Preview

Why Did Russia Lose The First World War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1518 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Russia Lose The First World War
A person can take cuts scraps and even slashes and survive after a little blood loss, but if the wounds are not treated and dressed properly then infection will set in and kill them. In World War I Russia did not die from her wounds but died of infection. Yes Russia faced many problems during the First World War but so did everyone else and yet some of them, like the French, not only survived the war but ended up winning it. Even saying that Russia lost the war is not the best statement that can be made. A more accurate representation of what happened is that Russians lost parts of the war. This better reflects the inability of Russians to work together to overcome problems and to make decisions that could have helped lead Russia to overall …show more content…
The officers had no relationship with the men that fought under their command. They believed that there men where beneath them, but that belief did not show on the battlefield. In fact on the battlefield the officers were top notch leaders and displayed a selfless example (Horne 63). Winning the war was more important than class lines for the French. French commanders might have treated their soldiers horribly, but they did not let that come on to the battlefield they worked with their soldiers and each other to accomplish their mission. Class lines existed in French society and could have been a problem for the French military but winning the war took president and so French officers kept the problems of status in society off the battlefield. They did not let class be a wound that weakened France in the war. In Russia on the other hand, class separation occurred between commanders themselves and they were not willing to forget about their differing backgrounds and work together. The class lines were extremely rigid. Two Fifths of officers in the Russian army were of the peasant class, but if Sukhomlinov, the Chief of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1: World war one was sparked by the assignation of archduke Francis Ferdinand. The political objective of the assassination was to break Austria- Hungary’s south- Slav provinces off so they could be combined into a great Serbia. Both sides of the group believed it would be a quick war of many resources.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Kitchener Lose Ww1

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Men saw it as their patriotic duty to enlist in the war effort and to fight in the First Great War. Within days men from all over Britain joined under Kitchener to form the New Armies. These men went to the nearest War Office or local authorities to enlist for three years or the duration of the war. By August nineth through the fifteenth 43,354 men enlisted. On August 9th alone 1,640 men enlisted to join the army. Local authorities gave support to the War Office in each town in Britain to enlist more men to the war effort. The Army Council on August 11 agreed and signed the proposal for the organizations of the First New Army. Kitchener’s use of propaganda and volunteering paid off and Britain created an army worth fighting for against the overpowering German enemy.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evan Yau HIS 293 During World War II, the German army seemed unstoppable at the start of the war. They were able to take Poland in just 35 days and invade France with their tactics like blitzkrieg (lightning war). With them having an amazing victory in France over the Allies, causing them to surrender in six weeks, it seemed like there wasn’t much the Allies could do to stop Hitler’s army. However, once Hitler turned his army towards the USSR, we saw that they were able to slow down and eventually defeat. Now it leads to the question of what factors led the Germans to be so unstoppable against the Allies in the east and what factors hindered them in the west.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the 11th of November 1918, the Armistice was signed by Germany, France, and Britain that ended the first World War after four years of fighting. While negotiations had not yet been made with the Treaty of Versailles, the fight had finally ended. While both sides of the conflict, the Allies and the Central powers, were sure that their nation had a guaranteed fast win with their technological advances and all, it was Germany who lost in the end. Germany had been fighting a two-front war, but they had defeated the Russian army on the Eastern Front and forced their hands into signing the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, so what caused Germany to lose on the Western Front? Unlike with how close Germany got to capturing France’s capital, Paris, with the…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that the Allies powers should have lost WW1. This is because of the size of the Axis powers, European countries blaming each other , how much money the Axis powers spent on their army and navy, Bernherd von Bϋlow’s speech to the Reichstag ( German Congress) , the England Octopus, the area of the colonial empires. One of the reasons that the Allies should have is because of the Axis powers military size. For example the Axis powers where bigger in size than the Allied powers. The Allies had almost double the size of the Axis powers, with 42 million troops deployed versus 22 million.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At the front line the men only had three bullets and one rifle between two people and if every one ran out of bullets they would charge with bayonets and cavalry with sabers (a type of gun) this was one of their main tactics which they mainly trained and practice. There was also limited food, water and warmth, lots of people die of hunger and froze to death on the way to the battle and were too weak to fight when they arrived. In May 1915 Germany attacked Poland wiping out just under half of Russia's army, 1400 000 were kill in battle or got wounded and 976 000 were caught and became prisoners. The Germans had better attack and defense, they had bigger and deeper trenches and longer rang weaponry, and they had more ammo and could hold their position better. The Germans squads had twice as many guns and three times as much ammo as the Russian squads, their guns just mowed down the Russians like nothing. The main problem with the army was the transport, since Russia is so big it's hard to get troops, weapons, ammo, and food + water around to everyone. There was only two main train tracks running straight through the middle of Russia this made it hard to defend all around. All of this was blamed on the Tsar and because he was leading the army he was blamed for the massive defeat and the poor tactics. The State…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How far would you agree that the events of 1905 were caused by Russia’s failure to win the war against Japan? (30 marks)…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War I was, for most people, the most horrific event of their lives. There were over 35 million casualties, a war second only to World War II. No other war had changed the map of Europe so dramatically. Four empires disappeared: the German, Austrian-Hungarian, Ottoman, and Russian. Four dynasties all fell after the war: the Hohenzollerns, the Habsburgs, the Romanovs, and the Ottomans. Belgium and Serbia were badly damaged, as was France. Germany and Russia were similarly affected. Some may argue that the number of people killed was the most devastating and tragic aspect of the First World War, that the soldiers were a ‘lost generation’. Others argue, however, that other aspects come into play. Economic crashes, for example, crippled many countries, almost destroying Germany.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French were divided into different class and these classes had certain political rights which were unfair.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before World War 1, the Russian political state was extremely corrupt and fragile. Nicholas II held absolute power and his dynasty had ruled Russia for 500 years and was increasingly unpopular. Nicholas II traditional ruled Russia without a parliament. The Noble class of Russia owned most of the countries wealth and land. Nicholas II assigned family members to important political roles; this caused him to have absolute power over Russia without any threats of being over powered. Not only was Nicholas II corrupt with assigning important roles, but also he had insufficiency of the training and experience needed for the Russian Tsar, his failure to make decisions and his organization was extremely poor, “Unfit to run a village post office” This underlines the point that Nicholas II was extremely poor at making decisions and his lack organization was so poor that he would be unable to run a small village post office, that is normally very quiet, let alone Russia, one of the worlds biggest countries, this is backed up by “His ancestors did not pass on to him one quality which would have made him capable of governing an empire”. Therefore this shows that his leadership of the country…

    • 1818 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Hitler Lost the War

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As an influential, forceful person, Adolf Hitler used his articulate speech to empower the Nazi political party. Hitler received complete power as the Chancellor of Germany, after passing the Enabling Act. He utilized the totalitarian power to create the Third Reich, and through military moves and a propaganda movement headed by Joseph Goebbels, he made a great impact on the Germany’s citizens. Hitler influenced the Germans into sharing a deep sentiment of nationalism, and the significance of the Aryan, or “master,” race. With this widespread attitude and the mobilization of the German military, Hitler spearheaded the second world war. Despite the positive contributors to the German force, Hitler’s many mistakes hindered the armies’ ability to win the war. This included his impulsive demeanor and irresolute tendencies, his errors at Dunkirk, France, and his attack on Ukraine.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the one hand, world war one had a huge impact on the Tsar and his country. Firstly, the cost of the war was placing a huge strain on Russia’s economy. Taxes increased hugely and the cost of living rose by 300%, so in order to try and help the economy through the struggling times of world war one, the government printed more money, making all money worthless. The people of Russia were now struggling even more than they were before the war had begun. Secondly, the Germans were forcing the Russians to retreat and they were therefore losing a lot of land. The impact of the battle of Tannenburg, where 30,000 troops were killed and 95,000 captured had a huge impact on the army’s moral, and by the end of 1916, 2 million soldiers had left the army. The commander in chief shot himself because of how bad the country and the army were doing, and soon after, the Tsar himself took on the role of commander in chief, although he lacked ability and knowledge. Also, the military had a lack of resources, in each regiment in the army; there was one gun per three people; the Tsar was blamed for many of the military downfalls, and this was one of them. The Russian transport system was also facing serious problems, and the ammunitions being made in the factories weren’t getting to the front line. Thirdly, world war one was causing huge food shortages; in Moscow in 1914, Russia was receiving 2200 wagons of grain and by Christmas 1916, the number of carts was…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several treaties were signed during World War One including the infamous Treaty of Versailles, the Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye, the Treaty of Trianon, Treaty of Sèvres and the Treaty Brest Litovsk. The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was a peace treaty signed on March 3, 1918, between the Bolshevik government of Soviet Russia and the Central Powers in Brest-Litovsk in Brest Litovsk. This treaty officially brought Russia’s participation in the World war to an end. Russia had no other option other than to sign the treaty due to their weakened state. The Treaty was terminated on November 11 1919 when Germany surrendered to the allies ending the World War. The treaty only lasted for 8 and a half months when the Germans broke diplomatic relations with…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great War was fought using trench warfare and a stalemate was created. On the Western front France was fighting Germany, there were many casualties, 15 million soldiers were seriously injured, 7 million were permanently disabled and 8 million were killed. There was major destruction to land, property and empires were destroyed: The German, Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman and Russian. It was a total war; it took all resources from countries and caused food shortages. By the end of the war, famine had killed millions of people and diseases flourished in the wartime conditions. In 1917 the Americans came into the war and the Russians left. Finally the stalemate is broken and Germany made an extremely harsh treaty with Russia. The victorious countries were furious, they blamed Germany for starting the war and causing so much devastation to their countries. They wanted Germany to pay, so the Allies created a treaty which held Germany responsible for WW1.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Remarque, Erich Maria, and A. W. Wheen. All Quiet on the Western Front. Boston: Little, Brown, 1929. Print.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays