Preview

Why Do Prime Ministers Matter So Much?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1767 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Do Prime Ministers Matter So Much?
In my essay I will discuss how “If the ministers matter so much, or the quality of the ministerial governments matters so much, why don’t we already have this government and this political infrastructure, which can govern us better and which New Zealand has, Norway has, the Netherlands has, Denmark has and a number of countries have? Why haven’t we built up a system of government which suits our needs, which can look after us well and which doesn’t neglect us, as it has done up to now?” During my essay I will discuss how much Ireland actual respects and also proportionally looks at where it stands the limitation on power that the minister carries in the political government they are in. I will discuss further about the best way in which it elaborate on why we actually haven’t built up a system like this yet and in addition to the conclusion Whether or not it can actually better us as a nation or are we just diluted by the franchise of other progressing countries …show more content…
This puts pressure on prime ministers to use the cabinet-forming process to build coalitions of parties and even coalitions within a party. Prime ministers must be sensitive to the demands of their backbench colleagues and to the leadership of governing parties.” To even think as to how we have been effected by this, to say the least even when non-parliamentarians are appointed, the majority you could say have a long standing position or connect within the party. The fact that it is a lot much easier to be elected into parliament in other major European countries in which the electoral system allows the party to situate members in places where it is straightforwardly able to achieve

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The current cabinet of the United Kingdom is the result of a coalition government formed after the 2010 general election. Headed by the Conservative leader David Cameron it combines Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs and has been subject of intense scrutiny by each of the parties. This has meant that David Cameron has had to keep to his parties traditional values (e.g. Thatcherism) in order to hold party loyalty but at the same time make policy concessions to the Liberal Democrats so that he can maintain government unity. This has led to the cabinet being in a much stronger position (in relation to the prime minister) than in previous governments and has affirmed a re-emergence of the idea of cabinet government, an idea that had, in reality, become almost irrelevant.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main functions of backbench MPs is scrutinize the government and hold them to account via different ways, and it is this function which proves them to be highly effective. Their role in Parliament ensures and strengthens the democratic legitimacy of the executive, thus giving government the authority and right to exercise political power. Another key role of backbench MPs is to act as cross-section of the larger society and therefore represent their interests in Parliament. However, the increase of power held by the government further supports the Burkean view that an “elective dictatorship” has formed considerably in the UK political system. In addition to this, many people have argued that backbench MPs have limited power in actually calling the government to account due to the party system, which ensures that MPs are dictated by ministers and party whips – who use persuasive methods (the promise of promotions or the threat of expulsion/demotion) reduce the effectiveness within the political system. There are both arguments for and against the effectiveness of backbench MPs, however it is debatable as to which outweighs the other.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One argument for is that the cabinet includes more than one political party, this means that the Prime Minister has to confer, with other MP’s and with the other party in the coalition, on all matters. This limits the patronage and decision-making power of the Prime Minister, and that he/ she has to share their power with another party, in order to come to a decision that both parties are happy with. An example of this was when the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats had to discuss the annual Spending Review and decide which taxes they should raise and cut. This led to both parties wanting to cut different taxes, which the other party wanted to raise, such as housing. If only one party was in government and the one Prime Minister had all the power, then they would have been able to cut and raise the taxes they wanted to, but being in a coalition meant that they had to come to a group agreement, where both parties weren’t entirely happy. This argument is quite strong because if the Prime Minister has to share his/ her powers it means it is harder for the cabinet to come to a decision, however it does lead to the decision being fairer and appealing to a wider range of the population.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, their relationship is influenced by the whips, who attempt to place the loyal MPs on key committees and have to remove…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent has the formation of a coalition altered the relationship between Parliament and government?…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prime Minister is the most important person in British politics. The Prime Minister appoints his cabinet and makes the final decisions on major issues. The Prime Minister cannot become a President as the UK system would not allow it but in the recent years, people have criticised that our Prime Ministers have increasingly become more of a presidential figure in Parliament. Some of the ministers that have been referred to as presidential include Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair etc. Now in this essay, I will be analysing the factors that shows the growth of power of PM.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is an element of truth in the given statement and this essay will seek to explain UK’s Parliament today does, to a certain degree, lack democratic accountability, and this can be shown in dominance of the (i) Executive, (ii) Unrepresentative, and its (iii) Detachment from citizens.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How the coalition government has affected the role and functions of the Prime Minister and Cabinet…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Text’s concern: power as it is used to affect who will hold government office and how government will behave…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How democratic is the UK

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It can be argued that Britain is both democratic and undemocratic; this can be shown via a range of issues relating to British politics and the society in which we live. The generally accepted definition of a democracy is a form of government in which the major decisions of government and the direction of policy behind these decisions - rests directly or indirectly on the freely given consent of the freely given consent of the freely majority of the adults government. There are two forms of democracy but the UK is run through an indirect or representative democracy as opposed to a direct democracy, which relies on referendums and would be difficult in a large, modern society. Furthermore, the UK is a parliamentary democracy, the government and representatives are intermingled meaning that the UK does not have separation of powers, meaning that the executive, legislative and judicial courts all work together unlike the American Presidential system which could create a lack in communication. In this essay, I propose to argue both for and against and eventually come to a conclusion whether the UK is democratic or not and give a comparison between the UK and the US in terms of democracy.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prime Ministers of the last 25 years have been notes for deviating of what would be considered ‘Prime Ministerial’ into more of a ‘Presidential’ role. This is due to the expansion of a key power that the Prime Minister has, that of the Chief Executive, being expanded.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Supporting Learners

    • 3099 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Bibliography: 2. Cameron, D. and Clegg, N. (2010) The Coalition: Our Programme f0r Government. London: Cabinet Office.…

    • 3099 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Joseph, J., 2010. Governmentality and its Limits [pdf] University of Sussex. Available at:<https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=governmentality.pdf&site=12> [Accessed 29 December 2013]…

    • 2664 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In theory, the Parliament is the most important institution in the Canadian government and all members of the parliament are equal. The Prime Minister is supposed to be primus inter pares, meaning first among equals. But over the years, the cabinet has become more institutionalized and less departmentalized. Hence the Prime Minister’s power has increased over the years. Canada is the one of the most decentralized federations in the World. Power is swung away from the parliament and is more concentrated in the executive branch (Courtney, 1984: p. 241). The Prime Ministers is not too powerful in a global scale but it has substantial power within Canada. However the power of the Prime Minister can also be affected by many different factors. .…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the House of Commons there are many parties all fighting individually for control of the house, and to be in power and govern the land of the UK. To win the election and do this a party or coalition of parties needs a 326 majority to be able to form a government. This system creates a dominance in the house of commons if that majority is achieved sufficiently, as with Tony Blair’s landslide in 1997 where he had over a 150 seat majority, it is this kind of one party dominance I am going to be discussing in this essay and whether or not it limits parliaments main function to represent constituents and pass laws which benefit them.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays