Preview

Why Did the South Lose the Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
683 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did the South Lose the Civil War
Why did the South Lose the Civil War? Beginning as a battle of army versus army, the war became a conflict of society against society. In this kind of war, the ability to mobilize economic resources, the effectiveness of political leadership, and a society’s willingness to keep up the fight despite setbacks, are as crucial to the outcome as success or failure on the battlefields. Unfortunately for the Southern planters, by the spring of 1865, the South was exhausted, and on April 9, Lee surrendered to Grant at Appomattox Court House, effectively ending the war.
Economically, the war was a benefit for the North and a disaster for the South. The North began the war with several advantages. The North held a distinct lead in nearly every resource needed for warfare. Not only was the population deficit of the South compared to the North, roughly around 13 million, but the statistics for factories, goods produced, railroad tracks, textiles, and firearms all succeeded the south by more than half. As a result, the union army became the best-supplied and fed army while southern armies suffered shortages of food, and clothing. Shortly after the start of the war, Lincoln would further suffocate the south economically by implementing the Anaconda Plan, a naval blockade. Industrially the South couldn't keep up in output but also and in manpower. By the end of the war, the South had, more or less, plenty of weaponry still, but it just didn't have enough men to use the guns. Let alone enough men to defend the perimeter around the confederacy to protect its territory. Another key aspect that the North held over the South was the determination of Abraham Lincoln to win, and the incredible staying power of the people of the North, who stuck by Lincoln and stuck by the war in spite of the first two years of almost unrelenting defeat. A problem of the South was that it lacked the moral center that the North had in this conflict, the idea of Union, was important. One of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Why the North Won the Civil War, Henry Steele Commager believed that there were multiple causes that led the confederacy to their defeat and that it was “an inevitability in history.” While many historians believed the North won due to their economic, military, diplomatic, and social aspects, Richard N. Current stated that the Union won the Civil War due to their “fundamental economic superiority.” He believed the North sustained a vast and overwhelming economic superiority in men and materials, giving them “an advantage of almost five to two” in everything. The Union succeeded because they were productive with their economy, unlike the Confederates.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Williamson Murray's essay he discusses the struggle between the North and the South. Also how it was the first modern war that was fought using technology and industry on the slaughtering fields. The union lacked a cohesive army and a good plan of attack. Once General Grant was in command for the North, the Confederacy was hopeless to win. The Civil War ravaged armies of the North and South, many Americans lost their lives which made this the most costly of all the wars in American history. The North won the war because they "adapted to the conditions of the war." With the help of Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant, they came up with a strategy and won the war.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One factor that had the greatest impact in driving the country in war was the economic difference. The North and the South had different opinion and beliefs making them divide as a region. The Invention of cotton gin by Eli Whitney in 1793 made gathering cotton possible. This caused an increase in plantations to grow cotton which caused the great need for cheap labor. It meant that slaves were the cheap labor to get the work done. The southern economy became dependent on slavery and cotton. While in the northern states it was established on industry. North was purchasing raw cotton and turning it into finished goods. In the North people had to work together it didn't matter about their culture or class they were but rather had to put their…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because slaves fought for the South, many slaves were not fighting for what they believe in, while the North had more and passionate soldiers fighting for the North’s stance. Furthermore, the North’s expansion…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Civil war, which began in 1861, came to an end on May 13th,1865, and the Union claimed the victory. But the South were victorious in many of the earlier battles of the war, but at first they had a strong military leadership. The South’s defeat was due to poor strategy in the military and the appointment of weak generals, many people also believe that political leadership, foreign support, the supply of the army and war economics were reasons they didn’t win.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North and the South grew different way in Civil war. In the South, there were mostly farmers. There weren’t many skilled workers that why manufacturing was not much. But in the North there were a lot of manufacturing and wealthy people, they had a lot of skilled workers. During the Civil War, there were some advantages and disadvantages between South and North.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time. Time was the key reason for the North's victory and was achieved through a combination of the first and second reasons. As the war progressed the Union's blockade, largely a paper tiger at the beginning due to the fact that the Navy didn't have enough ships to properly enforce it, became a real blockade that slowly strangled the Confederacy to death. And as the war progressed the South, even before the end of the prisoner exchange, was losing men it could not afford to lose to attrition. Supplies and transportation of supplies. As stated in the first reason, the North was less dependant on Europe than the South was for supplies. There should be little doubt that the South was able to manufacture supplies needed to fight the war, but never in amounts it needed. Industry in the North was a bit larger than it was in the South and was thus able to out produce that of the South. But being able to out produce the South was all well and good unless the South could get the supplies to its troops in the field faster. It then became important to capture major railroad junctions and thus cut off the South's ability to move supplies in a timely…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The loss of the South in the Civil War was the result of various contributions. First of all, they were underequipped in artillery and production factories. The South’s population was about one fourth of the North’s excluding slaves. They were not united and lost because their own philosophical beliefs that destroyed them. Further, the South was underequipped and outclassed in everything industrially. They’re only hope of taking a military advantage was support from European countries. However, those connections were cut when the North blockaded the South and when the North incited the European public to support the North’s effort preventing European interference. Although there was a high morale to serving the Confederacy and to destroying the Union cause, they didn’t have the materials to do so. Many would just fight with stones or any primitive makeshift weapon they could use when they were depleted of bullets because of their low artillery production. The South also had much less supply lines. Their railroads were half that of the North’s and became less as the North decimated the South’s rail lines. The North figured that it would be wiser to destroy their supply lines and weaken the troops. However destroying food lines wouldn’t be a problem because the South couldn’t even supply food because as men were drafted into the army, the agricultural farms withered away due to lack of maintenance. Another disadvantage would be the size of the South. The ratio of people of South to North was about 3 to 7. However 3.5 million of those Southern people were slaves, so the actual ratio would be about 1 to 4. Considering the North’s territorial advantage over the South, it is impressive to see that the South could sustain such a defense over the four years of the war. The reason could be that the South had better trained generals such as…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    When the Confederate Army General Robert E. Lee surrendered to the Union Army General, Ulysses S. Grant at the Appomattox Courthouse on April 9, 1865, many considered the Civil War to be over. The fact that the North was victorious over the South was accepted and the process of reconstruction began in America. It was never openly discussed on why the North defeated the South. However, the question began to slowly arise over time on why the South lost the Civil War. Many historians have become interested in this question and many reasons have been given on why the South lost the Civil War. Lack of manpower, shortages of supplies, and inferior leadership and government were the three main reasons on why the South was defeated in the Civil War.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killer Angels

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The North, on the other hand, was fighting in the beginning to preserve the Union. However, later the focus changed to the ending of slavery after the Emancipation Proclamation.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning, the southerner’s morale was fueled by the hatred they had. The hatred they had toward the north was because of the fact that the south was not being properly represented in Congress and they did not have a voice in national affairs. As had been noted, this hatred was the inspiration the southerners needed to fight a long, drawn-out war with the Union because it gave them the morale they needed. Over the course of the war, the CSA’s morale decreased because soldiers was forgetting the motive they were even fighting for and they yearned to return to their families. In addition to this, the morale also decreased because of the North’s victories trampled over the south throughout the progression of the…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The American Civil War devastated the South. Most of the war was fought in the South and much of the region's infrastructure was destroyed. New technologies showing America's emerging industrial greatness were refined the Civil War: the railroad, the steamboat, the telegraph, and the steam-powered printing press. On the otherhand, the North was headed towards manufactoring and commercial economy. Industrulization was impacted and urbanization.…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An important advantage to have in the civil war was the advantage of technology. The north was a manufacturing center of the world, mass producing products new and old at an efficient rate. The north also had a sprawling system of railroads which could carry supplies and troops across the country fast. The north developed the telegraph which allowed them to telecommunicate pretty much anywhere instantly. Both the north and south had advantages in Government and society. The north already had an established government. Many of the southerners were united to defend their way of life. Advantages in geography/goals… or something to that effect. The southerners were used to the terrain. The north had to invade and take over while the south just…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    American Racial Beliefs

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Lee surrendered his troops to Union General Ulysses S. Grant, at an old Virginia courthouse. Following the completion of his military assignment in 1865, General Ulysses S. Grant revealed to Edwin M. Stanton the reasons for the war’s outcome. He stated, “Believing us to be one people, one blood and with identical interests, I do and have felt the same interest in the ultimate welfare of the South as of the North.”5 This statement showed that as time went on, peoples began to realize that the US would not be successful unless the North and the South unite as one. This is not saying that Ulysses S. Grant and others did not see the clear differences between the two territories, however they saw past it for the greater good of a common country. The surrender ended the four-year Civil War, and sparked a new period in American history known as…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays