Preview

Why 3rd Parties Do Not Exist

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
973 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why 3rd Parties Do Not Exist
Jonathan Safran Foer once quoted “I see myself as someone who makes things. Definitions have never done anything but constrain”. This quote carries weight among not only among communities but also the younger generations as new definitions are constantly being changed. As a definition changes, it can open new doors for interpretations as well as close doors for creation among a generation that thrives to make a change. One particular example of this is the word libertarian, a word that may need calling upon to change its definition from the one it was given over fifty years ago. The time has come to exchange the definition of libertarian from an anarchist who believes in selfish activities to a person who cares about the fundamental protection of each individual god given right. In order to understand why the common definition today should …show more content…
The modern political field is largely dominated by a two-party system of democrats and republicans who have representatives of their party in nearly every form of public office. This is the symbol for the libertarian’s misconception to the public that they because they don’t have large seats in public office it in return means they don’t have a solid argument. This however, is not the case when looking at the size of Democrats and Republicans simply because they have much greater attention from the press to speak policy and ideas, whereas the libertarian party lacks media attention to gain the traction that it potentially has. This lack of representation from the media has led to the suppression of the libertarian party, leaving the publics definition of them to be a simple third party. The libertarian party however offers much more than stealing votes in presidential elections, it offers a solution to the great moral crisis happening in America

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Classical liberals believe in negative freedom. This is the simple belief in an absence of external constraints on the individual and that they should be left alone to make their own choices. In this way classical liberals were heavily influenced by the natural rights theories of John Locke and Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson claimed that we were born with certain “inalienable” rights and therefore no individual or government had the right to constrict them or take them away. Freedom from constraints is therefor an essential condition for exercising these rights. In practice this has meant that classical liberals have advocated a minimal state, what John Locke referred to as the ‘night watchman state’. The states activities should, in his eyes, be limited to the enforcement of contracts, maintaining order and protection from foreign threats to prevent the state from infringing on individual liberties as much as possible. On the other hand, modern liberals have advocated a more positive interpretation of freedom. Positive freedom can be defined as the ability to achieve true self-mastery and self-realisation in order to fulfil our individual potential. Modern liberals such as TH Green criticised negative freedom on the grounds that it failed to address the social and economic factors that can prevent individuals from achieving their full potential. Negative freedom was inadequate because it failed to remove these barriers to true self-mastery such as social disadvantage and inequality. Modern liberals have therefore proposed an enabling state. Rather than a ‘necessary evil’ as classical liberals believe, the state can be a force for good by protecting individuals against social and…

    • 1082 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In their most recent general election the 3rd parties of Britain and America experienced significantly different outcomes. While the Liberal Democrats are now in a coalition the American Libertarian party received 0.99% of the popular vote. The clear failure of 3rd parties to break the monopoly of power held by the Democrats and Republicans can be explained by the electoral system, costs involved and influence of the media.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [8] Page 6 - Why Parties?: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America - John H…

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The post-revolutionary war period of the Unites States saw the establishment of the first party system and an enlarging gap in viewpoints between the wealthy and the common man. One might argue that a political party develops in response to a series of controversial issues yet to a great extent the contradictory views of Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson over issues related to views of government, the role of government and social philosophy in foreign and domestic affairs, were primarily responsible for shaping the rise of political parties from 1783-1800.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As our country grows and progresses into the future, so do our ethics. With each generation we tend to generally shift with our new definitions of what is right and what is wrong. Overtime, these shifts tend to break apart and either redefine or create new political parties. The current youthful generation could more than likely see such changes within their lifetimes, just as we’ve recently seen division in the Republican Party with the creation of the Tea Party Movement. With an ever changing demographic in our country and a general movement towards social reform from the now growing youth, combined with the dying out of aged conservatives, the future majority representative political parties could become…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The claim that political parties are in decline first arose in the United States in the late 1960s and 70s. There are several factors unique to the situation of American political parties that emphasise he case for party decline. In particular, the vast scale of party operations across the 52 states, the method used for candidate selection and the vast amounts of money used along the campaign. This essay will discuss whether the theory of party is outdated or not.…

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The defining political fact of our time is the division of America (Greenberg).” This is how George Stephanopoulos, a television journalist and former political adviser, summarizes the reality of American politics. One reason for this is America’s two-party system. These parties are the Democrats and the Republicans. Some people believe they are good, but others see them as destructive and useless. Political parties are bad for the United States because they are limited and cause national division.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Libertarians support the view that people have free will and so we are free to make moral decisions. For a Libertarian, the key evidence for this is the act of decision making in our daily lives. Hume states that “experience is what we see to be true”, each human being experiences the feeling of being free to make a decision. If experiencing any other action constitutes it to be true, then why not the same for free will? Libertarians argue that we have awareness of the choices we make; we can choose to do anything that we are capable of. Though we are influenced by our environment and experiences, ultimately we can make our own decisions, nothing is inevitable or determined. Libertarians hold the belief of a moral self; humans want to want to do things. For example, a smoker may think it would be a good idea to give up smoking, but their addiction is too strong for them to think it possible or in any way likely; they want to want to give up smoking. Humans are unique in this way and it is this which is called the moral self. Libertarians are dualists believing that the human mind is separate from the physical world. It is because of this that our reason and autonomy, our moral self, can transcend over other causal determinants. Kant argues that by applying reason to decisions we can escape any authority from cause and effect or desires and emotions, we are the agents of our own decisions. Libertarians believe in a forking path of choices rather than the straight road of determinism.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Utopian Analysis

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Talmon argues that utopianism assumes an ‘ultimate harmony’ of individual expression and social cohesion. However, he asserts that without coercion, these values cannot in fact be reconciled; no society can hope for both ‘freedom’ and ‘salvation’. Berlin agrees, holding that ‘the necessity of choosing between absolute claims is… an inescapable characteristic of the human condition’. This is why anti-utopian authors believe that utopian thought conforms to the ‘anti-liberal’ aspect of Goodwin and Taylor’s definition of authoritarianism: freedom of choice in life is restricted or completely curtailed in order to achieve social cohesion.A utopia that serves as a useful example of this was conceived by Rousseau. In The Social Contract, he argues that members of an ideal legislature should, after rational consideration, conform to the ‘general will’. This is ‘the balance that remains, when we take away from [individual wills], the pluses and minuses which cancel each other out. For each individual, the general will becomes ‘their own’. Hence, when they obey it, they are obeying themselves. As a result of this, when people are coerced into following the general will, they are being ‘forced to be free’. Another key utopian thinker, Marx, proposes a theory that fulfils all three of Goodwin and Taylor’s criteria for authoritarianism. It holds that…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democrats vs. Republicans

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In today’s society, we believe that the two main political parties of America, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, are completely different. We say that democrats are liberal and the republican are conservative – two adjectives that are complete opposites. When we actually step back and look, and the two parties and their actual positions we realize and learn that the two parties are actually very similar. Many of their positions are the same but they have different policies or they disagree on a position but the roots from where they derived their positions are similar.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every 4 years, we as Americans, come together in attempt to find the best possible candidate to become our next President. We look for a trustworthy, respectable, and intelligent person who thinks rationally and who agrees with us on most political issues. We have done this 57 times so far, and of all of these men, one most favorably remembered, is Ronald Reagan. Reagan once said that libertarianism is “the very heart and soul of conservatism.” If one of our favorite presidents believed in libertarianism, then we should put someone in office that also believes in libertarianism and they will likely get a similar reputation. Although Rand Paul is running for the Republican Ticket, he tends to incorporate many libertarian ideals into his policies.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anarchism, not in the sense of lawlessness, but in the sense of noninterventionist governmental policy and activity, has a colorful history in the United States. It has enjoyed periods of welcoming and periods of scorn by every class of people and for widely varied reasons. It is embraced by free market economists and by the socially liberal, favored in part by both major parties and wholly endorsed by the Libertarian Party in the U.S. today. In the past, its place has been substantially different, for at different periods of time, different policies and mindsets on the parts of the citizens and the government have been at the forefront of progressive thought. Whether it is considered novel, conservative, beneficial, or detrimental is all dependent on a large array of contemporary social and economic considerations.…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political Parties

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Acting as the organized opposition to the party in power- acting as the “watch dog” to the opposite in power…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    John Locke's America

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages

    John Locke is a seventeenth century English philosopher (1) whose ideas have had far reaching influence on many parts of western culture. It is a widely entertained notion that John Locke’s ideas and writings had heavy impact on the writing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776 (2), and it can easily be understood that this may be one of the most important distinguishing factors setting American culture and idealism apart from that of powerful European empires and nations of the time. Locke’s works began their shaping of America with The Virginia Declaration of Rights, the ideas of which were then translated into the Declaration of Independence, and eventually into the Bill of Rights. (3) This inceptive influence has carried through American history and come to shape the modern American way. Indeed, even the ever sought after “American Dream” suggests that it dates back to Locke’s ideas, with concepts like equality, democracy, and material prosperity. America has achieved idealistic distinction from other nations, and remains to be held as a forward thinking, progressive nation because of the influence of John Locke, and the reflections of his ideas in the original American charters of freedom.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The idea of personal freedom and individuality is a concept that has been debated by philosophers throughout history. In 380 BC, Plato addresses his thoughts on freedom in society throughout The Republic. His main opinion is, too much freedom given to individuals will lead to an unjust society. This concept, through proven thoroughly, has some complications with adapting to todays society. Years later, Plato’s ideals are hard for today’s society to grasp. In an age of rapid change and constant growth, individuals feel entitled to freedom in society. Knowing Plato’s views and how our society works we are left with the question of whether or not his ideal society would transition well into our world. We must question, how much freedom is appropriate for society.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays