Why Is Latin America Unstable
In Latin America 25% of Latin Americans lives on 4 dollars a day or less. Compared to The United States, Latin America is very unstable in several ways for several reasons. This instability is important because it affects the lives of everyone that lives there. Looking at how Latin America developed you can learn why it's unstable. Latin America developed an unstable government because a lack of foreign intervention, industrialization, and authoritarianism. (Deyonna Lansden, Tamia Roshell, Quin Balthrop)
Latin America has a government called authoritarianism and the United States has a social contract. Authoritarianism, that is the enforcement of strict obedience at the expense of personal freedom. This makes Latin America unstable because …show more content…
In America and Latin America had two different types of effects on its government. After the Civil War the U.S Industrialization industry grew tremendously with machines replacing hand labor. Industrialization is the development of industries in a country or region on a wide scale. Industrialization in America helped the country form a stable government because during the Industrial Revolution lots of new inventions were made. Because of all these new inventions factories had to manufacture them and that led to an increase in products which increased America's Industrialization which helped their economy thus leading them to a successful government. On the other hand in Latin America there Industrial period was completely opposite from Americas. The Industrial Revolution in Europe helped Latin America recover from their indepence war but Latin America had no industry which then lead them to form an unstable government. This created an unstable government because Latin America had to depend on other countries trading their resources to them. In Latin America there wasn't enough investments but there was new demands for their natural resources like coffee, sugar and beef. To conclude America's government was successful because they had a boom in new products which then increased their industrialization which helped their economy. Latin America's government wasn't successful because they depend on other countries trading resources to them and there wasn't enough investments there which hurt their economy thus affecting their government.
Latin America has a government called authoritarianism and the United States has a social contract. Authoritarianism, that is the enforcement of strict obedience at the expense of personal freedom. This makes Latin America unstable because …show more content…
In America and Latin America had two different types of effects on its government. After the Civil War the U.S Industrialization industry grew tremendously with machines replacing hand labor. Industrialization is the development of industries in a country or region on a wide scale. Industrialization in America helped the country form a stable government because during the Industrial Revolution lots of new inventions were made. Because of all these new inventions factories had to manufacture them and that led to an increase in products which increased America's Industrialization which helped their economy thus leading them to a successful government. On the other hand in Latin America there Industrial period was completely opposite from Americas. The Industrial Revolution in Europe helped Latin America recover from their indepence war but Latin America had no industry which then lead them to form an unstable government. This created an unstable government because Latin America had to depend on other countries trading their resources to them. In Latin America there wasn't enough investments but there was new demands for their natural resources like coffee, sugar and beef. To conclude America's government was successful because they had a boom in new products which then increased their industrialization which helped their economy. Latin America's government wasn't successful because they depend on other countries trading resources to them and there wasn't enough investments there which hurt their economy thus affecting their government.