Preview

Why Is National Security Important

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1829 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is National Security Important
Zahir Whyte Ms.Toscano
3/. /16 Ms. Bauer
The importance of Civil liberties over National security Multiple people have different opinions on whether National security is more important than civil liberties or Civil liberties is more important than national security personally Civil liberties is more important an example to show that civil
…show more content…
Civil liberties are more important than the nations security because we have lots of security like police officers and the military and the CIA and lots of other secret organizations protecting the nation but we have nothing that can really protect our privacy. Amendment IV states "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" (BillOfRights.Org). This basically means that all people can have the privacy of there house, papers they have and anything else. This goes with when the NYPD had surveillance on Muslims and the mosques. "Civil rights lawyers say such 'widespread and intense' surveillance has created a climate of fear, and stigma among Muslims living in New York. They are now seeking a court injunction against the NYPD's ability to instigate investigations into Muslims without evidence of crimes and for a judge to appoint an independent monitor to oversee its counter-terrorism efforts" (McVeigh). This quote explains how Muslims are scared and they feel shame and want to bring the NYPD to court for starting investigations about Muslims without any evidence of crimes. Another piece of evidence is "Lawyers …show more content…
Civil liberties is more important because people's privacy is more important the nations security because we will always have people watching over the nation. In the article "US Court: Muslims can sue NYPD over mass surveillance" by Dien Luong the article says "In 2012, Muslim Advocates, a national advocacy group, and the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights filed a lawsuit against what they called the NYPD's unlawful and blanket surveillance of Muslim Americans in New Jersey. The move came after the Associated Press published an expose of the program in 2011" (Luong). This quote is stating that a national supporting group of Muslims filed a lawsuit against the New York Police Department for keeping surveillance of Muslims in New Jersey and the Muslims where right to sue the NYPD because they are racially profiling Muslims for past events that happened. Another quote stating why civil liberties is more important than national security is "According to documents the plaintiffs filed, the NYPD's surveillance program, which by its own admission has not yet led to a single conviction, "uses a variety of methods to spy on Muslims", such as pictures, video, and collecting license plate numbers of mosque congregants" (Luong). This quote says that according to documents the supporting group filed about the NYPD's surveillance program they used several methods to watch the Muslims like using photography, video, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    What is more important to the citizens of America? The right to their privacy and doing what they want as they wish, in private? Or are they okay with the government surveilling every living thing that they do? Through loopholes in the Patriot Act, the government misuses their power by spying on millions of innocent Americans. The people do have rights within the fourth Amendment though. Simplified, it states that Americans have the right to privacy unless there is probable cause. (Kids n.d.) Where do we as Americans draw the line?…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harnoor Chatha Professor Sumstad English-1002-16 October 19, 2014 Rhetorical Analysis Final Draft Deborah Pearlstein author, of Rights in an Insecure World, is the Director of the United States Law and Security Program at Human Rights First. Pearlstein’s purpose is to elaborate and examine different ways our rights are redefined against us after September 11 attack. The Author emphasize her claim about Liberty and Security after September 11 attack on the United States. Author’s intended audience is informing U.S. citizens and criticizing the Government officials (FBI, CIA, and interrogation team at Guantanamo Bay). Author’s main goal is to elaborate and compare how Liberty and Security rights are being violated before and after the September…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For more than two hundred years the bill of rights also known as the first ten amendments of the U.S. constitution has been responsible for protecting the American people and maintains their rights and freedoms. One Particular Amendment in the United States constitution of importance in the legal system and unparalleled is the 4th Amendment. Since the 9/11 attacks Muslim men have been persecuted by what they wear and believe because of America’s fear on another attack on the United States.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2001, people are quick to dismiss the idea of an internment of American citizens, suggesting that the country has come a long way from 1942. The hypothesis that the government might conduct surveillance or use illegal wiretaps to monitor groups or individuals that it suspects of domestic terrorism seemed foreign before September 11th, and now has become a way to gain more information about potential suspects. These new measures, included in the USA Patriot Act, delicately trace the line between national security and civil liberties. A brief look at how the Bush…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Equally important, as we all understand that the government of the United States is mandated to strike a balance between the civil liberties and overall security, some of the Acts such as that called PATRIOT Act are supposed to ensure that the future challenges that will face the homeland security will have tomust provide a secure air transportation system (Nakaya, 2005). This is because PATRIOT Act will offer the best way to go alongside other existing laws in the United States. When such laws are in action, it is the function of the Civil Authorities to see into it that the same laws are not abused in any way.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bill of Rights and the fourteenth amendment are the most important constitutional provisions affecting civil liberties policy making. Bills of Rights which are the 1st 10th amendment of the constitution. Fourteenth amendment granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States. I really appreciate what government have done for people’s right because according to my experience I have never seen in any country such as Europe, Asia or Middle East where people have such freedom like those. Bill of rights such as freedom of expression or religion was not guaranteed to be absolute, government could resist one’s right unless they cross the limit. The condition was to keep balance between the Church and State. I agree…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not agree with Benjamin Franklin, in many situations, it is favorable to give up public liberties so that we may ensure public safety. Such is often the case in airports, schools, federal buildings and various other locations. Additionally, while the constitution means to secure America’s liberties as well as insuring its domestic tranquility, it has been shown in several situations that this can not always be upheld.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil liberties are our natural rights, such as freedom, equality and pursuit of happiness, which the government cannot modify by making new laws or by judicial interpretation. Civil liberties are important because it helps restrain the power of the government to dictate how we behave. This ensures that our daily life is not interrupted by authoritative figures that may just try to intentionally cause harm. Civil liberties contribute to the protection of our personal choices, such as the right to abortions. The bill of rights is important to civil liberties because it does not allow the government to govern our personal lives. Unfortunately, with this war against terrorism, we have given those authoritative figures the ability to mandate new laws that invade our personal privacy in the name of terrorism, such as the Patriot Act.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ender's Game

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As I mentioned before, government does have a small role in our personal lives in America, although some people might not realize it. After the tragedy of 9/11, the government stepped up efforts to prevent another terrorism attack on the U.S. Specifically, in The 9/11 Dilemma: Freedom vs. Security, it said “... Congress united to pass the Patriot Act, which expanded the government’s powers to conduct counterterrorism surveillance and investigations.” This gave the government the ability to do many new things, such as to monitor phone calls, conduct surveillance on anyone, and to go through household trash. In the second reference document I was given called Preserving Life and Liberty, it described more of the governments rights with the Patriot Act. It stated that the government could have access to library records, and could perform searches without first obtaining a warrant.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lucille Roybal-Allard said, “Even though some in our government may claim that civil liberties must be compromised in order to protect the public, we must be wary of what we are giving up in the name of fighting terrorism”. In the dystopian novel 1984 by George Orwell, the citizens in the community have no rights whatsoever and the society is in terrible shape. It is unnecessary to sacrifice civil liberties in order to live in a safe, egalitarian society because the people will not be equal and safe if the right against unreasonable search and seizure, freedom of speech, and right to privacy are altered.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Stop And Frisk

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Founding Fathers believed that the sanctity of individual rights must be held above all else, due to their prior experiences with the tyrannical rule of King George III of Great Britain. After the drafting and ratification of the Constitution, the United States government has introduced several laws and allowed several actions that compromise the liberties guaranteed by the Constitution in the supposed name of security or the general welfare. These laws include the Espionage Act which was introduced during World War I, and the use and allowance of ‘Stop and Frisk’ procedures amongst America’s various police agencies. The introduction and use of these laws and procedures were meant to keep the American public safe following outbreaks of war and to try and prevent weapon related violence, but they also compromise the liberties that are ensured to the…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s important to know the difference between your civil liberties and your civil rights. Knowledge is power and knowing your rights is important for the protection of your own rights and respect for the rights of others around you; if you don’t stand up for yourself and know your own right then who will? But first to understand what the difference between these two essential parts of our overall freedom and everyday lives, we must distinguish and understand what they are individually.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of the attacks on the date of 9/11, Congress passed the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act made the government’s ability to spy on individuals easier, but also weakened the checks and balances our country relies on. So in essence, the threat of terrorism against our country paved the way for violating one of our basic civil liberties under the fourth amendment of the constitution – the ability to live free of unreasonable searches and seizures. However, the ability for government agencies to obtain information quickly and without warning becomes a powerful tool against terrorism.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The safety of the general population is far more important than the protection of the rights of one citizen. Many argue the Constitutionality of restricting civil rights in the name of public safety, but the same people lobby for law enforcement agencies to work harder to protect our citizens from domestic terrorism and other criminal acts. The two principles cannot go hand in hand, and public safety is far more important. Almost every crime and domestic terrorist act that has succeeded could have been prevented by authorities. Civil rights restrict law enforcement agencies from operating in an ideal manner. With tighter restrictions, certain people and certain actions do not slip by government agencies, and decrease the risk for a terrorist act of happening in the United States. Pubic safety of it’s people is the most important job of the government. Many times the government fails to do it’s job when more emphasis is placed on civil rights. The analysis below will present both arguments of the public safety versus civil rights debate and evaluate key issues and current laws and amendments associated with the administration of justice and security among communities. Some of those key issues are: the death penalty, gun control, pursuit driving, and hate crimes.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Too many wrongly characterize the debate as "security versus privacy." The real choice is liberty versus control. Tyranny, whether it arises under threat of foreign physical attack or under constant domestic authoritative scrutiny, is still tyranny. Liberty requires security without intrusion, security plus privacy. Widespread police surveillance is the very definition of a police state. And that's why we should champion privacy even when we have…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays