Preview

Why Did Germany Unify Under Prussia and Not Austria Outline

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
502 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Germany Unify Under Prussia and Not Austria Outline
Why did Germany unify under Prussia and not Austria?

Thesis: Prussia was economically powerful, militarily advanced, politically stronger with progressive government

Economic Policies: Powerhouse: Prussia debt 11%, Austria debt 26% 1) Zollverein 1818 : customs union * Ended internal tariffs, encouraged development and communication between the States * Economic leader of the German Confederation; other states looked to Prussia economically * Austria didn’t remove internal tariffs until 1829; was excluded from Zollverein * Prussia had a strong economic base which gave to the opportunity to expand military
2) Population Increase * 87% of population increase, 2x Austria * Economically larger, larger work force
3) Industrialization * Prussia had a booming economy * Krupp Factory * Coal and Iron= Steel Production * Prussia had a booming economy and had the materials to create weaponry for war. * Austria= Agrarian, cotton production

Analysis: Other German states looked to Prussia as the economic leader, Prussia’s ability to expand militarily (large economic base) and industrial base can triumph over Austria in times of war.

Militarily Advanced: defeated Austrian army although outnumbered 300k to 400k
1) Education System: 90% vs. 34% literacy in the army * Van Humboldt System * More cohesive army— all spoke one language, could read manuals, be commanded by one general * Austrian soldiers were less educated and from different ethnicities: couldn’t read written manuals, didn’t speak the same language, couldn’t be commanded by one person
2) Developments * Needleguns vs. Muskets (5 shots in the time of 1) * Railroads: transport troops by train; owned 56% of railroads * Advanced weaponry; advanced way to transport troops; efficient * Austrians tools were outdated and less effective

3) Strong Leadership * Moltka: Chief of Staff of war—very strategic * Bismarck—ability to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    different generals at the head of their armies. These generals ranged from very skilled, highly…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The country was at war with much of Europe including Britain, the Netherlands, Spain, and Prussia.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Western Civ Ii Notes

    • 3811 Words
    • 16 Pages

    * During the 18th century the capital of Prussia was Berlin, it was becoming a military power and was becoming very powerful…

    • 3811 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition to the lack of colonies, both powers, especially Russia, had low industrial strength, with Russia only having a steel output of less than 4 million tonnes a year. That is under 3 times less than the production in Germany. The low outputs of…

    • 770 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During this time in Prussia they had a guy who became the German prime minister, very strong…

    • 3184 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gr. 10 History Review

    • 9341 Words
    • 38 Pages

    - Germany wanted to expand/dominate on global scale, but by the time they wanted to build own empire, no valuable territories remained…

    • 9341 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frederick the Great, along with his militaristic father, took Prussia from a dwindling spectator along the sidelines of European powers, and placed it on the top. Using his sheer militaristic nature, and the training and discipline of his army, Frederick the Great conquered many of the European armies. His actions lead to the development of the Prussian army. This army would have great influences all the way to World War I.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, by the time of King Fredrick the great, Prussia had a major power army that relied not solely on tax money, or on economic sources from its allies, but on Prussian rural conscripts. So every village needed to provide young body abled men who would go for military for life and they were chosen selectively and should be absolutely dedicated for Prussia. However, they remained inhabitance in their villages, which means that when needed they will train and fight. Then, return home to their crops and families for most of them were farmers. This gave them a prestigious privilege. This was the core of Prussian military. This was a success that made Prussia a major power for this military was loyal to defend Prussia the land (Magagna,…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    U.S. was now an imperialist power with all these new territories and could compete with Europe.…

    • 3158 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wwi Essay

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The most important of the long term effects leading to the outbreak of war was imperialism. Seemingly all at once, the great European Empires broke free of their decided boundaries, and expanded into colonies spanning the entire earth. Most colonized was Africa, due to the fact that it seemed every country had a piece of her. Distances meant nothing, as many countries spread over thousands of thousands of miles to set up a new colony. England holds the best example of this, as it managed to colonize Australia. Unfortunately, Germany was in troubled times. Instead of a unified country, Germany saw herself in many states. When the great Empires began to spread, Germany pulled together. This, however, was too late, and Germany was left with little to colonize. They began to pick up the scraps, the chunks of countries not colonized, which tended to yield little resources to the motherland, in hopes of still keeping some power. Germany now felt jealous, and needed to prove its power to the rest of Europe. They fought for new colonies, although gained little. Soon, they felt the need to increase the army and navy, in the hopes of becoming the strongest militarized nation. Militarism was not unusual, and generally poses little threat. The Kaiser wanted Germany to be a strong world power, with a Navy enough to challenge Great Britain's. This began the Naval Race. Great Britain was…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nationalism holds that where a nation exists, it should govern itself. The forces of nationalism influenced central Europe from Italy to the land of the Austrian Habsburgs. After 1815, the region knew the positive effects of a different style of governing and was divided into a much more rational set of political units. There was an effort by both states to unite its segmented lands, so that they could have a more international standpoint. By 1870, both Italy and the Austrian Empire had been re-established. Italy had become unified into a central power, whereas Austria-Hungary had established a dual monarchy.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prussia was successful in their goals of industrializing their country and thriving during this time period. The strategy behind their success was increasing the size of their army and navy, as well as making strong trading alliances with other countries. The success of Prussia taught me how to capitalize on other countries weaknesses for the benefit of your country.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Age of Absolutism

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    France under Louis XIV (1643-1715) was the epitome of the practice of absolutism in the 17th century.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I. Patterns on Industrialization A. The Factory System 1. Original a) Putting-out system b) Few workers c) Centered in household 2. Middle a) Larger units of production b)…

    • 411 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics