Preview

Why Did the Conservatives Loose the General Election of 1945?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1761 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did the Conservatives Loose the General Election of 1945?
Why did the Conservatives loose the general election of 1945?

The conservatives lost the general election in 1945 for a number of reasons some of which were the attitudes of many of the British after the war and the way the country had been run in the time leading up to the election. The labour party had gone from a party which people feared as being socialist to a party which during the war had shown was very much a balanced party which would not ruin the middle and upper classes and yet provide services that would help the poor and also be available to the other classes. The conservatives had put little effort into running the country whilst the war was going on and had assumed that winning the war would be enough to be re-elected. The conservatives had been linked to causing the war due to the appeasement methods and left the rule of Britain as a second priority up to the other men in the cabinet, mainly from the labour party. Labour had made advances on the much loved Welfare Reforms which the conservatives had failed to do leading up to the election leaving Labour looking ahead to the future but the Tories too involved in the war effort.

The conservatives had failed to make any policies or a real platform for the 1945 election which was conflicted by Labour's very advanced ideas of reforms and plans for the future with a clear set of policies and developments on the welfare state. The Conservatives had become split in views on the welfare reforms and for the first time, were less united than the new labour party. Churchill had proved himself a wartime leader but had made no effort to show to the public that he could be as productive as a peace time leader, overconfident and under organised, he and the party only spent £3,000 on publicity leading to the election as opposed to the £30,000 spent in 1935. He was not very close or involved with the rest of his party and listened mainly to his two cronies, Beaverbrook and Bracken. Churchill also seemed to come

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The government could not fumction without money so the issue was put to the voters to decide. The Conservatives had to win a large number of seats in order to justify their rejection of the budget, however they did not and ithe election was therefore a defeat for the Conservatives. However, the Liberals no longer had an overall majority in the commons so they could only get their bills passed if they got the support of the Labour party and Irish Nationalists. The Irish Nationalists would only give their support in return for granting of Home Rule for Ireland, so the Liberal party had to include Home Rule in their policy. The Liberals were reliant on the Labour Party as Labour would only support them in return for favourable legislation for trade unions, assistance for working class candidates to become MPs. This allowed the Labour Party to develop links with uniona and allowed them to field more candidates at future elections, enabling them to challenge the Liberal Party; weakening the Liberals. After the election the budget was re-introduced into parliament and was passed by both…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason why Conservatives won is that in there manifesto they promised to stabilise the cost of living which would close the gap between rich and poor and double everyone’s standard of living. This was helped by Labour being identified with the working class rather than the nation as a whole. This was a problem as 40% of manual workers now considered themselves middle class so the Labour policies for the unemployed and working class no longer appealed to them, instead they…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Liberals came into power in 1906 the Conservatives held a startling majority in the House of Lords due to their…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal’s victory in the 1906 was a very significant one due to how they won it with such an overwhelming majority; it was the biggest electoral victory since 1832. In the 1890’s the liberals were suffering from a crisis identity and they were lacking in money and morale. In the 1906 election the liberals won 49.4% of the vote and that amounted to 399 seats which was such a large margin compared to in 1900 where 45% of the vote was only 183 seats. There are four main reasons arguably why the Liberals won the1906 election and these are through Conservative faults such as the massacre in the Boer war. The education act in 1902 and Chamberlain’s tariff reform campaign also lost the conservatives a lot of support, which meant people turned to liberals just due to disliking the conservatives. The most important reason was Arthur Balfour getting involved and not making the right decisions for the conservatives and losing a lot of the voters they had before. The liberals also used a very negative campaign in order to get voters to realise the flaws in the conservative’s ideals and make them vote for the liberals just through dislike of the other parties.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Second World War ended, Winston Churchill (A Conservative, elected after the resignation of Neville Chamberlain) was regarded as a formidable war hero for his time as Prime Minister from 1940 - 1945. This is what made the 1945 general election results - which showed that the national government, which was dominated by the Conservative Party during Churchill’s time as Prime Minister, had lost the election to the Labour Party - surprising, because Churchill’s leadership was a major factor in Britain holding off against Nazi Germany. The Labour Party (Lead by Clement Attlee) won the 1945 general election instead of the Conservatives, gaining nearly 12 million votes and an additional 239 seats, which was a significant increase to the Conservatives…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Harold Macmillan said in 1957 that Britain had “never had it so good” it was easy to see why he spoke with such optimism. The period of Conservative dominance brought many benefits to the British people including the end of rationing, full employment and a boom in the economy. However, in labour’s 1964 manifesto they described this period as “thirteen wasted years”. It seems difficult to believe that both could be true and in this essay I will be assessing the successes and failures of the Conservative government during this time.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Euro Chapter 28 Outline

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages

    (36) Britain's Labour party, committed to revisionist socialism, replaced the Liberals as the main opposition party to the Conservatives.…

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to this Lloyd George had to concede to the conservatives at times as he did when they demanded that cuts be made and that Lloyd George agree to the Geddes axe. This was a mistake as it led to him earning a reputation of not fulfilling promises of reconstruction and led to a decline in popularity. The conservatives only needed Lloyd George as long as he was popular with the people and therefore an asset to them, his gradual decline in popularity led to the conservatives questioning his worth. His policies also went against what they stood for the most part and even though they remained loyal to the coalition due to Bonar Law, cracks appeared when Austen Chamberlain replaced him as leader of conservatives. However, it can argued that the conservatives were being pragmatic in letting Lloyd George introduce some social reform, especially since working class had received the vote. This did not deter backbenchers and die hards who grew in number and in criticism of Lloyd George’s policies, which culminated in the formation of the anti-waste league who won two by-elections, evidence that they held influence. As Lloyd George’s unpopularity grew so did the conservative attitude change towards him except in the senior members, which also led to the fear that a split may emerge over loyalty to the coalition.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thatcher offered different and better ideas for the country and government which many people believed an improvement, gaining her a lot of popularity amongst the public but before the Conservatives were in government with Thatcher, the Labour party had a few difficulties (such as the winter of Discontent) whilst in power, which is possibly why the Conservatives won the General election. However this win could be purely down to the conservatives and their new policies or it could’ve been down to the failure of the Labour party. I believe that it was combination of the two that led to the Conservatives win but the win, as much as it seemed likely wasn’t indefinitely certain.…

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 1964 election changed the British political landscape forever as a thirteen-year Conservative dominance crumbled at the hands of Harold Wilson and his youthful Labour Party. Historians, such as Rowe, postulate that there are a plethora of reasons to why Labour won the 1964 election, most prominently because of the Conservatives’ inability to economically modernise Britain. Contrastingly, other historians such as Lynch uphold the opinion that there are other factors responsible for Labour’s victory, including Labour’s prominence in areas of politics where the Conservatives lacked…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then cracks in the Liberal Party led to the defeat of Churchill as a Member of Parliament in 1922, so he then rejoined the Conservative Party and served as Chancellor of the Exchequer. With the downfall of the Conservative government in 1929, Churchill was out of good fortune and out of government. (Tolppanen 5)…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are of course several main reasons why the liberals lost the elections. Opinions of historians vary on this topic. Some historians see the defeat as the result of unpopular domestic and foreign policies, like Alabama Arbitration, however they cannot agree on which policies contributed the most. Others see this defeat as the consequence of poor election campaign by Gladstone; his promise to cut income tax simply did not appeal to people. On the other hand the importance of Conservative party in this defeat should not be overshadowed. After 1868 elections the Conservative reorganised the party and managed to create more positive and popular image.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Populist party was a party created primarily to express the agrarian protest, in some states the party was known as the People's Party. This party originated due to the Panic of 1873, where the economic welfare of farmers suffered badly; many believed that the management of currency was at fault. Farmers formed alliances in order to get their word out to the people and the government, their main reason farmers were agitated was because they wanted railroad regulation, tax reform, and unlimited coinage of silver, they attempted to influence the established political parties but were unsuccessful. The Farmers Alliance growth of members was rapid, members from farms and labor organizations with the same goals decided to meet in Cincinnati. They didn’t have a…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics