Preview

Why Is Socrates Unjust

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
330 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Socrates Unjust
1. What is the difference between a. and a. Both Socrates and Glaucon ultimately agree that it is better to be actually just and seemingly unjust than it is to be actually unjust but seemingly just. Their reasons for holding this position are because people just have control over themselves. They are able to maintain dominion over their desires, to avoid self indulgence in evil desires, and to choose good things. This is something the unjust person loses no matter how just he may seem. Socrates uses the image of a beast to show how injustice causes the inner life to war with the man, but justice orders the inner part and makes it cooperative and docile.

I do find this reasoning in favor of being truly persuasive. I find the life of Gyges morally
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Glaucon vs. Thrasymachus Essay Example
    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Glaucon vs. Thrasymachus Essay Example

    representing the Sophist school argues that Justice is nothing more than the "advantage of the stronger." What Thrasymachus means by this statement is confusing as while it seems he is asserting that the strong have justice he later contradicts himself by arguing that what gets called injustice is justice. Thrasymachus' slippage presents two different accounts of justice which conflict with each other. Although it appears that the immoralist position is what Thrasymachus intended to take due to his slippage, there exists some confusion as to whether the stronger doing justice will benefit the stronger or the weaker. In Book II Glaucon and his brother Adimantus restore Thrasymachus' delegitimization of justice claiming that "… Thrasymachus, like a snake, has been charmed more quickly than he should have been…" (358b). Glaucon defines justice as a necessary evil, and that justice is derived from human weakness and fear. Glaucon argues that justice is practiced not out of its own sake but a good that we only desire for its consequences.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Just And Unjust In Plato's Republic
    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page

    Just And Unjust In Plato's Republic

    In many societies, including our own, we labeled the meaning of the word “justice” for the sole purpose of maintaining social and political stability and order for the good of many instead of the few. However, what we believe to be just and unjust in regards to what Plato’s Republic explains about what is actually just and unjust are inadvertently blurred from a somewhat conflicting (if not unintended biased) perspective. These concepts of thought originate in a hierarchical group of knowledge: understanding, thought, belief, and imagination (Socrates 511e); most of which we use for measuring the ideal implementation of practical and critical forms of theory. What we portray justice in the United States today mostly consists of both opinionated…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Socrates Fight An Unjust Law
    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Socrates Fight An Unjust Law

    1. The similarity between the two lie in their belief to fight an unjust law through persuasion and to do so in a peaceful way. He also claims “In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices are alive, negotiation, self-purification and direct action,” and Socrates does participate in the several of these actions to further his point. They both agree that in cases of unjust law, they should fight it (despite that one was willing to go further than another) but still respect the laws in place. King knew that disobeying the law would only bring chaos and reflect badly on the idea of change they wanted and to get the desired results he needed to act in a way that would properly show what he desired.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Persuasion By Peopl Socrates-Just Or Unjust?
    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Persuasion By Peopl Socrates-Just Or Unjust?

    Plato adopted persuasion by argument to provide an explanation about the societal issues. Therefore, he believes that proper steps have to be taken in order to persuade other groups. Firstly, Socrates strives to use three arguments to support just life in that a just man is good and wise while the unjust person is bad and ignorant. Injustice produces disharmony preventing effective actions, while justice helps one to live a much happier life. It shows that one will choose to be just rather than unjust due to the outcomes that result from both just and unjust behaviors. Plato depicts that evil is not the basis of strength, but of dissolution and discord.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tyrant In The Republic, The Iliad And Exodus
    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tyrant In The Republic, The Iliad And Exodus

    Socrates and Glaucon analyzes and discuss what a tyrant man is, and the life that he lives in by illustrating “three proofs”. During the conversation Socrates states that, “lust will dwell within him as a tyrant, in total anarchy and lawlessness” (p. 290). Socrates is explaining that lust is the most dangerous form of all desires. A tyrant becomes a slave to his irrational desires, and tries to continue to feed his desires by stealing from others and commit murders. However, he will never be able to fulfill it. So, he would have to live a life of unhappiness and fear among the victims that he has done wrong. Because of his aggressive actions, he will never have any freedom and will never develop any friendships. At the end, Socrates states that the bad and unjust is the unhappiest which is a tyrant that brings fear among the people of the state and…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato Justice And Injustice Analysis
    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato Justice And Injustice Analysis

    What is justice is a question that has plagued philosophers since the time of Plato when he wrote The Republic to present day. In the book, Plato uses the dialectic, between Socrates and other Athenians like Polemarchus, Cephalus, and Glacuon, to try and find the definition of justice. Through the voice of Glaucon, Plato defines justice as a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear, and injustice as the things that we wouldn’t…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Socrates Guilty
    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    Was Socrates Guilty

    Is Socrates actually guilty of either of the crimes with which he is charged: impiety and corrupting the youth? Are these crimes dangerous for a political community? Is Socrates, in his Apology, fully persuasive that he and his way of life pose no threat to the city? (To answer these questions, you will need to ask yourself what is the foundation for Athenian or, indeed, any political society.)…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Disobeyed The Unjust Analysis
    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates Disobeyed The Unjust Analysis

    • 1. In the Apology, Socrates recounts how he disobeyed the unjust order of the Thirty Tyrants to arrest a fellow citizen; he also claims that he will never stop philosophizing, regardless of what the legally constituted political authority commands. Yet, in the Crito, Socrates provides numerous arguments for obeying the decision of the legally constituted political authority, even though the decision (to put Socrates to death) was unjust. Critically assess whether Socrates’s view about political obligation in the two texts is consistent.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Socrates Considered Unjust
    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is Socrates Considered Unjust

    Socrates was a man of distinction and a man with strong ideas on how to make a more perfect society. Although a lot of his ideas conflict with his ability to be just or unjust it does not in his mind. Being just or unjust is a major topic in the book and there are many different ways of being both. Socrates used the terms, not necessarily the way we would normally use the term today, but parts of his depiction made sense. He said a lot of different things could be considered unjust. For example not doing what you were Destined to do or what you are best at is considered unjust in his mind.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Not Guilty: The Criminality Of Socrates
    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not Guilty: The Criminality Of Socrates

    The question of Socrates’ criminality is not straightforward. The truth or falsity of the accusations is not certain. Also, the perspective from which the question is viewed changes its answer. The only certainty is that the philosopher, Socrates, was found guilty and sentenced to death by a jury of his peers for corrupting the youth and a disbelief in the Athenian’s Gods. If the Apology’s origins are to be believed, as in if Plato wrote a true description of events, then it can be said that Socrates does not believe himself to be guilty of these crimes.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates: Breaking the Law
    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates: Breaking the Law

    In the case of Socrates I believe him breaking the law was justifiable, although I don’t…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Unjust
    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates Unjust

    This establishes that whether or not Socrates originally believes his punishment is right, by staying in Athens his entire life, he made a commitment to follow the law-being just-therefore, if he is accused of breaking the law and is convicted by the courts of Athens, which represent the law, then he must complete his sentence, or else he is only becoming more unjust. Socrates later decides that although he could escape, it is better to try and do the right thing, despite having done unjust things in the past, and ultimately decides to carry out his punishment. This passage also further examines the gray area within the idea of just and unjust by saying that following the laws is just; however, the people of the court who determine which acts are within the bounds the laws and which acts are not, are also biased according to their own personal perceptions, meaning no human truly knows the intransigent definitions of what is just and what is unjust.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Unjust Analysis
    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates Unjust Analysis

    Socrates an ancient Greek philosopher who arguably set a philosophical president for all modern western theories, though he lived in ___________. Today in the 21st century his trial is still studied and debated. Some belief the trial justified and the Athenians were correct in his prosecution. However, large populations argue that the trial was unjust and Athenians used Socrates as a scapegoat for the troubles that the Athena democracy was facing during that time. Three men brought the charges laid against Socrates. Metetus, a wildly religious man, Anytus, a wealthy business owner and Lycon who was largely unknown and likely only there to fill the Athenian political requirements, there brought fourth two charges, impiety and the corruption of the youth. A…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice In Plato's Republic
    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Justice In Plato's Republic

    In Plato’s Republic he attempts to break down the complex idea of Justice, what it means to be just, and if man is just willingly or unwillingly. In Book II of the Republic, Plato uses Glaucon’s Challenge to discuss what it means to be good and just. Two stories are present in the explanation: one of the ancestor of Gyges of Lydia that involves an invisibility ring and what the just person versus the unjust person would do with the power the ring possesses and another of a just man and an unjust man and which one is the preferred life to live. Before Plato explains what it means to be just and unjust, he categorizes types of goodness: there are things that are good-in-itself, things that are good-in-itself and good-for-its-consequences,…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ring of Gyges
    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Ring of Gyges

    Throughout the back-and-forth debate between Socrates and his comrades on the definition of justice, many questions are raised about the integrity and justice of mankind. Does man practice justice because he truly believes in it? Or perhaps because humans fear the consequences of committing injustice? In Book II, Glaucon attempts to tackle the question and points out 3 kinds of justice: the kind that is good in itself, the kind that is good in itself and its results, and the kind that is good in its results but unpleasant. He then further ventures into these ideas of justice by claiming “the best is to do injustice without paying the penalty; the worst is to suffer it without being able to take revenge” (35). Glaucon invokes the legend of the Ring of Gyges to further emphasize his argument.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More