Whose Interests Should Be the Paramount Concern of Government Trade Policy - the Interests of Producers (Businesses and Their Employees) or Those of Consumers?
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES Vol. XLIV No. 4 December 2010 DOI 10.2753/JEI0021-3624440402
Government-Led Export Promotion in Light of Distributional Fairness in the Global Trading System
Jai S. Mah
Abstract: Since developing countries were relatively free from the trade regulations relating to export promotion policies until 1994, the northeast Asian dynamic economies could pursue export promotion policies aggressively during the period of rapid economic growth. Under the current World Trade Organization (WTO) system, there are restrictions or even prohibitions on the developing countries’ use of export promotion policies. One may doubt the fairness of the current WTO system, which regulates the use of export promotion policies regardless of different economic development levels. The current paper suggests various ways of allowing developing countries to develop their production capacities and exports of manufactured products. It also provides suggestions on modifying the current WTO regulations in favor of the export promotion policies of developing countries. Such special treatment of developing countries could be justified from the viewpoint of distributional fairness applied to international trade relations. Keywords: distributional fairness, export promotion, international trade JEL Classification Codes: F13, F53, O25
Several developing economies including the East Asian tigers and China have achieved very rapid economic growth over the past decades. The outward oriented economic development strategy of those countries may have contributed to rapid economic growth due to an enlarged market, improvement of productivity, and vent for surplus, among other factors. Meanwhile, Sarkar (2008), using a sample of 51 developing countries (DCs), shows that there is no significant relationship between trade openness per se and economic growth. Reviewing the works of the early development economists such as Prebisch, Myrdal, and Singer, Ho (2008, 512-513) notices
Government-Led Export Promotion in Light of Distributional Fairness in the Global Trading System
Jai S. Mah
Abstract: Since developing countries were relatively free from the trade regulations relating to export promotion policies until 1994, the northeast Asian dynamic economies could pursue export promotion policies aggressively during the period of rapid economic growth. Under the current World Trade Organization (WTO) system, there are restrictions or even prohibitions on the developing countries’ use of export promotion policies. One may doubt the fairness of the current WTO system, which regulates the use of export promotion policies regardless of different economic development levels. The current paper suggests various ways of allowing developing countries to develop their production capacities and exports of manufactured products. It also provides suggestions on modifying the current WTO regulations in favor of the export promotion policies of developing countries. Such special treatment of developing countries could be justified from the viewpoint of distributional fairness applied to international trade relations. Keywords: distributional fairness, export promotion, international trade JEL Classification Codes: F13, F53, O25
Several developing economies including the East Asian tigers and China have achieved very rapid economic growth over the past decades. The outward oriented economic development strategy of those countries may have contributed to rapid economic growth due to an enlarged market, improvement of productivity, and vent for surplus, among other factors. Meanwhile, Sarkar (2008), using a sample of 51 developing countries (DCs), shows that there is no significant relationship between trade openness per se and economic growth. Reviewing the works of the early development economists such as Prebisch, Myrdal, and Singer, Ho (2008, 512-513) notices
References: Adamantopoulos, Konstantinous. “Article 1 SCMA.” In WTO – Trade Remedies, edited by Rudiger Wolfrum, Peter Tobias Stoll and Michael Koebele, pp. 423-452. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008. Amsden, Alice H. “Industrialization Under New WTO Law.” Presented at UNCTAD X, Bangkok. February 12, 2000. ———. The Rise of “The Rest”: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Audet, Denis. “Smooth as Silk? A First Look at the Post MFA Textiles and Clothing Landscape.” Journal of International Economic Law 10, 2 (2007): 267-284. Barcelo, J. J. “Subsidies and Countervailing Duties – Analysis and a Proposal.” Law and Policy in International Business 9 (1977): 779-852. Bhagwati, Jagdish. “President Obama and Trade Policy.” Keynote luncheon speech at the World Affairs Council Summit Meeting. Washington, DC, February 19, 2009. Blackhurst, Richard, Bill Lyakurwa and Ademola Oyejide. “Options for Improving Africa’s Participation in the WTO.” World Economy 23, 4 (2000): 491-510. Brander, J. A. and B. J. Spencer. “Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry.” Journal of International Economics 18, 1/2 (1985): 83-100. Chang, Ha-Joon. “Policy Space in Historical Perspective – with Special Reference to Trade and Industrial Policies.” Presented at the Queen Elizabeth House 50th Anniversary Conference on The Development Threats and Promises. University of Oxford, July 4-5, 2005. ———. The East Asian Development Experience: The Miracle, the Crisis and the Future. London and New York: Zed Books, 2006. Collins-Williams, Terry and Gerry Salembier. “International Disciplines on Subsidies: The GATT, the WTO and the Future Agenda.” Journal of World Trade 30 (1996): 5-17. Government-Led Export Promotion 893 Devault, James M. “The Political Economy of Trade Preferences.” Contemporary Economic Policy 23, 2 (2005): 278-285. DiCaprio, Alisa and Kevin P. Gallagher. “The WTO and the Shrinking of Development Space: How Big Is the Bite?” Journal of World Investment and Trade (2006): 781-803. Durling, James P. “Article 15 SCMA.” In WTO – Trade Remedies, edited by Rudiger Wolfrum, Peter Tobias Stoll and Michael Koebele, pp. 598-626. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008. Evans, H. Davis. “Outward Orientation: An Assessment.” In Export Promotion Strategies: Theory and Evidence from Developing Countries, edited by Chris Milner, pp. 40-58. Wheatsheaf, NY: Harvester, 1990. Fabre, Cecile. “Global Distributive Justice: An Egalitarian Perspective.” In Global Justice, Global Institutions, edited by Daniel Weisnstock, pp. 139-164. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 2005. Haggard, Stephan. Pathways from the Periphery. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1990. Held, David, Anthony McGrew, David Goldblatt and Jonathan Perraton. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999. Ho, P. Sai-wing. “Arguing for Policy Space to Promote Development: Prebisch, Myrdal, and Singer.” Journal of Economic Issues 42, 2 (2008): 509-516. Hoda, Anwarul and Rajeev Ahuja. “Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Need for Clarification and Improvement.” Journal of World Trade 39, 6 (2005): 1009-1069. Horlick, Gary N. and Kelly Shoop. “Article 25 SCMA.” In WTO – Trade Remedies, edited by Rudiger Wolfrum, Peter Tobias Stoll and Michael Koebele, pp. 687-694. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008. James, Elijah M. “The Political Economy of Export Concentration.” Journal of Economic Issues 14, 4 (1980): 967-975. Lichtenstein, Peter M. “Competing Perspectives on the Liberalization of China’s Foreign Trade and Investment Regime.” Journal of Economic Issues 34, 4 (2000): 873-889. Mah, Jai S. “Industrial Policy and Economic Development: Korea’s Experience.” Journal of Economic Issues 41, 1 (2007a): 77-92. ———. “Duty Drawback and Export Promotion in China.” Journal of Developing Areas 40, 2 (2007b): 133140. ———. “Foreign Direct Investment Inflows and Economic Development: The Case of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone in China.” Journal of World Investment and Trade 9, 4 (2008): 319-332. Meyer, Wolfgang. “The Infant-Export Industry Argument.” Canadian Journal of Economics 17 (1984): 249269. Narlikar, Amrita. “The Ministerial Process and Power Dynamics in the World Trade Organization: Understanding Failure from Seattle to Cancun.” New Political Economy 9, 3 (2004): 413-428. ———. “Fairness in International Trade Negotiations: Developing Countries in the GATT and WTO.” World Economy 29, 8 (2006): 1005-1029. Ozden, Caglar and Eric Reinhardt. “The Perversity of Preferences: GSP and Developing Country Trade Policies, 1976-2000.” Journal of Development Economics 78, 1 (2005): 1-21. Pangetsu, Mari. “Special and Differential Treatment in the Millennium: Special for Whom and How Different?” World Economy 23, 9 (2000): 1285-1302. Rios Herran, Roberto and Pietro Poretti. “Article 8 SCMA.” In WTO – Trade Remedies, edited by Rudiger Wolfrum, Peter Tobias Stoll and Michael Koebele, pp. 544-552. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008. Sarkar, Prabirjit. “Trade Opennes and Growth: Is There Any Link?” Journal of Economic Issues 42, 3 (2008): 763-785. Scitovsky, Tibor. “Economic Development in Taiwan and South Korea, 1965-1981.” In Models of Development, edited by Lawrence J. Lau, pp. 129-181. San Francisco: ICS Press, 1990. Senona, Joseph M. “Negotiating Special and Differential Treatment from Doha to Post-Hong Kong: Can Poor People Still Benefit?” Journal of World Trade 42, 6 (2008): 1041-1064. Singh, Ajit. “Special and Differential Treatment: The Multilateral Trading System and Economic Development in the Twenty-First Century.” In Putting Development First, edited by Kevin P. Gallagher, pp. 233-263. London and New York: Zed Books, 2005. Suranovic, Steven M. “A Positive Analysis of Fairness with Applications to International Trade.” World Economy 23, 3 (2000): 283-307. 894 Jai S. Mah Wade, Robert Hunter. “What Strategies Are Viable for Developing Countries Today? The World Trade Organization and the Shrinking of ‘Development Space’.” Review of International Political Economy 10, 4 (2003): 621-644. ———. Governing the Market, 2nd edition. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2004. ———. “Time for More Subtlety in World Trade.” Financial Times. June 29, 2009. Weiss, Linda. “Global Governance, National Strategies: How Industrialized States Make Room to Move under the WTO.” Review of International Political Economy 12, 5 (2005): 723-749. Whalley, John. “Special and Differential Treatment in the Millennium Round.” World Economy 22, 8 (1999): 1065-1093. Wolf, Martin. “Two-Edged Sword: Demands of Developing Countries and the Trading System.” In Power, Passions and Purpose, edited by Jagdish N. Bhagwati and John Gerard Ruggie, pp. 201-229. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984. Wolfe, Robert. “Crossing the River by Feeling the Stones: Where the WTO Is Going after Seattle, Doha and Cancun.” Review of International Political Economy 11, 3 (2004): 574-596. Copyright of Journal of Economic Issues (M.E. Sharpe Inc.) is the property of M.E. Sharpe Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder 's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.