In addition, the railroads were not only beneficial because of trade. The link between cities that were more that 200km apart meant that a more effective system of law and order could be established. A police force…
India got a lot out of Imperialism, good and bad. The British found a lot of useful…
The British set up good things like railways, roads, and canals used for transportation, however, they also caused the Indians to lose control of their economy. The British caused Indians to have no control over their own taxation (Doc. 2). Without this control, the Indians didn’t have a voice and were overpowered by the British. Along with losing control of taxation, the Indians were forced to grow cash crops like indigo instead of natural resources. Growing cotton, indigo, and tobacco caused the land to degrade and become unfit for growing other crops which led to a famine (Doc. 6). Also, they weren’t allowed to sell the crops for money, and all of the money made went to the British. Being unable to control their own taxation and the types of crops they grew shows us that the British had a negative economic impact over India because they didn’t allow them to take on much…
Jwaharlal Nehro, the author of The Discovery of India, states that Great Britain exploited the Indian Economy detrimentally. During British reign in India, British parliament disconnected the East India Company from supplying and manufacturing Indian goods within the country itself. The British, on the other hand, had all access to the goods. Nehru states, “The Indian Textile Industry collapsed, affecting vast members of weavers and artisans.”…
Industrial needs made new forms of public transport necessary – thus, the steam powered engine (e.g. steam trains etc). This source of transportation encouraged railway tracks and lines to be laid and also, the development of the electrical railway; which was better compared to the steam railway, as it did not produce soot and made less noise.…
Therefore Britain did not care about Indians and their well-being, and instead only cared for their own profit and gain. In addition, Britain was able to control the Indian economy due to mercantilism. Mercantilism is the establishment of foreign trading monopolies. This can be seen in India where the British took raw materials from India, produced them in their own industries in Britain, and sold the finished products back to India (Textbook, pg. 358). Britain was able to control the economy because the imported goods were much cheaper than the ones made in local Indian industries.…
British had political control and they succeeded in monopolizing the trade with India. Their foreign rivals were defeated in trade and thus they did not face any competition. They also monopolized the export of all types of raw materials. They use to buy them at low prices whereas the Indian weavers had to buy them at overpriced prices. They imposed heavy duties on Indian goods on their entrance in Britain so to protect their own monopolized industry. They thought out of the box and did many investments to expand the communication and transport system in the country. This in turn to facilitated the transportation of raw materials from the fields to the port, and also the transportation of finished goods from the ports to the markets got…
With many politicians believing the British were civilising the peoples of periphery, the British probably believed the peoples of the American colonies needed to be taught to respect the metropole, which believed it had a parent role. In contrast, in the Indian case acts of resistance had yield some success. It could, however, be argued that the war a make factor in this success. As Fieldhouse points out: Stafford Cripps promised India dominion status ‘to rally Indian opinion in the crisis caused by Japan’s entry into the war’ (Secondary Source 19.2, 2015, p.10). As well as the civil disobedience, which was part of the ‘Quit India’ campaign, the British were also concerned about the Japanese-back ‘Indian National Army’ who had have some military success. In this context, then, the British high likely perceived those whom taken in the civil disobedience as moderates. As Indian support was needed to fight Japan, the British probably felt placating moderates was a small price to pay considering the circumstances. Therefore, the circumstances of war played in a major factor in Indian progress towards…
The colonist weren’t quick to choose whether or not to leave Great Britain or to stay loyal to the king. Many of the colonist wanted to independent because they couldn’t handle the type of government. Given the reason why they came to the New World. Since the British was taxing them and limiting their power they wanted to be separated from Great Britain. The people who wanted to be separated were called Patriots.…
Whether you agree with the Imperialism in India or not you can't ignore the fact that the British went to India with a demand for more raw materials to fuel the industrial revolution. Once they saw the potential in India they decided they wanted to get involved, Splitting it up into many sections so that there would be no conflict, however the people of India had no say in this and the more advanced development of the British left them ultimately defenseless against the British. I believe the British did more harm than anything getting involved with India Politically, economically, and socially.…
2. Some historians believe that the American Revolution was actually not revolutionary at all. In their view, colonials rebelled against Britain to keep things the way they were, not to change them. Do you agree? Use relevant facts about the social, economic and/or political situation in pre-Revolutionary America to argue your point.…
British Imperialism was a large factor in the development of India both technologically and socially. The main reason that the British Imperialism has had such a large effect on the Indian way of life was because it lasted 190 years. Such a long direct and indirect rule impacted India's development immensely, with the occupation ranging from the oppressive company rule to the British monarchy. The imperialism of India had many negative effects on the nation. Indian culture was lost, people were repressed, and the social order was completely destroyed. However; there were also many good outcomes. This boost in resources allowed Britain colonies to contribute to fixing India as a whole and make their economy stronger. This also, eventually freed…
The British introduced education, language, religion, democracy and trade to India. It is evident that the direct British changes created positive growth for the country with regards to education and technological advances but it created socioeconomic changes to the culture according to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).…
* Importance of railways ( four main advantages ) : economic and demographic ( people) consequences.…
India has a history of being a fractured nation, at times this disunity was even able to save them from being taken over by conquerors like Alexander the Great. However, their luck was doomed to run out. India has always been a country rich in resources, making it natural prey to the British imperialists who not only wished to exploit these resources but the people of India as well. With a viewpoint such as this, it’s simple to see why Indian's view of British Imperialists evolved into yet another divided nation, with some coming to accept and see the benefits of Britain's political control, while others couldn’t come to terms with how easily the British system disregarded them and how altered it was from the once great Mughal Empire. Despite…