Preview

Why Are Pseudoscientific Theories Are Falsifiable?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
807 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Are Pseudoscientific Theories Are Falsifiable?
Scientific theories are fundamentally characterized by being based on empirical observation which explains a range of factual phenomena and has been verifiably tested in a meaningful way based on specific predictions deduced from the theory. Thus, scientific theories are falsifiable.
Pseudoscientific theories attempts to gain legitimacy by masquerading these theories as science, when in actuality, there is no scientific evidence to substantiate pseudoscientific claims. Pseudoscience is completely unfalsifiable, because it has little to no factual basis. It therefore becomes unreasonable and illogical to believe these claims, as there is no factual evidence or data to support pseudoscientific hypotheses.
It is crucial that we understand the
…show more content…
Suppliers of pseudoscientific products tends to avoid presenting valid evidence to support its claims. The “research” represented by these firms does not conform to the standards for scientific research, namely the double-blind experimental trial. This links to the next reason which is that pseudoscience relies heavily on subjective validation. This is a cognitive bias, by which people consider information to be correct based on the personal significance or sentiment it holds to them. Pseudoscientific products are often advertised using emotive language, which appeals to potential consumers, in order to attract persuade them that the product is an essential part of their lives. Consumers may then become engrossed in the prospective benefits offered by the pseudoscientific product, that they are driven to the extent of losing their rationality in the pursuit of the potential benefit. This, may also contribute towards the climate of …show more content…
The more people believe in it, the more people will follow. This can be attributed to the availability heuristic.
One of the dangers of a climate of unreason is probability of allowing pseudoscientific ideas to infiltrate political systems and, for example, justify atrocities in the name of racial purity. It can also result in extremism and a severe degree of intolerance. This can be attributed to one of the dangers of pseudoscience is that it can cause people to fall victim to “belief perseverance”, which is their tendency to cling to their beliefs despite repeated contradictory evidence. Pseudoscience incorporated through the educational system may lead to driving out science and sensibility, which could have detrimental effects on the thinking faculties of individuals. In the field of health, the preference towards pseudoscience over conventional forms of medical treatment may lead to unnecessary deaths and suffering, in certain instances. More commonly though, a climate of unreason in the market for pseudoscientific products can have detrimental financial consequences for individuals, as an irrational consumer will end up spending more than what they can afford to, based on their pseudoscientific

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    How in a scientific age as ours, with legitimate data and reasoning as close as a Google search, can people believe in crazy unsubstantiated theories? Pseudoscience has been around longer than true science has, but with all we know, wouldn’t folks wise up? According to Wikkipedia, “Pseudoscience is any body of knowledge, methodology, or practice that is erroneously regarded as scientific”. (Wikkipedia) In the past, honest scientific mistakes were believed to be true. The flat earth theory, astrology and the Sun revolving around the earth were all accepted science, until proven false. Those who continued to profess those beliefs became…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Words such as “comfortons”, “reflexology”, and “semi-plausible” reflect upon how easy it is for companies to manipulate consumers. It goes to show that some people are often fooled into belief from intelligent-sounding words that share a resemblance to modern scientific words. Furthermore, within this passage, a man named Geoff DeAngelis, advocates MagnaSoles since they are "clearly endorsed by an intelligent-looking man in a white lab coat." By using the phrase “intelligent-looking man”, the article pokes fun at consumers who willingly believe information they are told as long as it comes from people who look certified. Not only does the diction show this but the hyperbolic tone also reflects this message as well. The tone of the passage challenges the mind of the reader as it affects the emotion and thought processes of the audience. Many readers will feel confused and amused at how silly these ads are. But with claims such as how the “healing power of crystals to re-stimulate dead foot cells with vibrational biofeedback… a process similar to that by which medicine makes people better” it displays a strikingly similarity for ads that claim similar things. It is obvious that the claim is false as such a process is impossible and not supported. Through this and many other ridiculous sentiments the Onion does a wonderful job in…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article,"Why do many Reasonable People doubt Science?", the writer, Joel Achenbach, asserts that people disbelief science for a variety of reasons. He first described dogmatism and naive beliefs, which are subconscious intuitions that people cling to, to be the reason why many disbelieve science. He further explains that many are reliant on personal experience and anecdotes rather than hard facts and statistics to come to conclusions and that is why many disagree with scientific findings. Achenbach, in his article, also mentioned that, another reason for the disbelief of science is political where "disbelievers", claim that the purport of science, especially in the aspects of climate change, is a propaganda of climate activists and environmentalists who seek to employ the idea of global warming to attack the free market and industrial society. He also mentioned that the disbelief is science is caused the fact that,…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hummanities 3991

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages

    When we talk about science, many people hear the term “theory”. The definition of a scientific theory can become confusing since many people interpret the meaning differently. When a person uses the term “theory” in a sentence it is usually used in a non-scientific way. They assume that a theory is something assumed, but not proven. When the term “theory” is used in science, it means an explanation based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning. It has been tested and confirmed as a general principle to explain phenomena. A scientific theory must be based on careful examination of facts. “A theory is a hypothesis or set of hypotheses that has stood the test and (so far, at least) has not been contradicted by evidence” (Suplee 9).…

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have finished reading the novel Bad Science written by Ben Goldacre, and I thought that the novel was absolutely brilliant. It is a nonfiction work of popular science, and if people were to read the novel with an open mind they would realize that this novel has the potential to change their perspective of the world for the better. Within the novel, four ideas were brought up that particularly had interested me. The detox phenomenon, placebo explanations, vaccine scares, and the social influences put upon consumers. These all interested me and with some of these ideas I learned countless new concepts.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pseudoscience: anything being presented, as scientific but is not. Usually characterized by exaggerations, UN falsifiable claims, and anecdotes.…

    • 6427 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Placebo Effect Analysis

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I introduce one researcher’s appropriate opinion about how hard a placebo effect could be triggered. This citation supports my argument that a placebo effect derived from false information about drugs does not apply to all patient, so it is not a good method of treating patients in a general way. To make a flow of sentences clear, I add a direct explanation of why a placebo effect is concerned, such as “the placebo effect derived from the promotion of DTC advertisements reduce the amount of required treatments for patients” Also, I add my explanation of why the placebo effect is an inappropriate way to treat patients and show how the citation supports my argument. Furthermore, I add a sentence at the end of this passage to remind that distorted information from DTC advertisements generates the false consequences, and I explain why the placebo effect is related to regulations against DTC advertisements by adding “the placebo effect induced by highly distorted drug information from DTC advertisements have negative impacts on patients’…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    craziness taught to us in our most rational moments. People must be taught to trust true scientists…

    • 1908 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first break through that caught my attention was the most common one, the application of “ The Placebo Effect” on our society. A placebo is a fake treatment, inactive substance that can sometimes improve a patient’s condition simply because the person has the expectation that it will. As I read Ben Goldacre’s book Bad Science, I was surprised to learn a couple of new things. TThe first one was the fact that alerting a patient about the prescription of the placebo does not negate it’s effects. In his book Ben references to a study conducted at John Hopkins in 1965 in which patients were told they were going to receive a sugar pill as a treatment for their…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Popper science is an open belief system where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticised and tested by others. He says that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism. This is whereby scientists set out to try and falsify existing theories, deliberately seeking evidence that would disprove them. Such as the fact that the big bang is a theory that everyone accepts but there is much more that scientists do not know and more needed to be found therefore it could be false. It argues that there always can be more and more evidence for every theory that has ever been made and proven. Then when disproving these knowledge claims allows scientific world to grow. It is cumulative, whereby it builds on achievements of previous scientists. This explanation shows that science can be a belief system as nothing can ever be proven 100% as there will always be something or someone that will disprove a theory with other evidence and therefore people belief what they have been told. This is much like religion in a way by the fact that religion cannot be proven it is something that people belief in.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Watson stated in "The Value of Theories", a scientific theory is a systematic explanation that unifies various observed phenomena and facts. Based on observations we make, science operates under theories which are constantly revised and checked by experiment. A scientific theory also possesses many vital qualities for true understanding.…

    • 643 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Positivists Essay

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pseudoscience is involved in ranking people according to things like intelligence, fertility, and even genital size (Price, October 13). Good science provides correctable, reversible, and testable information. Pseudoscience on the other hand does none of this, yet still passes as good science because it is complicated by deceiving statistics (Price, October 13). Racial positivists such as J. Philippe Rushton, Francis Galton, and Pieter Camper all utilize pseudoscience to support their illegitimate views.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Scientific Method

    • 4542 Words
    • 130 Pages

    Learning Goal: To understand how the scientific method can be used to search for explanations of nature. The scientific method is a procedure used to search for explanations of nature. The scientific method consists of making observations, formulating hypotheses, designing and carrying out experiments, and repeating this cycle. Observations can be either quantitative or qualitative. Quantitative observations are measurements consisting of both numbers and units, such as the observation that ice melts at . In contrast, qualitative observations are observations that do not rely on numbers or units, such as the observation that water is clear. A hypothesis is a tentative explanation of the observations. The hypothesis is not necessarily correct, but it puts the scientist's understanding of the observations into a form that can be tested through experimentation. Experiments are then performed to test the validity of the hypothesis. Experiments are observations preferably made under conditions in which the variable of interest is clearly distinguishable from any others. If the experiment shows that the hypothesis is incorrect, the hypothesis can be modified, and further experiments can be carried out to test the modified hypothesis. This cycle is repeated, continually refining the hypothesis. If a large set of observations follow a reproducible pattern, this pattern can be summarized in a law—a verbal or mathematical generalization of a phenomenon. For example, over the years people observed that every morning the sun rises in the east, and every night the sun sets in the west. These observations can be described in a law stating, "The sun always rises in the east and sets in the west." After a great deal of refinement, a hypothesis can lead to a theory. A theory is an explanation of why something happens. For example, Newton's theory of gravitation explains why objects tend to fall toward the Earth (as well as explaining the interactions between the Earth and the other…

    • 4542 Words
    • 130 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Skepticism

    • 4192 Words
    • 17 Pages

    If I tried to simply tell a skeptic, "That rock will fall from the cliff because of gravity," he won't believe me because he will simply say, "Not necessarily." In fact, this can be the skeptic's answer to just about any attempt to refute his position.…

    • 4192 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pseudoscience, Against

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Regardless of how trivial the issue or product may be, in the broader spectrum of things it makes people more susceptible to ideas of pseudoscience, like a chain effect. The more people believing it, the more people will follow as humans naturally follow trends so not to fall out of normality – just like anything, people adapt to the culture and beliefs of their surroundings, something extremely hard to brake. Furthermore, if a person believes in one concept of pseudoscience, they are far more likely to believe in another; their unreason would even go as far as segueing into other parts of the person’s life, making them incapable or too lazy to determine the most reasonable and proven facts before making an important, or even trivial decision. Conclusively, a ‘climate of unreason’ is a very dangerous concept; in order for society to eliminate false beliefs and continue to discover the vast wonders of science and even just making important decisions in our daily lives affecting our finance, well-being and health, pseudoscience is taking all those who believe in it a step back and hindering them from contributing to a…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics