Preview

Why Do Claims Require Evidence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
947 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Do Claims Require Evidence
Claims require evidence, or else they are disregarded, but to what extent? Evidence is a fact or a piece of information that portrays the validity of a belief or proposition. For example, in science, you cannot claim a theory if it is not backed up with supportive evidence. However in matters like the reason of existence or religious beliefs, to what extent should evidence be provided? In Hitchens quote, he claims that if one makes a statement without providing evidences to back it up, the claim can quite possibly be disregarded without the need to even provide evidences to deem it untrue. However, doesn’t that mean we could disregard Hitchens' statement since there aren't any evidences to his statement? To answer that, one must define the …show more content…
Ethics is one's moral principles that dictates their actions and behaviors when performing an activity. Here, I would disagree to Hitchens quote for the following reasons. One wouldn't disregard their moral principles due to statements that lack proofs. Relating to one of my own personal experiences, during one of my visits to Egypt while I was walking down of the streets of a relatively poor area. I came across a homeless mother with her daughter and I was asked for money. My moral principles said that I should give her money because I should help the people in need whenever I can. What raised the feeling of obligation to do so was the fact that I felt fortunate enough to live under a roof, while she struggled to feed herself and her own daughter. However there was no evidence to whether or not the young girl was actually her daughter. There was also no evidence that her need was genuine and that she is not pretending to be the suffering mother of a child in order to gain the sympathy of people, like me, to make money. However, I could not let myself pass by this situation without helping them just because there was a lack of evidence in the sincerity of the situation. Adding to that, my own lack of evidence to dismiss it. In this case, the word of that women and my reason to trust this woman's words held the largest point of evidence in which I couldn't …show more content…
Generally in science a theory must be proven to deem it true, however evidences are also required to disprove the theory. For example, according to www.missionislam.com, the Big Bang Theory proves that the universe was created from nothingness that resulted from an explosion. Evidences were shown from NASA's sensors on board the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) space launched in 1992 capturing remains from the explosion of the Big Bang. However, scientists do not know what caused the explosion to occur, how and why it happened. Most scientists believe that it is the only rational and provable explanation to the creation of this Universe. Should we disregard this theory due to missing crucial evidences, or strive to discover and search for answers to prove it to be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We are looking for evidence god exists, so we turned to an evidential argument in favor of God: the cosmological argument.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This argument has been subject to great applause through the religious community for its simplistic and impactful articulation. However the cosmological argument is also opposed by atheists who fail to find substance and empirical evidence within its core.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hw Week2

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethics are the principles and standards that guide our behavior towards other people. Ethics are more subjective, more a matter of personal or cultural interpretation than laws. Laws either clearly require or prohibit an action, while ethical determinations can be harder to make because the distinctions between what is right and wrong are not always clearly defined in such black and white terms.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Epistemology Phil/201 Quiz

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The view that we have a duty to offer evidence for every belief we hold without exception.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to argue that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence” (as cited on p190). The aim of this essay is to establish whether indeed this view offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is convincing. In order to do this I will consider the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that which to believe anything based upon insufficient evidence always does harm and so is wrong. Such a statement is in direct opposition to those religious believers who regard their blind faith as a virtue and for whom evidence is something that is unnecessary in order to believe. Along with discussing Clifford I will detail the responses given by James who disagreed with Clifford and in response attacked his views within his own paper “The Will to Believe”. James believed instead that it is more important to achieve truth than to avoid error. Both men, in my opinion, offer strong and persuasive arguments however I do not believe that either stands without criticism, therefore throughout I will offer my own views on the foundations of their arguments, which I hope will establish, that although many of Clifford’s points are valid in particular and specific circumstances they do not offer, as proposed, a convincing view of religious faith.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hr Assesement

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    6. What evidence supports the Big Bang Theory? The Big Bang is the leading theory that almost all astrophysicists believe explains the origin of the universe. This is because all observations so far made support the Big Bang theory; there are four main lines of evidence that are most-often used. The expansion of the universe. The universe is expanding now, so in the past it must have been smaller. If it were smaller in the past, then there probably was a time when it was infinitesimally small…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hummanities 3991

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages

    When we talk about science, many people hear the term “theory”. The definition of a scientific theory can become confusing since many people interpret the meaning differently. When a person uses the term “theory” in a sentence it is usually used in a non-scientific way. They assume that a theory is something assumed, but not proven. When the term “theory” is used in science, it means an explanation based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning. It has been tested and confirmed as a general principle to explain phenomena. A scientific theory must be based on careful examination of facts. “A theory is a hypothesis or set of hypotheses that has stood the test and (so far, at least) has not been contradicted by evidence” (Suplee 9).…

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The information the author provides to support his position is… [How do we know there is a problem? What evidence is there that this problem exists?]…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    William K. Clifford sets out to show in “The Ethics of Belief” that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence…” In this paper, I will show that his argument lacks key definitions needed in order to found his inference upon and that it begs the question as to what qualifies as “insufficient” evidence. Furthermore, I will show that the primary issue is not the belief but the results of the belief that is important and that all judgment and interpretation should be based upon said results.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    of God or at least a creator. During this part we were taught that the big bang actually proves that…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics are defined as those things that a society considers to be right or wrong. For example, if we find a wallet in the park with $200 in it and take the wallet to the police station, you are acting ethically.…

    • 4156 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Webster's New World Dictionary, ethics is "the study of standards of conduct and moral judgment. The system of morals of a particular person, religion, or group. Morals, "is dealing with or capable of distinguishing between right and wrong, of teaching or in accordance with the principles of right and wrong" (2002).…

    • 3189 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    sayi

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. Think about other extraordinary claims, such as sightings of Big Foot and the Abominable Snowman. How are these similar to alien sightings? What are some other possible explanations for these claims?…

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Webster’s Dictionary defines ethics as “a set of moral principles: a theory or system of moral values.” (Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, 2011). Every person has ethics that he or she lives by, but sometimes in the business world many unethical business transactions occur. People do not realize that sometimes the statistics that he or she are fed have been falsified in order to get him or her to purchase a product or lure him or her in to participate in via false promises.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For instance, David Hume was an agnostic philosopher who approved the skeptical observation that we do not know enough to proclaim or reject the existence of God (as cited in Soccio, 2013, p. 296). Another theory, Thomas Aquinas is a philosopher that has a theory of five ways to demonstrate God’s existence for natural reasons; these are the argument from motion, the cosmological argument, argument from necessity, the argument from gradation, and the teleological argument (Soccio, 2013, p. 230). “The argument from motion explains that motion must be given to each object by some other object that is already moving. The cosmological argument clarifies that there is a cause for everything created in this world. The argument from necessity is based on the idea that nothing had ever occurred, nothing will continually occur, hence to some degree the existence of supernatural being is necessary. The argument from gradation creates the idea that the existence of god grows from having more being than a nonliving thing. Teleological argument believes that the universe displays order and resolution that can only be the outcome of a God” (as cited in Soccio, 2013, p. 232-236). Thomas Aquinas is an example to show that with his multiple ways of proving God existence can increase many people wanting answers. The way that no theories has completely demonstrated the presence of God indicates the proposal of this paper that people do not need evidence for the existence of…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays