006): 217-240. CQ Researcher Online. Web. 2 Dec. 2009.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fission and Fusion

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Article 2: “Should the world increase its reliance on nuclear energy?” The beginning of this article gives brief examples of the pros and cons of nuclear reactors from both sides. Opponents cite the case of the recent Japanese power plant disaster and dangers of Iran’s formation of nuclear power. Proponents argue that the backlash is overblown. They say how there have been no measured effects of human…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power’s bad reputation has come about due to the accident at nuclear plants such as Chernobyl in Ukraine, Fukushima in Japan and Three Mile Island in the USA. Chernobyl was one of the only ones out of three that has been classified as a “major accident” by The International Atomic Energy Agency; the other was the accident at Fukushima. The reason the Chernobyl accident was considered a “major accident”, was due to the emergency shutdown failing, with a full melt down being achieved. This area is not able to be populated ever again due to the extreme…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years, there has been a huge debate whether using renewable energy is beneficial to our environment or not. The biggest source of our energy has been sourced by coal, oil and natural gasses. Some researchers believe that there are many benefits of using renewable energy and that we should be concerned with seeking environmentally friendly alternatives instead. Not only are these sources harmful, they will eventually deplete our natural resources. The goal is to find pollution-free renewable energy that can offer a better future.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Solar Energy Pros and Cons

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Primarily, as I mentioned above, solar power is particularly useful in remote areas where it is lack of regular electricity supply. For instance, at Singleton, New South Wales, Australia, there are 2.75 hectare solar farm whose size is approximately…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We live in an era of untold gasoline prices and frequent political dialogue about finding and using alternative forms of energy. Some of these alternative energy sources that are being bantered about and, in some places, implemented include solar, wind, and hydroelectric power. The majority of Americans would agree that all of these forms of alternative energy are safe and should be pursued as new means of powering the country. However, there is one well-known energy source that stirs up dissent and division among the country’s citizens: nuclear power.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays