Preview

Why has the functionalist perspective been so severely criticised?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
833 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why has the functionalist perspective been so severely criticised?
Why has the functionalist perspective been so severely criticised?
Structural functionalism developed out of the European philosophical traditions of the C19th. It was in some respects, a response to the massive social upheavals of industrialisation and political unrest of the times as it offered a way of accounting for social unrest by looking at the power of society over the thoughts and actions of men.
The nature of humanity was seen as selfish but rational. Man needed the power of society to restrain and control him. Society was seen as a compelling force and early structuralists such as Hobbes and Durkheim emphasised the power of society and the relative lack of power of mankind to control it. The emphasis of the earliest writers in the tradition, Comte, Spencer and Durkheim, shows a concern with the need for order and harmonious integration in social life. It is their work which has formed the basis of the work by Parsons and others in the USA. This writing forms the basis of the functionalist perspective and has been very influential in the thought and research of Sociology in that country though functionalism has been less influential in modern European thought.
One of the underlying tenets of functionalism is the organic analogy. This is essentially a descriptive technique which suggests that society is similar to an organism in Biology. This theory has been put forward by many writers and is strongly associated with the work of the anthropologist, Radcliffe-Brown. It originated at the turn of the century with new discoveries in the natural sciences and is a holistic view of society which suggests that just as organs serve different functions for the biological organism, so the individual institutions of our society serve the needs and purposes of the whole of our culture.
The contrast with the social theory of Marxism could not be more strongly marked. Marxism stresses that the motive force for society and social change is conflict. He stresses that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In my last essay for this semester, I will first discuss the structural-functionalist perspective, which shows how society functions and is connected. Structural-functionalism views society as a complex system, made up of several different parts which work together to solidify, stabilize, and define a society.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Functionalism has a macro-structural approach to society. It looks at society as a whole and is known as a consensus perspective i.e. everyone agrees on social norms and values and people work together to maintain society. These norms and values are learned by social institutions such as the family, education, media, religion, law and work. Functionalists believe society is arranged similar to the human body and its vital organs. If one should malfunction, then the others will be affected. This organic analogy keeps society functioning and these institutions have functional dependency on each other. These ideas go back to Emile Durkheim (1858-1917), the French sociologist who is considered to be the founding father of functionalist sociology and whose writings form the basis for the functionalist theory(McClelland 2000).…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major theoretical perspective are known as Functionalist perspective, Conflict perspective, and Interactionist perspective. These three views are the ones most widely used by sociologists, which altogether will approach and provide an introductory look at the discipline. Some iconic sociologists such as Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, Karl Marx, W.E.B. DuBois and many others are major contributors to sociology. Functionalist perspective emphasizes the way in which the parts of a society are structured to maintain its stability. The functionalist perspective sees stability and agreement while the conflict sociologist sees the world as a continual struggle. Conflict perspective assumes that social behavior is best understood in terms of tension between groups over power or the allocation of resources, including housing, money, access to services, and political representation.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction of Sociology

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Functional Analysis (Functionalism, and structural functionalism) each aspect of society is interdependent and contributes to society's functioning as a whole. This basic approach can be applied to any social group, whether an entire society, a college, or even a group as small as a family. Nevertheless, when any social group loses function, functionalism does not encourage people to take an active role in changing their social environment.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    unit 7 p1

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marxism was introduced and studied by Karl Marx during 1818 and 1883. The Marxist view is based on the conflicts and interests of the society, it also strongly highlights on the importance of conflict in societies and communities. They also believe that economics are the bases of progressing and social life this can be achieved by struggling through social classes. The two classes that Marx discussed about were the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie class is a small powerful group who may have owned factories or own companies whereas the Proletariat is a poorer group of workers. The way a Marxists thinks is based on the financial structures and systems as well as social class meaning that these factors are vital in the Marxist view.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Durkheim introduced many key concepts and ideas which contribute to our understanding of society today, another functionalist, Parsons, also has been key within the Functionalist theory of Sociology. Parsons introduced the concept of society as a social system – institutions such as the family and education all work together to make society function. For example, the family socialises a child which teaches them basic norms and values of society. From there, education takes over through secondary socialisation (norms and values regarding behaviour in a professional, hierarchal environment, i.e. not being late, respecting elders, respecting authority). Functionalists, unlike conflict structuralists, believe that society is based on merit and institutions such as…

    • 1195 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalism is a structural theory they argue that society is made up of interrelated and interdependent institutions such as education, work, religion, law, the family etc. The main function of these institutions is to maintain social equilibrium.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalists regard society as a system made up of different parts that depend on each other such as a family. They see family as an important “organ” in the “body” of society. This is because they tend to look at the family in terms of the functions it performs for the benefit of society and the individual. They see the nuclear family of 2 parents with 2 children as the “ideal”.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Structural Functionalism as defined by Functionolists such as Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer, believe that society is a whole unit made up of many related parts, each having its own function. In order for society to maintain equilibrium or balance all parts must fulfill their function. If their function is not performed society is in an abnormal state.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalism is seen as a macro-scale approach to society; it sees society as a whole rather than looking at parts of it. Due to this, functionalism sees society as a body (organic analogy), all the institutions work together to make society. This is particularly useful when observing society in order to understand the way in which it functions and the way in which all the institutions (organic analogy: organs within the body) work together to sustain society as a whole. Functionalism being a macro-scale approach is therefore seen as a strength as it allows functionalist sociologists to observe society, and its institutions, as a whole. Functionalism is also seen as a consensus theory, it sees society as fair and just, and it acknowledges that many societies, including the majority of western ones, have democracy and all individuals within a particular society share the same or similar norms and values. This could therefore be seen as a strength as it acknowledges that democracy does exist in many societies.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalist, also known as structural functionalism because of its views on the ways social structures accompanies social needs. In perspective, functionalism structures social influences by what is visible and in demand now. (Boundless.com/Sociology)Functionalism has been criticized for downplaying the role of individual action, and for being unable to account for social change. In the functionalist perspective, society and its institutions are the primary units of analysis. Individuals are significant only in terms of their places within social systems (i.e., social status and position in patterns of social relations). Functionalists have been disputed because of its terms of how socialism is accounted, because of how it lacks the support and accredited ability of one’s actions and how socialization transforms during its process. Functionalist is the oldest theory but the most popular one used to determine groups because of its basic terms toward how social groups react and functions of how the mind and body works. The structure of how people interact with others and the ability to fit in certain groups are determined by the mind state of acceptability. When evaluating functionalism it is more of a hypothesis that could be proven right or wrong in its factor of determining how society works when it comes to grouping and organizations of people by characteristics. (Boundless.com/Sociology)Structural functionalism, or simply functionalism, is a framework for building theory that sees society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it still relevant to discuss social class? Social class is a division of a society based on social and economic status. It could be argued that it is clear that social class is relevant in our society, this is because there are a multitude of social establishments that are currently affected by differences in class, such as the education and health system. Social class is a system of social stratification, a system which creates different types of social inequalities.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Searle Functionalism

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Functionalism is the idea that the mind is like a computer program, which is the software of the body. It asserts that anything which has the ability to utilize our minds has intentionality, the ability to have thoughts about something. John Searle presents an argument which counters this idea called the Chinese Room which claims that even if something can mimic the workings of the human mind, it does not have intentionality.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalists see society as being similar to a biological organism for example the human body. This is called the organic analogy. The human body is made up of various different parts that function together, each part is necessary for the normal functioning of the whole body. Society is made up of various institutions (for example education or family), Functionalists believe that these institutions rely on each other each other which helps maintain social order. If one institution is quickly modified or fails to work with other institutions, society would be dysfunctional and would end up in anarchy. Functionalists compare this with the human body because if one component is unable to work, this often affects other components in the body, which could result in death. Functionalists believe that a family is a vital institution, which contributes to maintaining social order because it meets the needs of other institutions such as the education system, which enables society to function in a unified manner. Functionalists believes that the nuclear family fits society’s needs, however several alternative theories such as Feminism contradict Functionalist ideology.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social-Conflict Paradigm- assists researchers in focusing on the inequality in society. The inequalities studied often generate conflict as well as social change. These paradigms operate on a larger, macro-level. Experts credit Karl Marx as the founder of this approach. He believes that social conflict is unavoidable. It is the driving force to improve and progress to a better society. Human beings compete with one another to acquire the…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics