Why Civil Service Reforms Fail
WHY CIVIL SERVICE REFORMS FAIL
Charles Polidano
Office of the Prime Minister
Auberge de Castille, Valletta CMR 02, Malta
Tel: +356 224395
Fax: +356 246362
E-mail: charles.polidano@magnet.mt
IDPM Public Policy and Management Working Paper no.16 http://www.man.ac.uk/idpm/idpm_dp.htm idpm@man.ac.uk
March 2001
Abstract
Tactical choices in the design and implementation of civil service reform can determine whether it succeeds or fails. Yet researchers have paid scant attention to tactical issues in recent years. This paper considers three such issues: the scope of reform, the role of aid donors, and the leadership of reform. In each area it considers what sort of approach is likely to maximise the chances of success. However, the paper seeks to go beyond prescribing lessons, also looking at institutional and other reasons why reformers may be impelled to make the wrong tactical choices.
Charles Polidano is Director of Strategy and Planning at the Office of the Prime
Minister, Malta. Between 1996 and 1999 he lectured in public sector management at the University of Manchester. His work has appeared in several journals including
Public Administration, Political Studies and World Development. He is co-editor (with
Martin Minogue and David Hulme) of Beyond the New Public Management: Changing
Ideas and Practices in Governance (Edward Elgar, 1998).
WHY CIVIL SERVICE REFORMS FAIL
Charles Polidano
Most reforms in government fail. They do not fail because, once implemented, they yield unsatisfactory outcomes. They fail because they never get past the implementation stage at all. They are blocked outright or put into effect only in tokenistic, half-hearted fashion.
Observers who have followed recent reforms in countries such as Britain, New
Zealand and Australia may be surprised at this. Whatever else one can say about public sector change initiatives in these countries, one cannot deny that they were vigorously implemented. But there was an
Charles Polidano
Office of the Prime Minister
Auberge de Castille, Valletta CMR 02, Malta
Tel: +356 224395
Fax: +356 246362
E-mail: charles.polidano@magnet.mt
IDPM Public Policy and Management Working Paper no.16 http://www.man.ac.uk/idpm/idpm_dp.htm idpm@man.ac.uk
March 2001
Abstract
Tactical choices in the design and implementation of civil service reform can determine whether it succeeds or fails. Yet researchers have paid scant attention to tactical issues in recent years. This paper considers three such issues: the scope of reform, the role of aid donors, and the leadership of reform. In each area it considers what sort of approach is likely to maximise the chances of success. However, the paper seeks to go beyond prescribing lessons, also looking at institutional and other reasons why reformers may be impelled to make the wrong tactical choices.
Charles Polidano is Director of Strategy and Planning at the Office of the Prime
Minister, Malta. Between 1996 and 1999 he lectured in public sector management at the University of Manchester. His work has appeared in several journals including
Public Administration, Political Studies and World Development. He is co-editor (with
Martin Minogue and David Hulme) of Beyond the New Public Management: Changing
Ideas and Practices in Governance (Edward Elgar, 1998).
WHY CIVIL SERVICE REFORMS FAIL
Charles Polidano
Most reforms in government fail. They do not fail because, once implemented, they yield unsatisfactory outcomes. They fail because they never get past the implementation stage at all. They are blocked outright or put into effect only in tokenistic, half-hearted fashion.
Observers who have followed recent reforms in countries such as Britain, New
Zealand and Australia may be surprised at this. Whatever else one can say about public sector change initiatives in these countries, one cannot deny that they were vigorously implemented. But there was an
References: Adamolekun, Ladipo, Noel Kulemeka and Mouftaou Laleye (1997). ‘Political Transition, Economic Liberalization and Civil Service Reform in Malawi’ Bin Besar, Wan Ali (1998). ‘Managing Administrative Reforms in the Malaysia Public Service: The Roles of Malaysian Administrative Modernisation and Management Borins, Sandford, and Edward Warrington (1996). ‘The New Public Administration: Global Challenges, Local Solutions’ Caiden, Gerald E. (1991). Administrative Reform Comes of Age. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Clarke, Jeremy, and David Wood (2001). ‘New Public Management and Development: The Case of Public Service Reform in Tanzania and Uganda’, pp. Department for International Development (1997). Eliminating World Poverty: A Challenge for the 21st Century Dia, Mamadou (1994). ‘Civil Service Reform: The African Experience’, pp. 18–21 in S.A Harrigan, Jane (1998). ‘Effects of the IMF and World Bank on Public Expenditure Accountability in Jamaica’ Hirschmann, David (1993). ‘Institutional Development in the Era of Economic Policy Reform: Concerns, Contradictions, and Illustrations from Malawi’ Jacobs, Colin (1998). ‘Institutional Strengthening and Technical Co-operation: Developing a Best Practice Model’ Kiggundu, Moses N. (1998). ‘Civil Service Reforms: Limping Into the Twenty-First Century’, pp Klitgaard, Robert (1997). ‘Cleaning Up and Invigorating the Civil Service’. Public Administration and Development 17(5): 487–509. Langseth, Petter (1995a). ‘Civil Service Reform in Uganda: Lessons Learned’. Public Administration and Development 15: 365–90. Langseth, Petter (1995b). ‘Service Delivery Survey (SDS): A Diagnostic Tool’, pp. 239– 63 in Langseth et al Langseth, Petter, Sandile Nogxina, Daan Prinsloo and Roger Sullivan, eds (1995). MAMPU (1997). The Civil Service of Malaysia: Building an IT Culture. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Administrative Modernisation and Planning Unit. Matete, Ntahli J. (1998). ‘Civil Service Reform in Lesotho, 1995–97: Problems of Implementation’ McCourt, Willy (1998). ‘Civil Service Reform Equals Retrenchment? The Experience of “Right-Sizing” and Retrenchment in Ghana, Uganda and the UK’, pp McCourt, Willy (2001). ‘The NPM Agenda for Service Delivery: A Suitable Model for Developing Countries?’, pp Myers, Garth A. (1996). ‘Democracy and Development in Zanzibar? Contradictions in Land and Environment Planning’ Ng Kam Chiu (1997). ‘Service Targets and Methods of Redress: The Impact of Accountability in Malaysia’ Nunberg, Barbara (1996). ‘Re-thinking Civil Service Reform: An Agenda for Smart Government’ OECD (1995). ‘Managing Administrative Reform: A Case Study of Portugal (1976– 1994)’ Paul, Samuel, and Sita Sekhar (1997). ‘A Report Card on Public Services: A Comparative Analysis of Five Cities in India’ Polidano, Charles (1995). ‘Should Administrative Reform Commissions Be Decommissioned?’ Polidano, Charles (1999). ‘Looking Back at the Past with an Eye to the Future: Six Lessons of the 1988 Reforms’ Polidano, Charles (2001). ‘Administrative Reform in Core Civil Services: Application and Applicability of the New Public Management’, pp Polidano, Charles, and David Hulme (1999). ‘Public Management Reform in Developing Countries: Issues and Outcomes’ Polidano, Charles, and Nick Manning (1996). Redrawing the Lines: Service Commissions and the Delegation of Personnel Management Putnam, Robert D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Schacter, Mark (1995). ‘Recent Experience with Institutional Development: Lending in the Western Africa Department’, pp Seddon, John (2000). ‘The “Quality” You Can’t Feel’. The Observer, 19 November. Taylor, Harry (1999). ‘Training of Local Councillors in Tanzania: Learning “Good Governance”’ Wescott, Clay (1999). ‘Guiding Principles on Civil Service Reform in Africa: An Empirical Review’ Wilenski, Peter (1986). ‘Administrative Reform – General Principles and the Australian Experience’