Preview

Why Is It Justified To Survive Without Provocation?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
190 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is It Justified To Survive Without Provocation?
Think about two grown men on a raft with only enough food for one to survive. If the stronger man shoves the weaker man overboard, he may have done something necessary to his own survival, though, not just. Suppose the stronger guy woke to find the weaker guy atop him, attempting to choke him. Nonetheless, could he have subdued him without throwing him over the side? If killing the other man was the only way he could resist his violent attack, then we find the survivor's actions morally justified. But, since there was only food for one, why was it not justified to throw the guy over without provocation?
We have constructed a tendentious morality. It is overly devout to subtle gradations of external facts that are difficult to prove. It is like
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Christopher Browning And Stanley Milgram's Analysis
    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Comparing Christopher Browning And Stanley Milgram's Analysis

    We humans like to think of ourselves as morally decent creatures. Indeed, our capacity for morality has been a major factor in the sustainability and prosperity of our species. We take pride in the acts of kindness we perform, and more often then not, we express genuine sympathy for those who are suffering. Yet as comforting as this mentality may be, it fails to give consideration to the atrocities human beings have enacted on one other throughout history. Such atrocities are often considered exceptions to the rule of human nature, carried out by a few sadistic and evil individuals that don’t represent mankind’s normal behavior. However, Christopher Browning and Stanley Milgram offer a less comforting explanation; they…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Phil 1600 Ch 3 Questions
    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Phil 1600 Ch 3 Questions

    This describes how we think once we learn that there is more to ethics than conforming to the standards and rules of others.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lenn Goodman Analysis
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lenn Goodman Analysis

    ARE THERE UNIVERSAL MORAL REQUIREMENTS AND IS SOME MORALS UNIVERSALLY KNOWN AS WRONG? CHALLENGES TO RELATIVISM…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Kwame Anthony Appiah Analysis
    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kwame Anthony Appiah Analysis

    In our society there is a lot of tension revolving around concepts of morality. Constantly people are debating all over the world whether or not concepts like abortion, homosexuality, gambling, affairs, divorce, contraception, and premarital sex are morally acceptable or morally unacceptable. Right now there are even entire societies that believe the American way of life is morally unacceptable. In Moral Disagreement by Kwame Anthony Appiah, Appiah writes about differing values and morals around the world and within our society. He points out, “we aren’t the only people who have the concepts of right and wrong, good and bad; every society, it seems, has terms that correspond to these thin concepts” (658). However, these concepts…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eth 316: Relationship Between Critical Thinking And Ethics
    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Eth 316: Relationship Between Critical Thinking And Ethics

    One reason is because ethical reasoning is also culturally and religiously influenced and may at times suffer from misreading the environment or the desired accomplishments of actions.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    On Morality Didion Analysis
    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On Morality Didion Analysis

    We think that all actions are sound as long as they don’t hurt another person. But then we see people like Adolf Hitler. The man murdered millions of people. Yet, he had a bunch of supporters who helped him with these inhumane acts. But he did what he did in the name of morality, in the name of ‘respect for the greater race.’ The central idea of this essay is that morality depends largely on perception. What one finds wrong may not necessarily be seen as inappropriate by another. “I followed my own conscience.” “I did what I thought was right.” Didion questions the reader how many madmen have said this and meant it? Didion doesn’t believe that these men shelter themselves under the illusion of morality but actually believe their actions are moral and justified. Maybe we ourselves have said it before and been wrong. Our conscience isn’t always the best judge of things. But the concept of morality makes it okay to just be impulsive and do what we think is correct in the…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro And Socrates Analysis
    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Euthyphro And Socrates Analysis

    Because of this dilemma, philosophers have tried to create a secular ethic in order to avoid it. But, according to Kai Nielsen, “Religious morality… may have its difficulties, but secular morality, religious apologists argue, has still greater difficulties.” He then explains that without some great consequence, or without any bigger purpose for living morally, then there would be no reason to live morally, or to even define what morality consists…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    David Hume The Origin Of Morality Essay
    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    David Hume The Origin Of Morality Essay

    Morality is a uniquely human characteristic. As it is something we have created but cannot touch. We can assume it is housed in the inner workings of our mind. Morality moves us to action, but we must first determine its origin. The mind has the…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Relativism Unfair
    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Is Relativism Unfair

    Relativist morality could be seen as unfair, when looked at closely and seen from critics’ point of view it becomes clear that it is easy to question perhaps because of its weakness as a moral system. The weakness could somewhat be perceived as making Relativist morality unfair.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Conflict Expository (the Crucible)
    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Conflict Expository (the Crucible)

    The fight for survival is a conflict that all species encounter. It is instinctive for all animals to put up their best defence and protect themselves when a threat is encountered. In higher order thinking animals such as us humans, confronting a challenging conflict requires elaborate cognitive thought processes. Depending on the individual’s own conscience, some people may succumb to compromising their values in order to protect themselves. In many instances, in both the fictional world and real life, an individual is put in a position where they must decide what is more important to them – self-preservation or moral values.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Relativism Definition
    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cultural Relativism Definition

    What one may believe is right and worthy in their own culture may seem taboo in another culture’s standards. This is because of the use of cultural relativism, which is the belief that something is good or wrong if and only if it is approved or disapproved in a given culture. Right and wrong values vary from society to society; therefore, there is no standard base to judge what is universally right or wrong between the different cultures. Because of this, societies may disagree about the morality of what is right and wrong. Gensler believes that if cultural relativism is true, then there are no right or wrong moral values within a culture’s belief, because objective truths can still exist.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Individual vs. cultural relativism
    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Individual vs. cultural relativism

    Some people may argue that, “what’s right/moral in my eyes, may not be right/moral in your eyes”. This is considered individual moral relativism. Cultural moral relativism is putting culture at the top of relative ethical decision-making. (Argosy University, 2014). These two different moral relativisms differ in the fact that one is putting what you believe first and the other is putting your culture first.…

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Relativism and Morality
    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Relativism and Morality

    In the article, “Some Moral Minima,” Lenn E. Goodman raises the question, “if it is true that no norm can be made absolute unless some other is compromised, are there no rules that tell us that principles are principles – no norms delineating concretely, and uncompromisingly, wrong from right?” (Goodman, 2010) Goodman goes on to state that the areas singled out in this article are not comprehensive of every consideration to which humans are due; he asserts that these are just some of the practices that should never be considered as options.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    is killing ever justified
    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    is killing ever justified

    There are lots of arguments to say when killing is justified as in the case of a war. In World War II the Nazi’s attempting to kill all the Jews in the world was definitely not justified, but on the other hand the Allies killing was justified because they were trying to keep the Germans from taking over the world and because of this we live in the world we live today.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Relativism: The Minimum Conception Of Cultural Values
    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cultural Relativism: The Minimum Conception Of Cultural Values

    Moral schools of thought dictate ethical behavior, however, every culture assigns ethical and moral values differently (Lecture 1). Without a moral or ethical structure, society would not prosper. Clashing cultural values make defining morality complicated. Ethicists argue the minimum conception of morality establishes a starting point based on reason that defines and installs a code of morality or ethics. The minimum conception of morality is an “effort to guide one’s conduct by reason—that is, to do what there are the best reasons for doing—while giving equal weight to the interests of each individual affected by one’s action” (Rachels 13).…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics