Preview

Why Is It Worth Doing The Wrong Thing?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
581 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is It Worth Doing The Wrong Thing?
Every human has different morals and values which define what is good, bad, wrong, right, pretty, ugly, etc. The wrong or right thing might have varying meanings like any other adjectives. The wrong thing completely depends on how far someone is willing to go, but as long as that wrong thing remains reasonable based on common sense and laws, it would be worth doing it for the right reason. Although there are many gray and not acceptable situations, there are times when doing the wrong thing for the right reason is acceptable.
Many times, doing the wrong thing for the right reason is not acceptable because the wrong thing is a detrimental act which harms others in bad ways. For example, Traffic laws identify that going over speed limit is illegal, but what if someone is in an emergency situation in your car and no ambulance is available? It would not be right to go faster than the speed limit, but someone’s life tends to be significant. In this situation, the wrong act outweighs the right
…show more content…
An important example of this situation occurred in 2013 regarding the US national security. In 2013, Edward Snowden, a former US CIA employee and government contractor, committed a wrong and illegal act. He revealed details of classified United States National surveillance programs to the world. He surely did the wrong thing in eyes of many people and especially the government, but his work resulted in releasing significant information about how the US government accesses private information. Many people consider the result of his wrong work successful and helpful because they believe that Snowden shared crucial details with Americans to inform them about the government. On the other hand, many others believe that Snowden’s wrong act is not acceptable because secured documents of US were spread to other countries. This case remains a controversial topic of ethics and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The "right thing" is, by nature, something that is an opinionated concept. Many people could be doing something they see as correct while other people believe that thing could be awful. Take, for example, the holocaust in Germany. Adolf Hitler was in charge of Germany and made many statements supporting the mass genocide of jewish people. Looking back at it today, most people will see this as something horrible. Supporting the mass genocide of a group of people without any real reason seems completely ludicrous. However, in that era of Germany, many people supported the idea. They had the Hitler Jugend, also known as the Hitler Youth, who were training to become a Nazi and fight for what Hitler was supporting. "Heil Hitler" was a common greeting…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Finn and Sari Horwitz opinion piece, featured in the Washington Post on the 21st of June, engages the reader by describing Edward Snowden's accusations for what he has committed and to encourage the reader to think that he has done a terrible thing. This article generally gives the readers to have a specific view which is the writer's view and gives on the emotion as something to be angry with him as the society of America and America's security is at…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bradley Manlen

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bradley Manning, a member of the armed force in the United States, worked as an intelligence analyst in Iraq from 2009 to 2010. In 2010, he sent classified documents and videos about military decisions and actions in the Iraq War to a website, WikiLeaks and his intention was to reveal injustice and wrongdoings. Later on, he was accused of violating the American secrecy laws, providing aid to their national enemy and several relevant counts. At last, the US court’s military judge sentenced him to 35 years in prison for being guilty of violating the Espionage act, copying and distributing the high classified information. However, he was acquitted of the most serious charge of aiding the enemy.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout its long history, America has been tormented by a stream of its own traitors. Among those traitors many people believe that Edward Snowden and Julius and Ethel Rosenberg have been some of them. They have both done different deeds that have effected and impacted America in many different ways. Edward Snowden exposed holes in the country’s national security that could have proved disastrous in the future and should be pardoned for his crimes in light of this.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the day you are born, learning and education are the most important skills for survival in today's society. The most valuable thing learned on your journey of life is the ability to distinguish "Right from Wrong", both technically and morally. Though easy at first with the minor day to day issues we deal with, it can become quite difficult when more pressing issues are placed in front of you. Many things influence a person's judgment. While one person believes that their view is the absolute truth, another sees that person as idiotic and uneducated. The important thing to remember when making a decision is to be open-minded, and push the outside influences away so that you can see both sides of the issue and make a decision for yourself. Is there really a moral right or wrong, or is it just a view point?…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He observed documented proof of acts, committed by the NSA, which violated the public’s privacy and were initiated illegally. Disturbed by what he saw, he had a choice to make: 1.) Report his findings through appropriate government channels, 2.) Report his findings publicly or, 3.) Keep quiet all together. Unfortunately, Edward Snowden made the unethical decision to expose his discovery through the media. Revealing the NSA’s secret activity, in the manner that he did, put Americans at risk and wasted years of work and the funds spent on this endeavor. I don’t believe Edward Snowden lacked moral sensitivity, which is a component of ethical decision making (Johnson, 2011, p. 236). According to Johnson (2011), Rest states “problem recognition requires that we consider how our behavior affects others, identify possible courses of action, and determine the consequences of each potential strategy” (p. 237). The effects of his betrayal reached beyond American soil. I struggle to understand how he concluded that the path he choose was the best option benefitting the masses. He had the option to voice his objections over the activity to NSA officials. Doing so would have maintained the secrecy of the technology and methods utilized, thereby, preserving the fortification of Americans and our…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent discussions of Edward Snowden, a controversial issue has been whether or not he was wrong for leaking government information. On the one hand, some argue that he is an American hero. From this perspective, it is a good thing that he exposed the inappropriate surveillance tactics of the American government. On the other hand, however, others argue that he is a traitor. From this perspective, he betrayed his country by leaking information to other countries. In the words of President Barack Obama, “If any individual who objects to government policy can take it into their own hands to publicly disclose classified information, then we will not be able to keep our people safe, or conduct foreign policy” (Mason). In sum, then, the…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Edward Snowden is a criminal, yet known as a hero. He knew the consequences if he released the private information to the public. He simply wanted to let America know what actions the government is doing today. He confirmed that the U.S. government, without having any proof of a warrant, collects phone call logs and keeps them in file. The second leak he announced was the N.S.A., who wants to track down foreign suspects, and or criminals, has the capacity to access emails from U.S. based Internet companies. Most people were in disbelief about this information because they thought they had their own freedom on the internet and taking phone calls. Others did not react to Snowden's information because they already suspected it. Either way, this issue is important to be aware about because it can let citizens know what the N.S.A is capable of doing.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward Snowden Argument

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Activist Daniel Ellsberg, who himself had leaked the classified Pentagon Papers during the Nixon administration, applauded Snowden for being “the one person in the…NSA who did what he absolutely should have done” (Hope X). Ellsberg echoes the sentiments shared by many Americans and defends the whistleblower’s right to protect his own country’s Constitution. While it is clear that Snowden’s exposure of the NSA constitutes whistleblowing, it takes his supporters and well-known whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg to bring the issue light in the White House: the fact that the controversy is so ardent within the country—and the fact that the issues surrounding Snowden are not so cut-and-dry—mirrors many cases of questionable pardons in the U.S. in the past (Turley). According to Jonathan Tuley, Snowden’s situation is similar to Ellsberg’s and many other pardons in U.S. history, and furthermore, his pardon would pacify the “national divide” that has occurred as a result of the controversy. This argument is poignant, considering the level of controversy and the volume of unfavorable evidence against the NSA provided by…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    domestic terrorism

    • 1144 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is an unavoidable issue which continues inconclusive, whether Edward Snowden is a whistleblower, or a traitor. Those who support him call him a hero, a man protecting the people. Others view him as nothing but a traitor or defector. The people agree that his actions were unjust and are considered domestic terrorism on the United States. Snowden signed a contract under NSA, which he agreed to keep their secrets but he broke the contract by leaking information to the public. This was an enormous concern to political officials because that information leaked can be used by enemies of the United States.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Former C.I.A. employee Snowden leaked classified information about the National Security Agency’s programs. In other words, Snowden broke the law, and in doing so, he opened the eyes of the public to what some would perceive as an invasion of privacy. Those same people who perceived Snowden’s act of civil disobedience as an act of heroism would argue that this invasion of privacy is unjust according to the U.S. Constitution. In the event of Snowden’s civil disobedience, Snowden created distrust between Americans and the U.S. government by insinuating that the American government was unjustly infringing upon the rights of its citizens, and suggesting that there should be no circumstances in which this is legal or accepted by the American people. The reality is, however, that without organizations such as the N.S.A. there to monitor Americans from afar, the American nation would be open to millions of threats. In fact, those who view Snowden as a hero would likely view things differently if for example the safety of their nation was compromised by a secret terrorist organization within the United States which, without the efforts of the N.S.A.’s programs, had gone undetected. If this was the case, they would likely be arguing in favor of creating these programs rather than demolishing them. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that in the case of Edward Snowden’s act of civil disobedience, society was negatively impacted by…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism , utility encourges people to do the wrong thing ‘’ if right action is taken to…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Making Good Choices

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Making right choices is crucial for the direction that you want to go in in life, but sometimes it can be very hard to choose the right thing. Sometimes you do not make the right choice and there are consequences for those actions. Before you make a decision about doing something ask yourself a couple of questions. Would I tell my closest friend or relative about it? Will it have consequences? Will it cause harm?…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past century, the government has been a center of controversy and division. American citizens and non-American citizens, for years, have complained about many aspects of government ranging from hypocrisy to lies and false promises from politicians. This attitude was heightened because of an NSA employee named Edward Snowden, who afterwards fled to Russia for asylum from the U.S. government. Snowden revealed shocking secrets about operations orchestrated by the CIA and NSA. Most notably, their “snoopy” behavior. According to Snowden, government-based agencies constantly use programs and various devices to spy on people. The NSA has access to everyone’s phone records, emails, pictures, messages, and sensitive information. The leak caused…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays