Preview

Why I Liked Juror Number 8

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
350 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why I Liked Juror Number 8
My favorite person in the movie of 12 angry men was especially juror number 8 and the old man juror 9, also juror number 6. The reason i liked juror number 8 is because, juror 8 didn’t agree guilty right away just like the other jurors, number 8 really wanted to explain why everyone voted guilty. He didn’t right away think that the kid was really a murderer,because of the father as the court had said that the father was abusive and that the kid was everywhere as an orphan but so long to be beaten, number 8 thought after so long of taking all that abuse, who wouldn’t? And how number 8 really got everyone to really think about sending a kid to the electric chair, how he got everyone to vote not guilty. Also the reason i liked juror number 9 too

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    My # 3 is Uncle Billy. He is one of the guys you just can't trust because he can stab you in the back. He is exiled for being a slues robber and stealing gold from minors. He doesn't play too much of a role in this story.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A maintenance role that is notable within the group is an Encourager of Participation. This role is filled by juror number eight. Throughout the movie, he encourages everyone to give their opinion on the case. He listens and demonstrates a level of openness to the ideas of others. Juror number eight is also responsive to the other jurors.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A character who is like me is juror 9 because he’s open minded and fair. Juror 9 is trying to give good evidence about the old men, for example, “The old men has never been recognized his whole life he just wants to be recognized.” (pg. 36) I display this characteristic because I could tell fake from fake and real from real like juror 9 did with the old man when he could tell the old man was lying. A way how not alike is that I don’t really focus on things like he do I just go with my guts or my first instant unlike him he thinks it through and makes sure what he’s saying is…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 8th Juror is a key character throughout the play. He is the only dissenter who votes ‘not guilty’ in the very beginning and says ‘it’s not easy to raise hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.’ As a logical, gentle and thoughtful character, the 8th Juror slowly works out the way to make the jury rethink the case and the possibility of the boy not killing his…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When there is suppression and exploitation of voices, standing up to a group can prove to be difficult to the unrecognised heroes. Both Terry and 8th Juror, the protagonists in the texts experience self-doubt in their journey to heroism through daring actions that eventually getting them to success. Whilst the reader can identify the initial courage in 8th Juror voting ‘not guilty,’ against the opposing jurors and the majority bias, the reader can note through the stage directions his anxiousness leading up to revealing his vote “The 8th Juror turns, startled.” He’s logical sense came forward unlike the biased and lazy judgement of the other jurors. “There were eleven votes for “guilty.” It’s not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    4th Juror: 4th Juror is a stock broker. He seems very serious. He deals with the facts of the case logically and uses facts.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writer, Reginald Rose wants to show to me from thus play is that the truth matters more. He wants to show that the truth what matter more because throughout the play the Jurors keep arguing that boy isn't innocent. Later on in the play the Jurors started to find reasonable doubt on the evidence they had on the boy. Like when one of the witnesses said that they say the killing accruing through the window when the train was passing by. It wasn't possible for her to the killing accruing because it was in the middle of the night and she didn't have her glasses on so it was impossible for her to see the boy killing his father through the last to carts windows of the train when passing. (Rose 15) Also when the boy was accused of murdering his…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Okay, Juror #3 is the angry father, and Juror #8 is the guy who stands alone in the INNOCENT vote, right?…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are only twelve main characters in the entire play whose names we never learn. Despite that fact, there is a large amount of character development and the reader is able to learn lots about each juror. Character development is necessary for a good story and Twelve Angry Men has lots of it. It is all through the jurors dialogue and how they each act. The protagonist, juror 8, and the antagonist, juror 3, are easily identifiable thanks to how they talk about the case and what they want to happen. Juror 10 is clearly a racist based on the way he talks about “them”. As you can see, their names are not necessary for good characters and a good play. All that is…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the film Twelve Angry Men produced by Reginald Rose begins when a young teenage boy was on trial for murdering his abusive father. All the evidence and facts brought to the trial was against him, however, the twelve jurors had to make a verdict whether the boy is guilty or not guilty, and they decision would concluded whether the boy should or should not be sent to the electric chair. In process of making a verdict, the twelve jurors came together to reason and decide the fate of the boy. The verdict began with eleven guilty to one not guilty. Juror number 8, who voted not guilty did not believe on the evidence because, he believed that the murder weapon could be available to anyone, so he had purchased a look alike knife. Which made some…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eyewitness In 12 Angry Men

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film 12 Angry Men is about a murder trial conducted in a courtroom. The judge gave the jury its final instruction telling them that a guilty verdict will result in a death sentence for the defendant, an 18-year-old boy who was accused of murdering his father using a knife! One juror had a personal connection with the case. He has not seen his son for more than two years. He claims that the young boy is guilty and that all young kids are criminals. The juror has bias towards the trial because he see his son in the young boy. Out of the twelve jurors, eleven jurors voted for conviction. Another juror states that he has doubts about the case and hopes to give the boy a favorable decision. The young boy had a hard life living in the slum. A third juror claims that each of the…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of my favorite characters was Josh, since he is one of the only characters that seems to act of his own free will, ignoring the attitudes and beliefs of those around him, and giving the appearance of being free from the restraints of the racial inequality that surround the African-Americans in the story. Josh would rather die than be subservient and treated like an animal. I at first found this admirable but was later sad to read that his hatred got the…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research Paper

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 12 Angry Men the illogical fallacy for Juror Number 3 is a general fallacy. This fallacy is the result of an emotional prejudice by juror 3 has as he compares the defendant with his own child. Juror 3 says in the play,…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American novelist Harper Lee in her novel To Kill a Mockingbird wrote, “I'm no idealist to believe firmly in the integrity of our courts and in the jury system—that is no ideal to me, it is a living, working reality. Gentlemen, a court is no better than each man of you sitting before me on this jury. A court is only as sound as its jury, and a jury is only as sound as the men who make it up.” I had nervously opened the envelope with “Official Jury Summons” stamped on the outside many times before the autumn of 2014, however, up until that point, I had been lucky and avoided selection. My once thriving town was beginning to feel the consequences of a declining economy and increased poverty. My fellow citizens walked the streets with an almost…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What Is A Jury Unlucky

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The door was blown opened and here came the jury. Just by looking at them Silver was already scarred for life. The jury had some of the most ruthless criminals ever. Charles Milles Manson is the founder of Manson Family group, involved in murder and burglary. Theodore Robert Bundy was an American serial…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays