Preview

Why Case Problems Work

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
678 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Case Problems Work
Matthew Hoke
Case problem 8-5 trade secrets
Theories: Appropriation, Appropriation of Trade Secrets, Wrongful Interference with a Contractual Relationship

3. The business tort of wrongful interference with a contractual relationship is broken in the case of Briefing.com v. Jones court case. The particular issue in this case is in March of 2003 after Cynthia Dietzmann and Gregory Jones quit Briefing.com to start StreetAccount, LLC, was the information and data not returned by Cynthia Dietzmann used to form a competing business.
The tort of appropriation was broken in the case of Briefing.com v. Jones court case. The issue in this case is SteetAccount, LLC, using the data and information to create an economic competitive advantage on Briefing.com.
The appropriation of trade secrets law was also broken in the case of Briefing.com v. Jones court case. The particular issue in this case is was the data and information not returned by Cynthia Dietzmann used to start a new competitive business in StreetAccount, LLC.
A way to solve the issue of wrongful interference with a contractual relationship would be to determine if there was a contract among the Briefing.com employees that states if they are fired or quit from the company, those employees are to return and/or not to use any data or information they received to and use them at another business.
A way to solve the tort of appropriation is to identify that the data and information taken was used at StreetAccount, LLC, was used in the benefit of the new company.
A way to solve the appropriation of trade secrets law issue is to investigate that the data and information not returned by Cynthia Dietzmann, were revealed to employees at the StreetAccount, LLC.
The research defines proximate cause for filing a suit against StreetAccount, LLC, would be misuse of trade secrets because Gregory Jones was a member of its board of directors while working at Briefing.com for six years and Cynthia Dietzmann also worked

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the case of WIRETIME, Inc., tort has been committed. Per the reading, “a tort…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bugusa, Inc., Worksheet

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Non compete tort was committed in this situation because WIRETIME completely overlooked the fact that Janet is in a contract with BUGusa that says Janet is not to work for any company that is the competitor of BUGusa…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: In 1995 William Brotby was hired by Computer Task Group, Inc. (CTG) as an information technologies consultant. Upon hiring, Brotby had to sign an agreement stating that he would be restricted to work for any CTG customers if he left the company. No more than two years later, Brotby left CTG and began to work for one of CTG’s customers known as Alyeska Pipeline Service Company. CTG, plaintiff, filed a suit against Brotby, defendant, in a federal district court alleging breach of contract. During the production of discovery, Brotby refused to fully respond to CTG’s interrogatories, never gave truthful answers, filed unwarranted motions, made flimsy objections, and never disclosed all of the information that CTG sought. Brotby was fined twice by the court and was issued five separate orders ordering him to cooperate. Because of Brothby’s continuous refusal to cooperate, CTG eventually filed a motion to enter default judgment against him in 1999. The court granted the motion; however, Brotby appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BugUSA, Inc. - Case ScenarioThis scenario presents the case of BugUSA, Inc.; as a team, we endeavor to address the legal ramifications of each company's activities. BugUSA, Inc. has legal rights to intellectual property protection, and this paper explores the options available within that realm. WIRETAP, Inc. will face civil liability claims if caught in its underhanded measures, and possibly a civil RICO suit; BugUSA's security guard Walter, however, has also created a case against its own interests. When another company owns the rights to a web domain that suits BugUSA's needs, it faces the challenge of how to acquire the domain with as little hassle and as much protection as possible. A robbed vendor may present new tort liabilities for BugUSA, and we explore potential defenses. Finally, an injured police officer may have further claims against BugUSA in light of the company's manufacturing decisions.…

    • 2109 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 4 Knowledge Check Study Guide Concepts Mastery Questions Functions of administrative law 100% 1 2 3 100% 4 5 6 100% 7 8 9 100% 10 Powers of administrative agencies Trade secret protections Trademarks and copyright law Score: 12 / 12 11 12 Concept: Functions of administrative law Mastery 100% Questions 1 2 3 1.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    legal summary

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page

    Facts: the case between the two cases were intense, Lionel was trading Mikes Trains House Secrets, Once Mikes Train House Inc. found out in they began arguing in court on June, 7th 2006. The court took almost 6 months to come to the ruling. Defendant Lionel, L.L.C., is found guilty and liable for misappropriation of trade secrets and the use of blueprints, awarding the Plaintiff, Mike's Train House Inc., over $40 million in damages and $11 million in lost profit. MTH identified its "trade secrets" the joint and liability of the amount of the damage awarded. Lionel also appeals the court, granting MTH's request for order, Because Lionel argues that the court admitted expert testimony.…

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mgmt Project Wk 4

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The tort of misappropriation is a form of protection for a business whose trade secrets are taken without authorization.…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    M International (“M”) and W Inc. (“W,” a competitor of M) have been engaged in long- standing litigation over a specific patent infringement matter. Below is a summary timeline of specific events that have taken place related to this matter:…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A firm can lose the protection under the "qualified privilege" if the plaintiff can prove one of the following points: that there was malicious intent with the motive to harm his/her reputation, that the statement was given with reckless disregard for the truth, or the publication of the statement was overly broad. (P.152)…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SOC 315 Week 5 DQs

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A description of the compliance issue that led to the lawsuit and its ramifications for the organization.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    B LAW FINAL

    • 1426 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Greg could’ve sued many parties in this situation. First, Greg could go after the Limited Liability Corporation members for when Mike yelled at Greg after he criticized the Hunter Thompson Novels, a form of assault. In LLCs, the profits and losses are “passed through” the business to each member of the LLC. Secondly, Greg could go after Strip Mall 4 for damages resulting from the assault from Mike. Greg could also personally sue Mike for the tort he committed.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bugusa, Inc.

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This paper will discuss a set of hypothetical scenarios dealing with various legal issues BUGusa, Inc. must address with their interactions with WIRETIME, Inc., parking lot security, and vendors. The team will address each scenario and the different types of legal protections and situations brought before BUGusa, Inc.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Blaustein V. Burto Brief

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issue: Was there a contract, and if there was, did the defendants breached that contract and confidential relationship, and unjustly received enrichment from such breach?…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    EC-1.5(a), ABA 1.5(A) - Legal assistant ,Carl, did not protect the confidentiality of the work products laying on attorney Howe’s desk when he allowed Zeke to come behind attorney Howe’s desk to make a personal phone call. The…

    • 2220 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal

    • 4668 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Answer: Appropriation is one of the four privacy torts; it defines the use of a person's name, likeness or identity for trade or advertising purposes without consent.…

    • 4668 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics